Toggle SGML Header (+)


Section 1: 497 (497)

Document
Filed Pursuant to Rule 497
File No. 333-213391

PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
(To Prospectus dated October 30, 2017)

394855781_image1c45.jpg
Prospect Capital Corporation
Up to $100,000,000 6.25% Notes due 2024
Up to $100,000,000 6.25% Notes due 2028

Prospect Capital Corporation is a financial services company that lends to and invests in middle market, privately-held companies. We are organized as an externally-managed, non-diversified closed-end management investment company that has elected to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Prospect Capital Management L.P. manages our investments and Prospect Administration LLC provides the administrative services necessary for us to operate.
We have entered into debt distribution agreements, originally dated July 2, 2018 and amended and restated on August 31, 2018 with each of B. Riley FBR, Inc. (“B. Riley FBR”) and BB&T Capital Markets, a division of BB&T Securities, LLC (“BB&T”) and into a debt distribution agreement dated August 31, 2018 with Comerica Securities, Inc. (“Comerica”, together with B. Riley FBR and BB&T, the “Agents”) pursuant to which we may offer for sale, from time to time, up to $100,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of our 6.25% Notes due 2024 (the “2024 Notes”) and up to $100,000,000 in aggregate principal amount of our 6.25% Notes due 2028 (the “2028 Notes” and, together with the 2024 Notes, the “Notes”). During the period from July 2, 2018 (the original date of the debt distribution agreements with B. Riley FBR and BB&T) through August 30, we sold $10,131,175 aggregate principal amount of the 2024 Notes through B. Riley and BB&T pursuant to their debt distribution agreements and as such, there is $89,868,825 aggregate principal amount of the 2024 Notes remaining that we may offer and sell through the Agents pursuant to the debt distribution agreements. During the period from July 2, 2018 (the original date of the debt distribution agreements with B. Riley FBR and BB&T) through August 30, we sold $6,917,250 aggregate principal amount of the 2028 Notes through B. Riley and BB&T pursuant to their debt distribution agreements and as such, there is $93,082,750 aggregate principal amount of the 2028 Notes remaining that we may offer and sell through the Agents pursuant to the debt distribution agreements.
Sales of the Notes, if any, may be made in negotiated transactions or transactions that are deemed to be “at the market offerings” as defined in Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the “Securities Act”, including sales made directly on the New York Stock Exchange, or “NYSE,” or similar securities exchange or sales made to or through a market maker other than on an exchange at prices related to prevailing market prices or at negotiated prices. If any of the Notes are sold at prices above the par value of $25 per Note, the effective yield on such Notes to the purchasers may be less than 6.25%.
The Agents will receive a commission from us equal to up to 2.0% of the gross sales price of any Notes sold through the Agents under the debt distribution agreements. The Agents are not required to sell any specific principal amount of Notes, but will use commercially reasonable efforts consistent with their sales and trading practices to sell the Notes offered by this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. See “Plan of Distribution” beginning on page S-87 of this prospectus supplement.
The 2024 Notes will mature on June 15, 2024 and the 2028 Notes will mature on June 15, 2028. We will pay interest on the Notes on March 15, June 15, September 15 and December 15 of each year, beginning September 15, 2018. Interest on the Notes will accrue from the most recent interest payment date immediately preceding the date of issuance of the Notes from time to time, except that, if you purchase Notes after the record dates noted below (or your settlement of a purchase of Notes otherwise occurs after such record date), your Notes will not accrue interest for the period from such purchase date to the interest payment date immediately following such record date. The interest payable on each interest payment date will be paid only to holders of record of the Notes at the close of business on March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1 of each year, as the case may be, immediately preceding the applicable interest payment date. As a general matter, holders of the Notes will not be entitled to receive any payments of principal on the Notes prior to the stated maturity date. We may redeem the 2024 Notes in whole or in part at any time or from time to time on or after December 15, 2018 and we may redeem the 2028 Notes in whole



or in part at any time or from time to time on or after June 15, 2021, in each case, at the redemption price discussed under the caption “Specific Terms of the Notes and the Offering-Optional redemption” in this prospectus supplement. The Notes will be issued in minimum denominations of $25 and integral multiples of $25 in excess thereof. We may offer other debt securities from time to time other than the Notes under our Registration Statement or in private placements.
The 2024 Notes offered hereby will be a further issuance of, are fungible with, rank equally in right of payment with, and form a single series for all purposes under the indenture including, without limitation, waivers, amendments, consents, redemptions and other offers to purchase and voting, with $209,412,175 in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% Notes due 2024, initially issued by us in December 2015 with additional issuances by us from June 2016 through August 2016 and from July 2018 through August 2018 (the “Existing 2024 Notes”). The Existing 2024 Notes, as well as any newly issued 2024 Notes, will mature on June 15, 2024, and may be redeemed in whole or in part at any time or from time to time at the Company’s option on or after December 15, 2018. The 2024 Notes will have terms identical to the Existing 2024 Notes and will have the same CUSIP number as, and will be fungible and vote together with, the Existing 2024 Notes immediately upon issuance.
The 2028 Notes offered hereby will be a further issuance of, are fungible with, rank equally in right of payment with, and form a single series for all purposes under the indenture including, without limitation, waivers, amendments, consents, redemptions and other offers to purchase and voting, with $61,917,250 in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% Notes due 2028, initially issued by us in June 2018 with additional issuances by us from July 2018 through August 2018 (the “Existing 2028 Notes,” and together with the Existing 2024 Notes, the “Existing Notes”). The Existing 2028 Notes, as well as any newly issued 2028 Notes, will mature on June 15, 2028, and may be redeemed in whole or in part at any time or from time to time at the Company’s option on or after June 15, 2021. The 2028 Notes will have terms identical to the Existing 2028 Notes and will have the same CUSIP number as, and will be fungible and vote together with, the Existing 2028 Notes immediately upon issuance.
Each of the Existing 2024 Notes and the Existing 2028 Notes are listed on the NYSE and trade on the NYSE under the symbol “PBB” and “PBY,” respectively. We intend to list the Notes offered hereby on the NYSE under the same respective trading symbol. The Notes are expected to trade “flat,” which means that purchasers in the secondary market will not pay, and sellers will not receive, any accrued and unpaid interest on the Notes that is not reflected in the trading price. On August 30, 2018, there were 8,376,487 Existing 2024 Notes issued and outstanding and 2,476,690 Existing 2028 Notes issued and outstanding. Further, as of August 30, 2018, the last reported sales price on the NYSE was $25.15 per Existing 2024 Note and $25.10 per Existing 2028 Note.
The Notes will be our direct unsecured obligations and rank pari passu, or equal in right of payment, with all outstanding and future unsecured unsubordinated indebtedness issued by us. We currently do not have any indebtedness outstanding that is subordinated to the Notes and currently have no intention of issuing any such subordinated indebtedness. The Notes will be effectively subordinated, or junior in right of payment, to our future secured indebtedness and structurally subordinated, or junior in right of payment, to all existing and future indebtedness and other obligations of any of our subsidiaries. In any liquidation, dissolution, bankruptcy or other similar proceeding, the holders of any of our existing or future secured indebtedness and any indebtedness of any future subsidiaries may assert rights of payment prior to the holders of the Notes. See the related disclosure in “Risk Factors” beginning on page S-11 of this prospectus supplement.
Investing in the Notes involves risks, including those described in the “Risk Factors” section beginning on page S-11 of this prospectus supplement and page 12 of the accompanying prospectus.
THE NOTES ARE NOT DEPOSITS OR OTHER OBLIGATIONS OF A BANK AND ARE NOT INSURED BY THE FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION OR ANY OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCY.

Delivery of the Notes in book-entry form only through The Depository Trust Company will be made on or about the second trading date following the date of the purchase.
This prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus contain important information you should know before investing in our securities. Please read this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus before you invest and keep it for future reference. We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information about us with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the “SEC.” This information is available free of charge by contacting us at 10 East 40th Street, 42nd Floor, New York, NY 10016 or by telephone at (212) 448-0702. The SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov where such information is available without charge upon written or oral request. Our internet website address is www.prospectstreet.com. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference into this prospectus supplement



or the accompanying prospectus and you should not consider information contained on our website to be part of this prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus.
Neither the SEC nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed on the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

B. Riley FBR
 
BB&T Capital Markets
 
Comerica Securities
Prospectus Supplement dated August 31, 2018.



FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the “Exchange Act,” which involve substantial risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements predict or describe our future operations, business plans, business and investment strategies and portfolio management and the performance of our investments and our investment management business. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, our beliefs, and our assumptions. Words such as “intends,” “intend,” “intended,” “goal,” “estimate,” “estimates,” “expects,” “expect,” “expected,” “project,” “projected,” “projections,” “plans,” “seeks,” “anticipates,” “anticipated,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “will,” “designed to,” “foreseeable future,” “believe,” “believes” and “scheduled” and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Our actual results or outcomes may differ materially from those anticipated. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements, including without limitation:
our future operating results,
our business prospects and the prospects of our portfolio companies,
the impact of investments that we expect to make,
our contractual arrangements and relationships with third parties,
the dependence of our future success on the general economy and its impact on the industries in which we invest,
the ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their objectives,
difficulty in obtaining financing or raising capital, especially in the current credit and equity environment,
the level and volatility of prevailing interest rates and credit spreads, magnified by the current turmoil in the credit markets,
adverse developments in the availability of desirable loan and investment opportunities whether they are due to competition, regulation or otherwise,
a compression of the yield on our investments and the cost of our liabilities, as well as the level of leverage available to us,
our regulatory structure and tax treatment, including our ability to operate as a business development company and a regulated investment company,
the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital,
the timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our portfolio companies,
the ability of our investment adviser to locate suitable investments for us and to monitor and administer our investments,
authoritative generally accepted accounting principles or policy changes from such standard-setting bodies as the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the SEC, Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), the NASDAQ Global Select Market, the New York Stock Exchange and other authorities that we are subject to, as well as their counterparts in any foreign jurisdictions where we might do business, and
the risks, uncertainties and other factors we identify in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus and in our filings with the SEC.
Although we believe that the assumptions on which these forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate and, as a result, the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions also could be inaccurate. Important assumptions include our ability to originate new loans and investments, ability to obtain certain margins and levels of profitability and the availability of additional capital. In light of these and other uncertainties, the inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus, respectively, should not be regarded as a representation by us that our plans and objectives will be achieved. These risks and uncertainties include those described or identified in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus, respectively. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply

i


only as of the date of this prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus, as applicable. These forward-looking statements do not meet the safe harbor for forward-looking statements pursuant to Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the “Securities Act.”
You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. We have not, and the Agents have not, authorized any other person to provide you with information that is different from that contained in this prospectus supplement or the accompanying prospectus. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are not, and the Agents are not, making an offer of these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer is not permitted. You should assume that the information appearing in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus is accurate only as of their respective dates and we assume no obligation to update any such information. Our business, financial condition and results of operations may have changed since those dates. Although we undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, you are advised to consult any additional disclosures that we may make directly to you or through reports that we have filed with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K.
This prospectus supplement supersedes the accompanying prospectus to the extent it contains information that is different from or in addition to the information in that prospectus.



ii


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT
PAGE
PROSPECTUS
PAGE

iii





iv


PROSPECTUS SUMMARY
This summary highlights some of the information contained elsewhere in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. It is not complete and may not contain all of the information that you may want to consider. You should read carefully the more detailed information set forth under “Risk Factors” in this prospectus supplement and in the accompanying prospectus and the other information included in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus.
On December 10, 2015, we and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, entered into a supplemental indenture (the “Existing 2024 Notes Supplemental Indenture”) to the Indenture referred to in the accompanying prospectus between us and U.S. Bank National Association (the “base indenture”), relating to the original issuance of our Existing 2024 Notes. We will issue the 2024 Notes offered hereby under the base indenture and an additional supplemental indenture that will contain the same terms and conditions as the Existing 2024 Notes Supplemental Indenture.
On June 7, 2018, we and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, entered into a supplemental indenture (the “Existing 2028 Notes Supplemental Indenture”) to the base indenture relating to the original issuance of our Existing 2028 Notes. We will issue the 2028 Notes offered hereby under the base indenture and an additional supplemental indenture that will contain the same terms and conditions as the Existing 2028 Notes Supplemental Indenture.
We refer to the base indenture, the Existing 2024 Notes Supplemental Indenture, the Existing 2028 Notes Supplemental Indenture and the additional supplemental indentures collectively as the “Indenture.” The 2024 Notes offered hereby will be a further issuance of, are fungible with, rank equally in right of payment with, and form a single series for all purposes under the Indenture including, without limitation, waivers, amendments, consents, redemptions and other offers to purchase and voting, with the Existing 2024 Notes. The 2028 Notes offered hereby will be a further issuance of, are fungible with, rank equally in right of payment with, and form a single series for all purposes under the Indenture including, without limitation, waivers, amendments, consents, redemptions and other offers to purchase and voting, with the Existing 2028 Notes.
The terms “we,” “us,” “our” and “Company” refer to Prospect Capital Corporation; “Prospect Capital Management,” “Investment Adviser” and “PCM” refer to Prospect Capital Management L.P.; and “Prospect Administration” and the “Administrator” refer to Prospect Administration LLC.
Our $101.6 million aggregate principal amount of 5.875% Senior Convertible Notes due 2019 are referred to as the “2019 Notes.” Our $392.0 million aggregate principal amount of 4.75% Senior Convertible Notes due 2020 are referred to as the “2020 Notes.” Our $328.5 million aggregate principal amount of 4.95% Convertible Notes due 2022 are referred to as the “2022 Notes” and, collectively with the 2019 Notes and the 2020 Notes, the “Senior Convertible Notes.” Our $153.5 million aggregate principal amount of 5.00% Senior Notes due 2019 are referred to as the “5.00% 2019 Notes.” Our $320.0 million aggregate principal amount of 5.875% Senior Notes due 2023 are referred to as the “2023 Notes.” Our $209.40 million aggregate principal amount of 6.25% Notes due 2024 are referred to as the “2024 Notes.” Our $61.9 million aggregate principal amount of 6.25% Senior Notes due 2028 are referred to as the “2028 Notes.” The 5.00% 2019 Notes, 2023 Notes, 2024 Notes and the 2028 Notes, are collectively referred to as the “Public Notes.” Any Prospect Capital InterNotes® issued pursuant to our medium term notes program are referred to as the “Prospect Capital InterNotes.” The Senior Convertible Notes, the Public Notes and the Prospect Capital InterNotes are referred to as the “Unsecured Notes.”
The Company
Prospect Capital Corporation is a financial services company that primarily lends to and invests in middle market privately-held companies. We are a closed-end investment company incorporated in Maryland. We have elected to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”). As a BDC, we have elected to be treated as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”). We were organized on April 13, 2004 and were funded in an initial public offering completed on July 27, 2004. We are one of the largest BDCs with approximately $5.84 billion of total assets as of June 30, 2018.
We are externally managed by our investment adviser, Prospect Capital Management. Prospect Administration provides administrative services and facilities necessary for us to operate.
On May 15, 2007, we formed a wholly-owned subsidiary Prospect Capital Funding LLC (“PCF”), a Delaware limited liability company and a bankruptcy remote special purpose entity, which holds certain of our portfolio loan investments that are used as collateral for the revolving credit facility at PCF. Our wholly-owned subsidiary Prospect Small Business Lending, LLC (“PSBL”) was formed on January 27, 2014 and purchases small business whole loans on a recurring basis from online small business loan originators, including On Deck Capital, Inc. (“OnDeck”). On September 30, 2014, we formed a wholly-owned subsidiary Prospect Yield Corporation, LLC (“PYC”) and effective October 23, 2014, PYC holds our investments in collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”). Each of these subsidiaries have been consolidated since operations commenced.

S-1


We currently have nine strategies that guide our origination of investment opportunities: (1) lending to companies controlled by private equity sponsors, (2) lending to companies not controlled by private equity sponsors, (3) purchasing controlling equity positions and lending to operating companies, (4) purchasing controlling equity positions and lending to financial services companies, (5) purchasing controlling equity positions and lending to real estate companies, (6) purchasing controlling equity positions and lending to aircraft leasing companies, (7) investing in structured credit, (8) investing in syndicated debt and (9) investing in consumer and small business loans and asset-backed securitizations. We may also invest in other strategies and opportunities from time to time that we view as attractive. We continue to evaluate other origination strategies in the ordinary course of business with no specific top-down allocation to any single origination strategy.
Lending to Companies Controlled by Private Equity Sponsors - We make agented loans to companies which are controlled by private equity sponsors. This debt can take the form of first lien, second lien, unitranche or unsecured loans. These loans typically have equity subordinate to our loan position. Historically, this strategy has comprised approximately 40%-60% of our portfolio.
Lending to Companies not Controlled by Private Equity Sponsors - We make loans to companies which are not controlled by private equity sponsors, such as companies that are controlled by the management team, the founder, a family or public shareholders. This origination strategy may have less competition to provide debt financing than the private-equity-sponsor origination strategy because such company financing needs are not easily addressed by banks and often require more diligence preparation. This origination strategy can result in investments with higher returns or lower leverage than the private-equity-sponsor origination strategy. Historically, this strategy has comprised up to approximately 15% of our portfolio.
Purchasing Controlling Equity Positions and Lending to Operating Companies - This strategy involves purchasing yield-producing debt and controlling equity investments in non-financial-services operating companies. We believe that we can provide enhanced certainty of closure and liquidity to sellers and we look for management to continue on in their current roles. This strategy has comprised approximately 5%-15% of our portfolio.

Purchasing Controlling Equity Positions and Lending to Financial Services Companies - This strategy involves purchasing yield-producing debt and controlling equity positions in financial services companies, including consumer direct lending, sub-prime auto lending and other strategies. These investments are often structured in tax-efficient partnerships, enhancing returns. This strategy has comprised approximately 5%-15% of our portfolio.
Purchasing Controlling Equity Positions and Lending to Real Estate Companies - We purchase debt and controlling equity positions in tax-efficient real estate investment trusts (“REIT” or “REITs”). National Property REIT Corp.’s (“NPRC”), an operating company and the surviving entity of the May 23, 2016 merger with American Property REIT Corp. (“APRC”) and United Property REIT Corp. (“UPRC”), real estate investments are in various classes of developed and occupied real estate properties that generate current yields, including multi-family properties, student housing, and self-storage. NPRC seeks to identify properties that have historically significant occupancy rates and recurring cash flow generation. NPRC generally co-invests with established and experienced property management teams that manage such properties after acquisition. Additionally, NPRC purchases loans originated by certain consumer loan facilitators. It purchases each loan in its entirety (i.e., a “whole loan”). The borrowers are consumers, and the loans are typically serviced by the facilitators of the loans. This investment strategy has comprised approximately 10%-20% of our business.
Purchasing Controlling Equity Positions and Lending to Aircraft Leasing Companies - We invest in debt as well as equity in companies with aircraft assets subject to commercial leases to airlines across the globe. We believe that these investments can present attractive return opportunities due to cash flow consistency from long-term leases coupled with hard asset residual value. We believe that these investment companies seek to deliver risk-adjusted returns with strong downside protection by analyzing relative value characteristics across a variety of aircraft types and vintages. This strategy historically has comprised less than 5% of our portfolio.
Investing in Structured Credit - We make investments in CLOs, often taking a significant position in the subordinated interests (equity) and debt of the CLOs. The underlying portfolio of each CLO investment is diversified across approximately 100 to 200 broadly syndicated loans and does not have direct exposure to real estate, mortgages, or consumer-based credit assets. The CLOs in which we invest are managed by established collateral management teams with many years of experience in the industry. This strategy has comprised approximately 10%-20% of our portfolio.
Investing in Syndicated Debt - On a primary or secondary basis, we purchase primarily senior and secured loans and high yield bonds that have been sold to a club or syndicate of buyers. These investments are often purchased with a long term, buy-and-hold outlook, and we often look to provide significant input to the transaction by providing anchoring orders. This strategy has comprised approximately 5%-10% of our portfolio.

S-2


Investing in Consumer and Small Business Loans and Asset-Backed Securitizations - We purchase loans originated by certain consumer and small-and-medium-sized business (“SME”) loan facilitators. We generally purchase each loan in its entirety (i.e., a “whole loan”) and we invest in asset-backed securitizations collateralized by consumer or small business loans. The borrowers are consumer and SMEs and the loans are typically serviced by the facilitators of the loans. This investment strategy has comprised up to approximately 1% of our portfolio.
Typically, we concentrate on making investments in companies with annual revenues of less than $750 million and enterprise values of less than $1 billion. Our typical investment involves a secured loan of less than $250 million. We also acquire controlling interests in companies in conjunction with making secured debt investments in such companies. In most cases, companies in which we invest are privately held at the time we invest in them. We refer to these companies as “target” or “middle market” companies and these investments as “middle market investments.”
We seek to maximize total returns to our investors, including both current yield and equity upside, by applying rigorous credit analysis and asset-based and cash-flow based lending techniques to make and monitor our investments. We are constantly pursuing multiple investment opportunities, including purchases of portfolios from private and public companies, as well as originations and secondary purchases of particular securities. We also regularly evaluate control investment opportunities in a range of industries, and some of these investments could be material to us. There can be no assurance that we will successfully consummate any investment opportunity we are currently pursuing. If any of these opportunities are consummated, there can be no assurance that investors will share our view of valuation or that any assets acquired will not be subject to future write downs, each of which could have an adverse effect on our stock price.
As of June 30, 2018, we had investments in 135 portfolio companies and CLOs. The aggregate fair value as of June 30, 2018 of investments in these portfolio companies held on that date is approximately $5.7 billion. Our portfolio across all our performing interest-bearing investments had an annualized current yield of 13.0% as of June 30, 2018. Our annualized current yield was 10.5% as of June 30, 2018 across all investments.
Recent Developments
Investment Activity
During the period from July 13, 2018 to July 16, 2018, we made follow-on first lien term loan investments of $105.0 million in Town & Country Holdings, Inc., to support acquisitions.
On August 1, 2018, we purchased from a third party $14.0 million of First Lien Senior Secured Term Loan A and Term Loan B Notes issued by InterDent, Inc. at par. 

On August 6, 2018, we made a $17.5 million senior secured investment in Halyard MD OPCO, LLC, a healthcare IT and advertising technology business that enables targeted advertising campaigns to healthcare providers and patients. Our investment is comprised of a $12.0 million first lien term loan, a $2.0 million unfunded revolving credit facility, and a $3.5 million unfunded delayed draw investment.

Debt and Equity
On July 2, 2018, we entered into debt distribution agreements with each of B. Riley FBR, Inc. and BB&T Capital Markets, a division of BB&T Securities, LLC (together, the “Agents”) pursuant to which we may sell, by means of at-the-market offerings, up to $100.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2024 Notes and up to $100.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2028 Notes. As of August 28, 2018, we have issued an additional $10.1 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2024 Notes for net proceeds of $10.1 million and have issued an additional $6.92 million in aggregate principal amount of the 2028 Notes for net proceeds of $6.8 million.
On August 1, 2018, we completed an extension of the Revolving Credit Facility (the “New Facility”) for PCF, extending the term 5.7 years from such date and reducing the interest rate on drawn amounts to one-month LIBOR plus 2.20%. The New Facility, for which $770 million of commitments have been closed to date, includes an accordion feature that allows the New Facility, at our discretion, to accept up to a total of $1.5 billion of commitments. The New Facility matures on March 27, 2024. It includes a revolving period that extends through March 27, 2022, followed by an additional two-year amortization period, with distributions allowed to us after the completion of the revolving period. Pricing for amounts drawn under the New Facility is one-month LIBOR plus 2.20%, which achieves a 5 basis point reduction in the interest rate from the previous facility rate of LIBOR plus 2.25%. Additionally, the lenders charge a fee on the unused portion of the credit facility equal to either 50 basis points if more than 60% of the New Facility is drawn, or 100 basis points if more than 35% and an amount less than or equal to 60% of the New Facility is drawn, or 150 basis points if an amount less than or equal to 35% of the New Facility is drawn.

S-3


During the period from July 1, 2018 through August 30, 2018 we issued $27.5 million aggregate principal amount of Prospect Capital InterNotes® for net proceeds of $27.1 million.
Pursuant to a notice to call provided on July 5, 2018, we redeemed $2.6 million of our Prospect Capital InterNotes® at par maturing on February 15, 2020, with a weighted average rate of 4.0%. Settlement of the call occurred on August 15, 2018. We have provided notice to call on August 8, 2018 with settlement on September 15, 2018, $26.8 million of our Prospect Capital InterNotes® at par maturing between March 15, 2020 and September 15, 2020, with a weighted average rate of 4.77%.

We have provided notice to redeem on August 20, 2018 the 5.00% Senior Notes due 2019 (the “5.00% 2019 Notes”) in the amount of $153.5 million. The redemption is to be completed on or about September 26, 2018. Following the redemption, none of the 5.00% 2019 Notes will remain outstanding.

Dividends
On August 28, 2018, we announced the declaration of monthly dividends in the following amounts and with the following dates:
$0.06 per share for September 2018 to holders of record on September 28, 2018 with a payment date of October 18, 2018.
$0.06 per share for October 2018 to holders of record on October 31, 2018 with a payment date of November 21, 2018.


S-4


Specific Terms of the Notes and the Offering
This prospectus supplement sets forth certain terms of the Notes that Prospect Capital Corporation is offering pursuant to this prospectus supplement and supplements the accompanying prospectus that is attached to the back of this prospectus supplement. The 2024 Notes offered hereby will be a further issuance of, are fungible with, rank equally in right of payment with, and form a single series for all purposes under the Indenture including, without limitation, waivers, amendments, consents, redemptions and other offers to purchase and voting, with the $209,412,175 in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% Notes due 2024, initially issued by us in December 2015. The 2028 Notes offered hereby will be a further issuance of, are fungible with, rank equally in right of payment with, and form a single series for all purposes under the Indenture including, without limitation, waivers, amendments, consents, redemptions and other offers to purchase and voting, with the $61,197,250 in aggregate principal amount of 6.25% Notes due 2028, initially issued by us in June 2018. Unless otherwise indicated, the Notes offered hereby and the Existing Notes are collectively referred to herein as the “Notes.” This section outlines the specific legal and financial terms of the Notes. You should read this section together with the more general description of the Notes under the heading “Description of the Notes” in this prospectus supplement and in the accompanying prospectus under the heading “Description of Our Debt Securities” before investing in the Notes. Capitalized terms used in this prospectus supplement and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the accompanying prospectus or in the Indenture.
Issuer
 
Prospect Capital Corporation
 
 
 
 
Title of securities
 
6.25% Notes due 2024
6.25% Notes due 2028
 
 
 
 
Initial aggregate principal amount being offered
 
Up to $100,000,000. During the period from July 2, 2018 (the original date of the debt distribution agreements with B. Riley FBR and BB&T) through August 30, we sold $10,131,175 aggregate principal amount of the 2024 Notes through B. Riley and BB&T pursuant to their debt distribution agreements and as such, there is $89,868,825 aggregate principal amount of the 2024 Notes remaining that we may offer and sell through the Agents pursuant to the debt distribution agreements.
Up to $100,000,000. During the period from July 2, 2018 (the original date of the debt distribution agreements with B. Riley FBR and BB&T) through August 30, we sold $6,917,250 aggregate principal amount of the 2028 Notes through B. Riley and BB&T pursuant to their debt distribution agreements and as such, there is $93,082,750 aggregate principal amount of the 2028 Notes remaining that we may offer and sell through the Agents pursuant to the debt distribution agreements.
 
 
 
 
Manner of offering
 
“At the market” offering that may be made from time to time through the Agents, as sales agents, using commercially reasonable efforts or otherwise in negotiated transactions. See “Plan of Distribution.”
 
 
 
 
Principal payable at maturity
 
100% of the aggregate principal amount; the principal amount of each Note will be payable on its stated maturity date at the office of the Paying Agent, Registrar and Transfer Agent for the Notes or at such other office in The City of New York as we may designate.
 
 
 
 
Type of Note
 
Fixed rate note
 
 
 
 
Listing
 
The Existing 2024 Notes are traded on the New York Stock Exchange, or the “NYSE,” under the trading symbol “PBB.” We intend to list the 2024 Notes offered hereby on the NYSE under the same trading symbol.
The Existing 2028 Notes are traded on the New York Stock Exchange, or the “NYSE,” under the trading symbol “PBY.” We intend to list the 2028 Notes offered hereby on the NYSE under the same trading symbol.
 
 
 
 
Interest rate
 
6.25% per year. However, if any of the Notes are sold at prices above the par value of $25 per Note, the effective yield on such Notes to the purchasers may be less than 6.25%.
 
 
 
 
Day count basis
 
360-day year of twelve 30-day months
 
 
 
 
Issuance date
 
The second trading date following the date of the purchase of the Notes.
 
 
 
 
Stated maturity date
 
June 15, 2024
June 15, 2028
 
 
 
 
Date interest starts accruing on Existing Notes
 
June 15, 2015
June 7, 2018

S-5


 
 
 
 
Interest payment dates
 
March 15, June 15, September 15 and December 15, commencing on the first applicable interest payment date following a given purchase of the Notes under this prospectus supplement. The interest payable on each interest payment date will be paid only to holders of record of the Notes at the close of business on the record date immediately preceding the applicable interest payment date. If Notes are purchased after a record date but before the interest payment date immediately following such record date, the applicable interest payment date for such Notes will be the interest payment date after the interest payment date immediately following such record date. If an interest payment date falls on a non-business day, the applicable interest payment will be made on the next business day and no additional interest will accrue as a result of such delayed payment.
 
 
 
 
Interest periods
 
Interest periods will be the periods from and including an interest payment date to, but excluding, the next interest payment date or the stated maturity date, as the case may be. Interest on the Notes will accrue from the most recent interest payment date immediately preceding the date of issuance of the Notes from time to time, except that, if you purchase Notes after a record date (or your settlement of a purchase of Notes otherwise occurs after such record date), your Notes will not accrue interest for the period from such purchase date to the interest payment date immediately following such record date.
 
 
 
 
Regular record dates for interest
 
March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1 of each year, commencing with the first such date to follow a given purchase of the Notes under this prospectus supplement.
 
 
 
 
Specified currency
 
U.S. Dollars
 
 
 
 
Place of payment
 
New York City
 
 
 
 
Ranking of Notes
 
The Notes will be our general, unsecured obligations and will rank equal in right of payment with all of our existing and future senior, unsecured indebtedness (including the Unsecured Notes) and senior in right of payment to any of our subordinated indebtedness. As a result, the Notes will be effectively subordinated to our existing and future secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness and structurally subordinated to any existing and future liabilities and other indebtedness of our subsidiaries.

As of August 30, 2018, we and our subsidiaries had approximately $2.5 billion of senior indebtedness outstanding, $2.4 billion of which was unsecured indebtedness.
 
 
 
 
Denominations
 
We will issue the Notes in denominations of $25 and integral multiples of $25 in excess thereof.
 
 
 
 
Business day
 
Each Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday that is not a day on which banking institutions in New York City are authorized or required by law or executive order to close.
 
 
 
 

S-6


Optional redemption
 
Each of the 2024 Notes and 2028 Notes may be redeemed in whole or in part at any time or from time to time at our option on or after December 15, 2018 or June 15, 2021, respectively, upon not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days’ with respect to the 2024 Notes and not less than 30 days nor more than 90 days’ with respect to the 2028 Notes written notice by mail prior to the date fixed for redemption thereof, at a redemption price of $25 per Note plus accrued and unpaid interest payments otherwise payable for the then-current quarterly interest period accrued to, but excluding, the date fixed for redemption.

You may be prevented from exchanging or transferring the Notes when they are subject to a written notice of redemption issued by us even though the Notes are listed for trading on the NYSE. In case any Notes are to be redeemed in part only, the redemption notice will provide that, upon surrender of such Note, you will receive, without a charge, a new Note or Notes of authorized denominations representing the principal amount of your remaining unredeemed Notes.

Any exercise of our option to redeem the Notes will be done in compliance with the 1940 Act, to the extent applicable.

If we redeem only some of the Notes, the Trustee will determine the method for selection of the particular Notes to be redeemed, in accordance with the 1940 Act, to the extent applicable, and the rules of the NYSE, and any unredeemed Notes will have the same rights and be entitled to the same benefits that the Notes had prior to any such redemption. Unless we default in payment of the redemption price, on and after the date of redemption, interest will cease to accrue on the Notes called for redemption.
 
 
 
 
Sinking fund
 
The Notes will not be subject to any sinking fund (i.e., no amounts will be set aside by us to ensure repayment of the Notes at maturity). As a result, our ability to repay the Notes at maturity will depend on our financial condition on the date that we are required to repay the Notes.
 
 
 
 
Repayment at option of Holders
 
Holders will not have the option to have the Notes repaid prior to the stated maturity date unless we undergo a fundamental change (as defined in this prospectus supplement). See “-Fundamental change repurchase right of Holders.”
 
 
 
 
Defeasance
 
The Notes are subject to defeasance by us. “Defeasance” means that, by depositing with a trustee an amount of cash and/or government securities sufficient to pay all principal and interest, if any, on the Notes when due and satisfying any additional conditions noted below, we will be deemed to have been discharged from our obligations under the Notes. We are under no obligation to exercise any such rights of defeasance.
 
 
 
 
Covenant defeasance
 
The Notes are subject to covenant defeasance by us. In the event of a “covenant defeasance,” upon depositing such funds and satisfying similar conditions discussed below we would be released from the restrictive covenants under the Indenture relating to the Notes. The consequences to the holders of the Notes is that, while they no longer benefit from the restrictive covenants under the Indenture, and while the Notes may not be accelerated for any reason, the holders of Notes nonetheless are guaranteed to receive the principal and interest owed to them. We are under no obligation to exercise any such rights of covenant defeasance.
 
 
 
 
Form of Notes
 
The Notes will be represented by global securities that will be deposited and registered in the name of The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) or its nominee. This means that, except in limited circumstances, you will not receive certificates for the Notes. Beneficial interests in the Notes will be represented through book-entry accounts of financial institutions acting on behalf of beneficial owners as direct and indirect participants in DTC. Investors may elect to hold interests in the Notes through either DTC, if they are a participant, or indirectly through organizations which are participants in DTC.
 
 
 
 
Trustee, Paying Agent, Registrar and Transfer Agent
 
U.S. Bank National Association
 
 
 
 
Fundamental change repurchase right of Holders
 
If we undergo a fundamental change (as defined in this prospectus supplement) prior to maturity, you will have the right, at your option, to require us to repurchase for cash some or all of your Notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes being repurchased, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the repurchase date. See “Description of the Notes-Purchase of Notes by Us for Cash at the Option of Holders upon a Fundamental Change.”

S-7


 
 
 
 
Events of default
 
If an event of default on the Notes occurs, the principal amount of the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest (including additional interest, if any) may be declared immediately due and payable, subject to certain conditions set forth in the Indenture. These amounts automatically become due and payable in the case of certain types of bankruptcy or insolvency events of default involving the Company as defined in the Indenture.
 
 
 
 
Other covenants
 
In addition to the covenants described in the prospectus attached to this prospectus supplement, the following covenants shall apply to the Notes:
We agree that for the period of time during which the Notes are outstanding, we will not violate Section 18(a)(1)(A) as modified by Section 61(a)(1) of the 1940 Act or any successor provisions.
If, at any time, we are not subject to the reporting requirements of Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act to file any periodic reports with the SEC, we agree to furnish to holders of the Notes and the Trustee, for the period of time during which the Notes are outstanding, our audited annual consolidated financial statements, within 90 days of our fiscal year end, and unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, within 45 days of our fiscal quarter end. All such financial statements will be prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with applicable United States generally accepted accounting principles.
 
 
 
 
Use of proceeds
 
We expect to use the net proceeds from the sale of the Notes initially to maintain balance sheet liquidity, involving repayment of debt under our credit facility, if any, and redemption of our debt, investments in high quality short-term debt instruments or a combination thereof, and thereafter to make long-term investments in accordance with our investment objective. We anticipate that substantially all of the net proceeds from the offering will be used for the above purposes within six months, depending on the availability of appropriate investment opportunities consistent with our investment objective and market conditions.
 
 
 
 
Global clearance and settlement procedures
 
Interests in the Notes will trade in DTC's Same Day Funds Settlement System, and any permitted secondary market trading activity in such Notes will, therefore, be required by DTC to be settled in immediately available funds. None of the Company, the Trustee or the paying agent will have any responsibility for the performance by DTC or its participants or indirect participants of their respective obligations under the rules and procedures governing their operations.
 
 
 
 
Governing law
 
The Notes and the Indenture shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of New York.

S-8


SELECTED CONDENSED FINANCIAL DATA
You should read the condensed consolidated financial information below with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. Financial information below for the years ended June 30, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014 has been derived from the financial statements that were audited by our independent registered public accounting firm. Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period financial information to conform to the current period presentation. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” starting on page S-24 for more information.
 
Year Ended June 30,
 
2018
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
 
(in thousands except data relating to shares,
per share and number of portfolio companies)
Performance Data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total interest income
$
607,012

 
$
668,717

 
$
731,618

 
$
748,974

 
$
613,741

Total dividend income
13,046

 
5,679

 
26,501

 
7,663

 
26,837

Total other income
37,787

 
26,650

 
33,854

 
34,447

 
71,713

Total Investment Income
657,845

 
701,046

 
791,973

 
791,084

 
712,291

Interest and credit facility expenses
(155,039
)
 
(164,848
)
 
(167,719
)
 
(170,660
)
 
(130,103
)
Investment advisory expense
(189,759
)
 
(199,394
)
 
(219,305
)
 
(225,277
)
 
(198,296
)
Other expenses
(26,197
)
 
(30,722
)
 
(33,821
)
 
(32,400
)
 
(26,669
)
Total Operating Expenses
(370,995
)
 
(394,964
)
 
(420,845
)
 
(428,337
)
 
(355,068
)
Net Investment Income
286,850

 
306,082

 
371,128

 
362,747

 
357,223

Net realized and change in unrealized gains (losses)
13,013

 
(53,176
)
 
(267,766
)
 
(16,408
)
 
(38,203
)
Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations
$
299,863

 
$
252,906

 
$
103,362

 
$
346,339

 
$
319,020

Per Share Data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net Increase in Net Assets from Operations(1)
$
0.83

 
$
0.70

 
$
0.29

 
$
0.98

 
$
1.06

Dividends declared per share
$
(0.77
)
 
$
(1.00
)
 
$
(1.00
)
 
$
(1.19
)
 
$
(1.32
)
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding
361,456,075

 
358,841,714

 
356,134,297

 
353,648,522

 
300,283,941

Assets and Liabilities Data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Investments at Fair Value
5,727,279

 
5,838,305

 
5,897,708

 
$
6,609,558

 
$
6,253,739

Other Assets(4)
111,541

 
334,484

 
338,473

 
144,356

 
166,520

Total Assets(4)
5,838,820

 
6,172,789

 
6,236,181

 
6,753,914

 
6,420,259

Revolving Credit Facility
37,000

 

 

 
368,700

 
92,000

Convertible Notes(4)
809,073

 
937,641

 
1,074,361

 
1,218,226

 
1,219,676

Public Notes(4)
716,810

 
738,300

 
699,368

 
541,490

 
637,584

Prospect Capital InterNotes®(4)
748,926

 
966,254

 
893,210

 
811,180

 
766,781

Due to Prospect Administration and Prospect Capital Management
51,257

 
50,159

 
55,914

 
6,788

 
2,211

Other liabilities
68,707

 
125,483

 
77,411

 
104,481

 
83,825

Total Liabilities(4)
2,431,773

 
2,817,837

 
2,800,264

 
3,050,865

 
2,802,077

Net Assets
$
3,407,047

 
$
3,354,952

 
$
3,435,917

 
$
3,703,049

 
$
3,618,182


S-9


 
Year Ended June 30,
 
2018
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
 
2014
 
(in thousands except data relating to shares,
per share and number of portfolio companies)
Investment Activity Data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
No. of portfolio companies at period end
135

 
121

 
125

 
131

 
142

Acquisitions
$
1,730,657

 
$
1,489,470

 
$
979,102

 
$
1,867,477

 
$
2,933,365

Sales, repayments, and other disposals
$
1,831,286

 
$
1,413,882

 
$
1,338,875

 
$
1,411,562

 
$
767,978

Total return based on market value(2)
(7.42
)%
 
16.80
%
 
21.84
%
 
(20.84
)%
 
10.88
%
Total return based on net asset value(2)
12.39
 %
 
8.98
%
 
7.15
%
 
11.47
 %
 
10.97
%
Weighted average yield on debt portfolio at year end(3)
13.00
 %
 
12.20
%
 
13.20
%
 
12.70
 %
 
12.10
%
Weighted average yield on total portfolio at year end(5)
10.50
 %
 
10.35
%
 
12.04
%
 
11.87
 %
 
11.90
%
_______________________________________________________________________________

(1)
Per share data is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the year presented (except for dividends to shareholders which is based on actual rate per share).
(2)
Total return based on market value is based on the change in market price per share between the opening and ending market prices per share in each year and assumes that dividends are reinvested in accordance with our dividend reinvestment plan. Total return based on net asset value is based upon the change in net asset value per share between the opening and ending net asset values per share in each year and assumes that dividends are reinvested in accordance with our dividend reinvestment plan.
(3)
Excludes equity investments and non-performing loans.
(4)
We have changed our method of presentation relating to debt issuance costs in accordance with ASU 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30). Unamortized deferred financing costs of $40,526, $44,140, and $57,010 previously reported as an asset on the Consolidated Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of June 30, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively, have been reclassified as a direct deduction to the respective Unsecured Notes. See Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates for further discussion.
(5)
Includes equity investments and non-performing loans.



S-10


RISK FACTORS
Investing in our Notes involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below, together with all of the other information included in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus, before you decide whether to make an investment in the Notes. If any of the adverse events or conditions described below or in the accompanying prospectus occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case, our net asset value, or NAV, and the value of the Notes and the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
Our amount of debt outstanding will increase as a result of this offering. Our current indebtedness could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to meet our payment obligations under the Notes and our other debt.
As of August 30, 2018, together with our subsidiaries, we had approximately $2.4 billion of unsecured senior indebtedness outstanding and $194.0 million of secured indebtedness outstanding.
The use of debt could have significant consequences on our future operations, including:
making it more difficult for us to meet our payment and other obligations under the Notes and our other outstanding debt;
resulting in an event of default if we fail to comply with the financial and other restrictive covenants contained in our debt agreements, which event of default could result in substantially all of our debt becoming immediately due and payable;
reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund investments, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes, and limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for these purposes;
subjecting us to the risk of increased sensitivity to interest rate increases on our indebtedness with variable interest rates, including borrowings under our credit facility; and
limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, and increasing our vulnerability to, changes in our business, the industry in which we operate and the general economy.
Any of the above‑listed factors could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and our ability to meet our payment obligations under the Notes and our other debt.
Our ability to meet our payment and other obligations under our debt instruments depends on our ability to generate significant cash flow in the future. This, to some extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative and regulatory factors as well as other factors that are beyond our control. We cannot assure you that our business will generate cash flow from operations, or that future borrowings will be available to us under our credit facility or otherwise, in an amount sufficient to enable us to meet our payment obligations under the Notes and our other debt and to fund other liquidity needs. If we are not able to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt obligations, we may need to refinance or restructure our debt, including any Notes sold, sell assets, reduce or delay capital investments, or seek to raise additional capital. If we are unable to implement one or more of these alternatives, we may not be able to meet our payment obligations under the Notes and our other debt.
A downgrade, suspension or withdrawal of the rating assigned by a rating agency to us or the Notes, if any, could cause the liquidity or market value of the Notes to decline significantly.
Our credit ratings are an assessment by rating agencies of our ability to pay our debts when due. Consequently, real or anticipated changes in our credit ratings will generally affect the market value of the Notes. These credit ratings may not reflect the potential impact of risks relating to the structure or marketing of the Notes. Credit ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold any security, and may be revised or withdrawn at any time by the issuing organization in its sole discretion. Neither we nor the Agents undertake any obligation to maintain the ratings or to advise holders of Notes of any changes in ratings.
The Notes will be rated by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, or “S&P,” and Kroll Bond Rating Agency, Inc., or “Kroll.” There can be no assurance that their rating will remain for any given period of time or that such rating will not be

S-11


lowered or withdrawn entirely by S&P or Kroll if in their respective judgment future circumstances relating to the basis of the rating, such as adverse changes in our company, so warrant.
An increase in market interest rates could result in a decrease in the market value of the Notes.
The condition of the financial markets and prevailing interest rates have fluctuated in the past and are likely to fluctuate in the future, which could have an adverse effect on the market prices of the Notes. In general, as market interest rates rise, debt securities bearing interest at fixed rates of interest decline in value. Consequently, if you purchase notes bearing interest at fixed rates of interest and market interest rates increase, the market values of those notes may decline. We cannot predict the future level of market interest rates.
The Notes will be effectively subordinated to any existing and future secured indebtedness and structurally subordinated to existing and future liabilities and other indebtedness of our subsidiaries.
The Notes are our general, senior unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future senior unsecured indebtedness, including without limitation, our Unsecured Notes. As a result, the Notes are effectively subordinated to our existing and future secured indebtedness (including indebtedness that is initially unsecured to which we subsequently grant security) to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness and structurally subordinated to any existing and future liabilities and other indebtedness of our subsidiaries. Effective subordination means that in any liquidation, dissolution, bankruptcy or other similar proceeding, the holders of any of our existing or future secured indebtedness and the secured indebtedness of our subsidiaries may assert rights against the assets pledged to secure that indebtedness in order to receive full payment of their indebtedness before the assets may be used to pay other creditors. Structural subordination means that creditors of a parent entity are subordinate to creditors of a subsidiary entity with respect to the subsidiary’s assets. These liabilities may include indebtedness, trade payables, guarantees, lease obligations and letter of credit obligations. The Notes do not restrict us or our subsidiaries from incurring indebtedness, including senior secured indebtedness in the future, nor do they limit the amount of indebtedness we can issue that is equal in right of payment to the Notes. As of August 30, 2018, we had $194.0 million borrowings under our credit facility. Our credit facility is secured by certain of our assets and the indebtedness thereunder is therefore effectively senior to the Notes to the extent of the value of such assets.
The Senior Convertible Notes, 5.00% 2019 Notes and 2023 Notes and certain Prospect Capital InterNotes® will be due prior to the Notes. We do not currently know whether we will be able to replace any such notes upon their respective maturities, or if we do, whether we will be able to do so on terms that are as favorable as such notes. In the event that we are not able to replace such notes at the time of their respective maturities, this could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and ability to fund new investments, our ability to make distributions to our stockholders, our ability to repay the Notes and our ability to qualify as a regulated investment company, or “RIC.”
The Indenture under which the Notes will be issued will contain limited protection for holders of the Notes.
The Indenture under which the Notes will be issued offers limited protection to holders of the Notes. The terms of the Indenture and the Notes do not restrict our or any of our subsidiaries’ ability to engage in, or otherwise be a party to, a variety of corporate transactions, circumstances or events that could have an adverse impact on your investment in the Notes. In particular, the terms of the Indenture and the Notes will not place any restrictions on our or our subsidiaries’ ability to:
issue securities or otherwise incur additional indebtedness or other obligations, including (1) any indebtedness or other obligations that would be equal in right of payment to the Notes, (2) any indebtedness or other obligations that would be secured and therefore rank effectively senior in right of payment to the Notes to the extent of the values of the assets securing such debt, (3) indebtedness of ours that is guaranteed by one or more of our subsidiaries and which therefore is structurally senior to the Notes and (4) securities, indebtedness or obligations issued or incurred by our subsidiaries that would be senior to our equity interests in our subsidiaries and therefore rank structurally senior to the Notes with respect to the assets of our subsidiaries, in each case other than an incurrence of indebtedness or other obligation that would cause a violation of Section 18(a)(1)(A) as modified by Section 61(a)(1) of the 1940 Act or any successor provisions;
pay dividends on, or purchase or redeem or make any payments in respect of, capital stock or other securities ranking junior in right of payment to the Notes;
sell assets (other than certain limited restrictions on our ability to consolidate, merge or sell all or substantially all of our assets);

S-12


enter into transactions with affiliates;
create liens (including liens on the shares of our subsidiaries) or enter into sale and leaseback transactions;
make investments; or
create restrictions on the payment of dividends or other amounts to us from our consolidated subsidiaries.
Furthermore, the terms of the Indenture and the Notes do not protect holders of the Notes in the event that we experience changes (including significant adverse changes) in our financial condition, results of operations or credit ratings, as they do not require that we or our subsidiaries adhere to any financial tests or ratios or specified levels of net worth, revenues, income, cash flow, or liquidity other than certain limited restrictions on dividends and certain board structures or default provisions mandated by the 1940 Act.
Our ability to recapitalize, incur additional debt and take a number of other actions that are not limited by the terms of the Notes may have important consequences for you as a holder of the Notes, including making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to the Notes or negatively affecting the trading value of the Notes.
Certain of our current debt instruments include more protections for their holders than the Indenture and the Notes. In addition, other debt we issue or incur in the future could contain more protections for its holders than the Indenture and the Notes, including additional covenants and events of default. The issuance or incurrence of any such debt with incremental protections could affect the market for and trading levels and prices of the Notes.
We may be subject to certain corporate-level taxes which could adversely affect our cash flow and consequently adversely affect our ability to make payments on the Notes.
We may be subject to certain corporate-level taxes regardless of whether we continue to qualify as a RIC. Additionally, should we fail to qualify as a RIC, we would be subject to corporate-level taxes on all of our taxable income. The imposition of corporate-level taxes could adversely affect our cash flow and consequently adversely affect our ability to make payments on the Notes.
An active trading market for the Notes may not develop or be maintained, which could limit the market price of the Notes or your ability to sell them.
Although the Existing 2024 Notes are listed on the NYSE under the trading symbol “PBB” and the Existing 2028 Notes are listed on the NYSE under the trading symbol “PBY,” we cannot provide any assurances that an active trading market will develop or be maintained for the Notes or that you will be able to sell your Notes. If the Notes are traded after their initial issuance, they may trade at a discount from their initial offering price depending on prevailing interest rates, the market for similar securities, our credit ratings, general economic conditions, our financial condition, performance and prospects and other factors. The sales agents have advised us that they intend to make a market in the Notes, but they are not obligated to do so. The sales agents may discontinue any market-making in the Notes at any time at their sole discretion. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that a liquid trading market will develop or be maintained for the Notes, that you will be able to sell your Notes at a particular time or that the price you receive when you sell will be favorable. To the extent an active trading market does not develop, the liquidity and trading price for the Notes may be harmed. Accordingly, you may be required to bear the financial risk of an investment in the Notes for an indefinite period of time.
We may choose to redeem the Notes when prevailing interest rates are relatively low.
Beginning December 15, 2018 or June 15, 2021, we may choose to redeem the 2024 Notes or 2028 Notes, respectively, from time to time, especially when prevailing interest rates are lower than the rate borne by such Notes. If prevailing rates are lower at the time of redemption, you would not be able to reinvest the redemption proceeds in a comparable security at an effective interest rate as high as the interest rate on the Notes. Our redemption right also may adversely impact your ability to sell the Notes.

S-13


The Indenture governing the Notes will not contain restrictive covenants and will provide only limited protection in the event of a change of control.
The Indenture under which the Notes will be issued will not contain any financial or operating covenants or any other restrictive covenants that would limit our ability to engage in certain transactions that may adversely affect you. In particular, the Indenture will not contain covenants that limit our ability to pay dividends or make distributions on or redeem our capital stock or that limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness, including in a highly leveraged transaction or other similar transaction. We will only be required to offer to repurchase the Notes upon a change of control in the case of the transactions specified in the definition of a “fundamental change” under “Description of the Notes-Purchase of Notes by Us for Cash at the Option of Holders upon a Fundamental Change.”
Accordingly, subject to restrictions contained in our other debt agreements, we will be permitted to engage in certain transactions, such as acquisitions, refinancings or recapitalizations, that could affect our capital structure and the value of the Notes but would not constitute a fundamental change under the Notes.
We may be unable to repurchase the Notes following a fundamental change.
Holders of the Notes have the right to require us to repurchase the Notes prior to their maturity upon the occurrence of a fundamental change as described under “Description of the Notes-Purchase of Notes by Us for Cash at the Option of Holders upon a Fundamental Change.” Any of our future debt agreements may contain similar provisions. We may not have sufficient funds or the ability to arrange necessary financing on acceptable terms at the time we are required to make repurchases of tendered Notes. In addition, our ability to repurchase the Notes may be limited by law or the terms of other agreements relating to our debt outstanding at the time, including our credit facility. If we fail to repurchase the Notes as required by the Indenture, it would constitute an event of default under the Indenture governing the Notes, which, in turn, would constitute an event of default under our credit facility.
Some significant restructuring transactions may not constitute a fundamental change, in which case we would not be obligated to offer to repurchase the Notes.
Upon the occurrence of a fundamental change, you have the right to require us to offer to repurchase the Notes. However, the fundamental change provisions will not afford protection to holders of the Notes in the event of certain transactions. For example, transactions such as leveraged recapitalizations, refinancings, restructurings or acquisitions initiated by us would not constitute a fundamental change event which may require us to repurchase the Notes. In the event of any such transaction, the holders would not have the right to require us to repurchase the Notes, even though each of these transactions could increase the amount of our indebtedness, or otherwise adversely affect our capital structure or any credit ratings, thereby adversely affecting the holders of the Notes.
Provisions of the Notes could discourage an acquisition of us by a third party.
Certain provisions of the Notes could make it more difficult or more expensive for a third party to acquire us. Upon the occurrence of certain transactions constituting a fundamental change event, holders of the Notes will have the right, at their option, to require us to repurchase all of their Notes or any portion of the principal amount of such Notes in integral multiples of $25. These provisions could discourage an acquisition of us by a third party.
Changes relating to the LIBOR calculation process may adversely affect the value of the LIBOR-indexed, floating-rate debt securities in our portfolio.
In the recent past, concerns have been publicized that some of the member banks surveyed by the British Bankers’ Association (“BBA”) in connection with the calculation of LIBOR across a range of maturities and currencies may have been under-reporting or otherwise manipulating the inter-bank lending rate applicable to them in order to profit on their derivatives positions or to avoid an appearance of capital insufficiency or adverse reputational or other consequences that may have resulted from reporting inter-bank lending rates higher than those they actually submitted. A number of BBA member banks entered into settlements with their regulators and law enforcement agencies with respect to alleged manipulation of LIBOR, and investigations by regulators and governmental authorities in various jurisdictions are ongoing.

S-14


In July 2017, the head of the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority announced the desire to phase out the use of LIBOR by the end of 2021. There is currently no definitive information regarding the future utilization of LIBOR or of any particular replacement rate. As such, the potential effect of any such event on our cost of capital and net investment income cannot yet be determined.
Actions by the BBA, the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority or other regulators or law enforcement agencies as a result of these or future events, may result in changes to the manner in which LIBOR is determined. Potential changes, or uncertainty related to such potential changes may adversely affect the market for LIBOR-based securities, including our portfolio of LIBOR-indexed, floating-rate debt securities. In addition, any further changes or reforms to the determination or supervision of LIBOR may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in reported LIBOR, which could have an adverse impact on the market for LIBOR-based securities or the value of our portfolio of LIBOR-indexed, floating-rate debt securities.
Regulations governing our operation as a business development company affect our ability to raise, and the way in which we raise, additional capital.
We have incurred indebtedness under our revolving credit facility and through the issuance of the Unsecured Notes and, in the future, may issue preferred stock or debt securities and/or borrow additional money from banks or other financial institutions, which we refer to collectively as “senior securities,” up to the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. Under the provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as a BDC, to incur indebtedness or issue senior securities only in amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% after each issuance of senior securities. If the value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy this test, which would prohibit us from paying dividends in cash or other property and could prohibit us from qualifying as a RIC. If we cannot satisfy this test, we may be required to sell a portion of our investments or sell additional shares of common stock at a time when such sales may be disadvantageous in order to repay a portion of our indebtedness or otherwise increase our net assets. In addition, issuance of additional common stock could dilute the percentage ownership of our current stockholders in us. On March 23, 2018, President Trump signed into law the Small Business Credit Availability Act, which included various changes to regulations under the federal securities laws that impact BDCs, including changes to the 1940 Act to allow BDCs to decrease their asset coverage requirement to 150% from 200% under certain circumstances. While certain other BDCs have elected to allow for the increase in leverage, after consideration of the expected negative impact on us, including a rating downgrade by S&P, our Board of Directors has not currently elected to approve the application of the modified asset coverage requirement for the Company. If, in the future, we choose to take advantage of such additional leverage, it will mean that for every $100 of net assets, we may raise $200 from senior securities, such as borrowings or issuing secured stock. If this ratio declines below 150%, we may not be able to incur additional debt and may need to sell a portion of our investments to repay some debt when it is disadvantageous to do so, and we may not be able to make distributions.
As a BDC regulated under provisions of the 1940 Act, we are not generally able to issue and sell our common stock at a price below the current net asset value per share without stockholder approval. If our common stock trades at a discount to net asset value, this restriction could adversely affect our ability to raise capital. We may, however, sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below the current net asset value of our common stock in certain circumstances, including if (i)(1) the holders of a majority of our shares (or, if less, at least 67% of a quorum consisting of a majority of our shares) and a similar majority of the holders of our shares who are not affiliated persons of us approve the sale of our common stock at a price that is less than the current net asset value, and (2) a majority of our Directors who have no financial interest in the transaction and a majority of our independent Directors (a) determine that such sale is in our and our stockholders’ best interests and (b) in consultation with any underwriter or underwriters of the offering, make a good faith determination as of a time either immediately prior to the first solicitation by us or on our behalf of firm commitments to purchase such shares, or immediately prior to the issuance of such shares, that the price at which such shares are to be sold is not less than a price which closely approximates the market value of such shares, less any distributing commission or discount or if (ii) a majority of the number of the beneficial holders of our common stock entitled to vote at our annual meeting, without regard to whether a majority of such shares are voted in favor of the proposal, approve the sale of our common stock at a price that is less than the current net asset value per share.
To generate cash for funding new investments, we pledged a substantial portion of our portfolio investments under our revolving credit facility. These assets are not available to secure other sources of funding or for securitization. Our ability to obtain additional secured or unsecured financing on attractive terms in the future is uncertain.
Alternatively, we may securitize our future loans to generate cash for funding new investments. See “Securitization of our assets subjects us to various risks” in the accompanying prospectus.

S-15


Uncertainty about the financial stability of the United States, the economic crisis in Europe and the new presidential administration could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Although U.S. lawmakers passed legislation to raise the federal debt ceiling and Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services affirmed its AA+ long-term sovereign credit rating on the United States and revised the outlook on the long-term rating from negative to stable in June of 2013, U.S. debt ceiling and budget deficit concerns together with signs of deteriorating sovereign debt conditions in Europe continue to present the possibility of a credit-rating downgrade, economic slowdowns, or a recession for the United States. The impact of any further downgrades to the U.S. government’s sovereign credit rating or downgraded sovereign credit ratings of European countries or the Russian Federation, or their perceived creditworthiness could adversely affect the U.S. and global financial markets and economic conditions. These developments, along with any further European sovereign debt issues, could cause interest rates and borrowing costs to rise, which may negatively impact our ability to access the debt markets on favorable terms. Continued adverse economic conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In October 2014, the Federal Reserve announced that it was concluding its bond-buying program, or quantitative easing, which was designed to stimulate the economy and expand the Federal Reserve's holdings of long-term securities, suggesting that key economic indicators, such as the unemployment rate, had showed signs of improvement since the inception of the program. In June 2017, the Federal Reserve raised the target range for the federal funds rate, which was the fourth such interest rate hike in nearly a decade. To the extent the Federal Reserve continues to raise rates, and without quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve, there is a risk that the debt markets may experience increased volatility and that the liquidity of certain of our investments may be reduced. These developments, along with the corresponding potential rise in interest rates and borrowing costs, the United States government's credit and deficit concerns and the European sovereign debt crisis, may negatively impact our ability to access the debt markets on favorable terms.
The Trump administration has called for significant changes to U.S. trade, healthcare, immigration, foreign, and government regulatory policy. In this regard, there is significant uncertainty with respect to legislation, regulation and government policy at the federal level, as well as the state and local levels. Recent events have created a climate of heightened uncertainty and introduced new and difficult-to-quantify macroeconomic and political risks with potentially far-reaching implications. There has been a corresponding meaningful increase in the uncertainty surrounding interest rates, inflation, foreign exchange rates, trade volumes and fiscal and monetary policy. To the extent the U.S. Congress or Trump administration implements changes to U.S. policy, those changes may impact, among other things, the U.S. and global economy, international trade and relations, unemployment, immigration, corporate taxes, healthcare, the U.S. regulatory environment, inflation and other areas. Some particular areas identified as subject to potential change, amendment or repeal include the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), including the Volcker Rule and various swaps and derivatives regulations, credit risk retention requirements and the authorities of the Federal Reserve, the Financial Stability Oversight Council and the SEC. Although we cannot predict the impact, if any, of these changes to our business, they could adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows. Until we know what policy changes are made and how those changes impact our business and the business of our competitors over the long term, we will not know if, overall, we will benefit from them or be negatively affected by them. The Federal Reserve raised the Federal Funds Rate three times in 2017 and two times thus far in 2018, and it may continue to raise the Federal Funds Rate in the future. General interest rate fluctuations may have a substantial negative impact on our investments, the value of our common stock and our rate of return on invested capital. A reduction in the interest rates on new investments relative to interest rates on current investments could also have an adverse impact on our net investment income. An increase in interest rates could decrease the value of any investments we hold which earn fixed interest rates, including subordinated loans, senior and junior secured and unsecured debt securities and loans and high-yield bonds, and also could increase our interest expense, thereby decreasing our net investment income. Also, an increase in interest rates available to investors could make investment in our common stock less attractive if we are not able to increase our distributions rate, which could reduce the value of our common stock.
On February 3, 2017, President Trump signed Executive Order 13772 announcing the administration’s policy to regulate the U.S. financial system in a manner consistent with certain “Core Principles,” including regulation that is efficient, effective and appropriately tailored. The Executive Order directed the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the heads of the member agencies of the Financial Stability Oversight Council, to report to the President on the extent to which existing laws, regulations and other government policies promote the Core Principles and to identify any laws, regulations or other government policies that inhibit federal regulation of the U.S. financial system. On June 12, 2017, the U.S. Department of the Treasury published the first of several reports in response to the Executive Order on the depository system covering banks and other savings institutions. On October 6, 2017, the Treasury released a second report outlining ways to streamline and reform the U.S. regulatory system for capital markets, followed by a third report, on October 26, 2017, examining the current regulatory framework for the asset management and insurance industries. Subsequent reports are expected to address: retail and

S-16


institutional investment products and vehicles; as well as non-bank financial institutions, financial technology, and financial innovation.
On June 8, 2017, the U. S. House of Representatives passed the Financial Choice Act, which includes legislation intended to repeal or replace substantial portions of the Dodd-Frank Act. Among other things, the proposed law would repeal the Volcker Rule limiting certain proprietary investment and trading activities by banks, eliminate the authority of regulators to designate asset managers and other large non-bank institutions as "systemically important financial institutions" or "SIFIs," and repeal the Department of Labor ("DOL") "fiduciary rule" governing standards for dealing with retirement plans until the SEC issues standards for similar dealings by broker-dealers and limiting the substance of any subsequent DOL rule to the SEC standards. The bill was referred to the Senate, where it is unlikely to pass as proposed. On November 16, 2017, a bipartisan group of U.S. Senators, led by Senate Banking Committee Chairman, introduced the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (the "Senate Regulatory Relief Bill"). The Senate Regulatory Relief Bill would revise various post-crisis regulatory requirements and provide targeted regulatory relief to certain financial institutions. Among the most significant of its proposed amendments to the Dodd-Frank Act are a substantial increase in the $50 billion asset threshold for automatic regulation of bank holding companies as SIFIs, an exemption from the Volcker Rule for insured depository institutions with less than $10 billion in consolidated assets and lower levels of trading assets and liabilities, as well as amendments to the liquidity leverage ratio and supplementary leverage ratio requirements. On December 5, 2017, the Senate Banking Committee approved the Senate Regulatory Relief Bill. If the legislation is adopted in the Senate, it remains unclear whether and how it would be reconciled with its House-passed counterpart, the Financial Choice Act, which is substantially different in scope and substance, and ultimately approved by both chambers of Congress. At this time it is not possible to determine whether any such particular proposal will become law or its potential impact on us.
Legislative or other actions relating to taxes could have a negative effect on us.
The rules dealing with U.S. federal income taxation are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department. In 2017, the Trump administration enacted substantial changes to U.S. fiscal and tax policies, which include comprehensive corporate and individual tax reform. On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which significantly changed the Code, including by, among other changes, instituting a reduction in the corporate income tax rate, changing the tax rates applicable to non-corporate taxpayers, creating a new limitation on the deductibility of interest expense and other deductions, and making significant changes to the taxation of income earned from foreign sources and foreign subsidiaries. The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act also authorizes the IRS to issue regulations with respect to the new provisions. We cannot predict how the changes in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or regulations or other guidance issued under it, might affect us, our business, the business of our portfolio companies, or an investment in our securities. In addition, other legislation, U.S. Treasury regulations, administrative interpretations or court decisions, with or without retroactive application, could affect the U.S. federal income tax consequences to our investors and us or could have other adverse consequences. You are urged to consult with your tax advisor with respect to the status of legislative, regulatory or administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our securities.
Volatility in the global financial markets resulting from relapse of the Eurozone crisis, geopolitical developments in Eastern Europe, turbulence in the Chinese stock markets and global commodity markets, the United Kingdom’s vote to leave the European Union or otherwise could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Volatility in the global financial markets could have an adverse effect on the economic recovery in the United States and could result from a number of causes, including a relapse in the Eurozone crisis, geopolitical developments in Eastern Europe, turbulence in the Chinese stock markets and global commodity markets or otherwise. In 2010, a financial crisis emerged in Europe, triggered by high budget deficits and rising direct and contingent sovereign debt in Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain, which created concerns about the ability of these nations to continue to service their sovereign debt obligations. While the financial stability of many of such countries has improved significantly, risks resulting from any future debt crisis in Europe or any similar crisis could have a detrimental impact on the global economic recovery, sovereign and non-sovereign debt in these countries and the financial condition of European financial institutions. Market and economic disruptions have affected, and may in the future affect, consumer confidence levels and spending, personal bankruptcy rates, levels of incurrence and default on consumer debt and home prices, among other factors. We cannot assure you that market disruptions in Europe, including the increased cost of funding for certain governments and financial institutions, will not impact the global economy, and we cannot assure you that assistance packages will be available, or if available, be sufficient to stabilize countries and markets in Europe or elsewhere affected by a financial crisis. To the extent uncertainty regarding any economic recovery in Europe negatively impacts consumer confidence and consumer credit factors, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be significantly and adversely affected.

S-17


In the second quarter of 2015, stock prices in China experienced a significant drop, resulting primarily from continued sell-off of shares trading in Chinese markets. In addition, in August 2015, Chinese authorities sharply devalued China's currency. Since then, the Chinese capital markets have continued to experience periods of instability. These market and economic disruptions have affected, and may in the future affect, the financial markets, including the U.S. capital markets, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
As a consequence of the United Kingdom’s vote to withdraw from the European Union (the “EU”), the government of the United Kingdom gave notice of its withdrawal from the EU (“Brexit”). As a result of this decision, the financial markets experienced high levels of volatility and it is likely that, in the near term, Brexit will continue to bring about higher levels of uncertainty and volatility. During this period of uncertainty, the negative impact on not only the United Kingdom and European economies, but the broader global economy, could be significant, potentially resulting in increased market and currency volatility (including volatility of the value of the British pound sterling relative to the United States dollar and other currencies and volatility in global currency markets generally), and illiquidity and lower economic growth for companies that rely significantly on Europe for their business activities and revenues. It is possible that certain economic activity will be curtailed until some signs of clarity begin to emerge, including negotiations around the terms for United Kingdom’s exit out of the EU. Additional risks associated with the outcome of Brexit include macroeconomic risk to the United Kingdom and European economies, impetus for further disintegration of the EU and related political stresses (including those related to sentiment against cross border capital movements and activities of investors like us), prejudice to financial services business that are conducting business in the EU and which are based in the United Kingdom, legal uncertainty regarding achievement of compliance with applicable financial and commercial laws and regulations in view of the expected steps to be taken pursuant to or in contemplation of Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union and negotiations undertaken under Article 218 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and the unavailability of timely information as to expected legal, tax and other regimes. Any further exits from the EU, or the possibility of such exits, would likely cause additional market disruption globally and introduce new legal and regulatory uncertainties. We will continue to monitor the potential impact of Brexit on its results of operations and financial condition.
The occurrence of events similar to those in recent years, such as the aftermath of the war in Iraq, instability in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Russia, Ukraine and the Middle East, ongoing epidemics of infectious diseases in certain parts of the world, terrorist attacks in the U.S. and around the world, social and political discord, debt crises (such as the Greek crisis), sovereign debt downgrades, continued tensions between North Korea and the United States and the international community generally, new and continued political unrest in various countries, such as Venezuela, the exit or potential exit of one or more countries from the EU or the Economic and Monetary Union, the change in the U.S. president and the new administration, among others, may result in market volatility, may have long term effects on the U.S. and worldwide financial markets, and may cause further economic uncertainties in the U.S. and worldwide.
The occurrence of any of these above event(s) could have a significant adverse impact on the value and risk profile of our portfolio. We do not know how long the securities markets may be affected by similar events and cannot predict the effects of similar events in the future on the U.S. economy and securities markets. Non-investment grade and equity securities tend to be more volatile than investment-grade fixed income securities; therefore, these events and other market disruptions may have a greater impact on the prices and volatility of non-investment grade and equity securities than on investment-grade fixed income securities. There can be no assurances that similar events and other market disruptions will not have other material and adverse implications.
Our most recent NAV was calculated on June 30, 2018 and our NAV when calculated effective September 30, 2018 and thereafter may be higher or lower.
Our NAV per share is $9.35 as of June 30, 2018. NAV per share as of September 30, 2018 may be higher or lower than $9.35 based on potential changes in valuations, issuances of securities, repurchases of securities, dividends paid and earnings for the quarter then ended. Our Board of Directors has not yet determined the fair value of portfolio investments at any date subsequent to June 30, 2018. Our Board of Directors determines the fair value of our portfolio investments on a quarterly basis in connection with the preparation of quarterly financial statements and based on input from independent valuation firms, the Investment Adviser, the Administrator and the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors.
We may be obligated to pay our Investment Adviser incentive compensation even if we incur a loss.
The Investment Adviser is entitled to incentive compensation for each fiscal quarter based, in part, on our pre-incentive fee net investment income if any, for the immediately preceding calendar quarter above a performance threshold for that quarter. Accordingly, since the performance threshold is based on a percentage of our net asset value, decreases in our net asset value make it easier to achieve the performance threshold. Our pre-incentive fee net investment income for incentive

S-18


compensation purposes excludes realized and unrealized capital losses or depreciation that we may incur in the fiscal quarter, even if such capital losses or depreciation result in a net loss on our statement of operations for that quarter. Thus, we may be required to pay the Investment Adviser incentive compensation for a fiscal quarter even if there is a decline in the value of our portfolio or we incur a net loss for that quarter. In addition, increases in interest rates may increase the amount of incentive fees we pay to our Investment Adviser even though our performance relative to the market has not increased.
The application of the risk retention rules under Section 941 of the Dodd-Frank Act to CLOs may have broader effects on the CLO and loan markets in general, potentially resulting in fewer or less desirable investment opportunities for us..
Section 941 of the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”) added a provision to the Exchange Act, requiring the seller, sponsor or securitizer of a securitization vehicle to retain no less than five percent of the credit risk in assets it sells into a securitization and prohibiting such securitizer from directly or indirectly hedging or otherwise transferring the retained credit risk. The responsible federal agencies adopted final rules implementing these restrictions on October 22, 2014. The risk retention rules became effective with respect to CLOs two years after publication in the Federal Register. Under the final rules, the asset manager of a CLO is considered the sponsor of a securitization vehicle and is required to retain five percent of the credit risk in the CLO, which may be retained horizontally in the equity tranche of the CLO or vertically as a five percent interest in each tranche of the securities issued by the CLO. Although the final rules contain an exemption from such requirements for the asset manager of a CLO if, among other things, the originator or lead arranger of all of the loans acquired by the CLO retain such risk at the asset level and, at origination of such asset, takes a loan tranche of at least 20% of the aggregate principal balance, it is possible that the originators and lead arrangers of loans in this market will not agree to assume this risk or provide such retention at origination of the asset in a manner that would provide meaningful relief from the risk retention requirements for CLO managers.
We believe that the U.S. risk retention requirements imposed for CLO managers under Section 941 of the Dodd-Frank Act has created some uncertainty in the market in regard to future CLO issuance. Given that certain CLO managers may require capital provider partners to satisfy this requirement, we believe that this may create additional risks for us in the future.
On February 9, 2018, a panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled (the “D.C. Circuit Ruling”) that the federal agencies exceeded their authority under the Dodd-Frank Act in adopting the final rules as applied to asset managers of open-market CLOs. On April 5, 2018, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia entered an order implementing the D.C. Circuit Ruling and thereby vacated the U.S. Risk Retention Rules insofar as they apply to CLO managers of “open market CLOs”.
As of the date of hereof, there has been no petition for writ of certiorari filed requesting the case to be heard by the United States Supreme Court. Since there hasn’t been a successful challenge to the D.C. Circuit Ruling and the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has issued the above described order implementing the D.C. Circuit Ruling, collateral managers of open market CLOs are no longer required to comply with the U.S. Risk Retention Rules at this time. As such, it is possible that some collateral managers of open market CLOs will decide to dispose of the notes constituting the “eligible vertical interest” or “eligible horizontal interest” they were previously required to retain, or decide to take other action with respect to such notes that is not otherwise permitted by the U.S. risk retention rules. As a result of this decision, certain CLO managers of “open market CLOs” will no longer be required to comply with the U.S. risk retention rules solely because of their roles as managers of “open market CLOs”, and there may be no “sponsor” of such securitization transactions and no party may be required to acquire and retain an economic interest in the credit risk of the securitized assets of such transactions.
There can be no assurance or representation that any of the transactions, structures or arrangements currently under consideration by or currently used by CLO market participants will comply with the U.S. risk retention rules to the extent such rules are reinstated or otherwise become applicable to open market CLOs. The ultimate impact of the U.S. risk retention rules on the loan securitization market and the leveraged loan market generally remains uncertain, and any negative impact on secondary market liquidity for securities comprising a CLO may be experienced due to the effects of the U.S. risk retention rules on market expectations or uncertainty, the relative appeal of other investments not impacted by the U.S. risk retention rules and other factors.

S-19


To the extent original issue discount (“OID”) and payment in kind (“PIK”) interest constitute a portion of our income, we will be exposed to typical risks associated with such income being required to be included in taxable and accounting income prior to receipt of cash representing such income.
Our investments may include OID instruments and PIK interest arrangements, which represents contractual interest added to a loan balance and due at the end of such loan’s term. To the extent OID or PIK interest constitute a portion of our income, we are exposed to typical risks associated with such income being required to be included in taxable and accounting income prior to receipt of cash, including the following:
The higher interest rates of OID and PIK instruments reflect the payment deferral and increased credit risk associated with these instruments, and OID and PIK instruments generally represent a significantly higher credit risk than coupon loans.
Even if the accounting conditions for income accrual are met, the borrower could still default when our actual collection is supposed to occur at the maturity of the obligation.
OID and PIK instruments may have unreliable valuations because their continuing accruals require continuing judgments about the collectibility of the deferred payments and the value of any associated collateral. OID and PIK income may also create uncertainty about the source of our cash distributions.

For accounting purposes, any cash distributions to shareholders representing OID and PIK income are not treated as coming from paid-in capital, even if the cash to pay them comes from offering proceeds. As a result, despite the fact that a distribution representing OID and PIK income could be paid out of amounts invested by our stockholders, the 1940 Act does not require that stockholders be given notice of this fact by reporting it as a return of capital.
Capitalizing PIK interest to loan principal increases our gross assets, thus increasing our Investment Adviser’s future base management fees, and increases future investment income, thus increasing our Investment Adviser’s future income incentive fees at a compounding rate.
Market prices of zero-coupon or PIK securities may be affected to a greater extent by interest rate changes and may be more volatile than securities that pay interest periodically and in cash.
For accounting purposes, any cash distributions to stockholders representing OID and PIK income are not designated as paid-in capital, even if the cash to pay them derives from offering proceeds. As a result, despite the fact that a distribution representing OID and PIK income could be paid out of amounts invested by our stockholders, the 1940 Act does not require that stockholders be given notice of this fact by reporting it as a return of capital.
Senior securities, including debt, expose us to additional risks, including the typical risks associated with leverage and could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We currently use our revolving credit facility to leverage our portfolio and we expect in the future to borrow from and issue senior debt securities to banks and other lenders and may securitize certain of our portfolio investments. We also have the Unsecured Notes outstanding, which are a form of leverage and are senior in payment rights to our common stock.
With certain limited exceptions, as a BDC, we are only allowed to borrow amounts or otherwise issue senior securities such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least 200% after such borrowing or other issuance. The amount of leverage that we employ will depend on the Investment Adviser’s and our Board of Directors’ assessment of market conditions and other factors at the time of any proposed borrowing. There is no assurance that a leveraging strategy will be successful. Leverage involves risks and special considerations for stockholders, any of which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, including the following:
A likelihood of greater volatility in the net asset value and market price of our common stock;
Diminished operating flexibility as a result of asset coverage or investment portfolio composition requirements required by lenders or investors that are more stringent than those imposed by the 1940 Act;
The possibility that investments will have to be liquidated at less than full value or at inopportune times to comply with debt covenants or to pay interest or dividends on the leverage;
Increased operating expenses due to the cost of leverage, including issuance and servicing costs;
Convertible or exchangeable securities, such as the Convertible Notes outstanding or those issued in the future may have rights, preferences and privileges more favorable than those of our common stock;

S-20


Subordination to lenders’ superior claims on our assets as a result of which lenders will be able to receive proceeds available in the case of our liquidation before any proceeds will be distributed to our stockholders;
Difficulty meeting our payment and other obligations under the Unsecured Notes and our other outstanding debt;
The occurrence of an event of default if we fail to comply with the financial and/or other restrictive covenants contained in our debt agreements, including the credit agreement and each indenture governing the Unsecured Notes, which event of default could result in all or some of our debt becoming immediately due and payable;
Reduced availability of our cash flow to fund investments, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes, and limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for these purposes;
The risk of increased sensitivity to interest rate increases on our indebtedness with variable interest rates, including borrowings under our amended senior credit facility; and
Reduced flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, and increasing our vulnerability to, changes in our business, the industry in which we operate and the general economy.

For example, the amount we may borrow under our revolving credit facility is determined, in part, by the fair value of our investments. If the fair value of our investments declines, we may be forced to sell investments at a loss to maintain compliance with our borrowing limits. Other debt facilities we may enter into in the future may contain similar provisions. Any such forced sales would reduce our net asset value and also make it difficult for the net asset value to recover. The Investment Adviser and our Board of Directors in their best judgment nevertheless may determine to use leverage if they expect that the benefits to our stockholders of maintaining the leveraged position will outweigh the risks.
In addition, our ability to meet our payment and other obligations of the Unsecured Notes and our credit facility depends on our ability to generate significant cash flow in the future. This, to some extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative and regulatory factors as well as other factors that are beyond our control. We cannot provide assurance that our business will generate cash flow from operations, or that future borrowings will be available to us under our existing credit facility or otherwise, in an amount sufficient to enable us to meet our payment obligations under the Unsecured Notes and our other debt and to fund other liquidity needs. If we are not able to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt obligations, we may need to refinance or restructure our debt, including the Unsecured Notes, sell assets, reduce or delay capital investments, or seek to raise additional capital. If we are unable to implement one or more of these alternatives, we may not be able to meet our payment obligations under the Unsecured Notes and our other debt.

Illustration.    The following table illustrates the effect of leverage on returns from an investment in our common stock assuming various annual returns, net of interest expense. The calculations in the table below are hypothetical and actual returns may be higher or lower than those appearing below. The calculation assumes (i) $5.8 billion in total assets, (ii) an average cost of funds of 5.30%, (iii) $2.3 billion in debt outstanding and (iv) $3.5 billion of shareholders’ equity.
Assumed Return on Our Portfolio (net of expenses)
 
(10.0
)%
 
(5.0
)%
 
 %
 
5.0
%
 
10.0
%
Corresponding Return to Stockholder
 
(20.1
)%
 
(11.8
)%
 
(3.5
)%
 
4.8
%
 
13.1
%

The assumed portfolio return is required by regulation of the SEC and is not a prediction of, and does not represent, our projected or actual performance. Actual returns may be greater or less than those appearing in the table. Pursuant to SEC regulations, this table is calculated as of June 30, 2018. As a result, it has not been updated to take into account any changes in assets or leverage since June 30, 2018.
On March 23, 2018, the Small Business Credit Availability Act was signed into law, which included various changes to regulations under the federal securities laws that impact BDCs, including changes to the 1940 Act to allow BDCs to decrease their asset coverage requirement to 150% from 200% under certain circumstances. While certain other BDCs have elected to allow for the increase in leverage, after consideration of the expected negative impact on us, including a rating downgrade by S&P, our Board of Directors has not currently elected to approve the application of the modified asset coverage requirements for the Company.
In addition to regulatory restrictions that restrict our ability to raise capital, our credit facility contains various covenants which, if not complied with, could accelerate repayment under the facility, thereby materially and adversely affecting our liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

S-21


The agreement governing our credit facility requires us to comply with certain financial and operational covenants. These covenants include:
Restrictions on the level of indebtedness that we are permitted to incur in relation to the value of our assets;
Restrictions on our ability to incur liens; and
Maintenance of a minimum level of stockholders’ equity.

As of June 30, 2018, we were in compliance with these covenants. However, our continued compliance with these covenants depends on many factors, some of which are beyond our control. Accordingly, there are no assurances that we will continue to comply with the covenants in our credit facility. Failure to comply with these covenants would result in a default under this facility which, if we were unable to obtain a waiver from the lenders thereunder, could result in an acceleration of repayments under the facility and thereby have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Failure to extend our existing credit facility, the revolving period of which is currently scheduled to expire on March 27, 2022, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position and our ability to pay expenses and make distributions.
The revolving period for our credit facility with a syndicate of lenders is currently scheduled to terminate on March 27, 2022, with an additional two year amortization period (with distributions allowed) after the completion of the revolving period. During such two year amortization period, all principal payments on the pledged assets will be applied to reduce the balance. At the end of the two year amortization period, the remaining balance will become due, if required by the lenders. If the credit facility is not renewed or extended by the participant banks by March 27, 2022, we will not be able to make further borrowings under the facility after such date and the outstanding principal balance on that date will be due and payable on March 27, 2024. As of June 30, 2018, we had $37.0 million of outstanding borrowings under our credit facility. Interest on borrowings under the credit facility is one-month LIBOR plus 220 basis points with a minimum LIBOR floor of zero. Additionally, the lenders charge a fee on the unused portion of the credit facility equal to either 50 basis points if more than 60% of the credit facility is drawn, or 100 basis points if more than 35% and an amount less than or equal to 60% of the credit facility is drawn, or 150 basis points if an amount less than or equal to 35% of the credit facility is drawn.
The credit facility requires us to pledge assets as collateral in order to borrow under the credit facility. If we are unable to extend our facility or find a new source of borrowing on acceptable terms, we will be required to pay down the amounts outstanding under the facility during the two-year term-out period through one or more of the following: (1) principal collections on our securities pledged under the facility, (2) at our option, interest collections on our securities pledged under the facility and cash collections on our securities not pledged under the facility, or (3) possible liquidation of some or all of our loans and other assets, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position and may force us to decrease or stop paying certain expenses and making distributions until the facility is repaid. In addition, our stock price could decline significantly, we would be restricted in our ability to acquire new investments and, in connection with our year-end audit, and our independent registered accounting firm could raise an issue as to our ability to continue as a going concern.
Failure to refinance our existing Unsecured Notes could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position.
The Unsecured Notes mature at various dates from January 15, 2020 to October 15, 2043. If we are unable to refinance the Unsecured Notes or find a new source of borrowing on acceptable terms, we will be required to pay down the amounts outstanding at maturity under the facility during the two-year term-out period through one or more of the following: (1) borrowing additional funds under our then current credit facility, (2) issuance of additional common stock or (3) possible liquidation of some or all of our loans and other assets, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position. In addition, our stock price could decline significantly; we would be restricted in our ability to acquire new investments and, in connection with our year-end audit, our independent registered accounting firm could raise an issue as to our ability to continue as a going concern.

S-22


Our shares of common stock currently trade at a discount from net asset value and may continue to do so in the future, which could limit our ability to raise additional equity capital.
Shares of closed-end investment companies frequently trade at a market price that is less than the net asset value that is attributable to those shares. This characteristic of closed-end investment companies is separate and distinct from the risk that our net asset value per share may decline. It is not possible to predict whether any shares of our common stock will trade at, above, or below net asset value. The stocks of BDCs as an industry, including shares of our common stock, currently trade below net asset value as a result of concerns over liquidity, interest rate changes, leverage restrictions and distribution requirements. When our common stock is trading below its net asset value per share, we will not be able to issue additional shares of our common stock at its market price without first obtaining approval for such issuance from our stockholders and our independent directors. Similar to our 2017 annual meeting, we do not intend to seek stockholder approval at our 2018 annual meeting to be able to sell shares of common stock at any level of discount from net asset value per share, subject to the condition that the maximum number of shares salable below net asset value pursuant to this authority in any particular offering that could result in such dilution is limited to 25% of our then outstanding common stock immediately prior to each such offering, but may seek stockholder approval to do so in the future.
Our stockholders may experience dilution in their ownership percentage if they opt out of our dividend reinvestment plan.
All dividends declared in cash payable to stockholders that are participants in our dividend reinvestment plan are automatically reinvested in shares of our common stock. As a result, our stockholders that opt out of our dividend reinvestment plan will experience dilution in their ownership percentage of our common stock over time. Stockholders who do not elect to receive distributions in shares of common stock may experience accretion to the net asset value of their shares if our shares are trading at a premium and dilution if our shares are trading at a discount. The level of accretion or discount would depend on various factors, including the proportion of our stockholders who participate in the plan, the level of premium or discount at which our shares are trading and the amount of the distribution payable to a stockholder.
If we sell shares of our common stock or securities to subscribe for or are convertible into shares of our common stock at a discount to our net asset value per share, stockholders who do not participate in such sale will experience immediate dilution in an amount that may be material.
Similar to our 2017 annual meeting, we do not intend to seek stockholder approval at our 2018 annual meeting to be able to sell shares of common stock at any level of discount from net asset value per share, subject to the condition that the maximum number of shares salable below net asset value pursuant to this authority in any particular offering that could result in such dilution is limited to 25% of our then outstanding common stock immediately prior to each such offering, but may seek stockholder approval to do so in the future. The issuance or sale by us of shares of our common stock or securities to subscribe for or are convertible into shares of our common stock at a discount to net asset value poses a risk of dilution to our stockholders. In particular, stockholders who do not purchase additional shares of common stock at or below the discounted price in proportion to their current ownership will experience an immediate decrease in net asset value per share (as well as in the aggregate net asset value of their shares of common stock if they do not participate at all). These stockholders will also experience a disproportionately greater decrease in their participation in our earnings and assets and their voting power than the increase we experience in our assets, potential earning power and voting interests from such issuance or sale. In addition, such sales may adversely affect the price at which our common stock trades. We have sold shares of our common stock at prices below net asset value per share in the past and may do so to the future. We have not sold any shares of our common stock at prices below net asset value per share since December 3, 2014.


S-23


MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
(All figures in this item are in thousands except share, per share and other data.)
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this prospectus supplement and accompanying prospectus. Historical results set forth are not necessarily indicative of our future financial position and results of operations.
Overview
The terms “Prospect,” “we,” “us” and “our” mean Prospect Capital Corporation and its subsidiaries unless the context specifically requires otherwise.

Prospect is a financial services company that primarily lends to and invests in middle market privately-held companies. We are a closed-end investment company incorporated in Maryland. We have elected to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”). As a BDC, we have elected to be treated as a regulated investment company (“RIC”), under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”). We were organized on April 13, 2004 and were funded in an initial public offering completed on July 27, 2004.

On May 15, 2007, we formed a wholly-owned subsidiary Prospect Capital Funding LLC (“PCF”), a Delaware limited liability company and a bankruptcy remote special purpose entity, which holds certain of our portfolio loan investments that are used as collateral for the revolving credit facility at PCF. Our wholly-owned subsidiary Prospect Small Business Lending, LLC (“PSBL”) was formed on January 27, 2014 and purchases small business whole loans on a recurring basis from online small business loan originators, including On Deck Capital, Inc. (“OnDeck”). On September 30, 2014, we formed a wholly-owned subsidiary Prospect Yield Corporation, LLC (“PYC”) and effective October 23, 2014, PYC holds our investments in collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”). Each of these subsidiaries have been consolidated since operations commenced.
We consolidate certain of our wholly-owned and substantially wholly-owned holding companies formed by us in order to facilitate our investment strategy. The following companies are included in our consolidated financial statements and are collectively referred to as the “Consolidated Holdings Companies”: APH Property Holdings, LLC (“APH”); Arctic Oilfield Equipment USA, Inc. (“Arctic Equipment”); CCPI Holdings Inc.; CP Holdings of Delaware LLC (“CP Holdings”); Credit Central Holdings of Delaware, LLC; Energy Solutions Holdings Inc.; First Tower Holdings of Delaware LLC (“First Tower Delaware”); Harbortouch Holdings of Delaware Inc.; MITY Holdings of Delaware Inc.; Nationwide Acceptance Holdings LLC; NMMB Holdings, Inc. (“NMMB Holdings, Inc.”); NPH Property Holdings, LLC (“NPH”); STI Holding, Inc.; UPH Property Holdings, LLC (“UPH”); Valley Electric Holdings I, Inc.; Valley Electric Holdings II, Inc.; and Wolf Energy Holdings Inc. (“Wolf Energy Holdings”). On October 10, 2014, concurrent with the sale of the operating company, our ownership increased to 100% of the outstanding equity of ARRM Services, Inc. (“ARRM”), which was renamed SB Forging Company, Inc. (“SB Forging”). As such, we began consolidating SB Forging on October 11, 2014. Effective May 23, 2016, in connection with the merger of American Property REIT Corp. (“APRC”) and United Property REIT Corp. (“UPRC”) with and into National Property REIT Corp. (“NPRC”), APH and UPH merged with and into NPH, and were dissolved. Effective April 6, 2018, Arctic Equipment merged with and into CP Energy Services, Inc. (“CP Energy”), a substantially wholly-owned subsidiary of CP Holdings, with CP Energy continuing as the surviving entity.
We are externally managed by our investment adviser, Prospect Capital Management L.P. (“Prospect Capital Management” or the “Investment Adviser”). Prospect Administration LLC (“Prospect Administration”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Investment Adviser, provides administrative services and facilities necessary for us to operate.
Our investment objective is to generate both current income and long-term capital appreciation through debt and equity investments. We invest primarily in senior and subordinated debt and equity of private companies in need of capital for acquisitions, divestitures, growth, development, recapitalizations and other purposes. We work with the management teams or financial sponsors to seek investments with historical cash flows, asset collateral or contracted pro-forma cash flows.
We currently have nine strategies that guide our origination of investment opportunities: (1) lending to companies controlled by private equity sponsors, (2) lending to companies not controlled by private equity sponsors, (3) purchasing controlling equity positions and lending to operating companies, (4) purchasing controlling equity positions and lending to financial services companies, (5) purchasing controlling equity positions and lending to real estate companies, (6) purchasing controlling equity positions and lending to aircraft leasing companies, (7) investing in structured credit, (8) investing in syndicated debt and (9) investing in consumer and small business loans and asset-backed securitizations. We may also invest in other strategies and opportunities from time to time that we view as attractive. We continue to evaluate other origination strategies in the ordinary course of business with no specific top-down allocation to any single origination strategy.
Lending to Companies Controlled by Private Equity Sponsors - We make agented loans to companies which are controlled by private equity sponsors. This debt can take the form of first lien, second lien, unitranche or unsecured loans. These loans typically have equity subordinate to our loan position. Historically, this strategy has comprised approximately 40%-60% of our portfolio.
Lending to Companies not Controlled by Private Equity Sponsors - We make loans to companies which are not controlled by private equity sponsors, such as companies that are controlled by the management team, the founder, a family or public shareholders. This origination strategy may have less competition to provide debt financing than the private-equity-sponsor origination strategy because such company financing needs are not easily addressed by banks and often require more diligence preparation. This origination strategy can result in investments with higher returns or lower leverage than the private-equity-sponsor origination strategy. Historically, this strategy has comprised up to approximately 15% of our portfolio.
Purchasing Controlling Equity Positions and Lending to Operating Companies - This strategy involves purchasing yield-producing debt and controlling equity positions in non-financial-services operating companies. We believe that we can provide enhanced certainty of closure and liquidity to sellers and we look for management to continue on in their current roles. This strategy has comprised approximately 5%-15% of our portfolio.
Purchasing Controlling Equity Positions and Lending to Financial Services Companies - This strategy involves purchasing yield-producing debt and control equity investments in financial services companies, including consumer direct lending, sub-prime auto lending and other strategies. These investments are often structured in tax-efficient partnerships, enhancing returns. This strategy has comprised approximately 5%-15% of our portfolio.
Purchasing Controlling Equity Positions and Lending to Real Estate Companies - We purchase debt and controlling equity positions in tax-efficient real estate investment trusts (“REIT” or “REITs”). NPRC’s, an operating company and the surviving entity of the May 23, 2016 merger with APRC and UPRC, real estate investments are in various classes of developed and occupied real estate properties that generate current yields, including multi-family properties, student housing, and self-storage. NPRC seeks to identify properties that have historically significant occupancy rates and recurring cash flow generation. NPRC generally co-invests with established and experienced property management teams that manage such properties after acquisition. Additionally, NPRC purchases loans originated by certain consumer loan facilitators. It purchases each loan in its entirety (i.e., a “whole loan”). The borrowers are consumers, and the loans are typically serviced by the facilitators of the loans. This investment strategy has comprised approximately 10%-20% of our business.
Purchasing Controlling Equity Positions and Lending to Aircraft Leasing Companies - We invest in debt as well as equity in companies with aircraft assets subject to commercial leases to airlines across the globe. We believe that these investments can present attractive return opportunities due to cash flow consistency from long-term leases coupled with hard asset residual value. We believe that these investment companies seek to deliver risk-adjusted returns with strong downside protection by analyzing relative value characteristics across a variety of aircraft types and vintages. This strategy historically has comprised less than 5% of our portfolio.
Investing in Structured Credit - We make investments in CLOs, often taking a significant position in the subordinated interests (equity) and debt of the CLOs. The underlying portfolio of each CLO investment is diversified across approximately 100 to 200 broadly syndicated loans and does not have direct exposure to real estate, mortgages, or consumer-based credit assets. The CLOs in which we invest are managed by established collateral management teams with many years of experience in the industry. This strategy has comprised approximately 10%-20% of our portfolio.
Investing in Syndicated Debt - On a primary or secondary basis, we purchase primarily senior and secured loans and high yield bonds that have been sold to a club or syndicate of buyers. These investments are often purchased with a long term, buy-and-hold outlook, and we often look to provide significant input to the transaction by providing anchoring orders. This strategy has comprised approximately 5%-10% of our portfolio.
Investing in Consumer and Small Business Loans and Asset-Backed Securitizations - We purchase loans originated by certain consumer and small-and-medium-sized business (“SME”) loan facilitators. We generally purchase each loan in its entirety (i.e., a “whole loan”) and we invest in asset-backed securitizations collateralized by consumer or small business loans. The borrowers are consumers and SMEs and the loans are typically serviced by the facilitators of the loans. This investment strategy has comprised up to approximately 1% of our portfolio.

S-24


We invest primarily in first and second lien secured loans and unsecured debt, which in some cases includes an equity component. First and second lien secured loans generally are senior debt instruments that rank ahead of unsecured debt of a given portfolio company. These loans also have the benefit of security interests on the assets of the portfolio company, which may rank ahead of or be junior to other security interests. Our investments in CLOs are subordinated to senior loans and are generally unsecured. We invest in debt and equity positions of CLOs which are a form of securitization in which the cash flows of a portfolio of loans are pooled and passed on to different classes of owners in various tranches. Our CLO investments are derived from portfolios of corporate debt securities which are generally risk rated from BB to B.
We hold many of our control investments in a two-tier structure consisting of a holding company and one or more related operating companies for tax purposes. These holding companies serve various business purposes including concentration of management teams, optimization of third party borrowing costs, improvement of supplier, customer, and insurance terms, and enhancement of co-investments by the management teams. In these cases, our investment, which is generally equity in the holding company, the holding company’s equity investment in the operating company and any debt from us directly to the operating company structure represents our total exposure for the investment. As of June 30, 2018, as shown in our Consolidated Schedule of Investments, the cost basis and fair value of our investments in controlled companies was $2,300,526 and $2,404,326, respectively. This structure gives rise to several of the risks described in our public documents and highlighted elsewhere in this prospectus supplement and the accompanying prospectus. We consolidate all wholly-owned and substantially wholly-owned holding companies formed by us for the purpose of holding our controlled investments in operating companies. There is no significant effect of consolidating these holding companies as they hold minimal assets other than their investments in the controlled operating companies. Investment company accounting prohibits the consolidation of any operating companies.
Fourth Quarter Highlights
Investment Transactions
We seek to be a long-term investor with our portfolio companies. During the three months ended June 30, 2018, we acquired $241,150 of new investments, completed follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies totaling approximately $95,415, and recorded paid in kind (“PIK”) interest of $3,276, resulting in gross investment originations of $339,841. During the three months ended June 30, 2018, we received full repayments on five investments, partially sold two investments and received several partial prepayments and amortization payments totaling $362,287.
Debt Issuances and Redemptions
During the three months ended June 30, 2018, we issued $6,869 aggregate principal amount of Prospect Capital InterNotes® with a stated and weighted average interest rate of 4.98%, to extend our borrowing base. The newly issued notes mature between April 15, 2023 and May 15, 2026 and generated net proceeds of $6,763.
During the three months ended June 30, 2018, we repaid $2,016 aggregate principal amount of Prospect Capital InterNotes® at par in accordance with the Survivor’s Option, as defined in the InterNotes® Offering prospectus. As a result of these transactions, we recorded a loss in the amount of the unamortized debt issuance costs. The net loss on the extinguishment of Prospect Capital InterNotes® in the three months ended June 30, 2018 was $60.
On May 18, 2018, we issued an additional $103,500 aggregate principal amount of convertible notes that mature on July 15, 2022 (the “Additional 2022 Notes”, and together with the Original 2022 Notes, the “2022 Notes”), unless previously converted or repurchased in accordance with their terms. The Additional 2022 Notes were a further issuance of, and are fully fungible and rank equally in right of payment with, the Original 2022 Notes and bear interest at a rate of 4.95% per year, payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 each year, beginning July 15, 2018. Total proceeds from the issuance of the Additional 2022 Notes, net of underwriting discounts and offering costs, were $100,749. Following the issuance of the Additional 2022 notes, the outstanding aggregate principal amount of the 2022 Notes is now $328,500.
In May 2018, we repurchased $98,353 aggregate principal amount of the 2019 Notes at a price of 102.0, including commissions. As a result of these transactions, we recorded a loss in the amount of the difference between the reacquisition price and the net carrying amount of the 2019 Notes, net of the proportionate amount of unamortized debt issuance costs. The net loss on extinguishment of debt we recorded in the three months ending June 30, 2018 was $2,383.

S-25


On June 20, 2018, we issued an additional $70,000 aggregate principal amount of unsecured notes that mature on March 15, 2023 (the “Additional 2023 Notes”, and together with the Original 2023 Notes, the “2023 Notes”). The Additional 2023 Notes were a further issuance of, and are fully fungible and rank equally in right of payment with, the Original 2023 Notes and bear interest at a rate of 5.875% per year, payable semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 of each year, beginning September 15, 2018. Total proceeds from the issuance of the Additional 2023 Notes, net of underwriting discounts, were $69,403. Following the issuance of the Additional 2023 Notes, the outstanding aggregate principal amount of our 5.875% Senior Notes due 2023 is $320,000.
On June 7, 2018, we commenced a tender offer to purchase for cash any and all of the $300,000 aggregate principal amount outstanding of the 5.00% 2019 Notes. On June 20, 2018, $146,464 aggregate principal amount of the 5.00% 2019 Notes, representing 48.8% of the previously outstanding 5.00% 2019 Notes, were validly tendered and accepted. The transaction resulted in our recognizing a $3,705 loss during the three months ended June 30, 2018.
On June 7, 2018, we issued $55,000 aggregate principal amount of unsecured notes that mature on June 15, 2028 (the “2028 Notes”). The 2028 Notes bear interest at a rate of 6.25% per year, payable quarterly on March 15, June 15, September 15, and December 15 of each year, beginning September 15, 2018. Total proceeds from the issuance of the 2028 Notes, net of underwriting discounts and offering costs were $53,119.
Equity Issuances
On April 19, 2018, May 24, 2018, and June 21, 2018, we issued 608,202, 572,125, and 572,249 shares of our common stock in connection with the dividend reinvestment plan, respectively.
Investment Holdings
As of June 30, 2018, we continue to pursue our investment strategy. At June 30, 2018, approximately $5,727,279, or 168.1%, of our net assets are invested in 135 long-term portfolio investments and CLOs.
During the year ended June 30, 2018, we originated $1,730,657 of new investments, primarily composed of $1,457,615 of debt and equity financing to non-controlled portfolio investments, $218,695 of debt and equity financing to controlled investments, and $54,347 of subordinated notes in CLOs. Our origination efforts are focused primarily on secured lending to non-control investments to reduce the risk in the portfolio by investing primarily in first lien loans, though we also continue to close select junior debt and equity investments. Our annualized current yield was 13.0% and 12.2% as of June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017, respectively, across all performing interest bearing investments, excluding equity investments and non-accrual loans. Our annualized current yield was 10.5% and 10.4% as of June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017, respectively, across all investments. Monetization of equity positions that we hold and loans on non-accrual status are not included in this yield calculation. In many of our portfolio companies we hold equity positions, ranging from minority interests to majority stakes, which we expect over time to contribute to our investment returns. Some of these equity positions include features such as contractual minimum internal rates of returns, preferred distributions, flip structures and other features expected to generate additional investment returns, as well as contractual protections and preferences over junior equity, in addition to the yield and security offered by our cash flow and collateral debt protections.
We are a non-diversified company within the meaning of the 1940 Act. As required by the 1940 Act, we classify our investments by level of control. As defined in the 1940 Act, “Control Investments” are those where there is the ability or power to exercise a controlling influence over the management or policies of a company. Control is generally deemed to exist when a company or individual possesses or has the right to acquire within 60 days or less, a beneficial ownership of 25% or more of the voting securities of an investee company. Under the 1940 Act, “Affiliate Investments” are defined by a lesser degree of influence and are deemed to exist through the possession outright or via the right to acquire within 60 days or less, beneficial ownership of 5% or more of the outstanding voting securities of another person. “Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments” are those that are neither Control Investments nor Affiliate Investments.
As of June 30, 2018, we own controlling interests in the following portfolio companies: CCPI Inc. (“CCPI”); CP Energy Services Inc. (“CP Energy”); Credit Central Loan Company, LLC (“Credit Central”); Echelon Transportation, LLC (f/k/a Echelon Aviation, LLC, “Echelon”); First Tower Finance Company LLC (“First Tower Finance”); Freedom Marine Solutions, LLC (“Freedom Marine”); InterDent, Inc. (“InterDent”), MITY, Inc. (“MITY”); NPRC; Nationwide Loan Company LLC (f/k/a Nationwide Acceptance LLC) (“Nationwide”); NMMB, Inc. (“NMMB”); Pacific World Corporation (“Pacific World”); R-V Industries, Inc. (“R-V”); SB Forging Company II, Inc. (f/k/a Gulf Coast Machine & Supply Company) (“Gulfco”); USES Corp. (“USES”); Valley Electric Company, Inc. (“Valley Electric”); and Wolf Energy, LLC (“Wolf Energy”). We also own affiliated interests in Edmentum Ultimate Holdings, LLC (“Edmentum”); Nixon, Inc. (“Nixon”) and Targus International, LLC (“Targus”).



The following shows the composition of our investment portfolio by level of control as of June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017:
 
June 30, 2018
 
June 30, 2017
Level of Control
Cost
% of Portfolio
Fair Value
% of Portfolio
 
Cost
% of Portfolio
Fair Value
% of Portfolio
Control Investments
$
2,300,526

39.5
%
$
2,404,326

42.0
%
 
$
1,840,731

30.8
%
$
1,911,775

32.7
%
Affiliate Investments
55,637

0.9
%
58,436

1.0
%
 
22,957

0.4
%
11,429

0.2
%
Non-Control/Non-Affiliate Investments
3,475,295

59.6
%
3,264,517

57.0
%
 
4,117,868

68.8
%
3,915,101

67.1
%
Total Investments
$
5,831,458

100.0
%
$
5,727,279

100.0
%
 
$
5,981,556

100.0
%
$
5,838,305

100.0
%
The following shows the composition of our investment portfolio by type of investment as of June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017:
 
June 30, 2018
 
June 30, 2017
Type of Investment
Cost
% of Portfolio
Fair Value
% of Portfolio
 
Cost
% of Portfolio
Fair Value
% of Portfolio
Revolving Line of Credit
$
38,659

0.7
%
$
38,559

0.7
%
 
$
27,409

0.5
%
$
27,409

0.5
%
Senior Secured Debt
2,602,018

44.6
%
2,481,353

43.3
%
 
2,940,163

49.2
%
2,798,796

47.9
%
Subordinated Secured Debt
1,318,028

22.6
%
1,260,525

22.0
%
 
1,160,019

19.4
%
1,107,040

19.0
%
Subordinated Unsecured Debt
38,548

0.7
%
32,945

0.6
%
 
37,934

0.6
%
44,434

0.8
%
Small Business Loans
30

%
17

%
 
8,434

0.1
%
7,964

0.1
%
CLO Debt
6,159

0.1
%
6,159

0.1
%
 

%

%
CLO Residual Interest
1,096,768

18.8
%
954,035

16.7
%
 
1,150,006

19.2
%
1,079,712

18.5
%
Preferred Stock
92,346

1.6
%
75,986

1.3
%
 
112,394

1.9
%
83,209

1.4
%
Common Stock
445,364

7.6
%
517,858

9.0
%
 
295,200

4.9
%
391,374

6.7
%
Membership Interest
193,538

3.3
%
257,799

4.5
%
 
249,997

4.2
%
206,012

3.5
%
Participating Interest(1)

%
101,126

1.8
%
 

%
91,491

1.6
%
Escrow Receivable

%
917

%
 

%
864

%
Total Investments
$
5,831,458

100.0
%
$
5,727,279

100.0
%
 
$
5,981,556

100.0
%
$
5,838,305

100.0
%
(1)
Participating Interest includes our participating equity investments, such as net profits interests, net operating income interests, net revenue interests, and overriding royalty interests.
The following shows our investments in interest bearing securities by type of investment as of June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017:
 
June 30, 2018
 
June 30, 2017
Type of Investment
Cost
% of Portfolio
Fair Value
% of Portfolio
 
Cost
% of Portfolio
Fair Value
% of Portfolio
First Lien
$
2,632,843

51.6
%
$
2,512,078

52.6
%
 
$
2,959,738

55.6
%
$
2,818,371

55.6
%
Second Lien
1,325,862

26.0
%
1,268,359

26.6
%
 
1,167,853

21.9
%
1,114,874

22.0
%
Unsecured
38,548

0.8
%
32,945

0.7
%
 
37,934

0.7
%
44,434

0.9
%
Small Business Loans
30

%
17

%
 
8,434

0.2
%
7,964

0.2
%
CLO Debt
6,159

0.1
%
6,159

0.1
%
 

%

%
CLO Residual Interest
1,096,768

21.5
%
954,035

20.0
%
 
1,150,006

21.6
%
1,079,712

21.3
%
Total Debt Investments
$
5,100,210

100.0
%
$
4,773,593

100.0
%
 
$
5,323,965

100.0
%
$
5,065,355

100.0
%

S-27


The following shows the composition of our investment portfolio by geographic location as of June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017:
 
June 30, 2018
 
June 30, 2017
Geographic Location
Cost
% of Portfolio
Fair Value
% of Portfolio
 
Cost
% of Portfolio
Fair Value
% of Portfolio
Canada
$
16,809

0.3
%
$
17,816

0.3
%
 
$
9,831

0.2
%
$
10,000

0.2
%
Cayman Islands
1,102,927

18.9
%
960,194

16.8
%
 
1,150,006

19.2
%
1,079,712

18.5
%
France
12,490

0.2
%
12,334

0.2
%
 
9,755

0.2
%
8,794

0.2
%
MidAtlanticUS
410,644

7.0
%
410,644

7.2
%
 

%

%
Midwest US
395,622

6.8
%
413,758

7.2
%
 
605,417

10.1
%
678,766

11.6
%
Northeast US
677,204

11.6
%
701,851

12.3
%
 
786,552

13.1
%
823,616

14.1
%
Northwest US
103,906

1.8
%
90,288

1.6
%
 
281,336

4.7
%
207,962

3.6
%
Puerto Rico
84,713

1.5
%
83,507

1.5
%
 
83,410

1.4
%
83,410

1.4
%
Southeast US
1,243,430

21.3
%
1,524,379

26.6
%
 
1,367,606

22.9
%
1,412,351

24.2
%
Southwest US
723,038

12.4
%
599,914

10.4
%
 
616,008

10.3
%
558,368

9.5
%
Western US
1,060,675

18.2
%
912,594

15.9
%
 
1,071,635

17.9
%
975,326

16.7
%
Total Investments
$
5,831,458

100.0
%
$
5,727,279

100.0
%
 
$
5,981,556

100.0
%
$
5,838,305

100.0
%

S-28


The following shows the composition of our investment portfolio by industry as of June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017:
 
June 30, 2018
 
June 30, 2017
Industry
Cost
% of Portfolio
Fair Value
% of Portfolio
 
Cost
% of Portfolio
Fair Value
% of Portfolio
Aerospace & Defense
$
69,837

1.2
%
$
82,278

1.4
%
 
$
69,837

1.2
%
$
71,318

1.2
%
Air Freight & Logistics

%

%
 
51,952

0.9
%
51,952

0.9
%
Auto Components
12,681

0.2
%
12,887

0.2
%
 
30,222

0.5
%
30,460

0.5
%
Building Products
9,905

0.2
%
10,000

0.2
%
 

%

%
Capital Markets
19,799

0.3
%
20,000

0.3
%
 
14,796

0.2
%
15,000

0.3
%
Chemicals

%

%
 
17,489

0.3
%
16,699

0.3
%
Commercial Services & Supplies
386,187

6.6
%
330,024

5.8
%
 
354,185

5.9
%
312,634

5.3
%
Communications Equipment
39,860

0.7
%
40,000

0.7
%
 

%

%
Construction & Engineering
64,415

1.1
%
50,797

0.9
%
 
62,258

1.0
%
32,509

0.6
%
Consumer Finance
485,381

8.3
%
586,978

10.2
%
 
469,869

7.9
%
502,941

8.6
%
Distributors
470,750

8.1
%
402,465

7.0
%
 
140,847

2.4
%
83,225

1.4
%
Diversified Consumer Services
173,695

3.0
%
163,152

2.8
%
 
188,912

3.2
%
190,662

3.3
%
Diversified Telecommunication Services

%

%
 
4,395

0.1
%
4,410

0.1
%
Electronic Equipment, Instruments & Components
54,805

0.9
%
62,964

1.1
%
 
37,696

0.6
%
51,846

0.9
%
Energy Equipment & Services
257,371

4.4
%
170,574

3.0
%
 
251,019

4.2
%
131,660

2.3
%
Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
499,858

8.6
%
811,915

14.2
%
 
374,380

6.3
%
624,337

10.7
%
Food Products
9,884

0.2
%
9,886

0.2
%
 

%

%
Health Care Equipment & Supplies
43,279

0.7
%
43,279

0.8
%
 

%

%
Health Care Providers & Services
421,198

7.2
%
404,130

7.1
%
 
422,919

7.2
%
421,389

7.1
%
Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure
37,295

0.6
%
37,295

0.6
%
 
127,638

2.1
%
103,897

1.8
%
Hotels & Personal Products
24,938

0.4
%
24,938

0.4
%
 

%

%
Household Durables
42,539

0.7
%
41,623

0.7
%
 
146,031

2.4
%
146,183

2.5
%
Insurance
2,986

0.1
%
2,986

0.1
%
 

%

%
Internet & Direct Marketing Retail
39,813

0.7
%
39,813

0.7
%
 

%

%
Internet Software & Services
229,717

4.0
%
229,791

4.0
%
 
219,348

3.7
%
219,348

3.8
%
IT Services
182,183

3.1
%
182,578

3.2
%
 
19,531

0.3
%
20,000

0.3
%
Leisure Products
45,531

0.8
%
45,626

0.8
%
 
44,085

0.7
%
44,204

0.8
%
Machinery
35,488

0.6
%
31,886

0.6
%
 
35,488

0.6
%
32,678

0.6
%
Marine (1)

%

%
 
8,919

0.1
%
8,800

0.2
%
Media
143,063

2.5
%
140,365

2.4
%
 
469,108

7.8
%
466,500

8.0
%
Metals & Mining

%

%
 
9,953

0.2
%
10,000

0.2
%
Online Lending
327,159

5.6
%
243,078

4.2
%
 
424,350

7.0
%
370,931

6.3
%
Paper & Forest Products
11,328

0.2
%
11,226

0.2
%
 
11,295

0.2
%
11,500

0.2
%
Personal Products
228,575

3.9
%
165,020

2.9
%
 
222,698

3.7
%
192,748

3.3
%
Pharmaceuticals
11,882

0.2
%
12,000

0.2
%
 
117,989

2.0
%
117,989

2.0
%
Professional Services
74,272

1.3
%
76,991

1.3
%
 
64,242

1.1
%
64,473

1.1
%
Real Estate Management & Development
41,860

0.7
%
41,860

0.7
%
 

%

%
Software
66,435

1.1
%
67,265

1.2
%
 
56,041

0.9
%
55,150

0.9
%
Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals
12,384

0.2
%
12,500

0.2
%
 

%

%
Textiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods
46,429

0.8
%
60,220

1.1
%
 
285,180

4.8
%
274,206

4.7
%
Tobacco
14,392

0.3
%
14,392

0.3
%
 
14,365

0.2
%
14,431

0.2
%
Trading Companies & Distributors
63,863

1.1
%
56,199

1.0
%
 
64,513

1.1
%
64,513

1.1
%
Transportation Infrastructure
27,494

0.5
%
28,104

0.5
%
 

%

%
Subtotal
$
4,728,531

81.1
%
$
4,767,085

83.2
%
 
$
4,831,550

80.8
%
$
4,758,593

81.5
%
Structured Finance (2)
$
1,102,927

18.9
%
$
960,194

16.8
%
 
$
1,150,006

19.2
%
$
1,079,712

18.5
%
Total Investments
$
5,831,458

100.0
%
$
5,727,279

100.0
%
 
$
5,981,556

100.0
%
$
5,838,305

100.0
%

S-29


(1)
Industry includes exposure to the energy markets through our investments in Harley Marine Services, Inc. Including this investment, our overall fair value exposure to the broader energy industry, including energy equipment and services as noted above as of June 30, 2017 is $140,460. We do not hold an investment in Harley Marine Services, Inc. as of June 30, 2018.
(2)
Our CLO investments do not have industry concentrations and as such have been separated in the table above.
Portfolio Investment Activity
During the year ended June 30, 2018, we acquired $820,137 of new investments, completed follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies totaling approximately $881,807, funded $19,309 of revolver advances, and recorded PIK interest of $9,404, resulting in gross investment originations of $1,730,657. The more significant of these transactions are briefly described below.
During the period from July 19, 2017 through September 11, 2017, we made a $16,000 follow-on first lien senior debt investment in RGIS Services, LLC. The senior secured loan bears interest at the greater of 8.50% or LIBOR plus 7.50% and has a final maturity of March 31, 2023.
On September 22, 2017, we made a $21,000 follow-on Senior Secured Term Loan A and a $17,000 follow-on Senior Secured Term Loan B debt investment in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. The $21,000 Senior Secured Term Loan A bears interest at the greater of 7.50% or LIBOR plus 6.50% and has a final maturity of September 22, 2020. The $17,000 Senior Secured Term Loan B bears interest at the greater of 12.50% or LIBOR plus 11.50% and has a final maturity of September 22, 2020.
On September 25, 2017, we made a $5,000 first lien senior secured and $35,000 second lien senior secured debt investment in Engine Group, a marketing services firm, in order to support a refinancing. The first lien term loan bears interest at the great of 5.75% or LIBOR plus 4.75% and has a final maturity of September 15, 2022. The second lien term loan bears interest at the greater of 9.75% or LIBOR plus 8.75% and has a final maturity of September 15, 2023.
On September 25, 2017, we made a $10,000 senior secured term loan to fund a dividend recapitalization in Ingenio, LLC, which operates as an online personal advice marketplace and as a provider of digital entertainment media. The senior secured term loan bears interest at the greater of 8.75% or LIBOR plus 7.50% and has a final maturity of September 26, 2022.
On September 25, 2017, we exchanged $1,600 of Senior Secured Term Loan A and $4,799 of Senior Secured Term Loan B investments in Targus International, LLC into 6,120,658 of common shares of Targus Cayman Holdco Limited, and recorded a realized gain of $846, as a result of this transaction.
On September 27, 2017, we made a $22,000 follow-on senior secured Term Loan C-3 investment in Instant Web, LLC to fund a dividend recapitalization. The senior secured term loan bears interest at the greater of 12.50% or LIBOR plus 11.50% and has a final maturity of March 28, 2019.
On September 29, 2017, we made a $32,000 first lien senior secured debt investment to support operations and a refinancing of AgaMatrix, Inc., a leading developer, manufacturer, and marketer of diabetes monitoring care solutions. The first lien term loan bears interest at the greater of 10.25% or LIBOR plus 9.00% and has a final maturity of September 29, 2022.
On October 16, 2017, we made a $27,500 second lien secured investment in Transplace Holdings, a provider of transportation management solutions, in support of an acquisition of the company. The second lien term loan bears interest at the greater of 9.75% or LIBOR plus 8.75% and has a final maturity of October 6, 2025.
On November 3, 2017 through November 24, 2017, we made a $40,000 second lien secured investment to support the acquisition of Securus Technologies Holdings, a provider of mission-critical communication technology solutions and services. The second lien term loan bears interest at the greater of 9.25% or LIBOR plus 8.25% and has a final maturity of November 1, 2025.
On November 20, 2017, we made a $118,051 follow-on senior secured term loan A investment and a $900 follow-on senior secured term loan B investment in Instant Web, LLC (“IWCO”) to fund a refinancing and dividend recapitalization. The senior secured term loan A loan bears interest at the greater of 6.15% or LIBOR plus 5.15% and has a final maturity of November 20, 2022 and the senior secured term loan B bears interest at the greater of 10.15% or LIBOR plus 9.15% and has a final maturity of November 20, 2022. In addition, IWCO repaid the $27,000 term loan C, $25,000 term loan C-1, and $22,000 term loan C-2 receivable to us.
On December 1, 2017, we made a $10,000 second lien secured investment in UTZ Quality Foods, LLC, a salty snack food company, to fund an acquisition. The second lien term loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 7.25% and has a final maturity of November 21, 2025.

S-30


On December 4, 2017, we made an additional $235,453 senior secured investment in Broder Bros., Co., to fund an acquisition and a dividend recapitalization. The first lien term loan bears interest at the greater of 9.25% or LIBOR plus 8.00% and has a final maturity of December 2, 2022.
On December 15, 2017, we made a $12,000 second lien secured investment in PharMerica Corporation, which is a leading provider of institutional and specialty pharmacy services. The second lien term loan bears interest at the greater of 8.75% or LIBOR plus 7.75% and has a final maturity of December 7, 2025.
On December 20, 2017, we made a $15,000 second lien secured investment in Ability Network Inc., a leading healthcare IT company. The second lien term loan bears interest at the greater of 8.75% or LIBOR plus 7.75% and has a final maturity of December 13, 2025.
On December 8, 2017, we made a $20,000 Senior Secured Note investment in ACE Cash Express, Inc., which is a retailer of lending and non-lending financial products to customers in the U.S. The first lien term loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 12.00% and has a final maturity of December 15, 2022.
On December 5, 2017, we made a $12,500 second lien secured investment in EXC Holdings IIII Corp., an industrial technology company that designs and manufactures products that generate, detect, process, focus and harness light. The second lien term loan bears interest at the greater of 8.50% or LIBOR plus 7.50% and has a final maturity of December 1, 2025.
On December 29, 2017, we entered into a fee agreement with Wolf Energy Services Company, LLC (“Wolf”), for services required to locate, inventory, foreclose, and liquidate assets that were transferred from Ark-La-Tex to Wolf. Per the agreement, we will receive a fee equal to 8.0% of gross liquidation proceeds in the event aggregate liquidation gross proceeds exceed $19,000 (currently $18,500). During the three months ended March, 31, 2018, we received $1,222 in liquidation fees, net of third-party transaction costs, which is reflected as other income on our accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations.
On January 5, 2018, we made a $10,000 first lien and $50,000 second lien secured investment in Research Now Group, Inc., a provider of customer surveys for market research activities. The first lien term loan bears interest at the greater of 6.50% or LIBOR plus 5.50% and has a final maturity of December 20, 2024. The second lien term loan bears interest at the greater of 10.50% or LIBOR plus 9.50% and has a final maturity of December 20, 2025.
On January 23, 2018, we made a $12,500 Senior Secured Term Loan A and $12,500 Senior Secured Term Loan B investment in Candle-Lite Company, LLC, a manufacturer and designer of decorative candles. The $12,500 Senior Secured Term Loan A bears interest at the greater of 6.75% or LIBOR plus 5.50% and has a final maturity of January 23, 2023. The $12,500 Senior Secured Term Loan B bears interest at the greater of 10.75% or LIBOR plus 9.50% and has a final maturity of January 23, 2023.
On January 29, 2018, we made a $70,000 first lien senior secured investment in Town & Country Holdings, Inc., a manufacturer and designer of kitchen textiles and table linens. The first lien term loan bears interest at the greater of 10.25% or LIBOR plus 9.00% and has a final maturity of January 26, 2023.
During the period from February 8, 2018 through February 9, 2018, we made a $57,100 second lien secured and $10,000 first lien secured investments in Digital Room LLC, an online printing and design company. The second lien term loan bears interest at the greater of 9.75% or LIBOR plus 8.75% and has a final maturity of December 29, 2024. The first lien term loan bears interest at the greater of 6.00% or LIBOR plus 5.00% and has a final maturity of December 29, 2023.
On February 22, 2018, we made a $10,000 second lien secured investment in Janus International Group, LLC, a manufacturer of steel roll-up doors and building components. The second lien term loan bears interest at the greater of 8.75% or LIBOR plus 7.75% and has a final maturity of February 21, 2026.
On March 9, 2018, we made a follow-on $16,921 subordinated debt investment in First Tower LLC, and a $2,664 equity investment in First Tower Finance Company LLC, to support an acquisition. The subordinated debt bears interest at 10.00% and 10.00% PIK interest and has a final maturity of June 24, 2019.
On March 12, 2018, we made a $43,500 senior secured investment in Class Appraisal, LLC, a provider of residential appraisal services. Our investment is comprised of a $42,000 senior secured term loan and a $1,500 unfunded revolving credit facility. The senior secured term loan bears interest at the greater of 9.75% or LIBOR plus 8.25% and has a final maturity of March 10, 2023. The revolving credit facility, once drawn, will bear interest at the greater of 9.75% or LIBOR plus 8.25% and has a final maturity of March 12, 2020.

S-31


On March 19, 2018, we made a $15,000 second lien secured investment in ATS Consolidated Inc., a traffic management company. The second lien term loan bears interest at LIBOR plus 7.75% and has a final maturity of February 27, 2026.
On April 6, 2018, our common equity investment cost in the amount of $60,876 at the date of the merger in Arctic Equipment was exchanged for newly issued common shares of CP Energy. As a result of this merger between these controlled portfolio companies, our equity ownership percentage in CP Energy increased to 99.8%. There were no realized gain or loss recognized by us since this was a merger amongst two portfolio companies under our control.
On March 29, 2018, we made a $32,500 senior secured investment in Rosa Mexicano Company, an operator of Mexican themed restaurants. Our investment is comprised of a $30,000 senior secured term loan and a $2,500 unfunded revolving credit facility. The senior secured term loan bears interest at the greater of 9.00% or LIBOR plus 7.50% and has a final maturity of March 29, 2023. The revolving credit facility, once drawn, will bear interest at the greater of 9.00% or LIBOR plus 7.50% and has a final maturity of March 29, 2023.
On April 3, 2018, we made a $28,000 first lien senior secured investment in Mobile Posse Inc., which offers home screen content and messaging services to mobile phone carriers. The first lien term loan bears interest at the greater of 10.50% or LIBOR plus 8.50% and has a final maturity of April 3, 2023.
On April 10, 2018, we made a $25,500 Senior Secured Term Loan A and $17,000 Senior Secured Term Loan B investment in SEOTownCenter, Inc., a provider of search engine optimization services. The $25,500 Senior Secured Term Loan A bears interest at the greater of 9.50% or LIBOR plus 7.50% and has a final maturity of April 7, 2023. The $17,000 Senior Secured Term Loan B bears interest at the greater of 14.50% or LIBOR plus 12.50% and has a final maturity of April 7, 2023.
On April 17, 2018, we made a $43,000 Senior Secured Term Loan A and $43,000 Senior Secured Term Loan B investment in MRP Holdco, Inc., a provider of IT-focused contractor and permanent staffing recruitment solutions. The $43,000 Senior Secured Term Loan A bears interest at the greater of 6.00% or LIBOR plus 4.50% and has a final maturity of April 17, 2024. The $43,000 Senior Secured Term Loan B bears interest at the greater of 10.00% or LIBOR plus 8.50% and has a final maturity of April 17, 2024.
On April 17, 2018, we made a $10,000 Second Lien Term Loan investment in Help/Systems Holdings, Inc., a provider of software products. The second lien term loan bears interest at LIBOR + 7.75% and has a final maturity of March 27, 2026.
On May 31, 2018, we purchased $74,700 of first lien senior secured notes and $5,000 of revolving credit issued to support the acquisition of H.I.G. ECI Merger Sub, Inc. (“ECI”) by affiliates of H.I.G. Capital, LLC (“H.I.G”). Our revolving credit commitment was unfunded at close. ECI is a provider of managed services and technology solutions. The $44,800 Senior Secured Term Loan A bears interest at the greater of 7.00% or LIBOR + 5.50% and has a final maturity of May 31, 2023. The $29,900 Senior Secured Term Loan B bears interest at the greater of 12.00% or LIBOR plus 10.50% and has a final maturity of May 31, 2023. The revolving credit facility, once drawn, will bear interest at the greater of 9.00% or LIBOR plus 7.50% and has a final maturity of September 30, 2018.
On June 15, 2018, we made a $15,000 convertible preferred equity investment in Pacific World.
During the year ended June 30, 2018, we made five follow-on investments in NPRC totaling $35,292 to support the online consumer lending initiative, which was comprised of $13,434 of equity through NPH and $21,858 of debt directly to NPRC and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Additionally, we provided $96,199 of equity financing to NPRC for the acquisition of real estate properties and $1,112 of debt and $27,391 of equity financing to NPRC to fund capital expenditures for existing properties.
During the year ended June 30, 2018, we received full repayments on nineteen investments, partially sold two investments, and received several partial prepayments and amortization payments totaling $1,831,286, which resulted in net realized losses totaling $18,464. The more significant of these transactions are briefly described below.
On July 25, 2017, EZShield Parent, Inc. repaid the $14,963 Senior Secured Term Loan A and $15,000 Senior Secured Term Loan B receivable to us.
On July 28, 2017, Global Employment Solutions, Inc. repaid the $48,131 loan receivable to us.
On August 7, 2017, Water Pik, Inc. repaid the $13,739 loan receivable to us.
On September 25, 2017, Traeger Pellet Grills LLC repaid the $47,094 Senior Secured Term Loan A and $56,031 Senior Secured Term Loan B loan receivable to us.

S-32


On November 22, 2017, LaserShip, Inc, partially repaid $14,295 senior secured loan receivable to us.
On December 11, 2017, Primesport, Inc. repaid the $53,001 Senior Secured Term Loan A and $71,481 Senior Secured Term Loan B loan receivable to us, for which we agreed to a payment to satisfy the loan less than the par amount and recorded a realized loss of $3,019, as a result of this transaction.
On December 15, 2017, Instant Web, LLC repaid the $238,500 Senior Secured Term Loan A and $159,000 Senior Secured Term Loan B loan receivable to us.
On December 15, 2017, Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. repaid the $86,427 Senior Secured Term Loan A and $69,562 Senior Secured Term Loan B loan receivable to us.
On December 21, 2017, NCP Finance Limited Partnership repaid the $26,800 subordinated secured loan receivable to us.
On December 29, 2017, Digital Room LLC repaid the $34,000 second lien term loan receivable to us.
On March 1, 2018, LaserShip, Inc. repaid the $22,990 Senior Secured Term Loan A and $14,124 Senior Secured Term Loan B loan receivable to us.
On March 20, 2018, PGX Holdings, Inc, partially repaid $16,379 second lien term loan receivable to us.
On March 28, 2018, Prince Mineral Holding Corp. repaid the $10,000 senior secured term loan receivable to us.
On March 31, 2018, we wrote down the value of Nixon, Inc. resulting in a realized a loss of $14,197.
On April 2, 2018, Ability Network Inc. fully repaid the $15,000 second lien term loan receivable to us.
On April 4, 2018, Wheel Pros, LLC fully repaid the $20,760 senior secured subordinated notes receivable to us.
During the period from April 16, 2018 to June 29, 2018, we sold $180,000 of the outstanding principal balance of the senior secured note investment in Broder Bros., Co. at 100% of par, representing 39.53% of the principal outstanding prior to the sale. There was no gain or loss realized on the sale.
On April 17 and April 18, 2018, we sold 49.71% of the outstanding principal balance of the senior secured term loan investment in RGIS Services, LLC, for a total of $15,000 at 93.5% of par. We realized a $423 loss on the sale.
On May 1, 2018, Pelican Products, Inc. fully repaid the $17,500 second lien term loan receivable to us.
On May 15, 2018, National Home Healthcare Corp. fully repaid the $15,407 second lien term loan receivable to us.
During the year ended June 30, 2018, we received $21,845, $26,244 and $6,729 as a partial return of capital on our investments in Voya CLO 2012-2, Ltd., Voya CLO 2012-3, Ltd., and Madison Park Funding IX, Ltd., respectively.
During the year ended June 30, 2018, one of our CLO investments was deemed to have an other-than-temporary loss. In accordance with ASC 325-40, Beneficial Interest in Securitized Financial Assets, we recorded a total loss of $2,495 related to this investment for the amount our amortized cost exceeded fair value as of the respective determination dates.
During the year ended June 30, 2018, we received partial repayments of $113,675 of our loans previously outstanding with NPRC and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and $10,403 as a return of capital on our equity investment in NPRC.

S-33


The following table provides a summary of our investment activity for each quarter within the three years ending June 30, 2018:
Quarter Ended
 
Acquisitions(1)
 
Dispositions(2)
September 30, 2015
 
$
345,743

 
$
436,919

December 31, 2015
 
316,145

 
354,855

March 31, 2016
 
23,176

 
163,641

June 30, 2016
 
294,038

 
383,460

September 30, 2016
 
347,150

 
114,331

December 31, 2016
 
469,537

 
644,995

March 31, 2017
 
449,607

 
302,513

June 30, 2017
 
223,176

 
352,043

September 30, 2017
 
222,151

 
310,894

December 31, 2017
 
738,737

 
1,041,126

March 31, 2018
 
429,928

 
116,978

June 30, 2018
 
339,841

 
362,287

(1)
Includes investments in new portfolio companies, follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies, refinancings and PIK interest.
(2)
Includes sales, scheduled principal payments, prepayments and refinancings.
Investment Valuation
In determining the range of values for debt instruments, except CLOs and debt investments in controlling portfolio companies, management and the independent valuation firm estimated corporate and security credit ratings and identified corresponding yields to maturity for each loan from relevant market data. A discounted cash flow technique was then prepared using the appropriate yield to maturity as the discount rate, to determine a range of values. In determining the range of values for debt investments of controlled companies and equity investments, the enterprise value was determined by applying earnings before interest, income tax, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) multiples, the discounted cash flow technique, net income and/or book value multiples for similar guideline public companies and/or similar recent investment transactions. The enterprise value technique may also be used to value debt investments which are credit impaired. For stressed debt and equity investments, a liquidation analysis was prepared.
In determining the range of values for our investments in CLOs, the independent valuation firm uses a discounted multi-path cash flow model. The valuations were accomplished through the analysis of the CLO deal structures to identify the risk exposures from the modeling point of view as well as to determine an appropriate call date (i.e., expected maturity). These risk factors are sensitized in the multi-path cash flow model using Monte Carlo simulations,which is a simulation used to model the probability of different outcomes,to generate probability-weighted (i.e., multi-path) cash flows for the underlying assets and liabilities. These cash flows are discounted using appropriate market discount rates, and relevant data in the CLO market and certain benchmark credit indices are considered, to determine the value of each CLO investment. In addition, we generate a single-path cash flow utilizing our best estimate of expected cash receipts, and assess the reasonableness of the implied discount rate that would be effective for the value derived from the corresponding multi-path cash flow model.
With respect to our online consumer and SME lending initiative, we invest primarily in marketplace loans through marketplace lending facilitators.  We do not conduct loan origination activities ourselves. Therefore, our ability to purchase consumer and SME loans, and our ability to grow our portfolio of consumer and SME loans, are directly influenced by the business performance and competitiveness of the marketplace loan origination business of the marketplace lending facilitators from which we purchase consumer and SME loans. In addition, our ability to analyze the risk-return profile of consumer and SME loans is significantly dependent on the marketplace facilitators’ ability to effectively evaluate a borrower's credit profile and likelihood of default. If we are unable to effectively evaluate borrowers' credit profiles or the credit decisioning and scoring models implemented by each facilitator, we may incur unanticipated losses which could adversely impact our operating results.
The Board of Directors looked at several factors in determining where within the range to value the asset including: recent operating and financial trends for the asset, independent ratings obtained from third parties, comparable multiples for recent sales of companies within the industry and discounted cash flow models for our investments in CLOs. The composite of all these various valuation techniques, applied to each investment, was a total valuation of $5,727,279.

S-34


Our portfolio companies are generally lower middle market companies, outside of the financial sector, with less than $100,000 of annual EBITDA. We believe our investment portfolio has experienced less volatility than others because we believe there are more buy and hold investors who own these less liquid investments.
Control investments offer increased risk and reward over straight debt investments. Operating results and changes in market multiples can result in dramatic changes in values from quarter to quarter. Significant downturns in operations can further result in our looking to recoveries on sales of assets rather than the enterprise value of the investment. Equity positions in our portfolio are susceptible to potentially significant changes in value, both increases as well as decreases, due to changes in operating results and market multiples. Several of our controlled companies discussed below experienced such changes and we recorded corresponding fluctuations in valuations during the year ended June 30, 2018.
CP Energy Services Inc.
Prospect owns 100% of the equity of CP Holdings, a Consolidated Holding Company. CP Holdings owns 99.8% of the equity of CP Energy, and the remaining equity is owned by CP Energy management. CP Energy provides oilfield flowback services and fluid hauling and disposal services through its subsidiaries.
On April 6, 2018, our common equity investment in Arctic Equipment was exchanged for newly issued common shares of CP Energy as a result of a merger between the two companies. The cost basis of our investment in Arctic Equipment of $65,976 was transferred to CP Energy. as a result of the merger between these controlled portfolio companies. The exchange led to our increased 99.8% ownership interest of CP Energy as of June 30, 2018 compared to our 82.3% ownership as of June 30, 2017.
The fair value of our investment in CP Energy increased to $123,261 as of June 30, 2018, which is a discount of $56,215 from its amortized cost, compared to a fair value of $72,216 as of June 30, 2017, a discount of $41,284 to its amortized cost. The increase in fair value was driven by the inclusion of Arctic Equipment’s fair value as a result of the merger, in addition to a significant improvement in operating performance driven by both revenue growth and increased profitability. To a lesser extent, the increase in fair value was driven by an increase in comparable company market valuations.
First Tower Finance Company LLC
We own 80.1% of First Tower Finance, which owns 100% of First Tower, LLC (“First Tower”), the operating company. First Tower is a multiline specialty finance company based in Flowood, Mississippi with over 170 branch offices.
On June 15, 2012, we acquired 80.1% of First Tower businesses. As of June 30, 2016, First Tower had $432,639 of finance receivables net of unearned charges. As of June 30, 2017, First Tower’s total debt outstanding to parties senior to us was $304,337.
The fair value of our investment in First Tower increased to $443,010 as of June 30, 2018, representing a premium of $88,798 to its amortized cost basis compared to a fair value of $365,588 as of June 30, 2017, a premium of $25,993 to its amortized cost. The increase in fair value was driven by an increase in loan originations and improved operating margins, as well as an increase in trading multiples of comparable companies. Also contributing to the increase in fair value is First Tower’s acquisition of a loan portfolio from Harrison Finance.
Freedom Marine Solutions, LLC
Prospect owns 100% of the equity of Energy Solutions, a Consolidated Holding Company. Energy Solutions owns 100% of Freedom Marine. Freedom Marine owns 100% of each of Vessel Company, LLC, Vessel Company II, LLC, and Vessel Company III, LLC. Freedom Marine owns, manages, and operates offshore supply vessels to provide transportation and support services for the oil and gas exploration and production industries in the Gulf of Mexico.
The fair value of our investment in Freedom Marine decreased to $13,037 as of June 30, 2018, a discount of $30,555 to its amortized cost, compared to a discount of $18,616 to its amortized cost as of June 30, 2017. The decline in fair value was driven by a decrease in the appraised values of the vessels.  

InterDent, Inc.
Prospect exercised its rights and remedies under its loan documents to exercise the shareholder voting rights in respect of the stock of InterDent, Inc. (“InterDent”) and to appoint a new Board of Directors of InterDent. As a result, as of June 30, 2018, Prospect’s investment in InterDent is classified as a control investment. InterDent is a dental practice support organization based in Inglewood, California providing administrative, financial, and operational services to affiliated dental practices.

S-35


The fair value of our investment in InterDent decreased to $197,621 as of June 30, 2018, a discount of $15,080 to its amortized cost, compared to a discount of $1,268 to its amortized cost as of June 30, 2017. The decline in fair value was due to lower projected future earnings as a result of customer attrition.
MITY, Inc.
Prospect owns 100% of the equity of MITY Holdings of Delaware Inc. (“MITY Delaware”), a Consolidated Holding Company.
MITY Delaware holds 95.48% of the equity of MITY, Inc. (f/k/a MITY Enterprises, Inc.) (“MITY”), with management of
MITY owning the remaining 4.52% of the equity of MITY. MITY owns 100% of each of MITY-Lite, Inc. (“MITY-Lite”);
Broda USA, Inc. (f/k/a Broda Enterprises USA, Inc.) (“Broda USA”); and Broda Enterprises ULC (“Broda Canada”). MITY
is a designer, manufacturer and seller of multipurpose room furniture and specialty healthcare seating products.

The fair value of our investment in Mity decreased to $58,894 as of June 30, 2018, a discount of $5,847 to its amortized
cost, compared to a premium of $11,771 to its amortized cost as of June 30, 2017. The decrease in fair value is driven by a
decline in gross profit and operating margins, partially offset by projected revenue growth.

National Property REIT Corp.
NPRC is a Maryland corporation and a qualified REIT for federal income tax purposes. NPRC is held for purposes of investing, operating, financing, leasing, managing and selling a portfolio of real estate assets and engages in any and all other activities that may be necessary, incidental, or convenient to perform the foregoing. NPRC acquires real estate assets, including, but not limited to, industrial, commercial, and multi-family properties, self-storage, and student housing properties. NPRC may acquire real estate assets directly or through joint ventures by making a majority equity investment in a property-owning entity. Additionally, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, NPRC invests in online consumer loans. Effective May 23, 2016, APRC and UPRC merged with and into NPRC, to consolidate all of our real estate holdings, with NPRC as the surviving entity. As of June 30, 2018, we own 100% of the fully-diluted common equity of NPRC.
During the year ended June 30, 2018, we provided $96,199 of equity financing to NPRC for the acquisition of real estate properties and $1,112 of debt and $27,391 of equity financing to NPRC to fund capital expenditures for existing properties.
During the year ended June 30, 2018, we provided $21,858 of debt and $13,434 of debt and equity financing, respectively, to NPRC and its wholly-owned subsidiaries to support the online consumer lending initiative. In addition, during the year ended June 30, 2018, we received partial repayments of $113,675 of our loans previously outstanding with NPRC and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and $10,403 as a return of capital on our equity investment in NPRC.
The online consumer loan investments held by certain of NPRC’s wholly-owned subsidiaries are unsecured obligations of individual borrowers that are issued in amounts ranging from $1 to $50, with fixed terms ranging from 24 to 84 months. As of June 30, 2018, the outstanding investment in online consumer loans by certain of NPRC’s wholly-owned subsidiaries was comprised of 62,973 individual loans and residual interest in two securitizations, and had an aggregate fair value of $367,479. The average outstanding individual loan balance is approximately $5 and the loans mature on dates ranging from July 1, 2018 to April 19, 2025 with a weighted-average outstanding term of 27 months as of June 30, 2018. Fixed interest rates range from 4.0% to 36.0% with a weighted-average current interest rate of 27.4%. As of June 30, 2018, our investment in NPRC and its wholly-owned subsidiaries relating to online consumer lending had a fair value of $243,061.
As of June 30, 2018, based on outstanding principal balance, 6.3% of the portfolio was invested in super prime loans (borrowers with a Fair Isaac Corporation (“FICO”) score, of 720 or greater), 19.5% of the portfolio in prime loans (borrowers with a FICO score of 660 to 719) and 74.2% of the portfolio in near prime loans (borrowers with a FICO score of 580 to 659).
Loan Type
 
Outstanding Principal Balance
 
Fair Value
 
Weighted Average Interest Rate*
Super Prime
 
$
20,714

 
$
20,063

 
13.8%
Prime
 
63,565

 
60,554

 
17.9%
Near Prime
 
241,907

 
224,652

 
31.1%
*Weighted by outstanding principal balance of the online consumer loans.


S-36


As of June 30, 2018, our investment in NPRC and its wholly-owned subsidiaries had an amortized cost of $826,987 and a fair value of $1,054,976, including our investment in online consumer lending as discussed above. The fair value of $811,915 related to NPRC’s real estate portfolio was comprised of forty-two multi-families properties, twelve self-storage units, eight student housing properties and three commercial properties. The following table shows the location, acquisition date, purchase price, and mortgage outstanding due to other parties for each of the properties held by NPRC as of June 30, 2018.
No.
 
Property Name
 
City
 
Acquisition
Date
 
Purchase
Price
 
Mortgage
Outstanding
1
 
Filet of Chicken
 
Forest Park, GA
 
10/24/2012
 
$
7,400

 
$

2
 
5100 Live Oaks Blvd, LLC
 
Tampa, FL
 
1/17/2013
 
63,400

 
46,426

3
 
Lofton Place, LLC
 
Tampa, FL
 
4/30/2013
 
26,000

 
20,273

4
 
Arlington Park Marietta, LLC
 
Marietta, GA
 
5/8/2013
 
14,850

 
9,650

5
 
NPRC Carroll Resort, LLC
 
Pembroke Pines, FL
 
6/24/2013
 
225,000

 
175,885

6
 
Cordova Regency, LLC
 
Pensacola, FL
 
11/15/2013
 
13,750

 
11,375

7
 
Crestview at Oakleigh, LLC
 
Pensacola, FL
 
11/15/2013
 
17,500

 
13,845

8
 
Inverness Lakes, LLC
 
Mobile, AL
 
11/15/2013
 
29,600

 
24,700

9
 
Kings Mill Pensacola, LLC
 
Pensacola, FL
 
11/15/2013
 
20,750

 
17,550

10
 
Plantations at Pine Lake, LLC
 
Tallahassee, FL
 
11/15/2013
 
18,000

 
14,092

11
 
Verandas at Rocky Ridge, LLC
 
Birmingham, AL
 
11/15/2013
 
15,600

 
10,205

12
 
Matthews Reserve II, LLC
 
Matthews, NC
 
11/19/2013
 
22,063

 
19,765

13
 
City West Apartments II, LLC
 
Orlando, FL
 
11/19/2013
 
23,562

 
23,084

14
 
Vinings Corner II, LLC
 
Smyrna, GA
 
11/19/2013
 
35,691

 
32,649

15
 
Atlanta Eastwood Village LLC
 
Stockbridge, GA
 
12/12/2013
 
25,957

 
22,546

16
 
Atlanta Monterey Village LLC
 
Jonesboro, GA
 
12/12/2013
 
11,501

 
10,969

17
 
Atlanta Hidden Creek LLC
 
Morrow, GA
 
12/12/2013
 
5,098

 
4,696

18
 
Atlanta Meadow Springs LLC
 
College Park, GA
 
12/12/2013
 
13,116

 
12,914

19
 
Atlanta Meadow View LLC
 
College Park, GA
 
12/12/2013
 
14,354

 
12,968

20
 
Atlanta Peachtree Landing LLC
 
Fairburn, GA
 
12/12/2013
 
17,224

 
15,361

21
 
APH Carroll Bartram Park, LLC
 
Jacksonville, FL
 
12/31/2013
 
38,000

 
27,157

22
 
Crestview at Cordova, LLC
 
Pensacola, FL
 
1/17/2014
 
8,500

 
7,785

23
 
APH Carroll Atlantic Beach, LLC
 
Atlantic Beach, FL
 
1/31/2014
 
13,025

 
8,443

24
 
Taco Bell, OK
 
Yukon, OK
 
6/4/2014
 
1,719

 

25
 
Taco Bell, MO
 
Marshall, MO
 
6/4/2014
 
1,405

 

26
 
23 Mile Road Self Storage, LLC
 
Chesterfield, MI
 
8/19/2014
 
5,804

 
4,350

27
 
36th Street Self Storage, LLC
 
Wyoming, MI
 
8/19/2014
 
4,800

 
3,600

28
 
Ball Avenue Self Storage, LLC
 
Grand Rapids, MI
 
8/19/2014
 
7,281

 
5,460

29
 
Ford Road Self Storage, LLC
 
Westland, MI
 
8/29/2014
 
4,642

 
3,480

30
 
Ann Arbor Kalamazoo Self Storage, LLC
 
Ann Arbor, MI
 
8/29/2014
 
4,458

 
3,345

31
 
Ann Arbor Kalamazoo Self Storage, LLC
 
Ann Arbor, MI
 
8/29/2014
 
8,927

 
6,695

32
 
Ann Arbor Kalamazoo Self Storage, LLC
 
Kalamazoo, MI
 
8/29/2014
 
2,363

 
1,775

33
 
Canterbury Green Apartments Holdings LLC
 
Fort Wayne, IN
 
9/29/2014
 
85,500

 
74,046

34
 
Abbie Lakes OH Partners, LLC
 
Canal Winchester, OH
 
9/30/2014
 
12,600

 
13,055

35
 
Kengary Way OH Partners, LLC
 
Reynoldsburg, OH
 
9/30/2014
 
11,500

 
13,502

36
 
Lakeview Trail OH Partners, LLC
 
Canal Winchester, OH
 
9/30/2014
 
26,500

 
23,256

37
 
Lakepoint OH Partners, LLC
 
Pickerington, OH
 
9/30/2014
 
11,000

 
14,480

38
 
Sunbury OH Partners, LLC
 
Columbus, OH
 
9/30/2014
 
13,000

 
14,115

39
 
Heatherbridge OH Partners, LLC
 
Blacklick, OH
 
9/30/2014
 
18,416

 
18,328


S-37


No.
 
Property Name
 
City
 
Acquisition
Date
 
Purchase
Price
 
Mortgage
Outstanding
40
 
Jefferson Chase OH Partners, LLC
 
Blacklick, OH
 
9/30/2014
 
13,551

 
17,200

41
 
Goldenstrand OH Partners, LLC
 
Hilliard, OH
 
10/29/2014
 
7,810

 
9,600

42
 
Jolly Road Self Storage, LLC
 
Okemos, MI
 
1/16/2015
 
7,492

 
5,620

43
 
Eaton Rapids Road Self Storage, LLC
 
Lansing West, MI
 
1/16/2015
 
1,741

 
1,305

44
 
Haggerty Road Self Storage, LLC
 
Novi, MI
 
1/16/2015
 
6,700

 
5,025

45
 
Waldon Road Self Storage, LLC
 
Lake Orion, MI
 
1/16/2015
 
6,965