Toggle SGML Header (+)


Section 1: 10-K (10-K)

Document
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017
or
¨    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from             to    
Commission File Number: 001-36341        
Vectrus, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Indiana
 
38-3924636
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 
655 Space Center Drive, Colorado Springs, Colorado 80915
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(719) 591-3600
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
Title of Each Class 
 
Name of Exchange on Which Registered 
Common Stock, Par Value $.01 Per Share
 
New York Stock Exchange
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT: NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  ¨   No  þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes  ¨   No  þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  þ   No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  þ    No  ¨



Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer ¨
Accelerated filer þ
Non-accelerated filer ¨
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company ¨
Emerging growth company ¨


 
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨ No  þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant computed by reference to the closing price at which the common equity was last sold as of June 30, 2017, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter, was $353,018,852.
As of February 22, 2018, there were 11,120,528 shares of common stock ($0.01 par value per share) outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A relating to the registrant's Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 18, 2018 will be incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K in response to Items 10,11,12,13 and 14 of Part III.




VECTRUS, INC.
INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS



Page No.
 
 
 
 
 
 








 
 
 
 
 
 


 

 

 
 



 
 




Table of Contents

    
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
Vectrus, Inc. (Vectrus, the Company, our company, we, us or our) is a leading provider of services to the United States (U.S.) government worldwide. Leveraging a history of more than 70 years, we provide global service solutions in 177 locations and 21 countries across three continents in both stable and unstable political and economic environments. We believe that a primary strength of our company is our expeditionary nature that is grounded in our ability to recruit U.S. and international personnel with appropriate expertise, as well as navigate the logistical, legal, and other challenges of operating in multiple, challenging overseas locations. We have a proven history of deploying resources rapidly and with precision to support the mission success of our customers.
We operate our business based on three core values of Integrity, Respect and Responsibility. We operate as one segment and offer the following services: facility and logistics services and information technology and network communications services.
Our primary customer is the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD), with a high concentration in the U.S. Army. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we had total revenue of $1.1 billion, and for both of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we had total revenue of $1.2 billion, all of which was derived from U.S. government customers.
We employ approximately 6,700 people, including approximately 700 employees who joined our company following our acquisition of SENTEL Corporation (SENTEL) in January 2018, and engage approximately 5,800 subcontractor personnel around the world. This includes an experienced management team with an average of 29 years of experience in the military, defense industry, and a wide range of U.S. government agencies. Our management team has experience winning new contracts, driving premier operating efficiency, and managing all aspects of the demanding compliance culture required to do business with the U.S. government worldwide. We are also a leading employer of veterans with more than 35% of our employees voluntarily reporting a military background, and we have been recognized numerous times in recent years by veteran-focused organizations as a military-friendly employer.
Vectrus was incorporated as an Indiana corporation on February 4, 2014. On September 27, 2014, Exelis Inc. (Exelis) completed the spin-off (the Spin-off) of Vectrus. Prior to the Spin-off, we were a subsidiary of Exelis that constituted Exelis' Mission Systems business, which was part of Exelis' Information and Technical Services segment. As a result of the Spin-off, Vectrus became an independent, publicly traded company. References in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to Exelis or "Former Parent" refer to Exelis Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries (other than Vectrus). Exelis was acquired by Harris Corporation in May 2015.
Acquisition of SENTEL Corporation
On January 23, 2018, we acquired SENTEL, a U.S. government contractor with expertise in logistics and supply chain management, engineering and advanced information technology solutions for spectrum management systems, sensor networks, border and perimeter surveillance systems and other detection systems, and multidisciplinary mission support for various intelligence community clients. The acquisition advances our strategy to be a leader in the converging physical and digital infrastructure market and enhances our information technology, technical solutions and logistics capabilities while expanding our client base to customers in the U.S. intelligence community. SENTEL’s customers also include the U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, U.S. Air Force, Federal Aviation Administration, and the Internal Revenue Service. Headquartered in Alexandria, Virginia, and founded in 1986, SENTEL has approximately 700 employees. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017, SENTEL generated revenue of $107 million. The purchase price of $36 million was funded by cash on hand and borrowings under our revolving credit facility.
Our Business Strategy
Vectrus will drive growth through strategic imperatives aligned to the following three core strategies: Enhance the Foundation, Expand the Portfolio and Add More Value. These strategies will evolve to include more innovative, technology-enabled methods, capabilities and business models. Key components of our core strategies include:
Enhance the Foundation. We will enhance our business by strengthening our existing approaches to deliver high value, high impact services to our clients. We cultivate a global Vectrus Improvement Project (VIP) culture that encourages every Vectrus employee to implement measurable improvements. The VIPs align with our business objectives, benefiting our clients, employees, and overall performance. We support this VIP culture with an internal reward and recognition program and a robust internal training program, equipping our leaders with the tools to sustain

4

Table of Contents

our daily approach to continuous improvement. We will expand our VIP program to become an enterprise-wide program and infuse new technologies and enhanced operational capabilities into our current operations and programs wherever possible. 
Expand the Portfolio. We are focused on creating a higher-value, technology-enabled and differentiated platform through strengthening our IT competencies and fusing the physical and digital aspects of our clients' facility and logistics missions. We will package our capabilities by leveraging our strong foundation in facilities, logistics and IT. In addition, we will seek to partner with highly innovative third parties. The result will be a more technology-enabled, differentiated and higher value portfolio.
Add More Value. The convergence of our clients' physical and digital infrastructure and supply chains represents an opportunity to improve the outcomes of our clients' missions while creating a higher value, growth oriented platform. We are structuring our long-term strategy in order to take advantage of this opportunity and to shape our future. The essence of these imperatives will be to, with our clients, create more predictive, agile and responsive infrastructures and supply chains to create a significantly differentiated, growth oriented business.
We focus on the following service offerings in support of the U.S. government: facility and logistics services and information technology and network communications services. We strive to bring our service capabilities to all of our customers. Our primary geographic areas of operation include Asia, Europe, the Middle East and the U.S.
Facility and Logistics Services
Our facility and logistics services support the U.S. Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marines in both domestic and international environments, geographically ranging from the U.S. to Europe and Southwest Asia.
For the three years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, facility and logistics services had revenue of $812.6 million or 73% of total revenue, $925.7 million or 78% of total revenue, and $942.1 million or 80% of total revenue, respectively.
Facility and logistics capabilities consist of:
Airfield Management: These services include flight line operations and scheduling; runway maintenance and sweeping; air traffic control; Aerospace Ground Equipment (AGE) operation and maintenance; and navigation aids operation and maintenance.
Ammunition Management: These services include inventory control, accountability, security and shelf-life management of all ammunition categories, including small arms, explosives, mortars, artillery and missiles.
Civil Engineering: These services include sustainment of installation facilities and infrastructure and designing, executing and supervising construction projects.
Communications: These services include classified and unclassified email; voice; Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services; video teleconferencing; help desk operations; data and information management and analysis; and electronic repair.
Emergency Services: These services include fire, medical and emergency services operations and inspections.
Equipment Maintenance, Repair and Services: These services include the repair and sustainment of military and commercial wheeled and tracked vehicles; ground support equipment; communications and electronics equipment; weapons; emergency service vehicles and equipment; and subassemblies. We perform various repair functions including Line Replaceable Unit (LRU) testing and repair; small and heavy weapons repair; canvas and component repair; and Test, Measurement and Diagnostic Equipment (TMDE) repair.
Life Support Activities: These services include postal operations; housing management; lodging management; Morale, Welfare and Recreation (MWR) services; travel office support; laundry services; and food service operations.
Public Works: These services include utilities; power production and distribution; roads and grounds maintenance; water treatment; potable water production and distribution; solid waste disposal and recycling; and facilities operations, maintenance and repair, which consist of plumbing, electrical, carpentry, vector control, and heating, ventilation, air conditioning and refrigeration (HVAC-R).

5

Table of Contents

Security: These services include static and mobile security including entry and exit points to U.S. or coalition bases; installation security; residential security; personal security detachment operations in contingency environments; and management of biometric screening, interviews, and security badging.
Transportation Operations: These services include ground transportation of all commodities; shuttle bus services; operational movement of personnel and household goods and supplies; support for military unit movements by air, rail and ship; and transportation motor pool (TMP) operations.
Warehouse Management and Distribution: These services include warehouse management and inventory control for various equipment and commodities ranging from vehicles, weapons and ground support equipment to repair parts, general supplies, barrier material, packaged petroleum products, organization clothing and individual equipment, medical supplies equipment and rations. We also operate various storage distribution activities including Supply Support Activities (SSA); weapons storage sites; fuel distribution points; subsistence storage and distribution points; central receiving and shipping points; Care of Supplies in Storage (COSIS) operations; container storage and distribution points; and Contractor Operated and Maintained Base Supply (COMBS) points.
Facility and Logistics Services Key Contracts:
Kuwait Base Operations and Security Support Services in Kuwait (K-BOSSS). Our largest base operations support services contract supports geographically-dispersed primary operating locations within the State of Kuwait, including several camps and a range training complex. K-BOSSS provides critical base operations support and security support services including forms, publications, and reproductive services; postal operations; range operations and maintenance; logistics; information management; public works; environmental services; engineering services; medical administrative support; installation services; security services; and fire and emergency services.
Turkey and Spain Base Management (TSBMC II). We provide civil engineering, airfield support, facilities support, transportation, food services and fire emergency services support for all U.S. Air Force bases in Turkey and Spain. TSBMC II is the largest U.S. Air Force service contract in Europe and Africa. Our Spain operations support U.S. Marine Corps presence throughout Africa, while our Turkey operations support coalition forces efforts in Syria and Iraq. We also provide support to the Office of Defense Cooperation in Ankara, Turkey and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's (NATO) Allied Land Command in Izmir, Turkey.  
Maxwell Air Force Base Operations Support in Montgomery, Alabama (MAXWELL). We operate and maintain the key facilities at the Air University, which provides the full spectrum of Air Force education, from pre-commissioning to the highest levels of professional military education such as the Air War College. We perform facility maintenance, air base and equipment maintenance, communication architecture support and minor construction.
Thule Air Force Base Operations Support in Greenland (THULE). We provide base operations and maintenance services under extreme weather conditions to the Thule Air Base (AB) in Greenland. The base operations and maintenance services consist of supply, fuel, and airfield management; transportation operations; civil engineering; environmental management; health services; food services; temporary lodging; recreation services; community services; and non-sensitive communication services. The Thule AB is home to the 821st Air Base Group and host to both the Early Warning Radar (EWR) 12th Space Warning Squadron and the Air Force Satellite Control Network Detachment 1 Polar Orbiting Geophysical Observatory (DET1/POGO) 23rd Space Operations Squadron. EWR is one of many worldwide sensors reporting missile warning and space surveillance information to the North American Aerospace Defense command center in Cheyenne Mountain Air Station. DET 1/POGO is one of the 50th Space Wing’s remote satellite stations.
Fort Bragg Logistics Support Services under the Enhanced Army Global Logistics Enterprise (EAGLE). The Fort Bragg Logistics Readiness Center (LRC) serves as the primary logistics provider for maintenance, supply and services, and transportation support to the installation.  Our services include: equipment maintenance and repair in support of both installation support equipment and unit tactical equipment; warehousing operations for ammunition, clothing and equipment, hazardous material, general supplies, and subsistence items; and airfield terminal operations, local and charter bus/transportation support and services, coordination and inspection of moving and storage services, and the conduct of air/rail/ground transportation planning and operational support services. We acquired this contract as part of the SENTEL acquisition.
    


6

Table of Contents

Information Technology and Network Communications Services
Our information technology and network communications services consist of sustainment of communications systems, network security, systems installation, full life cycle management of information technology systems, system-of-systems engineering and software development, and mission support for the Department of Defense, including the military services and the intelligence community in multiple areas of operation that include Europe, the Middle East, Asia, the U.S., and at sea. To support high standards and performance excellence, our company applies the principles of Information Technology Infrastructure Library (ITIL), is certified to the ISO 9001, ISO 20000 and Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) level III standards and maintains important information assurance, network protection, project management and design credentials for providing these services. For the three years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, information technology and network communications services had revenue of $302.2 million or 27% of total revenue, $264.8 million or 22% of total revenue, and $238.6 million or 20% of total revenue, respectively.
Our information technology and network communications capabilities consist of:
Communications: These services include complete 24/7/365 communications systems operations and maintenance, including systems administration, network administration, operations and maintenance of technical control facilities, secure and non-secure telephone switch operations, VoIP, multi-media networks, cabling and distribution infrastructure and video information systems. Our support also includes contingency and backup site operations.
Management and Service Support: These services include full life cycle management and service delivery support functions, including preventative maintenance scheduling, material supply control functions, help desk support, training, electronic repair, logistics trend analysis, configuration control, project support agreements, technical reports, parts lists, site survey reports, systems as-built documentation and computer-aided design and drafting.
Network and Cybersecurity: These services include network cyber-center operations, information assurance, and data and information management and analysis.
Systems Installation and Activation: These services include engineering and technical support to identify and define systems requirements, determine capabilities and delineate and define interfaces, protocols, required upgrades, installation/de-installation, testing, integration, modification, documentation, troubleshooting, and training pertaining to information technology and command, control, communications, computer, and intelligence (C4I) systems.
System-of-Systems Engineering and Software Development: These services including engineering and technology solutions focused on high priority mission challenges for defense and national security customers.
Mission Support: These services include comprehensive mission support, from intelligence analysis to technical support, for customers across the intelligence and defense communities.
Information Technology and Network Communications Services Key Contracts:
Operations, Maintenance and Defense of Army Communications in Southwest Asia and Central Asia (OMDAC-SWACA). We provide the operations, maintenance and defense of the Army’s communications network across multiple locations in the Middle East and Central Asia. Technical support activities include the Southwest Asia Regional Cyber-Center (RCC-SWA) operations, regional network operations and security centers (RNOSCs), local area and wide area network administration, systems administration, service desk administration, computer repair (ADPE), email administration, the Defense Red Switch Network, satellite communications, microwave communications, tower and antenna maintenance, technical control facilities, high frequency and ultra-high frequency radios, telephone switches, telephone operations, inside and outside cable plants, prime power and backup power generators, HVAC systems, uninterruptible power supplies, logistics support services, and other contingency requirements for the warfighter.
Fleet Systems Engineering Team (FSET). We provide on-site technical and end-to-end systems engineering support for C4I systems for the U.S. Navy. FSET assures effective operations for all afloat and ashore C4I systems throughout the deployment cycle and provides systems engineering and technical support for rapid introduction of new capabilities into the fleet. Our engineers conduct on-site troubleshooting and maintenance assistance for problems that cross multiple C4I systems, provide over-the-shoulder training on C4I systems, and develop and implement technical processes crossing multiple C4I systems.

7

Table of Contents

Operations, Maintenance, and Supply - Europe (OPMAS-E). We provide IT support and services for the 2nd Signal Brigade G-6 mission within the U.S. Army Europe, U.S. European Command and U.S. Africa Command areas of operation. These services include deployed IT services and support in Kosovo, Turkey, Romania, Bulgaria, and Israel; defense red switch network hubs, information systems and communication infrastructures, which include: asynchronous transfer mode, synchronous optical network radios, dense wave division multiplexing and multiprotocol label switching systems, coalition network systems, and secure local area network systems; and communication security management. We provide subject matter expertise in areas ranging from help desk support to video teleconferencing and data communications capabilities.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Information Technology (ACE-IT). We provide information management, information technology and cybersecurity support services to more than 37,000 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) customers throughout the U.S., including USACE headquarters in Washington D.C.; nine divisions; 44 districts and their associated field and area project offices; and two data centers located in Vicksburg, Mississippi and Portland, Oregon. We provide comprehensive enterprise and transport services including IT service management; custom applications development and software integration services; engineering design and support services; and network operations and infrastructure management. This contract also includes rapid response and flexible support for emergency operations.
Customers
We attribute the strength of our relationship with the DoD to our focus on program performance, global responsiveness and operational excellence, as well as our core values of Integrity, Respect and Responsibility. We treat sales to our U.S. government customers as sales within the U.S. regardless of where the services are performed. Our revenue from the U.S. government for the periods presented below was as follows:
Revenue by military branch for the periods presented below was as follows:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Army
 
$
915,554

 
$
1,004,842

 
$
1,007,648

Navy
 
21,896

 
20,066

 
25,561

Air Force
 
177,338

 
165,611

 
145,854

Marines
 

 

 
1,621

Total Revenue
 
$
1,114,788

 
$
1,190,519

 
$
1,180,684

For information regarding the profit and total assets of our company, which operates as one segment, please refer to our Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Competition
Our competition varies depending on our service offerings. In facility and logistics services, our primary competitors are PAE Facilities Management (PAE), Delta Tucker Holdings, Inc. (DynCorp International), KBR Inc., Fluor Corporation and AECOM. Our principal competitors in information technology and network communications services include divisions of Leidos Holdings, Inc., Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), CSRA Inc., Peraton, and General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. (GDIT). There are typically fewer competitors in the overseas market for each of our services capabilities.
The U.S. government has implemented policies designed to protect small businesses and under-represented minority contractors. From time to time, certain U.S. government work in the U.S. has been restricted to small businesses, including Alaska native companies. We participate with these small businesses as a subcontractor for select opportunities, as appropriate. In addition, we rely on our teaming relationships with other prime contractors and subcontractors in order to submit bids for large procurements or other opportunities where we believe the combination of services will help us to win and perform the contract. Our competitors may consolidate or establish teaming or other relationships among themselves or with third parties to increase their ability to address customers’ needs.
Competitive bids for the work that Vectrus pursues are based on technical qualifications and corporate experience in performing contracts of similar size and scope, and are highly price sensitive. While not every contract is procured via selection of the lowest priced bidder, customers are sensitive to cost based on their budget allocations. Acquisition cycles are long (generally 12 to 24 months), and contracts are typically multi-year contracts that include an initial period of one year or less with annual one year (or less) option periods for the remaining contract period.

8

Table of Contents

Some U.S. government customers have shown a strong preference for multiple award indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts. These contracts offer awards to a pool of contractors, followed by competition within the pool for individual programs via task orders under each IDIQ over the period of performance. The period of performance under IDIQ contracts follows a traditional three-to-ten-year performance cycle. The governing IDIQ contracts often have multi-billion dollar ceiling values.
Our company closely monitors costs to foster highly competitive pricing and uses an in-house business development model both to manage the cost of revenue and capture opportunities for future bids.
Seasonality
We do not consider any material portion of our business to be seasonal. However, various factors can affect the distribution of our revenue between accounting periods, including the timing of awards, product deliveries, customer acceptance of products and services, contract phase-in durations, contract completions, and the availability of customer funding. Weather and natural phenomena can also temporarily affect the performance of our services.
The U.S. government's fiscal year ends on September 30 of each year. U.S. government agencies may award extra tasks or complete other contract actions in the timeframe leading up to the end of its fiscal year in order to avoid the loss of unexpended fiscal year funds, which may favorably impact our third fiscal quarter.
Regulatory Environment
The U.S. government markets in which we serve are highly regulated. When working with U.S. agencies and entities, we are subject to laws and regulations relating to the creation, administration and performance of contracts. Among other things, these laws and regulations:
Require compliance with government standards for contract administration, accounting and management internal control systems;
Define allowable and unallowable costs and otherwise govern our right to reimbursement under various flexibly priced U.S. government contracts;
Require certification and disclosure of all cost and pricing data in connection with certain contract negotiations;
Require us not to compete for, or to divest ourselves of, work if an organizational conflict of interest exists related to such work that cannot be appropriately mitigated; and
Restrict the use and dissemination of information classified for national security purposes and the exportation of certain products and technical data.
U.S. government contracts generally are subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), which sets forth policies, procedures and requirements for the acquisition of goods and services by the U.S. government, agency-specific regulations that implement or supplement FAR, such as the DoD’s Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS), and other applicable laws and regulations. These regulations impose a broad range of requirements, many of which are unique to government contracting, including various rules regarding procurement, import and export, security, contract pricing and cost, allowable costs, contract performance, contract termination and adjustment, audits, and IT system security and privacy controls. In addition, as government contractors, we are subject to routine audits and investigations by U.S. government agencies, such as the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) and the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA). These agencies review our performance, cost structure, incurred costs, forward pricing rates and compliance with applicable laws, regulations and standards under our contracts. The DCAA also reviews the adequacy of and our compliance with our internal control systems and policies, including our accounting, purchasing, government property, estimating, and related government business systems.
The U.S. government may revise its procurement practices or adopt new or revised contract rules and regulations at any time. In order to help ensure compliance with these complex laws and regulations, all of our employees are required to complete ethics and other compliance training relevant to their respective positions.
We are subject to other U.S. government laws, regulations and policies, including the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the False Claims Act. When working overseas, we must comply not only with applicable U.S. laws and regulations, but also with foreign government laws, regulations and procurement policies and practices, which may differ from U.S. laws, including regulations relating to import-export control, foreign tax considerations, data privacy, foreign labor and environmental law, and anti-corruption.

9

Table of Contents

Contracts
U.S. government programs generally are implemented by the award of individual contracts to a prime contractor, which may utilize one or more subcontractors. Our company usually is a prime contractor on long-term contracts that are of a finite duration of generally between three and ten years. We were the prime contractor on contracts representing 97%, 95% and 90% of our revenue for the three years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. In other contracts, we team with the prime contractor as a subcontractor. The U.S. Congress usually appropriates funds on a fiscal year basis even though a program may extend across several fiscal years. Consequently, programs are often only partially funded initially, and additional funds are committed only as the U.S. Congress approves further appropriations. Prior to the expiration of a contract, if the customer requires further services of the type provided by the contract, it typically begins a competitive rebidding or recompete process. The contracts and subcontracts under a program generally are subject to termination for convenience or adjustment if appropriations for such programs are not available or if they change. The U.S. government is required to equitably adjust a contract for additions to or reductions in scope or other changes, including price, which it directs.
Generally, the sales price elements for our contracts are cost-plus, cost-reimbursable or firm-fixed-price. We commonly have elements of cost-plus, cost-reimbursable and firm-fixed price contracts on a single contract.
On a cost-plus type contract, we are paid our allowable incurred costs plus a profit, which can be fixed or variable depending on the contract’s fee arrangement, up to funding levels predetermined by our customers. On cost-plus type contracts, we do not bear the risks of unexpected cost overruns, provided that we do not incur costs that exceed the predetermined funded amounts. Most of our cost-plus contracts also contain a firm-fixed-price element. Cost-plus type contracts with award and incentive fee provisions are our primary variable contract fee arrangement. Award fees provide for a fee based on actual performance relative to contractually specified performance criteria. Incentive fees provide for a fee based on the relationship between total allowable and target cost.
On most of our contracts, a cost-reimbursable element captures consumable materials required for the program. Typically these costs do not bear fees.
A firm-fixed-price type contract typically offers higher profit margin potential than a cost-plus type contract, which is commensurate with the greater levels of risk we assume on a firm-fixed-price type contract. On a firm-fixed-price type contract, we agree to perform the contractual statement of work for a predetermined contract price. Although a firm-fixed-price type contract generally permits us to retain profits if the total actual contract costs are less than the estimated contract costs, we bear the risk that increased or unexpected costs may reduce our profit or cause us to sustain losses on the contract. Although the overall scope of work required under the contract may not change, profit may be adjusted as experience is gained and as efficiencies are realized or costs are incurred.
The percentage of our total revenue generated from each contract type for the periods presented was as follows:


Year Ended December 31,
Contract type

2017

2016

2015
Cost-Plus and Cost-Reimbursable

73
%
 
75
%
 
73
%
Firm-Fixed-Price

27
%
 
25
%
 
27
%
Total Revenue

100
%
 
100
%
 
100
%
Backlog
For a discussion of our backlog, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations-Backlog” in Item 7 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Environmental, Health and Safety
We are subject to federal, state, local, and foreign environmental protection laws and regulations, including those governing the management and disposal of hazardous substances, the cleanup of contaminated sites, and the maintenance of a safe and healthy workplace for our employees, contractors, and visitors. Environmental, health and safety laws and regulations are subject to change, the nature of which is inherently unpredictable, and the timing of potential changes is uncertain. Environmental, health and safety requirements are significant factors affecting all of our operations, and we have established a comprehensive program to address compliance with applicable environmental, health and safety, requirements.

10

Table of Contents

Employees
Integrity, Respect and Responsibility are our core values. We maintain rigorous compliance and other corporate responsibility programs that are intended to ensure a safe and secure work environment and compliance with government regulations as well as allow employees to voice any concerns while knowing that matters raised will be appropriately addressed. Our company employs people of diverse backgrounds and we believe that our diversity enhances our creativity and enriches our work culture. We are committed to good corporate citizenship and intend to always seek to maintain the trust and support of the communities in which our employees work and live.
Following the acquisition of SENTEL on January 23, 2018, our global workforce is comprised of approximately 6,700 employees and approximately 5,800 subcontracted workers, spanning 177 locations in 21 countries. Approximately 2,500 of our employees are represented under 19 collective bargaining agreements with labor unions. In the ordinary course of business, a number of collective bargaining agreements will be subject to renegotiation in a given year. We do not expect that any of the contracts subject to renegotiation in 2018 (individually or as a whole) present a significant risk to our business. We believe that relations with our employees and union representatives are positive.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following table sets forth certain information as of December 31, 2017, regarding our executive officers including a five-year employment history and any directorships held in public companies.
Name
 
Age
 
Current Title(s)
Business Experience
Charles L. Prow
 
58

 
President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Director
Mr. Prow has served as President, CEO and director of the Company since December 2016. Mr. Prow has over thirty years of information technology and federal services experience, including leadership positions at IBM Corporation, PricewaterhouseCoopers, and Coopers & Lybrand. During his career, he has run large global government services organizations, delivering solutions to a wide array of DoD and other government customers. From August 2015 through August 2016, he served as President, CPS Professional Services, a service-disabled veteran-owned small business, where he provided management consulting services to U.S. government clients. Previously, Mr. Prow served in multiple roles with IBM Corporation including: (i) from 2014 to 2015 as General Manager, Global Government Industry in connection with IBM’s technology and services competencies, where he had responsibility for global revenues exceeding $9 billion, (ii) from 2012 to 2013 as General Manager, Global Business Services, with strategic, profit and loss and operational responsibility for IBM’s over $4 billion North America consulting services unit, and (iii) from 2007 to 2012 as General Manager, Global Business Services, with strategic, profit and loss and operational responsibility for IBM’s over $2.4 billion U.S. Public Sector business unit. He currently serves on the board of directors for the Wolf Trap Foundation for the Performing Arts and the International Research and Exchange Board (IREX).
Matthew M. Klein
 
47

 
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (CFO)
Mr. Klein has served as Senior Vice President and CFO of the Company since the Spin-off. Prior to the Spin-off, Mr. Klein was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Mission Systems business division of Exelis and had served in that position since May 2011. Prior to being named to that position, Mr. Klein was the Assistant Controller for the Electronic Systems business of ITT Communications Systems division located in Fort Wayne, Indiana. He also served as the acting Assistant Controller for ITT Electronic Systems, Radar, Reconnaissance and Acoustic Systems in Van Nuys, California. In addition, Mr. Klein served in the ITT internal audit department leading various audits for units worldwide. He joined ITT Corporation in 1996.

11

Table of Contents

Michele L. Tyler
 
49

 
Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary
Ms. Tyler has served as Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary since the Spin-off. In addition to the legal function, Ms. Tyler is responsible for overseeing the Contracts, Supply Chain, Trade Compliance, Environmental, Safety & Health, Security, Facilities, and Ethics & Compliance departments. From March 2012 to September 2014, Ms. Tyler was Vice President and General Counsel of the Mission Systems business division of Exelis. Ms. Tyler was responsible for all legal support for Mission Systems. From October 2011 to March 2012, she was Associate General Counsel, primarily responsible for labor and employment matters for the Exelis Mission Systems business. Ms. Tyler joined ITT Mission Systems in January 2009 as Senior Counsel.
Francis A. Peloso
 
48

 
Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer
Mr. Peloso has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer since the Spin-off. Prior to the Spin-off, Mr. Peloso was Vice President and Director, Human Resources of the Mission Systems business division of Exelis. Appointed to this role in November 2010, Mr. Peloso was responsible for all human resources activities and strategies for Mission Systems. Mr. Peloso joined ITT Corporation in 2000 and worked across a variety of business areas, including ITT Corporation's World Headquarters, ITT Mission Systems, ITT Communications Systems, and ITT Electronic Systems. From April 2010 to November 2010, Mr. Peloso served as the West Coast Regional Director for the Electronic Systems Division of ITT Corporation.
Susan L. Deagle
 
49

 
Senior Vice President and Chief Growth Officer
Ms. Deagle has served as Senior Vice President and Chief Growth Officer of the Company since May 2017. She is responsible for the Company's revenue growth, partnerships, strategy, marketing and business development. From 2015 to 2017, Ms. Deagle served as Vice President and Integration Executive for an acquisition aligned with the inception of IBM Corporation's Watson Health business unit. From 2013 to 2015, Ms. Deagle served as Vice President for sales and distribution strategy for IBM's U.S. Federal and Government Industries where she drove cross-brand and cross-sell opportunities to increase market penetration, expanding IBM's base business. From 2011 to 2012, Ms. Deagle served as Director of Sales and Distribution Strategy and Planning for IBM's global public sector. While at IBM, she also created and ran the federal government wide Acquisition Contract Center.
Kevin A. Leonard
 
60

 
Senior Vice President, Facility and Logistics Services
Mr. Leonard has served as Senior Vice President for Facility and Logistics Services of the Company since March 2017. He is responsible for the development and execution of short and long-term strategies aimed at growing the Facility and Logistics Services business. From 2013 to 2017, Mr. Leonard served as Vice President of contingency operations for Fluor Government Group. In this role, his responsibilities included the strategic planning and global execution of services supporting commercial clients, the U.S. federal government and select foreign governments. From 2012 to 2013, he served as director of launch operations for Amazon, where he assembled a launch team and successfully delivered eight new fulfillment centers in a four month period resulting in significant savings in resources, manpower, and cycle time. Mr. Leonard is also a retired U.S. Army Major General with a distinguished 33-year career leading complex transportation and logistics organizations. Most recently, he served as Commander Military Surface Deployment Distribution Command from 2010 to 2012.

12

Table of Contents

David A. Hathaway
 
51

 
Senior Vice President, IT and Network Communication Services
Mr. Hathaway has served as a Senior Vice President for Information Technology and Network Communication Services of the Company since October 2017. He is responsible for the development and execution of short and long-term information technology and network communications services strategies designed to create new growth opportunities within and across the Vectrus lines of service. Mr. Hathaway held several senior positions at IBM from 2004 to 2017. From 2015 to 2017, Mr. Hathaway served as vice president and partner of IBM's Global Business Services and leader of the Defense and Intelligence Industry team. During this time, Mr. Hathaway held similar senior leadership roles in IBM's Global Business Services Public Sector business. From 2015 to 2016, he led the Application Development and Integration service line responsible for custom software development, systems integration and engineering, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and program management. From 2012 to 2014, Mr. Hathaway led IBM Global Business Services in the Canadian public sector market, which included federal, provincial, healthcare, and education. Mr. Hathaway served seven years on active duty in the Air Force as a Communications-Computer Systems Officer. He had multiple assignments focused on information technology acquisition, research and development program management, and communications operations and maintenance.
Available Information
You can read and copy any materials that we file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Information on the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-732-0330. In addition, the SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file with the SEC at www.sec.gov.
Our website address is www.vectrus.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to these reports are available free of charge on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file those reports with the SEC. The information provided on our website is not part of this report, and is therefore not incorporated by reference, unless such information is otherwise specifically referenced elsewhere in this report.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider each of the following risks, which we believe are the principal risks that we face and of which we are currently aware, and all of the other information in this report. Some of the risks described below relate to our business, while others relate to the Spin-off. Other risks relate principally to the securities markets and ownership of our common stock.
Should any of the following risks and uncertainties develop into actual events, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Relating to Our Business
We face the following risks in connection with the business and industry in which we operate:
A significant portion of our revenue is derived from a few large contracts, and the loss or material reduction of any of these contracts could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows.
Aggregate revenue from our two largest contracts amounted to approximately $0.6 billion, or 57.9%, of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2017, our two largest contracts were the K-BOSSS and the OMDAC-SWACA contracts. The K-BOSSS contract is exercised through March 28, 2018 with an evaluated nine-month option of March 29, 2018 through December 28, 2018 and an evaluated three-month option of December 29, 2018 through March 28, 2019. The right to exercise an option period is at the sole discretion of the U.S. government. Performance on the OMDAC-SWACA contact commenced in July 2013 with a base period of 11 months and four option years. The U.S. government has exercised four option years, which run through May 2018. The U.S. government has stated that its anticipated timeline for the re-competition award for this contract is for the solicitation to be released in February 2019 and performance to commence sometime in 2019. These two contracts each accounted for more than 10% of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017. Our results of operations and cash flows are highly dependent on these contracts. The loss or material reduction of either of these contracts would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash

13

Table of Contents

flows. See "Recent Developments" and "Significant Contracts" in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Competition within our markets may reduce our revenue and market share.
Our business is highly competitive, and we compete with larger companies that have greater name recognition, greater financial resources, and larger technical staffs. Within our industry, companies have engaged in merger and acquisition activity, with a goal to increase their competitive position. Our competitors may be able to provide our customers with different or greater capabilities or better contract terms than we can provide, including past contract experience, geographic presence, price, and the availability of qualified professional personnel. Moreover, even if we are qualified to work on a government contract, we may not be awarded the contract because of existing government policies designed to assist small businesses and other designated classifications of business, such as under-represented minority contractors. In addition, our competitors may consolidate or establish teaming or other relationships among themselves or with third parties to increase their ability to address customers’ needs. Accordingly, larger or new competitors or alliances among competitors may emerge that may adversely affect our ability to compete. If we are unable to compete successfully against our current or future competitors, we may experience declines in revenue and market share, which could negatively impact our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
We are dependent on the U.S. government and, if our reputation or relationship with the U.S. government was harmed, our revenue and growth prospects could be adversely affected.
All of our 2017, 2016, and 2015 revenue was derived from services ultimately sold to the U.S. government, primarily the DoD, either as a prime contractor or as a subcontractor to other contractors engaged in work for the U.S. government. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we generated approximately 82% of our total revenue from the U.S. Army. We expect to continue to derive all or most of our revenue from work performed under U.S. government contracts. Our reputation and relationship with the U.S. government, and in particular with the branches and agencies of the DoD, are key factors in maintaining and growing this revenue. Negative press reports or publicity, which could pertain to employee or subcontractor misconduct, conflicts of interest, termination of a contract or task order, poor contract performance, deficiencies in services, reports or other deliverables, information security breaches, business system disapprovals, or other aspects of our business, regardless of accuracy, could harm our reputation, particularly with these branches and agencies. If our reputation is negatively affected, we lose our ability to conduct business in a foreign country (e.g., loss of business license), we lose a required security clearance, or we are suspended or debarred from contracting with government agencies or any branch of the DoD for any reason, the amount of our business with the U.S. government and other customers could decrease and our future revenue and growth prospects could be adversely affected.
We may not be successful in winning new contracts, which could have an adverse impact on our business and prospects.
Our contracts with the federal government are typically awarded through a competitive bidding process. This competitive bidding process presents a number of risks, including the following:
We may bid on programs for which the work activities, deliverables, and timelines are vague or for which the solicitation incompletely describes the actual work, which may result in inaccurate pricing assumptions;
We may incur substantial costs and spend a significant amount of managerial time and effort preparing bids and proposals; and
We may incur the opportunity cost of not bidding on and winning other contracts that we may have pursued otherwise.
Because our contracts are typically for a fixed duration, if we are unable to win a particular new contract, we may be prevented from providing the customer the services that are purchased under that contract for a number of years. If we are unable to consistently win new contract awards, our business and prospects will be adversely affected, and our actual results may differ materially and adversely from those anticipated.






14

Table of Contents

U.S. government contracts are only partially funded, and the termination, expiration or non-renewal of our existing U.S. government contracts may adversely affect our business.
The U.S. government services marketplace is characterized by contracts of shorter duration as compared to large production and systems integration programs. U.S. government services contracts generally are of a finite duration of five years and usually range between three and ten years. The U.S. Congress usually appropriates funds on a fiscal year basis even though a program may extend across several fiscal years. Consequently, programs are often only partially funded initially, and additional funds are committed only as the U.S. Congress approves further appropriations. The termination or reduction of funding for a U.S. government program would result in a loss of anticipated future revenue attributable to that program, which could have an adverse impact on our operations. In addition, the termination of a program or the failure to commit additional funds to a program that already has been started could result in lost revenue and increase our overall costs of doing business.
Prior to the expiration of a contract, if the customer requires further services of the type provided by the contract, it typically begins a competitive rebidding or recompete process. There can be no assurance that we will be able to renew or replace our current contracts upon expiration or completion. As contracts are recompeted, the scope, scale or profitability or other contract elements of the new contract could materially differ from the original contract. In addition, the U.S. government may terminate any of our government contracts, in whole or in part, at any time at its convenience with little or no notice. Additionally, the U.S. government may terminate our contracts for default if we fail to meet our obligations under a contract. If any of our contracts were to be terminated for convenience, we generally would be entitled to receive payment for work completed and allowable termination or cancellation costs. If any of our government contracts were to be terminated for default, generally the customer would pay us only for the work that has been accepted; moreover, the customer can require us to pay the difference between the original contract price and the cost to re-procure the contract deliverables, net of the work accepted from the original contract. In addition, the U.S. government can also hold us liable for damages resulting from the default.
The expiration, non-renewal or termination of any of our government contracts, whether for convenience or default, would adversely affect our current programs and reduce our revenue, earnings and cash flows. A termination for default may also negatively affect our reputation, performance ratings and our ability to win new contracts, particularly for contracts covering the same or similar types of services.
Our business could be adversely affected by bid protests.
We may experience additional costs and delays if our competitors protest or challenge awards of contracts to us in competitive bidding. Any such protest or challenge could result in the resubmission of bids on modified specifications, or in the termination, reduction or modification of the awarded contract. It can take a significant amount of time to resolve contract protests and, in the interim, the contracting U.S. federal agency may suspend our performance under the contract pending the outcome of the protest. For example, in October 2014, a Danish subsidiary of Vectrus received notice of an award of the THULE contract, which was protested by three competitors. Following a lengthy litigation process, the cases related to the THULE contract award protests were dismissed in October 2016. In January 2017, the Court of Federal Claims granted one protestor’s motion for reconsideration to address two claims that were not expressly ruled upon in the court’s dismissal of the case in October 2016. In April 2017, the court denied the protestor's motions and entered judgment in favor of the U.S. government and our Danish subsidiary. Our Danish subsidiary began full contract operations on October 1, 2017.
In addition, we may protest the contract awards of our competitors when we believe it is prudent to do so to protect our rights and interest in the competition, such as our protest of the K-BOSSS award in October 2016 with the GAO. This process requires the time, effort and attention of our management and employees and incurs additional costs.
As a U.S. government contractor, we are subject to a number of procurement laws and regulations and could be adversely affected by changes in regulations or our failure to comply with these regulations.
We operate in a highly regulated environment and must comply with many significant procurement regulations and other requirements. These regulations and requirements, although customary in government contracts, increase our performance and compliance costs. If any such regulations or procurement requirements change, our costs of complying with them could increase and therefore reduce our margins. Some significant statutes and regulations that affect us include:
The FAR and department or agency-specific regulations that implement or supplement the FAR, such as the DoD’s DFARS, which regulate the formation, administration and performance of U.S. government contracts;
The Truth in Negotiations Act, which requires certification and disclosure of cost and pricing data in connection with certain contract negotiations;

15

Table of Contents

The Procurement Integrity Act, which regulates access to competitor bid and proposal information and government source selection information, and our ability to provide compensation to certain former government officials;
The Civil False Claims Act, which provides for substantial civil penalties, including claims for treble damages, for violations, including for submission of a false or fraudulent claim to the U.S. government for payment or approval; and
The U.S. Government Cost Accounting Standards (CAS), which impose accounting requirements that govern our right to reimbursement under certain cost-based U.S. government contracts.
If we are found to have violated these or other laws or regulations, or are found not to have acted responsibly as defined by them, we may be subject to reductions of the value of contracts; contract modifications or terminations; the assessment of penalties and fines, compensatory damages or treble damages; or suspension or debarment from government contracting or subcontracting, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
Our business is subject to audits, reviews, cost adjustments, and investigations by the U.S. government, which, if resolved unfavorably to us, could adversely affect our profitability, cash position or growth prospects.
U.S. government agencies, including the DCAA, the DCMA and others, routinely audit and review our performance on government contracts, indirect rates and pricing practices, and compliance with applicable contracting and procurement laws, regulations and standards. They also review the adequacy of our compliance with government standards for our business systems, including our accounting, purchasing, government property, estimating, and related business systems.
Both contractors and the U.S. government agencies conducting these audits and reviews have come under increased scrutiny. As a result, audits and reviews have become more rigorous and the standards to which we are held are being more strictly interpreted and applied, increasing the likelihood of an audit or review resulting in an adverse outcome. These audits and reviews, although customary in government contracts, increase our performance and compliance costs. In addition, delays in audits or reviews by U.S. government agencies may increase the time and effort required for us to prepare responses and provide data.
Government audits or other reviews could result in adjustments to contract costs, mandatory customer refunds, or decreased billings to our U.S. government customers until the deficiencies identified in the audits or reviews are corrected and our corrections are accepted by DCMA. Such adjustments could be applied retroactively, which could result in significant customer refunds. A determination of non-compliance with applicable contracting and procurement laws, regulations and standards could result in the U.S. government imposing penalties and sanctions against us, including withholding of payments, suspension of payments and increased government scrutiny that could delay or adversely affect our ability to invoice and receive timely payment on contracts, perform contracts or compete for contracts. Non-compliance by us could result in our being placed on the “Excluded Parties List” maintained by the General Services Administration, and we could become ineligible to receive certain contracts, subcontracts and other benefits from the U.S. government or to perform work under a government contract or subcontract until the basis for the listing has been appropriately addressed. In addition, the U.S. government, from time to time, may require its contractors to reduce certain contract prices, or may disallow costs allocated to certain contracts. These adjustments can involve substantial amounts. In the past, as a result of such audits and other investigations and inquiries, we have on occasion made adjustments to our contract prices and the costs allocated to our government contracts.
We are routinely subjected to governmental investigations relating to our contracts and operations. If a review or investigation identifies improper or illegal activities, we may be subject to civil or criminal penalties or administrative sanctions, including the termination of contracts, forfeiture of profits, the triggering of price reduction clauses, suspension of payments, fines and suspension or debarment from doing business with governmental agencies. Civil penalties and sanctions are not uncommon in our industry. If we incur a material penalty or administrative sanction, our reputation, business, results of operations, and future prospects could be adversely affected.

16

Table of Contents

We rely on our information and communications systems in our operations. Security breaches and other disruptions could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
As a U.S. defense contractor, we face certain security threats, including cybersecurity threats to our information technology infrastructure, attempts to gain access to proprietary or classified information, and threats to physical security. In connection with the information technology and network communications services that we provide to our customers, we also may encounter cybersecurity threats at customer sites that we operate. The risk of a security breach or disruption, particularly through cyber attack or cyber intrusion, including by computer hackers, foreign governments and cyber terrorists, has increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions from around the world have increased. Cybersecurity threats are significant and evolving and include, among others, malicious software, attempts to gain unauthorized access to data, and other electronic security breaches that could lead to disruptions in mission critical systems, unauthorized release of confidential or otherwise protected information and corruption of data. In addition to security threats, we are also subject to other systems failures, including network, software or hardware failures, whether caused by us, third-party service providers, natural disasters, power shortages, terrorist attacks or other events. The unavailability of our information or communications systems, the failure of these systems to perform as anticipated or any significant breach of data security could cause loss of data, disrupt our operations, lead to financial losses from remedial actions, require significant management attention and resources, subject us to claims for breach of contract, damages, penalties or contract termination, and negatively impact our reputation among our customers and the public, which could have a negative impact on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. Our property and business interruption insurance may be inadequate to compensate us for all losses that may occur as a result of any system or operational failure or disruption.
Our systems are decentralized, which presents various risks, including the risk that we may be slower or less able to identify or react to problems affecting a business function than we would be in a more centralized environment. In addition, “company-wide” business initiatives, such as the integration of information technology systems or the formation of a technology system impacting different parts of our business, are often more challenging and costly to implement, and carry a higher risk of failure, than they would be in a more centralized environment. Depending on the nature of the initiative in question, such failure could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. Although preventative measures may help mitigate the damage from such occurrences, the damage and disruption to our business resulting from any of these events may be significant. If our insurance and other risk mitigation mechanisms are not sufficient to recover the costs, we could experience an adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
We continue to evaluate the need to upgrade and/or replace our systems and network infrastructure to protect our computing environment, to stay current on vendor supported products, to improve the effectiveness of our systems, strengthen cybersecurity requirements and improve the efficiency of our systems. The implementation of new systems and information technology could adversely impact our operations by imposing substantial capital expenditures, demands on management time and risks of delays or difficulties in transitioning to new systems. In addition, our systems implementations may not result in productivity improvements at the levels anticipated. Systems implementation disruption and any other information technology disruption, if not anticipated and appropriately mitigated, could have a material adverse effect on our business.
             As a U.S. entity operating in multiple European countries, we are also subject to regulatory compliance requirements under the European Union (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) that require our business to comply with security and privacy controls to protect personal data and privacy of EU citizens for transactions that occur within EU member states.  A failure to comply with the requirements could negatively impact our business and financial condition.
As a U.S. government contractor, we are also subject to regulatory compliance requirements under the DFARS and other federal regulations that require our IT systems to comply with the security and privacy controls in National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-171 (NIST 800-171). We may also be responsible if our subcontractors do not comply with these requirements. A failure to comply with the requirements could negatively impact our business and financial condition.
Many of the systems and networks that we develop, install and maintain for our customers involve managing and protecting personal information and information relating to national security and other sensitive government functions. While we have programs designed to comply with relevant privacy and security laws and restrictions, if a system or network that we develop, install or maintain were to fail or experience a security breach or service interruption, whether caused by us, third-party service providers, cybersecurity threats or other events, we may experience loss of revenue, remediation costs or face claims for damages or contract termination. Any such event could prevent us from having access to or being eligible for further work on such systems and networks and cause serious harm to our reputation. Our errors and omissions liability insurance may be inadequate to compensate us for all of the damages that we may incur and, as a result, our future results could be adversely affected.


17

Table of Contents

We may make or enter into acquisitions, investments and joint ventures that involve numerous risks and uncertainties.
We may selectively pursue strategic acquisitions, investments and joint ventures, such as our acquisition of SENTEL in January 2018. These transactions require significant investment of time and resources and may disrupt our business and distract our management from other responsibilities. Even if successful, these transactions could reduce earnings for a number of reasons, including the amortization of intangible assets, impairment charges, acquired operations that are not yet profitable or the payment of additional consideration under earn-out arrangements if an acquisition performs better than expected. If we engage in such transactions, we may incur significant transaction and integration costs and have difficulty integrating personnel, operations, products or technologies or otherwise realizing synergies or other benefits from the transactions. The integration process could result in the loss of key employees, loss of key customers, loss of key vendors, decreases in revenue and increases in operating costs. In addition, we may assume material liabilities in an acquisition, including liabilities that are unknown as of the time of the acquisition. Such transactions may dilute our earnings per share, disrupt our ongoing business, distract our management and employees, increase our expenses, perform poorly, subject us to liabilities, and increase our risk of litigation, all of which could harm our business.
Misconduct of our employees, subcontractors, agents, prime contractors or business partners could cause us to lose customers and could have a significant adverse impact on our business and reputation, adversely affecting our ability to obtain new contracts.
Misconduct, fraud or other improper activities by our employees, subcontractors, agents, prime contractors or business partners could have a material adverse impact on our business and reputation. Such misconduct could include the failure to comply with federal, state, local or foreign government procurement regulations, regulations regarding the protection of classified or personal information, legislation regarding the pricing of labor and other costs in government contracts, laws and regulations relating to environmental matters, bribery of foreign government officials, lobbying or similar activities, boycotts, antitrust and any other applicable laws or regulations. Misconduct involving data security lapses resulting in the compromise of personal information or the improper use of our customer’s sensitive or classified information could result in remediation costs, regulatory sanctions against us and serious harm to our reputation. Although we have implemented policies, procedures and controls that are designed to prevent and detect these activities, these precautions may not prevent all misconduct and as a result, we could face unknown risks or losses. Misconduct by any of our employees, subcontractors, agents, prime contractors or business partners or our failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations could subject us to fines and penalties, loss of security clearance, loss of current and future customer contracts and suspension or debarment from contracting with federal, state or local government agencies, any of which would adversely affect our business, our reputation and our future financial results.
Uncertainties in the U.S. government defense budget, changes in spending or budgetary priorities or delays in contract awards may significantly and adversely affect our future revenue and limit our growth prospects.
Our contracts and revenue primarily depend upon the U.S. DoD budget, which is subject to the congressional budget authorization and appropriations process and is difficult to project. The U.S. Congress usually appropriates funds for a given program on a September 30 fiscal year basis, even though contract periods of performance may extend over many years. Consequently, at the beginning of a major program, the contract is usually partially funded, and additional monies are normally committed to the contract by the procuring agency only as appropriations are made by Congress in future fiscal years. DoD budgets are a function of a number of factors beyond our control, including, but not limited to, changes in U.S. procurement policies, budget considerations, current and future economic conditions, presidential administration and congressional priorities, changing national security and defense requirements, geopolitical developments and actual fiscal year congressional appropriations for defense budgets. Any of these factors could result in a significant redirection of current and future DoD budgets and impact our future operations and cash flows. Such factors may have direct bearing on our new business opportunities as well as on whether the U.S. government will exercise its options for services under existing contracts, thus affecting the timing and volume of our business.
The U.S. government also conducts periodic reviews of U.S. defense strategies and priorities, which may shift DoD budgetary priorities, reduce overall U.S. government spending or delay contract or task order awards for defense related programs. A reduction in U.S. government defense spending could potentially reduce our future revenue and earnings and have a material impact on our business. Delays in the completion of the U.S. government’s budget process could delay procurement of the services we provide and have an adverse effect on our business.

18

Table of Contents

We use estimates in accounting for many of our programs, and changes in our estimates could adversely affect our future financial results.
Revenue from our contracts is recognized primarily using the percentage-of-completion method or on the basis of partial performance towards completion. These methodologies require estimates of total contract revenue, total costs at completion, and fees earned on the contract. Contract estimates are based on various assumptions to project the outcome of future events that often span several years. These assumptions include labor productivity and availability; the complexity of the work to be performed; the cost and availability of materials; and the performance of subcontractors. This estimation process, particularly due to the nature of the services being performed and the long-term nature of certain contracts, is complex and involves significant judgment. Adjustments to original estimates are often required as work progresses, experience is gained and additional information becomes known, even though the scope of the work required under the contract may not change. Any adjustment as a result of a change in estimates is recognized as additional information becomes known. Changes in the underlying assumptions, circumstances or estimates could result in adjustments that may adversely affect our future financial results. Beginning in 2018, our revenue recognition will be impacted by our adoption of a comprehensive new revenue recognition accounting standard. Refer to Note 2, "Recent Accounting Pronouncements" and Note 3, "Adoption of ASC Topic 606 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers" in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
We are subject to risks associated with operating internationally.
Our U.S. government contracts operating internationally represented approximately 85% of total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017. We are subject to a variety of U.S. and foreign laws and regulations, including, without limitation, business compliance, tax and anti-corruption laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. We also employ international personnel and engage with foreign subcontractors and labor brokers, which requires compliance with numerous foreign laws and regulations related to labor, benefits, taxes, insurance and reporting requirements, among others. Failure by us or our subcontractors or vendors to comply with these laws and regulations could result in administrative, civil, or criminal liabilities, suspension or debarment from government contracts, which could have a material adverse effect on us.
Our business operations are also subject to a variety of risks associated with conducting business internationally, including, without limitation:
Political instability in foreign countries;
Terrorist activity by various groups in the areas in which we operate;
Imposition of inconsistent foreign laws, regulations or policies or changes in or interpretations of such laws, regulations or policies;
Currency exchange controls, fluctuations of currency and foreign exchange rates, and currency revaluations;
Conducting business in places where laws, business practices and customs are unfamiliar or unknown; and
Imposition of limitations on or increases in withholding and other taxes on payments by foreign operations.
The services we provide internationally, including through the use of subcontractors, are sometimes in countries with unstable governments, in areas of military conflict, in hostile and unstable environments, including war zones, or at military installations. This increases the risk of an incident resulting in damage or destruction to our work or living sites or resulting in injury or loss of life to our employees, subcontractors or other third parties. We maintain insurance to mitigate risk and potential liabilities related to our international operations, but our insurance coverage may not be adequate to cover these claims and liabilities and we may be forced to bear substantial costs arising from those claims. The impact of these factors is difficult to predict, but any one or more of them could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Our level of indebtedness and our ability to make payments on or service our indebtedness may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $79.0 million of aggregate debt outstanding, which consists of a term loan (See Note 7, "Debt," in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). We also have the ability to incur up to $120.0 million of additional debt under our revolving credit facility. Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness, as well as any future debt that we may incur, will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future from operations, financings or asset sales. Our ability to generate cash is subject to our performance and to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control.

19

Table of Contents

If we are not able to repay or refinance our debt as it becomes due, we may be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as selling assets, restructuring debt or obtaining additional debt or equity on terms that may be onerous or highly dilutive, if we can obtain it at all. If we raise equity through the issuance of preferred stock, the terms of the preferred stock may give the holders rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock, particularly in the event of liquidation. We may not be able to engage in any of these activities or engage in these activities on desirable terms, which could result in a default on our debt obligations.
Our credit agreement contains covenants with which we must comply or risk default.
Our credit agreement contains a number of significant covenants that, among other things, restrict our ability to create liens and encumbrances; incur additional indebtedness; merge, dissolve, liquidate or consolidate; make acquisitions, investments, advances or loans; dispose of or transfer assets; pay dividends or make other payments in respect of our capital stock; redeem or repurchase capital stock or prepay, redeem or repurchase certain debt; engage in certain transactions with affiliates; enter into speculative hedging arrangements; and enter into certain restrictive agreements.
These restrictions could impair our ability to finance our future operations or capital needs or engage in other business activities that may be in our interests. In addition, the credit agreement also requires us to maintain compliance with certain financial ratios, including those relating to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization and consolidated indebtedness. Our ability to comply with these ratios and covenants may be affected by events beyond our control. A breach of the credit agreement or our inability to comply with or renegotiate the required financial ratios or covenants included therein could result in a default under the credit agreement and cause acceleration of the outstanding debt.
Our variable rate indebtedness may expose us to interest rate risk, which could cause our debt costs to increase significantly.
Our term loan and any revolving facility borrowings we may incur have variable rates of interest, which expose us to interest rate risks and to the risk of rising interest rates. As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $79.0 million outstanding under our floating-rate term loan and the ability to incur up to $120.0 million of additional floating-rate debt under our revolving facility. Although we have hedged a portion of our exposure to interest rate risk under the term loan through an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $31.6 million at December 31, 2017, if interest rates increase in the future, then the interest expense on the variable rate debt could increase materially.
Unanticipated changes in our tax provisions or exposure to additional U.S. and foreign tax liabilities could affect our profitability.
We are subject to various taxes, including but not limited to income, gross receipts and payroll withholding taxes in the U.S. and many foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining our worldwide provision or benefit for taxes. In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the ultimate tax determination is uncertain. Furthermore, changes in domestic or foreign tax laws and regulations, or their interpretation and enforcement, could result in higher or lower taxes assessed or changes in the taxability of certain revenue or the deductibility of certain expenses, thereby affecting our tax expense and profitability. The Tax Cut and Jobs Act (the Tax Act) was enacted on December 22, 2017. We are still evaluating the impact of the Tax Act on our income tax expense in future years. See Note 4, “Income Taxes,” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information. In addition, we regularly are under audit by tax authorities. The final determination of tax audits and any related litigation could be materially different from our historical tax provisions and accruals. Additionally, changes in the geographic mix of our revenue could also impact our tax liabilities and affect our overall tax expense and profitability.
Our contract sites are inherently dangerous workplaces. Failure to maintain safe work sites and equipment could result in environmental disasters, employee deaths or injuries, reduced profitability, the loss of projects or customers and possible exposure to litigation.
Our project sites often put our employees and others in close proximity with mechanized equipment, moving vehicles, and highly regulated materials. Although we have safety procedures in place, if we fail to implement them or if the procedures we implement are ineffective, we may suffer the loss of or injury to our employees, as well as expose ourselves to possible litigation. As a result, our failure to maintain adequate safety standards and equipment, as well as the nature of the environment in which we conduct business, could result in the loss of projects or customers, and could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We may not realize as revenue the full amounts reflected in our backlog, which could adversely affect our future revenue and growth.
As of December 31, 2017, our total backlog was $2.9 billion, which included $718.8 million in funded backlog. We may not realize the full amount of our backlog as revenue, particularly unfunded backlog and future services where the

20

Table of Contents

customer has an option to decline our continued services under a contract. In addition, there can be no assurance that our backlog will result in actual revenue in any particular period. Our receipt of revenue, and the timing and amount of revenue under contracts included in our backlog are subject to various contingencies, many of which are beyond our control, including congressional appropriations. In particular, delays in the completion of the U.S. government’s budgeting process and the use of continuing resolutions could adversely affect our ability to recognize revenue timely under the contracts included in our backlog. Furthermore, the actual receipt of revenue from contracts included in our backlog may never occur or may be delayed because:
a program schedule could change or the program could be canceled; a contract’s funding or scope could be reduced, modified, delayed, or terminated early, including as a result of a lack of appropriated funds or as a result of cost cutting initiatives and other efforts to reduce U.S. government spending or the automatic federal defense spending cuts required by sequestration;
in the case of funded backlog, the period of performance for the contract has expired; or
in the case of unfunded backlog, funding may not be available; or, in the case of priced options, our clients may not exercise their options.
Our earnings and margins depend, in part, on subcontractor performance.
We rely on other companies to perform some of the services that we provide to our customers. Disruptions or performance problems caused by our subcontractors could have an adverse effect on our ability as a prime contractor or higher tier subcontractor to meet our commitments to customers.
We may have disputes with our subcontractors arising from, among other things, the quality and timeliness of work performed by the subcontractor, customer concerns about the subcontractor, our failure to extend existing task orders or issue new task orders under a subcontract, proper invoicing, cost reasonableness, allocability, allowability, the hiring of each other’s personnel, adjustments to the scope of the subcontractor’s work, or the subcontractor’s failure to comply with applicable law or regulations. Uncertain economic conditions heighten the risk of financial stress of our subcontractors, which could adversely impact their ability to meet their contractual requirements to us. If any of our subcontractors fail to timely meet their contractual obligations or have regulatory compliance or other problems, our ability to fulfill our obligations may be jeopardized. Significant losses could arise in future periods and subcontractor performance deficiencies could result in our termination for default.
Our earnings and margins may vary based on the mix of our contracts, our performance, and our ability to control costs.
We generate revenue under various types of contracts, which include cost-plus, cost-reimbursable (including non-fee-bearing costs) and firm-fixed-price. Our earnings and profitability may vary materially depending on changes in the proportionate amount of revenue derived from each type of contract, the nature of services provided, as well as the achievement of performance objectives and the stage of performance at which the right to receive fees, particularly under incentive and award fee contracts, is finally determined. Cost-reimbursable contracts generally have lower profitability than firm-fixed-price contracts.
Our profitability is adversely affected when we incur contract costs that we cannot bill to our customers. To varying degrees, each of our contract types involves some risk that we could underestimate the costs and resources necessary to fulfill the contract. While firm-fixed-price contracts allow us to benefit from cost savings, these contracts also increase our exposure to the risk of cost overruns. Revenue derived from firm-fixed-price contracts represented approximately 27% of our total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017. When making proposals on firm-fixed-price contracts, we rely heavily on our estimates of costs and timing for completing the associated projects, as well as assumptions regarding technical issues. In each case, our failure to accurately estimate costs or the resources needed to perform our contracts or to effectively manage and control our costs during the performance of our work could result in reduced profits or in losses. If we incur costs in excess of initial estimates or funding on a contract, we generally seek reimbursement for those costs, but we may not be able to negotiate full recovery for these costs. More generally, any increased or unexpected costs or unanticipated delays in connection with the performance of our contracts, including costs and delays caused by contractual disputes or other factors outside of our control, such as performance failures of our subcontractors, natural disasters or other force majeure events, could make our contracts less profitable than expected or unprofitable. The U.S. and other countries also may experience increases in inflation. A significant increase in inflation rates could adversely impact the profitability of these contracts.
The failure to perform to customer expectations or contract requirements may result in reduced fees or claims made against us by our customers and may affect our financial performance in that period. Under each type of contract, if we are unable to control costs, our operating results could be adversely affected, particularly if we are unable to justify an increase in

21

Table of Contents

contract value to our customers. Cost overruns or the failure to perform on existing programs also may adversely affect our ability to retain existing programs and win future contract awards.
The DoD continues to modify its business practices, which could have a material effect on its overall procurement processes and adversely impact our current programs and potential new awards.
The DoD continues to pursue various initiatives designed to gain efficiencies and to focus and enhance business practices. These initiatives and resulting changes, such as increased usage of firm-fixed-price contracts, where we bear the risk that increased or unexpected costs may reduce our profit or cause us to sustain losses, multiple award IDIQ contracts and small and disadvantaged business set-aside contracts, are having an impact on the contracting environment in which we do business. Any of these changes could impact our ability to obtain new contracts or renew our existing contracts when those contracts are recompeted. These initiatives, such as IDIQ contracts, continue to evolve, and the full impact to our business remains uncertain and subject to the manner in which the DoD implements them. As a result of these initiatives, our profit margins on future contracts may be reduced and may require us to make sustained efforts to reduce costs in order to realize revenue and profits under our contracts. If we are not successful in reducing the amount of costs we incur, our profitability on our contracts will be negatively impacted. Any new contracting requirements or procurement methods could be costly or administratively difficult for us to implement and could adversely affect our future revenue, profitability and prospects.
Goodwill represents a significant portion of our assets and any impairment of these assets could negatively impact our results of operations.
At December 31, 2017, our goodwill was approximately $216.9 million, which represented approximately 43.8% of our total assets. We test goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable. We estimate the fair value of the reporting unit used in the goodwill impairment test using an income approach and market approach, and as a result the fair value measurements depend on revenue growth rates, future operating margin assumptions, risk-adjusted discount rates, future economic and market conditions, and identification of appropriate market comparable data. Because of the significance of our goodwill, any future impairment of this asset could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could have a material adverse effect on our business and our stock price.
As a public company, we are required to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Sarbanes-Oxley Act), which requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting and a report by our independent registered public accounting firm as to whether we maintained, in all material respects, effective internal controls over financial reporting as of the last day of the year. Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we are also required to maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures. These reporting and other obligations place significant demands on our management, administrative and operational resources, including accounting systems and resources. Any failure to achieve and maintain effective internal or disclosure controls could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Our profitability or performance could suffer if we are unable to recruit and retain qualified personnel or if we are unable to maintain adequate staffing levels for our contracts.
Due to the specialized nature of our business, our future performance is highly dependent upon the continued services of our personnel and executive officers, the development of additional management personnel and the hiring of new qualified technical, marketing, sales and management personnel for our operations. Competition for qualified personnel is intense, and we may not be successful in attracting or retaining qualified personnel. In addition, certain personnel may be required to receive security clearance and substantial training in order to work on certain contracts or perform certain tasks. The loss of key employees, our inability to attract new qualified employees or adequately train employees or the delay in hiring key personnel could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, our profitability is affected by how efficiently we utilize our workforce, including our ability to transition employees from completed contracts to new assignments, to hire and assimilate new employees; to hire personnel in or timely deploy expatriates to foreign countries; to manage attrition and a subcontractor workforce; and to devote time and resources to training, business development, professional development and other non-chargeable activities.

22

Table of Contents

Our business depends upon obtaining and maintaining required facility security clearance and individual security clearances.
Many of our federal government contracts require our employees to maintain various levels of security clearances complying with U.S. government requirements. Obtaining and maintaining security clearances for employees involves a lengthy process and it can be difficult to identify, recruit and retain employees who already hold security clearances. If our employees are unable to obtain or retain security clearances or if our employees who hold security clearances terminate employment with us, our ability to perform the work under the contract may be negatively affected, and the customer whose work requires cleared employees could terminate the contract or decide not to renew it upon its expiration. In addition, many of the contracts on which we bid require us to maintain a facility security clearance. To the extent we are not able to maintain a facility security clearance, we may not be able to bid on or win new contracts, or effectively re-bid on expiring contracts.
Some of our workforce is represented by labor unions, and our business could be harmed in the event of a prolonged work stoppage.
Approximately 2,500 of our employees, or approximately 37% of our employee base at December 31, 2017, are unionized. We have 19 collective bargaining agreements with labor unions. We cannot predict how stable our union relationships will be or whether we will be able to successfully negotiate successor agreements without impacting our financial condition. In addition, the presence of unions may limit our flexibility in dealing with our workforce. Work stoppages by our union employees could negatively impact our ability to provide services to our customers on a timely basis, which could negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition.
Legal disputes could require us to pay potentially large damage awards and could be costly to defend, which would adversely affect our cash balances and profitability, and could damage our reputation.
We are subject to a number of lawsuits and claims as described under Part I, Item 3, "Legal Proceedings," in this report. We are also subject to, and may become a party to, a variety of other litigation or claims and suits that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of our business. Adverse judgments or settlements in some or all of these legal disputes may result in significant monetary damages or injunctive relief against us. Any claims or litigation could be costly to defend, and even if we are successful or if fully indemnified or insured, could damage our reputation and make it more difficult to compete effectively or obtain adequate insurance in the future. Litigation and other claims are subject to inherent uncertainties and management’s view of these matters may change in the future.
Environmental, health and safety issues could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.
We are subject to federal, state, local, and foreign environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing: air emissions; discharges to water; the management, storage, transportation and disposal of hazardous wastes, petroleum, and other regulated substances; the investigation and cleanup of contaminated property; and the maintenance of a safe and healthy workplace for our employees, contractors, and visitors. These laws and their implementing regulations can impose certain operational controls for minimization of pollution, permitting, training, recordkeeping, monitoring and reporting requirements or other operational or siting constraints on our business, result in costs to remediate releases of regulated substances into the environment, or require costs to remediate sites to which we sent regulated substances for disposal. We have incurred and will continue to incur operating, maintenance and other expenditures as a result of environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. Developments such as the adoption of new environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, stricter enforcement of existing laws and regulations, violations by us of such laws and regulations, litigation involving environmental impacts, our inability to recover costs associated with any such developments under previously priced contracts, or financial insolvency of other responsible parties could in the future have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position or results of operations.
Our insurance may be insufficient to protect us from claims or losses.
We maintain insurance coverage with third-party insurers as part of our overall risk management strategy and because some of our contracts require us to maintain specific insurance coverage limits. However, not every risk or liability is or can be protected by insurance, and, for those risks we insure, the limits of coverage we purchase or that are reasonably obtainable in the market may not be sufficient to cover all actual losses or liabilities incurred. If any of our third-party insurers fail, cancel our coverage or otherwise are unable to provide us with adequate insurance coverage, then our overall risk exposure and our operational expenses would increase and the management of our business operations would be disrupted. Our insurance may be insufficient to protect us from significant warranty and other liability claims or losses. Moreover, there is a risk that commercially available liability insurance will not continue to be available to us at a reasonable cost, if at all. If liability claims or losses exceed our current or available insurance coverage, our business and prospects may be harmed. We are also subject to the requirements of the Defense Base Act (DBA), which generally requires insurance coverage to be

23

Table of Contents

provided to persons employed at U.S. military bases outside of the U.S. Failure to obtain DBA insurance may result in fines or other sanctions, including the loss of a particular contract.
Business disruptions caused by natural disasters and other crises could adversely affect our profitability and our overall financial position.
We have operations located in regions of the U.S. and internationally that may be exposed to natural disasters, such as hurricanes, tornadoes, blizzards, flooding, wildfires or earthquakes. Our business could also be disrupted by pandemics and other national or international crises. Although preventative measures may help mitigate the damage from such occurrences, the damage and disruption to our business resulting from any of these events may be significant. If our insurance and other risk mitigation mechanisms are not sufficient to recover all costs, including loss of revenue from sales to customers, we could experience a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
We depend on our teaming arrangements and relationships with other contractors. If we are not able to maintain these relationships, or if these parties fail to satisfy their obligations to us or the customer, our revenue, profitability and growth prospects could be adversely affected.
We rely on our teaming relationships and other arrangements with other prime contractors or subcontractors in order to submit bids for large procurements or other opportunities where we believe the combination of services provided by us and the other companies will help us to win and perform the contract. Our future revenue and growth prospects could be adversely affected if other contractors eliminate or reduce their contract relationships with us, or if the U.S. government terminates or reduces these other contractors' programs, does not award them new contracts or refuses to pay under a contract.
Government withholding regulations could adversely affect our operating performance.
A DFARS rule allows withholding of a percentage of payments when a contractor’s business system has one or more significant deficiencies. The DFARS rule applies to CAS covered contracts that have the DFARS clause in the contract terms and conditions. Contracting officers may withhold 5% of contract payments for one or more significant deficiencies in any single contractor business system or up to 10% of contract payments for significant deficiencies in multiple contractor business systems. A significant deficiency as defined by the DoD is a “shortcoming in the system that materially affects the ability of officials of the DoD to rely upon information produced by the system that is needed for management purposes.” If we have significant deficiencies and contract payments are withheld, our revenue and financial position may be adversely affected.
The effects of changes in worldwide economic and capital markets conditions may significantly affect our ability to maintain liquidity or procure capital.
Our business may be adversely affected by factors in the U.S. and other countries that are beyond our control, such as disruptions in financial markets or downturns in economic activity in specific countries or regions, or in the various industries in which our company operates; social, political or labor conditions in specific countries or regions; or adverse changes in the availability and cost of capital, interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, tax rates, or regulations in the jurisdictions in which our company operates. If we lose access to our revolving credit facility, or if we are required to raise additional capital, we may be unable to do so in the current credit and stock market environment, or we may be able to do so only on unfavorable terms.
Adverse changes to financial conditions also could jeopardize certain counterparty obligations, including those of our insurers and financial institutions and other third parties.
Risks Relating to the Spin-off from Our Former Parent
We face the following risks in connection with the Spin-off from our Former Parent:
In connection with the Spin-off, we and our Former Parent have each agreed to a broad release of claims and indemnification of the other party; we may be required to expend cash and resources to satisfy our indemnification obligations to our Former Parent and there is no assurance that our Former Parent's indemnities to us will be sufficient to insure us against the full amount of such liabilities, or that our Former Parent will have the ability to satisfy its indemnification obligations to us in the future.
In the Distribution Agreement that we and our Former Parent entered into in connection with the Spin-off, our Former Parent agreed to indemnify us from certain claims and liabilities, and we agreed to indemnify our Former Parent for certain claims and liabilities as discussed further in Note 16, “Agreements with Former Parent” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Indemnities that we are required to provide our Former Parent may be significant and could negatively impact our business, particularly those indemnities relating to our actions that could impact

24

Table of Contents

the tax-free nature of the Spin-off. Third-parties could also seek to hold us responsible for any of the liabilities that our Former Parent has agreed to retain. Further, there can be no assurance that the indemnity from our Former Parent will be sufficient to protect us against the full amount of such liabilities, or that our Former Parent will be able to fully satisfy its indemnification obligations. Moreover, even if we ultimately succeed in recovering from our Former Parent any amounts for which we are held liable, we may have to bear these losses ourselves until we receive these payments. Each of these risks could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our historical financial information has been derived in part from the financial information of our Former Parent, and our historical financial information may not be a reliable indicator of our future results.
The historical financial information we have included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for periods prior to the Spin-off has been derived in part from the consolidated financial statements of our Former Parent and does not necessarily reflect what our financial position, results of operations and cash flows would have been as a separate, stand-alone entity. Our Former Parent did not account for us, and we were not operated, as a single stand-alone entity for certain of the periods presented even if we represented an important business in the historical consolidated financial statements of our Former Parent. In addition, the historical information is not necessarily indicative of our future results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
The Spin-off may expose us to potential liabilities arising out of state and federal fraudulent conveyance laws and legal distribution requirements.
The Spin-off could be challenged under various state and federal fraudulent conveyance laws. An unpaid creditor or an entity vested with the power of such creditor (such as a trustee or debtor-in-possession in a bankruptcy) could claim that our Former Parent did not receive fair consideration or reasonably equivalent value in the Spin-off, and that the Spin-off left our Former Parent insolvent or with unreasonably small capital or that our Former Parent intended or believed it would incur debts beyond its ability to pay such debts as they mature. If a court were to agree with such a plaintiff, then such court could void the Spin-off as a fraudulent transfer and could impose a number of different remedies, including without limitation, returning our assets or your shares in our company to our Former Parent or providing our Former Parent with a claim for money damages against us in an amount equal to the difference between the consideration received by our Former Parent and the fair market value of our company at the time of the Spin-off.
The distribution by our Former Parent of the Vectrus common stock in the Spin-off could also be challenged under state corporate distribution statutes. Under the Indiana Business Corporation Law, a corporation may not make distributions to its shareholders if, after giving effect to the distribution, (i) the corporation would not be able to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of business; or (ii) the corporation’s total assets would be less than the sum of its total liabilities. No assurance can be given that a court will not later determine that the distribution by our Former Parent of Vectrus common stock in the Spin-off was unlawful.
Under the Distribution Agreement, we are responsible for the debts, liabilities and other obligations related to the business or businesses which we own and operate following the consummation of the Spin-off. Although we do not expect to be liable for any obligations not expressly assumed by us pursuant to the Distribution Agreement, it is possible that we could be required to assume responsibility for certain obligations retained by our Former Parent if our Former Parent fails to pay or perform its retained obligations.
We may be subject to potential adjustments to costs previously allocated by our Former Parent to our business.
As a result of final indirect rate negotiations between the U.S. government and our Former Parent, we may be subject to potential adjustments to costs previously allocated by our Former Parent to our business, which was formerly Exelis’ Mission Systems Business, from 2007 through 2014. As we do not participate in indirect rate negotiations between the U.S. government and our Former Parent, we cannot predict the outcome of any negotiated adjustment or the ultimate responsible party. Accordingly, we cannot reasonably predict the likelihood of such adjustments or estimate the amount of any potential impact to us.
Risks Relating to Our Common Stock
You face the following risks in connection with ownership of our common stock:
We do not currently plan to pay dividends on our common stock, and our indebtedness could limit our ability to pay dividends on our common stock in the future.
We do not currently plan to pay dividends on our common stock. The declaration of any future cash dividends and, if declared, the amount of any such dividends, will be subject to our financial condition, earnings, capital requirements, financial covenants and other contractual restrictions and to the discretion of our Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors may take

25

Table of Contents

into account such matters as general business conditions, industry practice, our financial condition and performance, our future prospects, our cash needs and capital investment plans, income tax consequences, applicable law and such other factors as our Board of Directors may deem relevant.
Additionally, our indebtedness could have important consequences for holders of our common stock. If we cannot generate sufficient cash flow from operations to meet our debt payment obligations, then our ability to pay dividends, if so determined by the Board of Directors, will be impaired. In addition, the terms of the agreements governing our current debt limit the payment of dividends and debt that we may incur in the future may also limit the payment of dividends.
Anti-takeover provisions in our organizational documents and Indiana law could delay or prevent a change in control.
Certain provisions of our amended and restated articles of incorporation and our amended and restated by-laws may delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that a shareholder may consider favorable. For example, the amended and restated articles of incorporation and the amended and restated by-laws, among other things, provide for a classified board and do not permit shareholders to convene special meetings or to remove our directors other than for cause. In addition, the amended and restated articles of incorporation authorize our Board of Directors to issue one or more series of preferred stock. These provisions may also discourage acquisition proposals or delay or prevent a change in control, which could harm our stock price. Indiana law also imposes some restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between any holder of 10% or more of our outstanding common stock and us as well as certain restrictions on the voting rights of “control shares” of an “issuing public corporation.”
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We have 177 locations in 21 countries on three continents. Our contract performance typically occurs on the government customer’s facility. Our significant locations are our corporate headquarters office located at 655 Space Center Drive, Colorado Springs, Colorado and our strategic information technology and network communications services operations office located at 11730 Plaza America Drive, Reston, Virginia. Both our Colorado Springs and Reston offices are leased and have approximately 104,000 and 7,000 square feet, respectively. We consider the properties that we lease to be in good condition and generally suitable for the purposes for which they are used.
Our lease in Colorado Springs expires in August 2018. We have entered into a lease for another facility in Colorado Springs with approximately 65,000 square feet.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time we are involved in legal proceedings that are incidental to the operation of our business. Some of these proceedings seek remedies relating to employment matters, matters in connection with our contracts and matters arising under laws relating to the protection of the environment.
Among these proceedings, we are defending a class action employment lawsuit that was initiated in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington in April 2010 against the predecessor of our Former Parent by individuals who worked on a particular contract in Kuwait after April 12, 2009. The plaintiffs are alleging a breach of employment contract by the predecessor of our Former Parent due to an alleged violation of Kuwait labor law. In November 2016, following an interlocutory appeal by Vectrus, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court’s decision certifying a class of plaintiffs. We filed a petition for certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court on the class certification decision in March 2017. On October 2, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court denied certiorari. Vectrus continues to vigorously defend the lawsuit.
Although the ultimate outcome of any legal matter cannot be predicted with certainty, based on present information, including our assessment of the merits of the particular claim, we do not expect that any asserted or unasserted legal claims or proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our cash flow, results of operations or financial condition.
See Note 17, "Commitments and Contingencies" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not Applicable.

26

Table of Contents


PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
COMMON STOCK – MARKET PRICES AND DIVIDENDS
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the symbol “VEC". Our common stock started trading on the NYSE in September 2014. As of February 22, 2018, there were approximately 5,536 stockholders of record and 11.1 million outstanding shares of common stock.
The trading price data, as reported on the NYSE for the indicated periods, are as follows:
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2017
 
 
Sales Price
 
 
High
 
Low
1st Quarter
 
$24.76
 
$21.31
2nd Quarter
 
$32.48
 
$21.72
3rd Quarter
 
$35.17
 
$25.77
4th Quarter
 
$33.73
 
$29.67
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2016
 
 
Sales Price
 
 
High
 
Low
1st Quarter

$23.04

$17.78
2nd Quarter

$29.20

$21.36
3rd Quarter

$34.56

$15.23
4th Quarter
 
$25.10
 
$15.91
To date, we have not declared or paid any dividends on our common stock. The declaration and payment of dividends by us are subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and depend on many factors including our financial condition, earnings, capital requirements, covenants associated with our debt obligations, legal requirements, regulatory constraints and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors. Therefore, there can be no assurance as to what level of dividends, if any, will be paid in the future. In deciding whether to pay future dividends on our common stock, our Board of Directors may take into account such matters as general business conditions, industry practice, our financial condition and performance, our future prospects, our cash needs and capital investment plans, debt levels and requirements, income tax consequences, applicable law and such other factors as our Board of Directors may deem relevant. See Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. For a discussion of restrictions on the payment of dividends under our credit agreement, see Note 7, "Debt", in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
For a discussion of the securities authorized under our equity compensation plans, see Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which incorporates by reference the information to be disclosed in our definitive proxy statement for our 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
We did not repurchase any of our equity securities for the year ended December 31, 2017.
STOCK PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following graph provides a comparison of the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock to the returns of the Russell 2000 Index and the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index from September 16, 2014 (the first

27

Table of Contents

day our common stock began “when-issued” trading on the NYSE) through December 31, 2017. Our common stock began “regular-way” trading in connection with the Spin-off on September 29, 2014. "When-issued" trading refers to a sale or purchase made conditionally because the security has been authorized but not yet issued. "Regular-way" trading refers to trading after a security has been issued. The graph is not, and is not intended to be, indicative of future performance of our common stock. This graph is not deemed to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act) and should not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any of our prior or subsequent filings under the Securities Act of 1933 as amended (Securities Act), or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
392410161_chart-8838e5b8b1274e2eec3.jpg
The above graph assumes the following:
(1)
$100 invested at the close of business on September 16, 2014, in Vectrus common stock, Russell 2000 Index and S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index.
(2)
The cumulative total return assumes reinvestment of dividends.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected financial data presented in this Item 6 represent:
(i) periods prior to September 27, 2014 when we were part of our Former Parent and
(ii) the period as of and subsequent to September 27, 2014 when we became a separate publicly traded company as a result of the Spin-off.
The statement of income data for each of the three years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 are derived from audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The statement of income data for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 are derived from audited combined financial statements that are not included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Balance sheet data as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are derived from audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Balance sheet data as of December 31, 2015 is derived from audited consolidated financial statements, balance sheet data as of December 31, 2014 is derived from audited consolidated and combined financial statements, and balance sheet data as of December 31, 2013 is derived from audited combined financial statements, none of which are included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

28

Table of Contents

 

Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands, except per share data)

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013
Results of Operations










Total revenue

$
1,114,788

 
$
1,190,519

 
$
1,180,684

 
$
1,203,269

 
$
1,511,638

Gross profit
 
101,948

 
106,912

 
105,649

 
118,757

 
214,549

Operating income

41,220

 
42,826

 
39,962

 
38,417

 
131,322

Operating margin

3.7
%
 
3.6
%
 
3.4
%
 
3.2
%
 
8.7
%
Net income

$
59,497

 
$
23,655

 
$
30,973

 
$
22,812

 
$
84,392

Basic earnings per common share ¹

$
5.40

 
$
2.21

 
$
2.94

 
$
2.18

 
$
8.06

Diluted earnings per common share ¹

$
5.31

 
$
2.16

 
$
2.86

 
$
2.13

 
$
8.06

Financial Position

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total assets

495,551

 
465,305

 
484,396

 
499,491

 
489,164

Total debt

$
79,000

 
$
85,000

 
$
111,615

 
$
137,375

 
$












¹ For the period ended September 27, 2014 and prior, basic and diluted earnings per share are computed using the number of shares of Vectrus common stock outstanding on September 27, 2014, the date on which Vectrus common stock was distributed to the shareholders of our Former Parent in the Spin-off.
The selected historical consolidated and combined financial data presented above should be read in conjunction with our audited Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Our historical financial information may not be indicative of our future performance. Our historical consolidated and combined financial information prior to September 27, 2014 reflects our performance as a business division of our Former Parent and may not provide a useful indicator of future performance. For further discussion of the factors that may affect comparability, see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as well as the discussion in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K entitled "Business." This Annual Report provides additional information regarding the Company, our services, industry outlook and forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates, assumptions and projections about our industry, business and future financial results. Our actual results could differ materially from the results contemplated by these forward-looking statements. See "Forward-Looking Statement Information" for further information regarding forward-looking statements. Amounts presented in and throughout this Item 7 are rounded and, as such, rounding differences could occur in period over period changes and percentages reported.
Forward-Looking Statement Information
This Annual Report on Form 10-K and certain information incorporated herein by reference contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Exchange Act, and Section 27A of the Securities Act, and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and, as such, may involve risks and uncertainties. All statements included or incorporated by reference in this report, other than statements that are purely historical, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “potential,” “continue” or similar terminology. These statements are based on the beliefs and assumptions of our management based on information currently available to management. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements.
The forward-looking statements included or incorporated by reference in this report are subject to additional risks and uncertainties further discussed under Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and are based on information available to us on the filing date of this report. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. New risks and uncertainties arise from time to time, and we cannot predict those events or how they may affect us.
We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. In addition, forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and

29

Table of Contents

uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the Company’s historical experience and our present expectations or projections. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: Our ability to submit proposals for and/or win all potential opportunities in our pipeline; our ability to retain and renew our existing contracts; protests of new awards; our recent acquisition of SENTEL and its integration into our business; economic, political and social conditions in the countries in which we conduct our businesses; changes in U.S. or international government defense budgets; government regulations and compliance therewith, including changes to the DoD procurement process; changes in technology; intellectual property matters; governmental investigations, reviews, audits and cost adjustments; contingencies related to actual or alleged environmental contamination, claims and concerns; delays in completion of the U.S. government's budget; our success in extending, deepening, and enhancing our technical capabilities; our success in expanding our geographic footprint or broadening or customer base; our ability to realize the full amounts reflected in our backlog; impairment of goodwill; misconduct of our employees, subcontractors, agents, prime contractors and business partners; our ability to control costs; our level of indebtedness; subcontractor performance; economic and capital markets conditions; our ability to retain and recruit qualified personnel; security breaches and other disruptions to our information technology and operation; changes in our tax provisions or exposure to additional income tax liabilities and other risks and uncertainties relating to the Spin-off; changes in U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP); and other factors described in Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” and elsewhere in this report and described from time to time in our future reports filed with the SEC.
Overview
Vectrus is a leading provider of services to the U.S. government worldwide. We operate as one segment and offer facility and logistics services and information technology and network communications services.
Our primary customer is the U.S. Department of Defense, with a high concentration in the U.S. Army. For the year ended December 31, 2017, we had total revenue of $1.1 billion, and for each of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, we had total revenue of $1.2 billion, all of which was derived from U.S. government customers. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we generated approximately 82%, 84% and 85%, respectively, of our total revenue from the U.S. Army.
Executive Summary
Our revenue decreased by $75.7 million, or 6.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease in revenue was attributable mainly to lower activity in our Middle East programs of $70.0 million, which was driven primarily by a decrease of $121.0 million from our APS-5 Kuwait contract, and our Afghanistan programs of $32.6 million, offset by increases of $16.7 million from our European programs and $10.2 million from our U.S. programs.
Operating income for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $41.2 million, a decrease of $1.6 million or 3.8%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. This decrease was due to lower operating income of $3.7 million from our Middle East programs and $1.7 million from our U.S. programs, offset by increases of higher operating income of $3.4 million from our European programs and $0.4 million from our Afghanistan programs.
During the performance of our long-term contracts, we periodically review estimated final contract prices and costs and make revisions as required, which are recorded as changes in revenue and cost of revenue in the periods in which they are determined. Additionally, the fees under certain contracts may be increased or decreased in accordance with cost or performance incentive provisions which measure actual performance against established targets or other criteria. Such incentive fee awards or penalties are included in revenue when there is sufficient information to reasonably assess anticipated contract performance. Amounts representing contract change orders or limitations in funding on contracts are recorded only if it is probable the claim will result in additional contract revenue and the amounts can be reliably estimated. Changes in estimated revenue, cost of revenue and the related effect to operating income are recognized using a cumulative catch-up adjustment, which recognizes in the current period the cumulative effect of the changes on current and prior periods based on a contract's percentage of completion. Aggregate changes in contract estimates recognized using the cumulative catch-up method of accounting increased operating income by $11.6 million and $7.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Cumulative catch-up adjustments are driven by changes in contract terms, program performance, customer scope changes and changes to estimates in the reported period. These changes can increase or decrease operating income depending on the dynamics of each contract.
We recorded an income tax benefit of $(22.9) million and an income tax expense of $13.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, which represented effective income tax benefit rate of (62.6)% and an income tax expense rate of 36.4%, respectively. See Note 4, “Income Taxes,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information regarding the passage of the Tax Act.

30

Table of Contents

Further details related to the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016, and the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, are contained in the Discussion of Financial Results section.
Recent Developments
On January 23, 2018, we acquired SENTEL, a U.S. government contractor with expertise in logistics and supply chain management, engineering and advanced information technology solutions for spectrum management systems, sensor networks, border and perimeter surveillance systems and other detection systems, and multidisciplinary mission support for various intelligence community clients. The acquisition advances our strategy to be a leader in the converging physical and digital infrastructure market and enhances our information technology, technical solutions and logistics capabilities while expanding our client base to customers in the U.S. intelligence community. SENTEL’s customers also include the U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, U.S. Air Force, Federal Aviation Administration, and the Internal Revenue Service. Headquartered in Alexandria, Virginia, and founded in 1986, SENTEL has approximately 700 employees. For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017, SENTEL generated revenue of $107 million. The purchase price of $36 million was funded by cash on hand and borrowings under our revolving credit facility.
The K-BOSSS contract commenced in November 2010 and currently is exercised through March 28, 2018. K-BOSSS, our largest base operations support services contract, supports geographically-dispersed primary operating locations within the State of Kuwait, including several camps and a range training complex. K-BOSSS provides critical base operations support and security support services, including forms, publications, and reproductive services; U.S. Army postal operations; operations; logistics; information management; public works; environmental services; medical administrative support; installation services; security services; fire services; and emergency services. The K-BOSSS contract extension is from March 29, 2017 to March 28, 2018, with an evaluated nine-month option of March 29, 2018 through December 28, 2018 and an evaluated three-month option of December 29, 2018 through March 28, 2019. The right to exercise an option period is at the sole discretion of the U.S. government. The K-BOSSS contract contributed $476 million and $438 million of revenue during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The Tax Act, which was enacted on December 22, 2017, impacted our income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2017. We would have had an income tax expense of approximately $12.2 million under prior law, as compared to the income tax benefit of $(22.9) million reflected in the statements of income in our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The income tax benefit resulted primarily because (i) the Tax Act requires the inclusion of the accumulated earnings and profits of foreign subsidiaries for which we have not provided U.S. federal income taxes of our controlled foreign corporations in the tax year ended December 31, 2017 and (ii) GAAP requires our deferred tax items to be revalued to reflect the lower 21% federal income tax rate. For the year ended December 31, 2017, these two items resulted in an increase in tax expense of $ 0.4 million and a tax benefit of ($35.5) million, respectively. We are still evaluating the impact of the Tax Act on our income tax expense in future years. See Note 4, “Income Taxes” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a further discussion of the Tax Act.
Information regarding certain other significant contracts is provided in "Significant Contracts" below.     
Significant Contracts
The table below reflects contracts that accounted for more than 10% of our total revenue for one or more of the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:
 
 
% of Total Revenue
 
 
Years Ended December 31,
Contract Name
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Kuwait Base Operations and Security Support Services (K-BOSSS)
 
42.7%
 
36.8%
 
32.6%
Operations, Maintenance and Defense of Army Communications in Southwest Asia and Central Asia (OMDAC-SWACA)
 
15.1%
 
12.8%
 
11.6%
Kuwait-based Army Pre-Positioned Stocks-5 (APS-5 Kuwait)
 
5.4%
 
15.1%
 
14.0%
Revenue associated with a contract will fluctuate based on increases or decreases in the work being performed on the contract, award fee payments, and other contract modifications within the term of the contract resulting in changes to the total contract value.
U.S. government contracts are multi-year contracts and typically include an initial period of one year or less with annual one year (or less) option periods for the remaining contract period. The number of option periods vary by contract, and there is no guarantee that an option period will be exercised by the U.S. government. The right to exercise an option period is

31

Table of Contents

at the sole discretion of the U.S. government. The U.S. government may also extend the term of a program by issuing extensions or bridge contracts, typically for periods of one year or less.
For discussion of the K-BOSSS contract, see "Recent Developments" above.
Performance on the OMDAC-SWACA contract commenced in July 2013 with a base period of 11 months and four option years. The U.S. government has exercised four option years, which run through May 2018. Although the current contract is exercised through May 2018, the U.S. government has stated that its anticipated timeline for the re-competition award is for the solicitation to be released in February 2019 and performance to commence sometime in 2019.
The APS-5 Kuwait contract commenced in April 2010 and ran through April 7, 2017. On September 1, 2016, we announced that we were not awarded the renewal of the APS-5 Kuwait contract.
Backlog
Total backlog includes both funded backlog (firm orders for which funding is contractually obligated by the customer) and unfunded backlog (firm orders for which funding is not currently contractually obligated by the customer) and represents firm orders and potential options on multi-year contracts. Total backlog excludes potential orders under indefinite delivery and indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts. Backlog also excludes contracts awarded to Vectrus but that are in protest with the GAO or the U.S. Court of Federal Claims. The value of the backlog is based on anticipated revenue levels over the anticipated life of the contract. Actual volumes may be greater or less than anticipated. Total backlog is converted into revenue as work is performed. The level of order activity related to programs can be affected by the timing of government funding authorizations and their project evaluation cycles. Year-over-year comparisons could, at times, be impacted by these factors, among others.
Our contracts are multi-year contracts and typically include an initial period of one year or less with annual one year (or less) option periods for the remaining contract period. The number of option periods vary by contract, and there is no guarantee that an option period will be exercised. The right to exercise an option period is at the sole discretion of the U.S. government when we are the prime contractor or of the prime contractor when we are a subcontractor. We expect to recognize a substantial portion of our funded backlog as revenue within the next 12 months. However, the U.S. government or the prime contractor may also cancel any contract at any time through a termination for convenience. Most of our contracts have terms that would permit us to recover all or a portion of our incurred costs and fees for work performed in the event of a termination for convenience.
Total backlog increased by $577.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2017, total backlog (funded and unfunded) was $2.9 billion.

As of December 31,
(In millions)
2017

2016
Funded backlog
$
719

 
$
665

Unfunded backlog
2,214

 
1,691

Total backlog
$
2,933

 
$
2,356

Funded orders, which are different from funded backlog, represent orders for which funding was received during the period. We received funded orders of $1.2 billion during the year ended December 31, 2017, which was a decrease of $1.3 million compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 due to the timing of funded orders for some of our contracts.
Economic Opportunities, Challenges and Risks
The U.S. government’s investment in services and capabilities in response to changing security challenges creates a complex and fluid business environment for Vectrus and other firms in this market segment. The pace and depth of U.S. government acquisition reform and cost savings initiatives, combined with increased industry competitiveness to win long-term positions on key programs, could add pressure to revenue levels and profit margins going forward. However, we expect the U.S. government will continue to place a high priority on national security and will continue to invest in affordable solutions for its facilities, logistics, equipment and communication needs, which aligns with our services and strengths.
Further, the DoD budget remains the largest in the world and management believes our addressable portion of the DoD budget offers substantial opportunity for growth. The U.S. government's fiscal year begins on October 1 and ends on September 30. The U.S. government has not yet passed an appropriations bill for fiscal year 2018. However, on February 9, 2018, the President signed into law the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018, which included a short-term continuing resolution that provided fiscal year 2018 appropriations for continuing projects and activities of the U.S. government through March 23, 2018.

32

Table of Contents

Additionally, the legislation increased the discretionary defense and non-defense spending caps in fiscal year 2018 and fiscal year 2019, which were originally created under the 2011 Budget Control Act. Subsequently, on February 12, 2018, the President sent Congress his proposed fiscal year 2019 defense budget request. The budget requests $716 billion for national security programs, which includes $686 billion for the DoD. Until regular appropriation bills are passed, we may experience delays in procurement of services due to lack of funding, and those delays may affect our results of operations.
We anticipate and will be experiencing reductions in revenue and profitability related to certain programs in which we participate, including from the contracts that expire without an award to Vectrus of the re-compete contract. However, other programs are expanding. We believe spending on operation and maintenance of defense assets, as well as civilian agency infrastructure and equipment, will continue to be a U.S. government priority. Our focus is on sustaining facilities, equipment and IT networks, which we believe aligns with our customers' intent to utilize existing equipment and infrastructure rather than executing new purchases. Many of the core functions we perform are mission-essential. The following are examples of a few of these core functions: (i) keeping communications networks operational; (ii) maintaining airfields; and (iii) providing emergency services. While customers may reduce the level of services required from us, we do not currently anticipate the complete elimination of these services.
The information provided above does not represent a complete list of trends and uncertainties that could impact our business in either the near or long-term and should be considered along with the risk factors identified under the caption “Risk Factors” identified in Part 1, Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the matters identified under the caption “Forward-Looking Statement Information" herein.

DISCUSSION OF FINANCIAL RESULTS
Year ended December 31, 2017, compared to Year ended December 31, 2016
Selected financial highlights are presented in the table below:


Year Ended December 31,

Change
(In thousands)

2017

2016

$
 
%
Revenue

$
1,114,788

 
$
1,190,519

 
$
(75,731
)
 
(6.4
)%
Cost of revenue

1,012,840

 
1,083,607

 
(70,767
)
 
(6.5
)%
% of revenue

90.9
 %
 
91.0
%
 
 
 
 
Selling, general and administrative

60,728

 
64,086

 
(3,358
)
 
(5.2
)%
% of revenue

5.4
 %
 
5.4
%
 
 
 
 
Operating income

41,220

 
42,826

 
(1,606
)
 
(3.8
)%
Operating margin

3.7
 %
 
3.6
%
 
 
 
 
Interest (expense) income, net

(4,640
)
 
(5,639
)
 
999

 
(17.7
)%
Income before taxes

36,580

 
37,187

 
(607
)
 
(1.6
)%
% of revenue

3.3
 %
 
3.1
%
 
 
 
 
Income tax (benefit) expense

(22,917
)
 
13,532

 
(36,449
)
 
(269.4
)%
Effective income tax rate

(62.6
)%
 
36.4
%
 
 
 
 
Net Income

$
59,497

 
$
23,655

 
$
35,842

 
151.5
 %
Revenue
Our revenue decreased by $75.7 million, or 6.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease in revenue was attributable mainly to lower activity in our Middle East programs of $70.0 million, which was driven primarily by a decrease of $121.0 million from our APS-5 Kuwait contract, and our Afghanistan programs of $32.6 million, offset by increases of $16.7 million from our European programs and $10.2 million from our U.S. programs.
Cost of Revenue
The decrease in cost of revenue of $70.8 million, or 6.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016, was primarily due to lower revenue as described above.

33

Table of Contents

Selling, General & Administrative (SG&A) Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2017, SG&A expenses of $60.7 million decreased by $3.4 million, or 5.2%, as compared to $64.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 primarily due to cost savings initiatives of $4.0 million offset by higher marketing costs of $0.7 million.
Operating Income
Operating income for the year ended December 31, 2017, decreased by $1.6 million, or 3.8%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. This decrease was due to lower operating income of $3.7 million from our Middle East programs and $1.7 million from our U.S. programs, offset by higher operating income of $3.4 million from our European programs and $0.4 million from our Afghanistan programs.
Operating income as a percentage of revenue was 3.7% for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to 3.6% for the year ended December 31, 2016.
Aggregate cumulative catch-up adjustments for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 increased operating income by $11.6 million and $7.5 million, respectively. The aggregate cumulative catch-up adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2017 related to approved contract modifications and negotiated lower contract costs. The aggregate cumulative catch-up adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2016 related to approved contract modifications and extensions with higher margins associated with labor-related items and additional negotiated fees, offset by lower earned incentive fees and higher contract costs. The gross aggregate effects of these favorable and unfavorable changes in estimates in 2017 and 2016 were $18.3 million and $15.3 million favorable to operating income, respectively, and $6.7 million and $7.8 million unfavorable to operating income, respectively.
Interest (Expense) Income, Net
Interest (expense) income, net for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was as follows:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
Change
(In thousands)
 
2017
 
2016
 
$
 
%
Interest income
 
$
47

 
$
41

 
$
6

 
14.6
 %
Interest (expense)
 
(4,687
)
 
(5,680
)
 
(993
)
 
(17.5
)%
Interest (expense) income, net
 
$
(4,640
)
 
$
(5,639
)
 
$
(999
)
 
(17.7
)%
Interest income is directly related to interest earned on our cash. Interest expense is directly related to borrowings under our senior secured credit facilities, the amortization of debt issuance costs, and derivative instruments used to hedge a portion of our exposure to interest rate risk. The decrease in interest expense of $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 was due to a lower average debt balance in 2017.
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense
We recorded an income tax benefit of $(22.9) million and an income tax expense of $13.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, which represented effective income tax benefit rate of (62.6)% and an income tax expense rate of 36.4%, respectively. The income tax benefit and lower effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the income tax expense and income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2016 was due to the passage of the Tax Act as described in Note 4, “Income Taxes,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which resulted in a decrease in deferred tax liabilities and a deferred income tax benefit of $(22.9) million.

34

Table of Contents

Year ended December 31, 2016, compared to year ended December 31, 2015
Selected financial highlights are presented in the table below:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
Change
(In thousands)
 
2016
 
2015
 
$
 
%
Revenue
 
$
1,190,519

 
$
1,180,684

 
$
9,835

 
0.8
 %
Cost of revenue
 
1,083,607

 
1,075,035

 
8,572

 
0.8
 %
% of revenue
 
91.0
%
 
91.1
%
 
 
 
 
Selling, general and administrative
 
64,086

 
65,687

 
(1,601
)
 
(2.4
)%
% of revenue
 
5.4
%
 
5.6
%
 
 
 
 
Operating income
 
42,826

 
39,962

 
2,864

 
7.2
 %
Operating margin
 
3.6
%
 
3.4
%
 
 
 
 
Interest (expense) income, net
 
(5,639
)
 
(6,531
)
 
892

 
(13.7
)%
Income before taxes
 
37,187

 
33,431

 
3,756

 
11.2
 %
% of revenue
 
3.1
%
 
2.8
%
 
 
 
 
Income tax expense
 
13,532

 
2,458

 
11,074

 
450.5
 %
Effective income tax rate
 
36.4
%
 
7.4
%
 
 
 
 
Net Income
 
$
23,655

 
$
30,973

 
$
(7,318
)
 
(23.6
)%
Revenue
Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2016, was $1.2 billion, reflecting an increase of $9.8 million, or 0.8%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in revenue was attributable mainly to higher activity in our Middle East contracts of $130.9 million. The increase in revenue was partially offset by decreases in revenue in our Afghanistan programs of $80.1 million, our U.S. programs of $35.7 million and our European programs of $5.3 million.
Cost of Revenue
The increase in cost of revenue of $8.6 million, or 0.8%, for the year ended December 31, 2016, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015, was primarily due to higher revenue as described above.
SG&A Expenses
For the year ended December 31, 2016, SG&A expenses of $64.1 million decreased by $1.6 million, or 2.4%, as compared to $65.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, SG&A expenses increased by $2.7 million due to costs associated with a work force reduction and CEO transition expenses and higher legal expenses of $1.1 million. These increases were offset by lower stock-based compensation expense of $2.0 million and the impact of items in the following paragraph that affected 2015 SG&A expenses.
For the year ended December 31, 2015, we recognized additional SG&A expenses due to the one-time settlement of a tax indemnification of $3.3 million as described in Note 4, “Income Taxes” in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
In addition, as part of the Spin-off, our Former Parent indemnified us for a receivable of approximately $11.4 million. We recorded a corresponding liability in other accrued liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2015 because we were required to remit amounts collected related to the indemnified receivable. In November 2015, we reached a settlement for the indemnified receivable of approximately $8.2 million. As part of the settlement, we cleared the corresponding liability by remitting payment of $8.2 million for the amount of the settlement. In addition, we recognized $0.2 million in SG&A expenses due to the effect of foreign currency translation during the period.
Operating Income
Operating income for the year ended December 31, 2016, increased by $2.9 million, or 7.2%, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015.

35

Table of Contents

Operating income as a percentage of revenue was 3.6% for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to 3.4% for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Aggregate cumulative catch-up adjustments for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 increased operating income by $7.5 million and decreased operating revenue by $1.9 million, respectively. The aggregate cumulative catch-up adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2016 related to approved contract modifications and extensions with higher margins associated with labor-related items and additional negotiated fees, offset by lower earned incentive fees and higher subcontractor costs. The aggregate cumulative catch-up adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2015 related to the early closure of sites in Afghanistan and contract line item realignments with our customers offset by operational efficiencies related primarily to cost savings from decreased staffing levels due to productivity improvements on maturing contracts. The gross aggregate effects of these favorable and unfavorable changes in estimates in 2016 and 2015 were $15.3 million and $9.7 million favorable to operating income, respectively, and $7.8 million and $11.6 million unfavorable to operating income, respectively.
Interest (Expense) Income, Net
Interest (expense) income, net for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 was as follows:
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
 
Change
(In thousands)
 
2016
 
2015
 
$
 
%
Interest income
 
$
41

 
$
80

 
$
(39
)
 
(48.6
)%
Interest (expense)
 
(5,680
)
 
(6,611
)
 
(931
)
 
(14.1
)%
Interest (expense) income, net
 
$
(5,639
)
 
$
(6,531
)
 
$
(892
)
 
(13.7
)%
Interest income is directly related to interest earned on our cash. Interest expense is directly related to borrowings under our senior secured credit facilities, the amortization of debt issuance costs and a derivative instrument used to hedge a portion of our exposure to interest rate risk. The decrease in interest expense of $0.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015 was due to a lower average debt balance in 2016.
Income Tax Expense
We recorded income tax expense of $13.5 million and $2.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which represented effective income tax rates of 36.4% and 7.4%, respectively. The lower effective income tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2016 was due to the one-time settlement of tax positions in 2015 as described in Note 4, “Income Taxes” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity
Historically, we have generated operating cash flow sufficient to fund our working capital, capital expenditures, and financing requirements. We expect to fund our ongoing working capital, capital expenditure and financing requirements, and pursue additional growth through new development and potential acquisition opportunities by using cash flows from operations, cash on hand, our credit facilities and access to capital markets. When necessary we will utilize our revolving credit facility to satisfy short-term working capital requirements.
If our cash flows from operations are less than we expect, we may need to access the long-term or short-term capital markets. Although we believe that our current financing arrangements will permit us to finance our operations on acceptable terms and conditions, our access to and the availability of financing on acceptable terms and conditions in the future will be impacted by many factors, including: our credit ratings or absence of a credit rating, the liquidity of the overall capital markets, and the current state of the economy. We cannot provide assurance that such financing will be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. The conclusion of the APS-5 Kuwait contract with associated revenue and costs in April 2017 did not have a material impact on our liquidity.
The cash presented on our balance sheet consists of U.S. and international cash from wholly owned subsidiaries. Approximately $10.8 million of our total $77.5 million in cash at December 31, 2017 is held by our foreign subsidiaries and is not available to fund U.S. operations unless repatriated. We do not currently expect that we will be required to repatriate undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries. We expect our U.S. domestic cash resources will be sufficient to fund our U.S. operating activities and cash commitments for financing activities. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Act was enacted into law. We are still evaluating the impact of the Tax Act on our income tax expense in future years. See Note 4, “Income Taxes” in the

36

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a further discussion of the Tax Act.
In September 2014, we and our wholly-owned subsidiary, Vectrus Systems Corporation (VSC), entered into a credit agreement with a group of lenders, including JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as administrative agent. The credit agreement was amended as of April 19, 2016, to modify certain financial and negative covenants (as so amended, the Credit Agreement). On November 15, 2017, we and VSC entered into an Amendment and Restatement Agreement (the Amendment Agreement) with a group of lenders including JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, which provides for the amendment and restatement of the Credit Agreement. The Amendment Agreement provides for $200.0 million in senior secured financing, consisting of a $80.0 million five-year term loan facility (the Amended Term Loan) and a $120.0 million five-year senior secured revolving credit facility (the Amended Revolver, and together with the Amended Term Loan, the Amended Credit Facilities). We used $74.6 million from the Amended Term Loan to repay principal and accrued but unpaid interest on the Credit Agreement. There were no outstanding borrowings under the Amended Revolver at December 31, 2017. At December 31, 2017, there were seven letters of credit outstanding in the aggregate amount of $12.0 million, which reduced our borrowing availability to $108.0 million under the Amended Revolver.
Dividends
We do not currently plan to pay a regular dividend on our common stock. The declaration of any future cash dividends and if declared, the amount of any such dividends, will depend upon our financial condition, earnings, capital requirements, financial covenants and other contractual restrictions and the discretion of our Board of Directors. In deciding whether to pay future dividends on our common stock, our Board of Directors may take into account such matters as general business conditions, industry practice, our financial condition and performance, our future prospects, our cash needs and capital investment plans, income tax consequences, applicable law and such other factors as our Board of Directors may deem relevant.
Sources and Uses of Liquidity
Cash, accounts receivable, unbilled receivables, and accounts payable are the principal components of our working capital and are generally driven by our level of revenue with other short-term fluctuations related to payment practices by our customers and the timing of our billings. Our receivables reflect amounts billed to our customers, as well as the revenue that was recognized in the preceding month, which is normally billed the month following each balance sheet date.
The total amount of our accounts receivable can vary significantly over time and is sensitive to revenue levels and the timing of payments received from our customers. Days sales outstanding (DSO) is a metric used to monitor accounts receivable levels. Our DSO was 54 and 57 days as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The following table sets forth net cash provided by operating activities, investing and financing activities.


Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)

2017

2016

2015
Operating activities

$
35,410

 
$
36,618

 
$
18,880

Investing activities

(2,344
)
 
(52
)
 
118

Financing activities

(7,130
)
 
(28,062
)
 
(21,710
)
Foreign exchange

3,866

 
(848
)
 
(116
)
Net change in cash

$
29,802

 
$
7,656

 
$
(2,828
)
Trends in our operating cash flows tend to follow trends in operating income, excluding non-cash charges. Net cash provided by operating activities decreased for the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 consisted of net income of $59.5 million and non-cash items of $7.6 million offset by unfavorable net working capital changes of $31.7 million due to a decrease in deferred taxes and the timing of cash collections and payments, as reflected in accounts payable, compensation and other employee benefits, other assets, and receivables. See Note 4, “Income Taxes” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information related to the passage of the Tax Act.
Net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 consisted of favorable net working capital changes of $4.7 million due to the timing of cash collections and payments, as reflected in receivables, non-cash items of $8.2 million and net income of $23.7 million.

37

Table of Contents

Net cash provided by operating activities during the year ended December 31, 2015 consisted of net income of $31.0 million, increased by non-cash items of $11.6 million, offset by other unfavorable net working capital changes of $23.7 million due to the timing of cash collections and payments, as reflected in receivables and other liabilities.     
Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2017 consisted of capital expenditures for the purchase of capital assets of $2.3 million. Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 consisted of capital expenditures for the purchase of capital assets offset by proceeds received from the disposition of capital assets and a distribution from an equity investment (see Note 1, "Description of Business and Basis of Presentation - Equity Investment," in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). Capital expenditures during the year ended December 31, 2016 were primarily for the purchase of hardware and software related to ongoing operations. Net cash provided by investing activities during the year ended December 31, 2015 primarily related to capital expenditures for the purchase of hardware and software related to ongoing operations and a distribution from the equity investment.
Net cash used in financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2017 consisted of repayments of long-term debt of $86.0 million, payments of debt issuance costs related to the Amendment Agreement of $1.8 million, and payments related to employee withholding taxes on share-based compensation in the amount of $1.3 million, offset by $80.0 million in cash received from the issuance of long-term debt and $2.0 million in cash received from the exercise of stock options. During the year ended December 31 2017, we borrowed and repaid a total of $42.5 million from the Revolver and Amended Revolver to meet short-term working capital requirements.
Net cash used in financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2016 consisted of repayments of long-term debt of $29.0 million, payments related to employee withholding taxes on share-based compensation in the amount of $1.0 million and a payment of $0.2 million related to an amendment of our Credit Agreement, offset by $2.1 million in cash received from the exercise of stock options. During the year ended December 31 2016, we borrowed and repaid a total of $74.0 million from the Revolver to meet short-term working capital requirements.
Net cash used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 was comprised of repayments of long-term debt of $23.4 million, repayment of financed insurance obligations of $12.1 million and payments related to employee withholding taxes on share-based compensation in the amount of $1.3 million, offset by $14.9 million in cash provided by an arrangement we entered into to finance certain of our insurance obligations and $0.2 million in cash received from the exercise of stock options. During the year ended December 31, 2015, we borrowed and repaid a total of $324.0 million from the Revolver to meet short-term working capital requirements.
Capital Resources
At December 31, 2017, we held cash of $77.5 million, which included $10.8 million held by foreign subsidiaries, and had $108.0 million of available borrowing capacity under the Amended Revolver which expires on November 15, 2022. We believe that our cash at December 31, 2017, as supplemented by cash flows from operations and the Amended Revolver, will be sufficient to fund our anticipated operating costs, capital expenditures and current debt repayment obligations for at least the next 12 months.
Contractual Obligations
Our commitments to make future payments under long-term contractual obligations were as follows, as of December 31, 2017:
 
 
Payments Due by Period
 
 
 
 

 
Less than 1 Year
 

 

 
 
(In thousands)
 
Total
 
 
1 - 3 Years
 
3 - 5 Years
 
More than 5 Years
Operating leases
 
$
5,513

 
$
3,626

 
$
1,664

 
$
223

 
$

Principal payments on Amended Term Loan
 
79,000

 
4,000

 
11,000

 
64,000

 

Interest on Amended Term Loan and Amended Revolver ¹
 
13,674

 
3,254

 
5,957

 
4,463

 

Severance costs
 
929

 
874

 
55

 

 

Total
 
$
99,116

 
$
11,754

 
$
18,676

 
$
68,686

 
$

¹ There were no outstanding borrowings on the Amended Revolver at December 31, 2017.


38

Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have obligations relating to operating leases, as discussed above, and letters of credit outstanding. Our Amended Revolver permits borrowings up to $120.0 million, of which $25.0 million is available for the issuance of letters of credit. At December 31, 2017, there were seven letters of credit outstanding in the aggregate amount of $12.0 million, which reduced our borrowing availability to $108.0 million under the Amended Revolver. These arrangements have not had, and management does not believe it is likely that they will in the future have, a material effect on our liquidity, capital resources, operations or financial condition. At December 31, 2017, we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements other than operating leases.
The lease of our current corporate headquarters in Colorado Springs, Colorado expires in August 2018. We entered into a new lease agreement for another headquarter office in Colorado Springs in February 2018. The lease obligation for the new office is $8.3 million over 10 years.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES, ESTIMATES AND JUDGMENTS
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Estimates are revised as additional information becomes available. Management believes that the accounting estimates employed and the resulting balances are reasonable; however, actual results in these areas could differ from management's estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Significant accounting policies used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements are discussed in Note 1, "Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies," in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We believe that the assumptions and estimates associated with revenue recognition, goodwill impairment assessments and income taxes have the greatest potential impact on our financial statements because they are inherently uncertain, involve significant judgments, include areas where different estimates reasonably could materially impact the financial statements. These significant critical accounting policies are discussed in this section. Management believes that the accounting estimates employed and the resulting balances are reasonable; however, actual results in these areas could differ from management's estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Revenue Recognition
As a defense contractor engaging in long-term contracts, substantially all of our revenue is derived from long-term service contracts for which revenue is recognized under the percentage-of-completion method based on levels of effort or percentage of costs incurred to total costs. For levels of effort, revenue and profits are recognized based upon the ratio of actual services delivered to estimated total services to be delivered under the contract. Under the cost-to-total cost method, revenue is recognized based upon the ratio of costs incurred to estimated total costs at completion. Revenue under cost-reimbursable contracts is recorded as costs are incurred and includes estimated earned fees or profits calculated on the basis of the relationship between costs incurred and total estimated costs. Revenue and profits on time-and-material type contracts are recognized based on billable rates multiplied by direct labor hours incurred plus material and other reimbursable costs incurred. The completed contract method is utilized when reasonable and reliable cost estimates for a project cannot be made. Amounts invoiced to customers in excess of revenue recognized are recorded as deferred revenue, until the revenue recognition criteria are satisfied, and are recorded as billings in excess of costs in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Revenue that is earned and recognized in excess of amounts invoiced is recorded as a component of receivables.
During the performance of our long-term contracts, estimated final contract prices and costs are reviewed periodically and changes are made as required and recorded as changes in revenue and cost of revenue in the period in which they are determined. Additionally, the fees under certain contracts may be increased or decreased in accordance with cost or performance incentive provisions which measure actual performance against established targets or other criteria. Such incentive fee awards or penalties are included in revenue when there is sufficient information to reasonably assess anticipated contract performance. Amounts representing contract change orders or limitations in funding on contracts are recorded only if it is probable the claim will result in additional contract revenue and the amounts can be reliably estimated. Changes in contract revenue and cost estimates and the related effect to operating income are recognized using a cumulative catch-up adjustment, which recognizes in the current period the cumulative effect of the changes on current and prior periods based on a contract’s percentage of completion. Changes in estimated revenue and cost could result in a forward loss or an adjustment to a forward loss. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted long-term contracts are made in the period in which such losses are determined and are recorded as a component of cost of revenue.
In certain circumstances, pricing for contract elements, or contract line items, is finalized during or after work commences on the specified activity.

39

Table of Contents

Aggregate revenue from our two largest contracts during 2017, which consisted of the K-BOSSS contract and the OMDAC-SWACA contract, described above in "Recent Developments" and "Significant Contracts," was approximately $0.6 billion, or 57.9%, of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017.
Contract option exercises are at the sole discretion of the U.S. government. Changes in contract revenue and cost estimates on our largest contracts could result in significant cumulative catch-up adjustments to the contract’s inception to date revenue, cost of revenue and profit in the period in which such changes are made. Contract estimates are based on various assumptions to project the outcome of future events that often span several years. These assumptions include labor productivity and availability; the complexity of the work to be performed; the cost and availability of materials; and the performance of subcontractors. Due to the significance of judgment in the estimated final contract prices and costs, it is likely that materially different revenue, cost of revenue and profit amounts could be recorded if we used different assumptions, or if the underlying circumstances were to change. Changes in underlying assumptions/estimates, or other circumstances, will adversely or positively affect financial performance in future periods.
Change in Revenue Recognition Standard (Adoption of ASC Topic 606)

We adopted Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, on January 1, 2018. See Note 3, "Adoption of ASC 606 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers," in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion.

Implementation Plan

Because the new standard impacted our business processes, systems and controls, we developed a comprehensive change management project plan to guide the implementation. This project plan included analyzing the standard’s impact on our contracts; comparing our historical accounting policies and procedures to the requirements of the new standard; instituting a training program for finance and contract management on the new requirements; and identifying differences from applying the requirements of the new standard to our contracts. We enhanced internal controls to ensure that we adequately evaluated our contracts under the five-step model to ensure proper assessment of our operating results under ASC Topic 606. We reported on the progress of the implementation to the Audit Committee and the Board of Directors on a regular basis during the project’s duration.

ASC Topic 606 Impacts

The new ASC Topic 606 guidance was only applied to contracts that were not completed as of the effective date of the guidance. During implementation of the standard, we identified performance obligations on the basis of the current version of the contract, including any contract modifications since inception; determined the transaction price, including any variable consideration, as of the transition date; and allocated the transaction price determined to the performance obligation(s) identified.

The majority of our revenue is derived from long-term contracts and programs that can span several years. The adoption of ASC Topic 606 will have the most significant impact to our accounting for firm-fixed price contracts. Our firm-fixed price contracts will continue to recognize revenue and earnings over time as services are rendered because of the continuous transfer of services to the customer, using an input measure of costs incurred, to reflect progress. However, we will be precluded from recognizing adjustments in estimated costs at completion as costs incurred in excess of billings on the balance sheet for firm-fixed price contracts. Adjustments in contract estimates for firm-fixed price contracts will result in more variability to revenue from period to period. The total impact of an adjustment in estimated profit recorded to date on a contract will continue to be recognized in the period it is identified (cumulative catch-up method). Despite this variability, a firm-fixed price contract’s cash flows and overall profitability at completion are the same as under the previous revenue recognition standard. Anticipated losses on contracts will continue to be recognized in the quarter in which they are identified.

The assessment of our January 1, 2018, Consolidated Balance Sheet under ASC Topic 606 will result in a cumulative-effect adjustment to opening retained earnings, unbilled receivables, and costs incurred in excess of billings for firm-fixed price contracts. These adjustments will not materially change the total amount of net assets as of December 31, 2017. See Note 3, "Adoption of ASC Topic 606 - Revenue from Contracts with Customers" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

As required by the new ASC Topic 606 revenue recognition guidance using the modified retrospective method, during 2018 we will report impacted financial statement line items under the new ASC Topic 606 revenue recognition guidance as well as what those financial statement line items would have been in 2018 under the former ASC Topic 605 revenue guidance.


40

Table of Contents

Goodwill

Goodwill represents purchase consideration paid in a business combination that exceeds the fair values assigned to the net assets of acquired businesses. Goodwill is not amortized, but instead is tested for impairment annually (or more frequently if impairment indicators arise, such as changes to the reporting unit structure or significant adverse changes in the business climate). We conduct our annual impairment testing during the fourth fiscal quarter. The impairment test is a two-step process measuring the magnitude of any impairment. In the first step, the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is developed and compared to the carrying value of the reporting unit. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, goodwill is not impaired and the second step of the impairment test is not performed. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, then the second step of the impairment test is performed in order to measure the impairment loss to be recorded. If the carrying value of the reporting unit's goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then we record an impairment loss equal to the difference. We estimate the fair value of our reporting unit using an income approach and a market approach. Under the income approach, we estimate fair value based on the present value of estimated future cash flows. Under the market approach, we compare our company to select reasonably similar publicly traded companies. No impairment charges related to goodwill have been recorded during 2017, 2016 and 2015.
Income Taxes
We determine the provision or benefit for income taxes using the asset and liability approach. Under this approach, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, applying enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which we expect the differences will reverse. Based on the evaluation of available evidence, we recognize future tax benefits, such as net operating loss carryforwards, to the extent that we believe it is more likely than not we will realize these benefits. We periodically assess the likelihood that we will be able to recover our deferred tax assets and reflect any changes to our estimate of the amount we are more likely than not to realize in the valuation allowance, with a corresponding adjustment to earnings or other comprehensive income (loss), as appropriate.
Our effective tax rate reflects the impact of certain undistributed foreign earnings for which we have not provided U.S. taxes because we plan to reinvest such earnings indefinitely outside the U.S. We plan foreign earnings remittance amounts based on projected cash flow needs, as well as the working capital and long-term investment requirements of our foreign subsidiaries and our domestic operations. Based on these assumptions, we estimate the amount we will distribute to the U.S. and provide the U.S. federal taxes due only on these amounts. Material changes in our estimates of cash, working capital and long-term investment requirements in the various jurisdictions in which we do business could impact our actual remittance amounts and, accordingly, our effective tax rate.
The calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations in a multitude of jurisdictions across our global operations. We recognize potential liabilities and record tax liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions based on our estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. Furthermore, we recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
We adjust our liability for unrecognized tax benefits in light of changing facts and circumstances; however, due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is materially different from our current estimate of the tax liabilities. If our estimate of tax liabilities proves to be less than the ultimate assessment, an additional tax expense would result. If a payment of these amounts ultimately proves to be less than the recorded amounts, the reversal of the liabilities would result in tax benefits being recognized in the period when we determine the liabilities are no longer necessary to be provided.
See also Note 4, “Income Taxes” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the Tax Act.
New Accounting Pronouncements
See Part II, Item 8, Note 2, "Recent Accounting Pronouncements" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information regarding accounting pronouncements and accounting standards updates.


41

Table of Contents

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our earnings, cash flows and financial position are exposed to market risks relating to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. All of the potential changes noted below are based on information available at December 31, 2017.

Interest Rate Risk
Each one percentage point change associated with the variable rate Amended Term Loan would result in a $0.8 million change in our annual cash interest expenses. Assuming our Amended Revolver was fully drawn to a principal amount equal to $120.0 million, each one percentage point change in interest rates would result in a $1.2 million change in our annual cash interest expense.

As of December 31, 2017, our interest rate swap agreement totaled $31.6 million. The difference to be paid or received under the terms of the interest rate swap agreements is accrued as interest rates change and recognized as an adjustment to interest expense for the related debt in the period incurred. Changes in the variable interest rates to be paid pursuant to the terms of the interest rate swap agreements will have a corresponding effect on future cash flows.
 
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
The majority of our business is conducted in U.S. dollars. However, we are required to transact in foreign currencies for some of our contracts, resulting in some assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. Therefore, our earnings may experience some volatility related to movements in foreign currency exchange rates. We enter into forward foreign exchange contracts to buy or sell various foreign currencies to selectively protect against volatility in the value of non-functional currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities. Changes in the fair value of these forward contracts are recognized in earnings. As of December 31, 2017, the U.S. dollar notional value of our outstanding foreign currency forward exchange contracts was approximately $5.7 million. The net fair value of these contracts at December 31, 2017 was an asset of $0.1 million.
We perform a sensitivity analysis to determine the effects that market risk exposures may have on the fair values of our forward foreign currency exchange contracts. To perform the sensitivity analysis, we assess the risk of loss in fair values from the effect of hypothetical changes in foreign currency exchange rates. This analysis assumes a like movement by the foreign currencies in our hedge portfolio against the U.S. dollar. As of December 31, 2017, a 5% appreciation in the value of the U.S. dollar would result in a net decrease in the fair value of our derivative portfolio of approximately $0.3 million.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements herein.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2017. Based on such evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2017, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports the Company files or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 was audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report included herein.

42

Table of Contents

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework). Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017. Management reviewed the results of its assessment with our Audit Committee.
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures
In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there may be resource constraints and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Vectrus, Inc.
Colorado Springs, Colorado

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Vectrus, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, of the Company and our report dated March 1, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying “Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.” Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures

43

Table of Contents

that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Denver, Colorado

March 1, 2018


ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.



44

Table of Contents

PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information called for by Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive proxy statement for the Company’s 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed within 120 days after the Company's fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Exchange Act, except that the information called for by Item 10 with respect to executive officers is set forth in Part I, Item 1, "Description of Business".
The Company filed with the SEC, as exhibits to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, the certifications required under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information called for by Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive proxy statement referred to in Item 10.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information called for by Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive proxy statement referred to in Item 10.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information called for by Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive proxy statement referred to in Item 10.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information called for by Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference to the definitive proxy statement referred to in Item 10.

PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)
Documents filed as a part of this report:
1.
See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements appearing on page F-1 for a list of the financial statements filed as a part of this report.
2.
Exhibits

45

Table of Contents


46

Table of Contents


47

Table of Contents

101
The following materials from Vectrus Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Statements of Income, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (v) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. #
* Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
+ Indicates this document is filed as an exhibit herewith.
# Submitted electronically with this report.

The Company’s Commission File Number for Reports on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q and Form 8-K is 001-36341.

(b)
Financial Statement Schedules are omitted because of the absence of the conditions under which they are required or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements filed as part of this report.


48

Table of Contents

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

VECTRUS, INC.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
 
 
Page No.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

F-1

Table of Contents


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Vectrus, Inc.
Colorado Springs, Colorado

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Vectrus, Inc. (the "Company") as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 1, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Denver, Colorado

March 1, 2018

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2013.



F-2

Table of Contents

VECTRUS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands, except per share data)
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Revenue
 
$
1,114,788

 
$
1,190,519

 
$
1,180,684

Cost of revenue
 
1,012,840

 
1,083,607

 
1,075,035

Selling, general and administrative expenses
 
60,728

 
64,086

 
65,687

Operating income
 
41,220

 
42,826

 
39,962

Interest (expense) income, net
 
(4,640
)
 
(5,639
)
 
(6,531
)
Income from operations before income taxes
 
36,580

 
37,187

 
33,431

Income tax (benefit) expense
 
(22,917
)
 
13,532

 
2,458

Net income
 
$
59,497

 
$
23,655

 
$
30,973

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Earnings per share
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
 
$
5.40

 
$
2.21

 
$
2.94

Diluted
 
$
5.31

 
$
2.16

 
$
2.86

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic
 
11,021

 
10,714

 
10,551

Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted
 
11,209

 
10,974

 
10,825

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-3

Table of Contents

VECTRUS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Net income
 
$
59,497

 
$
23,655

 
$
30,973

Other comprehensive income, net of tax
 
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in derivative instrument:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net change in fair value of interest rate swaps
 
(240
)
 
216

 
(43
)
Net (loss) gain reclassified to interest expense
 
(1
)
 
(2
)
 
3

Tax benefit (expense)
 
86

 
(76
)
 
14

Net change in derivative instrument
 
(155
)
 
138

 
(26
)
Foreign currency translation adjustments
 
3,052

 
(975
)
 
(1,186
)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
 
2,897

 
(837
)
 
(1,212
)
Total comprehensive income
 
$
62,394

 
$
22,818

 
$
29,761

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.


F-4

Table of Contents

VECTRUS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
 
December 31,
(In thousands, except share information)
 
2017
 
2016
Assets
 
 
 
 
Current assets
 
 
 
 
Cash
 
$
77,453

 
$
47,651

Receivables
 
174,995

 
172,072

Costs incurred in excess of billings
 
12,751

 
11,002

Other current assets
 
6,747

 
13,412

Total current assets
 
271,946

 
244,137

Property, plant, and equipment, net
 
3,733

 
3,061

Goodwill
 
216,930

 
216,930

Other non-current assets
 
2,942

 
1,177

Total non-current assets
 
223,605

 
221,168

Total Assets
 
$
495,551

 
$
465,305

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
 
 
 
 
Current liabilities
 
 
 
 
Accounts payable
 
$
115,899

 
$
118,055

Billings in excess of costs
 
3,766

 
1,421

Compensation and other employee benefits
 
39,304

 
34,917

Short-term debt
 
4,000

 
15,750

Other accrued liabilities
 
19,209

 
17,693

Total current liabilities
 
182,178

 
187,836

Long-term debt, net
 
73,211

 
67,842

Deferred tax liability
 
55,329

 
89,667

Other non-current liabilities
 
1,461

 
2,559

Total non-current liabilities
 
130,001

 
160,068

Total liabilities
 
312,179

 
347,904

Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)
 

 

Shareholders' Equity
 

 

Preferred stock; $0.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; No shares issued and outstanding
 

 

Common stock; $0.01 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; 11,120,528 and 10,894,924 shares issued and outstanding
 
111

 
109

Additional paid in capital
 
67,526

 
63,910

Retained earnings
 
117,415

 
57,959

Accumulated other comprehensive loss
 
(1,680
)
 
(4,577
)
Total shareholders' equity
 
183,372

 
117,401

Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
 
$
495,551

 
$
465,305

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-5

Table of Contents

VECTRUS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 
 
Year Ended December 31,
(In thousands)
 
2017
 
2016
 
2015
Operating activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
$
59,497

 
$
23,655

 
$
30,973

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation expense
 
1,686

 
1,920

 
3,138

Loss on disposal of property, plant, and equipment
 

 
405

 
686

Stock-based compensation
 
4,467

 
4,649

 
6,658

Amortization and write-off of debt issuance costs
 
1,464

 
1,198

 
1,130

Changes in assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Receivables
 
178

 
37,814

 
(9,886
)
Other assets
 
3,455

 
(13,903
)
 
12,005

Accounts payable
 
(4,346
)
 
(3,766
)
 
8,874

Billings in excess of costs
 
2,345

 
(4,605
)
 
219

Deferred taxes
 
(35,321
)
 
(2,163
)
 
(9,404
)
Compensation and other employee benefits
 
3,256

 
(1,808
)
 
275

Other liabilities
 
(1,271
)
 
(6,778
)
 
(25,788
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
 
35,410

 
36,618

 
18,880

Investing activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Purchases of capital assets
 
(2,344
)
 
(741
)
 
(793
)
Proceeds from the disposition of assets
 

 
116

 
387

Distributions from equity investment
 

 
573

 
524

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
 
(2,344
)
 
(52
)
 
118

Financing activities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
 
80,000

 

 

Repayments of long-term debt
 
(86,000
)
 
(29,000
)
 
(23,375
)
Proceeds from revolver
 
42,500

 
74,000

 
324,000

Repayments of revolver
 
(42,500
)
 
(74,000
)
 
(324,000
)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
 
2,031

 
2,146

 
239

Payment of debt issuance costs
 
(1,844
)
 
(221
)
 

Proceeds from insurance financing
 

 

 
14,857

Repayments of insurance financing
 

 

 
(12,130
)
Payments of employee withholding taxes on share-based compensation
 
(1,317
)
 
(987
)
 
(1,301
)
Net cash (used in) financing activities
 
(7,130
)
 
(28,062
)
 
(21,710
)
Exchange rate effect on cash
 
3,866

 
(848
)
 
(116
)
Net change in cash
 
29,802

 
7,656

 
(2,828
)
Cash-beginning of year
 
47,651

 
39,995

 
42,823

Cash-end of year
 
$
77,453

 
$
47,651

 
$
39,995

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest paid
 
$
5,886

 
$
5,278

 
$
6,047

Income taxes paid
 
$
4,802

 
$
26,068

 
$
16,096

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.

F-6

Table of Contents

VECTRUS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
 
 
Common Stock Issued
 
Additional Paid-in Capital
 
Retained Earnings
 
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
 
Total Shareholders' Equity
(In thousands)
 
Shares
 
Amount
 
 
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2014
 
10,485

 
$
105

 
$
52,967

 
$
3,331

 
$
(2,528
)
 
$
53,875

Net income
 

 

 

 
30,973

 

 
30,973

Foreign currency translation adjustments
 

 

 

 

 
(1,186
)
 
(1,186
)
Unrealized (loss) gain on cash flow hedge
 

 

 

 

 
(26
)
 
(26
)
Employee stock awards and stock options
 
127

 
1

 
(577
)
 

 

 
(576
)
Stock-based compensation
 

 

 
6,250

 

 

 
6,250

Balance at December 31, 2015
 
10,612

 
$
106

 
$
58,640

 
$
34,304

 
$
(3,740
)
 
$
89,310

Net income
 

 

 

 
23,655

 

 
23,655

Foreign currency translation adjustments
 

 

 

 

 
(975
)
 
(975
)
Unrealized (loss) gain on cash flow hedge
 

 

 

 

 
138

 
138

Employee stock awards and stock options
 
283

 
3

 
1,288