Toggle SGML Header (+)


Section 1: 10-K (FORM 10K 2017)

 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____ to _____

Commission File No. 1-12803


URSTADT BIDDLE PROPERTIES INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland
 
04-2458042
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

321 Railroad Avenue, Greenwich, CT
 
06830
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (203) 863-8200

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class
Name of each exchange on which registered
   
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
New York Stock Exchange
   
Class A Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
New York Stock Exchange
   
6.75% Series G Cumulative Preferred Stock
New York Stock Exchange
   
6.25% Series H Cumulative Preferred Stock
New York Stock Exchange
   
Preferred Share Purchase Rights
New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:  None

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes
No

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Act.
Yes
No

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes
No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definition of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer
Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer ☐  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes 
No

The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of April 30, 2017 (price at which the common equity was last sold as of the last business day of the Registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter): Common Shares, par value $.01 per share, $37,629,126; Class A Common Shares, par value $.01 per share, $574,864,298.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant's classes of Common Stock and Class A Common Stock, as of January 4, 2018 (latest date practicable): 9,817,478 Common Shares, par value $.01 per share, and 28,831,544 Class A Common Shares, par value $.01 per share.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on March 21, 2018 (certain parts as indicated herein) (Part III).


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item No.
 
Page No.
 
PART I
 
     
1.
Business
 1
     
1A.
Risk Factors
 3
     
1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
 7
     
2.
Properties
 8
     
3.
Legal Proceedings
 10
     
4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
 10
     
 
PART II
 
     
5.
Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
 11
     
6.
Selected Financial Data
 12
     
7.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
 13
     
7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
 22
     
8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
 23
     
9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
 23
     
9A.
Controls and Procedures
 23
     
9B.
Other Information
 26
     
 
PART III
 
     
10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
 27
     
11.
Executive Compensation
 27
     
12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
 27
     
13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
 27
     
14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
 27
     
 
PART IV
 
     
15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
 28
     
 
Signatures
 57, 58


Table Of Contents
 
PART I

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K of Urstadt Biddle Properties Inc. (the "Company") contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act.  Such statements can generally be identified by such words as "anticipate", "believe", "can", "continue", "could", "estimate", "expect", "intend", "may", "plan", "seek", "should", "will" or variations of such words or other similar expressions and the negatives of such words.  All statements included in this report that address activities, events or developments that we expect, believe or anticipate will or may occur in the future, including such matters as future capital expenditures, dividends and acquisitions (including the amount and nature thereof), business strategies, expansion and growth of our operations and other such matters, are forward-looking statements.  These statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by us in light of our experience and our perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors we believe are appropriate.  Such statements are inherently subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of which cannot be predicted with accuracy and some of which might not even be anticipated.  Future events and actual results, performance or achievements, financial and otherwise, may differ materially from the results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.  Risks, uncertainties and other factors that might cause such differences, some of which could be material, include, but are not limited to:

economic and other market conditions, including local real estate and market conditions, that could impact us, our properties or the financial stability of our tenants;

financing risks, such as the inability to obtain debt or equity financing on favorable terms, as well as the level and volatility of interest rates;

any difficulties in renewing leases, filling vacancies or negotiating improved lease terms;

the inability of the Company's properties to generate revenue increases to offset expense increases;

environmental risk and regulatory requirements;

risks of real estate acquisitions and dispositions (including the failure of transactions to close);

risks of operating properties through joint ventures that we do not fully control;

risks related to our status as a real estate investment trust, including the application of complex federal income tax regulations that are subject to change;

as well as other risks identified in this Annual Report on Form 10-K under Item 1A. Risk Factors and in the other reports filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC").

Item 1.                          Business.

Organization

We are a real estate investment trust, organized as a Maryland corporation, engaged in the acquisition, ownership and management of commercial real estate. We were organized as an unincorporated business trust (the "Trust") under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on July 7, 1969. In 1997, the shareholders of the Trust approved a plan of reorganization of the Trust from a Massachusetts business trust to a Maryland corporation.  As a result of the plan of reorganization, the Trust was merged with and into the Company, the separate existence of the Trust ceased, the Company was the surviving entity in the merger and each issued and outstanding common share of beneficial interest of the Trust was converted into one share of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Company.

Tax Status – Qualification as a Real Estate Investment Trust

We elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust ("REIT") under Sections 856-860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), beginning with its taxable year ended October 31, 1970.  Pursuant to such provisions of the Code, a REIT which distributes at least 90% of its real estate investment trust taxable income to its shareholders each year and which meets certain other conditions regarding the nature of its income and assets will not be taxed on that portion of its taxable income which is distributed to its shareholders.  Although we believe that we qualify as a real estate investment trust for federal income tax purposes, no assurance can be given that we will continue to qualify as a REIT.

Description of Business

Our business is the ownership of real estate investments, which consist principally of investments in income-producing properties, with primary emphasis on neighborhood and community shopping centers in the metropolitan New York tri-state area outside of the City of New York.  We believe that our geographic focus allows us to take advantage of the strong demographic profiles of the areas that surround the City of New York and the natural barriers to entry that such density and limitations on developable land provide.  We also believe that our ability to directly operate and manage all of our properties within the tri-state area reduces overhead costs and affords us efficiencies that a more dispersed portfolio would make difficult.

At October 31, 2017, the Company owned or had equity interests in 81 properties comprised of neighborhood and community shopping centers, office buildings, single tenant retail or restaurant properties and office/retail mixed use properties located in four states, containing a total of 5.1 million square feet of gross leasable area ("GLA").  We seek to identify desirable properties, typically neighborhood and community shopping centers, for acquisition, which we acquire in the normal course of business.  In addition, we regularly review our portfolio and, from time to time, may sell certain of our properties.  For a description of the Company's properties and information about the carrying amount of the properties at October 31 2017 and encumbrances, see Item 2. Properties and Schedule III located in Item 15.

We do not consider our real estate business to be seasonal in nature.

Growth Strategy

Our long-term growth strategy is to increase cash flow, and consequently the value of our properties, through strategic re-leasing, renovations and expansions of our existing properties and selective acquisitions of income-producing properties, primarily neighborhood and community shopping centers, in our targeted geographic region.  We may also invest in other types of real estate in our targeted geographic region. Key elements of our growth strategy and operating objectives are to:

acquire quality neighborhood and community shopping centers in the northeastern part of the United States with a concentration on properties in the metropolitan New York tri-state area outside of the City of New York, and unlock further value in these properties with selective enhancements to both the property and tenant mix, as well as improvements to management and leasing fundamentals;

selectively dispose of underperforming properties and re-deploy the proceeds into potentially higher performing properties that meet our acquisition criteria;

invest in our properties for the long-term through regular maintenance, periodic renovations and capital improvements, enhancing their attractiveness to tenants and customers, as well as increasing their value;

leverage opportunities to increase GLA at existing properties, through development of pad sites and reconfiguring of existing square footage, to meet the needs of existing or new tenants;

proactively manage our leasing strategy by aggressively marketing available GLA, renewing existing leases with strong tenants, and replacing weak ones when necessary, with an eye towards securing leases that include regular or fixed contractual increases to minimum rents, replacing below-market-rent leases with increased market rents when possible and further improving the quality of our tenant mix at our shopping centers;

maintain strong working relationships with our tenants, particularly our anchor tenants;

maintain a conservative capital structure with low leverage levels, ample liquidity and diverse sources of capital; and

control property operating and administrative costs.

Our hope is to grow our assets through acquisitions by 5% to 10% per year on a dollar value basis, subject to the availability of acquisitions that meet our investment parameters, although we cannot guarantee that investment properties meeting our investment specifications will be available to us.

Renovations and Expansions

We invest in properties where cost effective renovation and expansion programs, combined with effective leasing and operating strategies, can improve the properties' values and economic returns.  Retail properties are typically adaptable for varied tenant layouts and can be reconfigured to accommodate new tenants or the changing space needs of existing tenants.  We also seek to leverage existing shopping center assets through pad site development.  In determining whether to proceed with a renovation, expansion or pad, we consider both the cost of such expansion or renovation and the increase in rent attributable to such expansion or renovation.  We believe that certain of our properties provide opportunities for future renovation and expansion.  We generally do not engage in ground-up development projects.

Acquisitions and Dispositions

When evaluating potential acquisitions, we consider such factors as (i) economic, demographic, and regulatory conditions in the property's local and regional market; (ii) the location, construction quality, and design of the property; (iii) the current and projected cash flow of the property and the potential to increase cash flow; (iv) the potential for capital appreciation of the property; (v) the terms of tenant leases, including the relationship between the property's current rents and market rents and the ability to increase rents upon lease rollover; (vi) the occupancy and demand by tenants for properties of a similar type in the market area; (vii) the potential to complete a strategic renovation, expansion or re-tenanting of the property; (viii) the property's current expense structure and the potential to increase operating margins; (ix) competition from comparable properties in the market area; and (x) vulnerability of the property's tenants to competition from e-commerce.

We may, from time to time, enter into arrangements for the acquisition of properties with property owners through the issuance of non-managing member units or partnership units in these joint venture entities that we control, which we refer to as our DownREIT entities. The limited partners and non-managing members of each of these joint ventures are entitled to receive annual or quarterly cash distributions payable from available cash of the joint venture.  The limited partners and non-managing members of these joint ventures have the right to require the Company to repurchase or redeem all or a portion of their limited partner or non-managing member interests for cash or Class A Common Stock of the Company, at our election, at prices and on terms set forth in the partnership or operating agreements.  We also have the right to redeem all or a portion of the limited partner and non-managing member interests for cash or Class A Common Stock of the Company, at our election, under certain circumstances, at prices and on terms set forth in the partnership or operating agreements.   We believe that this acquisition method may permit us to acquire properties from property owners wishing to enter into tax-deferred transactions.

From time to time, we selectively dispose of underperforming properties and re-deploy the proceeds into potentially higher performing properties that meet our acquisition criteria.

1

Table Of Contents
Leasing Results

At October 31, 2017, our properties collectively had 947 leases with tenants providing a wide range of products and services.  Tenants include regional supermarkets, national and regional discount department stores, other local retailers and office tenants.  At October 31, 2017 the 74 consolidated properties were 92.7% leased and 91.0% occupied (see Results of Operations discussion in Item 7).  At October 31, 2017, we had equity investments in seven properties which we do not consolidate; those properties were 97.7% leased.  We believe the properties are adequately covered by property and liability insurance.

A substantial portion of our operating lease income is derived from tenants under leases with terms greater than one year.  Most of the leases provide for the payment of monthly fixed base rentals and for the payment by the tenant of a pro-rata share of the real estate taxes, insurance, utilities and common area maintenance expenses incurred in operating the properties.

For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017, no single tenant comprised more than 9.9% of the total annual base rents of our properties. The following table sets forth a schedule of our ten largest tenants by percent of total annual base rent of our properties to total annual base rent for the year ended October 31, 2017.

Tenant
 
Number
of Stores
   
% of Total Annual
Base Rent of Properties
 
Stop & Shop
   
8
     
9.9
%
CVS
   
10
     
5.4
%
The TJX Companies
   
6
     
3.4
%
Bed Bath & Beyond
   
3
     
2.9
%
Acme
   
4
     
2.7
%
ShopRite
   
3
     
1.8
%
Staples
   
3
     
1.4
%
BJ's
   
2
     
1.4
%
Rite Aid
   
4
     
1.3
%
DSW
   
2
     
1.1
%
     
45
     
31.3
%

See Item 2. Properties for a complete list of the Company's properties.

The Company's single largest real estate investment is its 100% ownership of the general and limited partnership interests in the Ridgeway Shopping Center ("Ridgeway").

Ridgeway is located in Stamford, Connecticut and was developed in the 1950s and redeveloped in the mid-1990s. The property contains approximately 374,000 square feet of GLA.  It is the dominant grocery anchored center and the largest non-mall shopping center located in the City of Stamford, Fairfield County, Connecticut. For the year ended October 31, 2017, Ridgeway revenues represented approximately 11.2% of the Company's total revenues and approximately 7.2% of the Company's total assets at October 31, 2017. As of October 31, 2017, Ridgeway was 97% leased. The property's largest tenants (by base rent) are:  The Stop & Shop Supermarket Company (19%), Bed, Bath & Beyond (14%) and Marshall's Inc., a division of the TJX Companies (11%).  No other tenant accounts for more than 10% of Ridgeway's annual base rents.

The following table sets forth a schedule of the annual lease expirations for retail leases at Ridgeway as of October 31, 2017 for each of the next ten years and thereafter (assuming that no tenants exercise renewal or cancellation options and that there are no tenant bankruptcies or other tenant defaults):

Year of Expiration
 
Number of
Leases Expiring
   
Square Footage
of Expiring Leases
   
Minimum
Base Rentals
   
Percentage of
Total Annual
Base Rent that is
Represented by
the Expiring Leases
 
2018
   
9
     
32,600
   
$
1,438,800
     
11.3
%
2019
   
3
     
14,600
     
431,900
     
3.3
%
2020
   
4
     
34,800
     
637,700
     
4.9
%
2021
   
4
     
44,800
     
994,700
     
7.7
%
2022
   
3
     
93,100
     
5,197,700
     
40.3
%
2023
   
6
     
92,200
     
2,583,300
     
20.0
%
2024
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
0.0
%
2025
   
-
     
-
     
-
     
0.0
%
2026
   
2
     
10,300
     
363,700
     
2.8
%
2027
   
2
     
5,000
     
135,600
     
1.1
%
Thereafter
   
1
     
33,800
     
1,115,700
     
8.6
%
Total
   
34
     
361,200
   
$
12,899,100
     
100
%

For further financial information about our only reportable operating segment, Ridgeway, see note 1 of our financial statements in Item 8 included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Financing Strategy

We intend to continue to finance acquisitions and property improvements and/or expansions with the most advantageous sources of capital which we believe are available to us at the time, and which may include the sale of common or preferred equity through public offerings or private placements, the incurrence of additional indebtedness through secured or unsecured borrowings, investments in real estate joint ventures and the reinvestment of proceeds from the disposition of assets.  Our financing strategy is to maintain a strong and flexible financial position by (i) maintaining a prudent level of leverage, and (ii) minimizing our exposure to interest rate risk represented by floating rate debt.

Compliance with Governmental Regulations

We, like others in the commercial real estate industry, are subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations.  We may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances at, on, in or under our properties, as well as certain other potential costs relating to hazardous or toxic substances (including government fines and penalties and damages for injuries to persons and adjacent property).  These laws may impose liability without regard to whether we knew of, or were responsible for, the presence or disposal of those substances.  This liability may be imposed on us in connection with the activities of an operator of, or tenant at, the property.  The cost of any required remediation, removal, fines or personal or property damages and our liability therefore could exceed the value of the property and/or our aggregate assets.  In addition, the presence of those substances, or the failure to properly dispose of or remove those substances, may adversely affect our ability to sell or rent that property or to borrow using that property as collateral, which, in turn, would reduce our revenues and ability to make distributions.

Our existing properties, as well as properties we may acquire, as commercial facilities, are required to comply with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990.  The requirements of this Act, or of other federal, state or local laws or regulations, also may change in the future and restrict further renovations of our properties with respect to access for disabled persons. Future compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and similar regulations may require expensive changes to the properties.

Competition

The real estate investment business is highly competitive.  We compete for real estate investments with investors of all types, including domestic and foreign corporations, financial institutions, other real estate investment trusts, real estate funds, individuals and privately owned companies.  In addition, our properties are subject to local competition from the surrounding areas.  Our shopping centers compete for tenants with other regional, community or neighborhood shopping centers in the respective areas where our retail properties are located.  In addition, the retail industry is seeing greater competition from internet retailers who may not need to establish "brick and mortar" retail locations for their businesses. This reduces the demand for traditional retail space in shopping centers like ours and other grocery-anchored shopping center properties.  Our office buildings compete for tenants principally with office buildings throughout the respective areas in which they are located.  Leasing decisions are generally determined by prospective tenants on the basis of, among other things, rental rates, location, and the physical quality of the property and availability of space.

Property Management

We actively manage and supervise the operations and leasing of all of our properties.

Employees

Our executive offices are located at 321 Railroad Avenue, Greenwich, Connecticut.  We have 51 employees and believe that our relationship with employees is good.

Company Website

All of the Company's filings with the SEC, including the Company's annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, are available free of charge at the Company's website at www.ubproperties.com as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files such material with, or furnishes it to, the SEC.  These filings can also be accessed through the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.
2

Table Of Contents

Item 1A.                          Risk Factors

Risks Related to our Operations and Properties

There are risks relating to investments in real estate and the value of our property interests depends on conditions beyond our control.  Yields from our properties depend on their net income and capital appreciation.  Real property income and capital appreciation may be adversely affected by general and local economic conditions, neighborhood values, competitive overbuilding, zoning laws, weather, casualty losses and other factors beyond our control.  Since substantially all of our income is rental income from real property, our income and cash flow could be adversely affected if a large tenant is, or a significant number of tenants are, unable to pay rent or if available space cannot be rented on favorable terms.

Operating and other expenses of our properties, particularly significant expenses such as interest, real estate taxes and maintenance costs, generally do not decrease when income decreases and, even if revenues increase, operating and other expenses may increase faster than revenues.

We may be unable to sell properties when appropriate because real estate investments are illiquid.  Real estate investments generally cannot be sold quickly. In addition, there are some limitations under federal income tax laws applicable to real estate and to REITs in particular that may limit our ability to sell our assets. With respect to each of our five consolidated joint ventures, Ironbound, McLean, Orangeburg, UB High Ridge and Dumont, which we refer to as our DownREITs, we may not sell or transfer the contributed property through contractually agreed upon protection periods other than as part of a tax-deferred transaction under the Code or if the conditions exist which would give us the right to call all of the non-managing member units or partnership units, as applicable, following the death or dissolution of certain non-managing members or, in connection with the exercise of creditor's rights and remedies under the existing mortgage or any refinancing by the holder thereof (which will not constitute a violation of this restriction).  Because of these market, regulatory and contractual conditions, we may not be able to alter our portfolio promptly in response to changes in economic or other conditions. Our inability to respond quickly to adverse changes in the performance of our investments could have an adverse effect on our ability to meet our obligations and make distributions to our stockholders.

Our business strategy is mainly concentrated in one type of commercial property and in one geographic location.  Our primary investment focus is neighborhood and community shopping centers, with a concentration in the metropolitan New York tri-state area outside of the City of New York.  For the year ended October 31, 2017, approximately 92.9% of our total revenues were from properties located in this area. Various factors may adversely affect a shopping center's profitability.  These factors include circumstances that affect consumer spending, such as general economic conditions, economic business cycles, rates of employment, income growth, interest rates and general consumer sentiment, as well as weather patterns and natural disasters that could have a more significant localized effect in the areas where our properties are concentrated.  Changes to the real estate market in our focus areas, such as an increase in retail space or a decrease in demand for shopping center properties, could adversely affect operating results.  As a result, we may be exposed to greater risks than if our investment focus was based on more diversified types of properties and in more diversified geographic areas.

The Company's single largest real estate investment is its ownership of the Ridgeway Shopping Center ("Ridgeway") located in Stamford, Connecticut.  For the year ended October 31, 2017, Ridgeway revenues represented approximately 11.2% of the Company's total revenues and approximately 7.2% of the Company's total assets at October 31, 2017.  The loss of Ridgeway or a material decrease in revenues from Ridgeway could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

We are dependent on anchor tenants in many of our retail properties.  Most of our retail properties are dependent on a major or anchor tenant, often a supermarket anchor.  If we are unable to renew any lease we have with the anchor tenant at one of these properties upon expiration of the current lease on favorable terms, or to re-lease the space to another anchor tenant of similar or better quality upon departure of an existing anchor tenant on similar or better terms, we could experience material adverse consequences with respect to such property such as higher vacancy, re-leasing on less favorable economic terms, reduced net income, reduced funds from operations and reduced property values.  Vacated anchor space also could adversely affect a property because of the loss of the departed anchor tenant's customer drawing power.  Loss of customer drawing power also can occur through the exercise of the right that some anchors have to vacate and prevent re-tenanting by paying rent for the balance of the lease term.  In addition, vacated anchor space could, under certain circumstances, permit other tenants to pay a reduced rent or terminate their leases at the affected property, which could adversely affect the future income from such property.  There can be no assurance that our anchor tenants will renew their leases when they expire or will be willing to renew on similar economic terms.  See Item 1. Business in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information on our ten largest tenants by percent of total annual base rent of our properties.

Similarly, if one or more of our anchor tenants goes bankrupt, we could experience material adverse consequences like those described above.  Under bankruptcy law, tenants have the right to reject their leases.  In the event a tenant exercises this right, the landlord generally may file a claim for a portion of its unpaid and future lost rent.  Actual amounts received in satisfaction of those claims, however, are typically very limited and will be subject to the tenant's final plan of reorganization and the availability of funds to pay its creditors.  In July 2015, The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company ("A&P"), an anchor at nine of our shopping centers, filed for bankruptcy, resulting in lost rent, vacancies of various duration at several of our shopping centers and other negative consequences.  We can provide no assurance that we will not experience similar bankruptcies by other anchor tenants. See Item 7. Management's Discussion of Operations and Financial Condition in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
 
We face potential difficulties or delays in renewing leases or re-leasing space.  We derive most of our income from rent received from our tenants.  Although substantially all of our properties currently have favorable occupancy rates, we cannot predict that current tenants will renew their leases upon expiration of their terms.  In addition, current tenants could attempt to terminate their leases prior to the scheduled expiration of such leases or might have difficulty in continuing to pay rent in full, if at all, in the event of a severe economic downturn.  If this occurs, we may not be able to promptly locate qualified replacement tenants and, as a result, we would lose a source of revenue while remaining responsible for the payment of our obligations.  Even if tenants decide to renew their leases, the terms of renewals or new leases, including the cost of required renovations or concessions to tenants, may be less favorable than current lease terms.

In some cases, our tenant leases contain provisions giving the tenant the exclusive right to sell particular types of merchandise or provide specific types of services within the particular retail center, or limit the ability of other tenants within the center to sell that merchandise or provide those services.  When re-leasing space after a vacancy in a center with one of these tenants, such provisions may limit the number and types of prospective tenants for the vacant space.  The failure to re-lease space or to re-lease space on satisfactory terms could adversely affect our results from operations.  Additionally, properties we may acquire in the future may not be fully leased and the cash flow from existing operations may be insufficient to pay the operating expenses and debt service associated with that property until the property is fully leased. As a result, our net income, funds from operations and ability to pay dividends to stockholders could be adversely affected.
 
We may acquire properties or acquire other real estate related companies, and this may create risks.  We may acquire properties or acquire other real estate related companies when we believe that an acquisition is consistent with our business strategies. We may not succeed in consummating desired acquisitions on time or within budget. When we do pursue a project or acquisition, we may not succeed in leasing newly acquired properties at rents sufficient to cover the costs of acquisition and operations. Acquisitions in new markets or industries where we do not have the same level of market knowledge may result in poorer than anticipated performance. We may also abandon acquisition opportunities that management has begun pursuing and consequently fail to recover expenses already incurred and will have devoted management's time to a matter not consummated. Furthermore, our acquisitions of new properties or companies will expose us to the liabilities of those properties or companies, some of which we may not be aware of at the time of the acquisition. In addition, redevelopment of our existing properties presents similar risks.

Newly acquired properties may have characteristics or deficiencies currently unknown to us that affect their value or revenue potential. It is also possible that the operating performance of these properties may decline under our management. As we acquire additional properties, we will be subject to risks associated with managing new properties, including lease-up and tenant retention. In addition, our ability to manage our growth effectively will require us to successfully integrate our new acquisitions into our existing management structure. We may not succeed with this integration or effectively manage additional properties, particularly in secondary markets. Also, newly acquired properties may not perform as expected.

3

Table Of Contents
Competition may adversely affect our ability to acquire new properties.  We compete for the purchase of commercial property with many entities, including other publicly traded REITs.  Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial resources than ours.  In addition, our competitors may be willing to accept lower returns on their investments.  If we are unable to successfully compete for the properties we have targeted for acquisition, we may not be able to meet our growth and investment objectives.  We may incur costs on unsuccessful acquisitions that we will not be able to recover.  The operating performance of our property acquisitions may also fall short of our expectations, which could adversely affect our financial performance.

Competition may limit our ability to generate sufficient income from tenants and may decrease the occupancy and rental rates for our properties. Our properties consist primarily of open-air shopping centers and other retail properties.  Our performance, therefore, is generally linked to economic conditions in the market for retail space.  In the future, the market for retail space could be adversely affected by:
weakness in the national, regional and local economies;
the adverse financial condition of some large retailing companies;
the impact of internet sales on the demand for retail space;
ongoing consolidation in the retail sector; and
the excess amount of retail space in a number of markets.
In addition, numerous commercial developers and real estate companies compete with us in seeking tenants for our existing properties.  If our competitors offer space at rental rates below our current rates or the market rates, we may lose current or potential tenants to other properties in our markets and we may need to reduce rental rates below our current rates in order to retain tenants upon expiration of their leases.  Increased competition for tenants may require us to make tenant and/or capital improvements to properties beyond those that we would otherwise have planned to make.  As a result, our results of operations and cash flow may be adversely affected. 

In addition, our tenants face increasing competition from internet commerce, outlet malls, discount retailers, warehouse clubs and other sources which could hinder our ability to attract and retain tenants and/or cause us to reduce rents at our properties, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows.  We may fail to anticipate the effects of changes in consumer buying practices, particularly of growing online sales and the resulting retailing practices and space needs of our tenants or a general downturn in our tenant's businesses, which may cause tenants to close their stores or default in payment of rent.

Property ownership through joint ventures could limit our control of those investments, restrict our ability to operate and finance the property on our terms, and reduce their expected return.  As of October 31, 2017, we owned seven of our operating properties through consolidated joint ventures and seven through unconsolidated joint ventures. Our joint ventures, and joint ventures we may enter into in the future, may involve risks not present with respect to our wholly-owned properties, including the following:
 
We may share decision-making authority with our joint venture partners regarding certain major decisions affecting the ownership or operation of the joint venture and the joint venture property, such as, but not limited to, (i) additional capital contribution requirements, (ii) obtaining, refinancing or paying off debt, and (iii) obtaining consent prior to the sale or transfer of our interest in the joint venture to a third party, which may prevent us from taking actions that are opposed by our joint venture partners;
Our joint venture partners may have business interests or goals with respect to the property that conflict with our business interests and goals, which could increase the likelihood of disputes regarding the ownership, management or disposition of the property;
Disputes may develop with our joint venture partners over decisions affecting the property or the joint venture, which may result in litigation or arbitration that would increase our expenses and distract our officers from focusing their time and effort on our business, disrupt the day-to-day operations of the property such as by delaying the implementation of important decisions until the conflict is resolved, and possibly force a sale of the property if the dispute cannot be resolved; and
The activities of a joint venture could adversely affect our ability to qualify as a REIT.

In addition, with respect to our five consolidated joint ventures, Ironbound, McLean, Orangeburg, UB High Ridge and Dumont, we have additional obligations to the limited partners and non-managing members and additional limitations on our activities with respect to those joint ventures.  The limited partners and non-managing members of each of these joint ventures are entitled to receive annual or quarterly cash distributions payable from available cash of the joint venture, with the Company required to provide such funds if the joint venture is unable to do so.  The limited partners and non-managing members of these joint ventures have the right to require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of their limited partner or non-managing member interests for cash or Class A Common Stock of the Company, at our election, at prices and on terms set forth in the partnership or operating agreements.  We also have the right to redeem all or a portion of the limited partner and non-managing member interests for cash or Class A Common Stock of the Company, at our election, under certain circumstances, at prices and on terms set forth in the partnership or operating agreements.  The right of these limited partners and non-managing members to put their equity interest to us could require us to expend cash, or issue Class A Common Stock of the REIT, at a time or under circumstances that are not desirable to us.

In addition, the partnership agreement or operating agreements with our partners in Ironbound, McLean, Orangeburg, UB High Ridge and Dumont include certain restrictions on our ability to sell the property and to pay off the mortgage debt on these properties before their maturity, although refinancings are generally permitted.  These restrictions could prevent us from taking advantage of favorable interest rate environments and limit our ability to best manage the debt on these properties.

Although we have historically used moderate levels of leverage, if we employed higher levels of leverage, it would result in increased risk of default on our obligations and in an increase in debt service requirements, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and our ability to pay dividends and make distributions. In addition, the viability of the interest rate hedges we use is subject to the strength of the counterparties.  We have incurred, and expect to continue to incur, indebtedness to advance our objectives. The only restrictions on the amount of indebtedness we may incur are certain contractual restrictions and financial covenants contained in our unsecured revolving credit agreement. Accordingly, we could become more highly leveraged, resulting in increased risk of default on our financial obligations and in an increase in debt service requirements. This, in turn, could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and our ability to make distributions.

Using debt to acquire properties, whether with recourse to us generally or only with respect to a particular property, creates an opportunity for increased return on our investment, but at the same time creates risks.  Our goal is to use debt to fund investments only when we believe it will enhance our risk-adjusted returns.  However, we cannot be sure that our use of leverage will prove to be beneficial.  Moreover, when our debt is secured by our assets, we can lose those assets through foreclosure if we do not meet our debt service obligations.  Incurring substantial debt may adversely affect our business and operating results by:

requiring us to use a substantial portion of our cash flow to pay interest and principal, which reduces the amount available for distributions, acquisitions and capital expenditures;
making us more vulnerable to economic and industry downturns and reducing our flexibility to respond to changing business and economic conditions;
requiring us to agree to less favorable terms, including higher interest rates, in order to incur additional debt, and otherwise limiting our ability to borrow for operations, working capital or to finance acquisitions in the future; or
limiting our flexibility in conducting our business, which may place us at a disadvantage compared to competitors with less debt or debt with less restrictive terms.

In addition, variable rate debt exposes us to changes in interest rates. Interest expense on our variable rate debt as of October 31, 2017 would increase by $40,000 annually for a 1% per annum increase in interest rates. This exposure would increase if we seek additional variable rate financing based on pricing and other commercial and financial terms.  We enter into interest rate hedging transactions, including interest rate swaps. There can be no guarantee that the future financial condition of these counterparties will enable them to fulfill their obligations under these agreements.

We are obligated to comply with financial and other covenants in our debt that could restrict our operating activities, and failure to comply could result in defaults that accelerate the payment under our debt.  Our mortgage notes payable contain customary covenants for such agreements including, among others, provisions:
restricting our ability to assign or further encumber the properties securing the debt; and
restricting our ability to enter into certain new leases or to amend or modify certain existing leases without obtaining consent of the lenders.

Our unsecured revolving credit agreement contains financial and other covenants which may limit our ability, without our lenders' consent, to engage in operating or financial activities that we may believe desirable.  Our unsecured revolving credit facility contains, among others, provisions restricting our ability to:
permit unsecured debt to exceed $400 million;
create certain liens;
increase our overall secured and unsecured borrowing beyond certain levels;
consolidate, merge or sell all or substantially all of our assets;
permit secured debt to be more than 40% of gross asset value, as defined in the agreement; and
        •      
permit unsecured indebtedness excluding preferred stock to exceed, 60% of eligible real estate asset value as defined in the agreement.
 
 
4

Table Of Contents
In addition, covenants included in our unsecured revolving credit facility (i) limit the amount of debt we may incur, excluding preferred stock, as a percentage of gross asset value, as defined in the agreement, to less than 60% (leverage ratio), (ii) require earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization to be at least 150% of fixed charges, (iii) require net operating income from unencumbered properties to be at least 200% of unsecured interest expenses, (iv) require not more than 15% of gross asset value and unencumbered asset pool, each term as defined in the agreement, to be attributable to the Company's pro rata share of the value of unencumbered properties owned by non-wholly owned subsidiaries or unconsolidated joint ventures, and (v) require at least 10 unencumbered properties in the unencumbered asset pool, with at least 10 properties owned by the company or a wholly-owned subsidiary.

If we were to breach any of our debt covenants and did not cure the breach within any applicable cure period, our lenders could require us to repay the debt immediately, and, if the debt is secured, could immediately begin proceedings to take possession of the property securing the loan.  As a result, a default under our debt covenants could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, our results of operations, our ability to meet our obligations and the market value of our shares.

We may be required to incur additional debt to qualify as a REIT.  As a REIT, we must generally make annual distributions to shareholders of at least 90% of our taxable income. We are subject to income tax on amounts of undistributed taxable income and net capital gain. In addition, we would be subject to a 4% excise tax if we fail to distribute sufficient income to meet a minimum distribution test based on our ordinary income, capital gain and aggregate undistributed income from prior years. We intend to make distributions to shareholders to comply with the Code's distribution provisions and to avoid federal income and excise tax. We may need to borrow funds to meet our distribution requirements because:

our income may not be matched by our related expenses at the time the income is considered received for purposes of determining taxable income; and
non-deductible capital expenditures, creation of reserves, or debt service requirements may reduce available cash but not taxable income.

In these circumstances, we might have to borrow funds on terms we might otherwise find unfavorable and we may have to borrow funds even if our management believes the market conditions make borrowing financially unattractive. Current tax law also allows us to pay a portion of our distributions in shares instead of cash.

Our ability to grow will be limited if we cannot obtain additional capital.  Our growth strategy includes the redevelopment of properties we already own and the acquisition of additional properties.  We are required to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our taxable income each year to continue to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.  Accordingly, in addition to our undistributed operating cash flow, we rely upon the availability of debt or equity capital to fund our growth, which financing may or may not be available on favorable terms or at all.  The debt could include mortgage loans from third parties or the sale of debt securities.  Equity capital could include our common stock or preferred stock.  Additional financing, refinancing or other capital may not be available in the amounts we desire or on favorable terms.

Our access to debt or equity capital depends on a number of factors, including the general state of the capital markets, the markets perception of our growth potential, our ability to pay dividends, and our current and potential future earnings.  Depending on the outcome of these factors, we could experience delay or difficulty in implementing our growth strategy on satisfactory terms, or be unable to implement this strategy.

We cannot assure you we will continue to pay dividends at historical rates.  Our ability to continue to pay dividends on our shares of Class A Common stock or Common stock at historical rates or to increase our dividend rate, and our ability to pay preferred share dividends will depend on a number of factors, including, among others, the following:

our financial condition and results of future operations;
the performance of lease terms by tenants;
the terms of our loan covenants;
payment obligations on debt; and
our ability to acquire, finance or redevelop and lease additional properties at attractive rates.

If we do not maintain or increase the dividend on our common shares, it could have an adverse effect on the market price of our shares of Class A Common stock or Common stock and other securities. Any preferred shares we may offer may have a fixed dividend rate that would not increase with any increases in the dividend rate of our common shares. Conversely, payment of dividends on our common shares may be subject to payment in full of the dividends on any preferred shares and payment of interest on any debt securities we may offer.

Market interest rates could adversely affect the share price of our stock and increase the cost of refinancing debt.  A variety of factors may influence the price of our common equities in the public trading markets.  We believe that investors generally perceive REITs as yield-driven investments and compare the annual yield from dividends by REITs with yields on various other types of financial instruments.  An increase in market interest rates may lead purchasers of stock to seek a higher annual dividend rate from other investments, which could adversely affect the market price of the stock.  In addition, we are subject to the risk that we will not be able to refinance existing indebtedness on our properties.  We anticipate that a portion of the principal of our debt will not be repaid prior to maturity.  Therefore, we likely will need to refinance at least a portion of our outstanding debt as it matures.  A change in interest rates may increase the risk that we will not be able to refinance existing debt or that the terms of any refinancing will not be as favorable as the terms of the existing debt.

If principal payments due at maturity cannot be refinanced, extended or repaid with proceeds from other sources, such as new equity capital or sales of properties, our cash flow will not be sufficient to repay all maturing debt in years when significant "balloon" payments come due.  As a result, our ability to retain properties or pay dividends to stockholders could be adversely affected and we may be forced to dispose of properties on unfavorable terms, which could adversely affect our business and net income.

Construction and renovation risks could adversely affect our profitability. We currently are renovating some of our properties and may in the future renovate other properties, including tenant improvements required under leases.  Our renovation and related construction activities may expose us to certain risks.  We may incur renovation costs for a property which exceed our original estimates due to increased costs for materials or labor or other costs that are unexpected.  We also may be unable to complete renovation of a property on schedule, which could result in increased debt service expense or construction costs.  Additionally, some tenants may have the right to terminate their leases if a renovation project is not completed on time.  The time frame required to recoup our renovation and construction costs and to realize a return on such costs can often be significant.

We are dependent on key personnel.  We depend on the services of our existing senior management to carry out our business and investment strategies.  We do not have employment agreements with any of our existing senior management.  As we expand, we may continue to need to recruit and retain qualified additional senior management.  The loss of the services of any of our key management personnel or our inability to recruit and retain qualified personnel in the future could have an adverse effect on our business and financial results.

Uninsured and underinsured losses may affect the value of, or return from, our property interests.  We maintain insurance on our properties, including the properties securing our loans, in amounts which we believe are sufficient to permit replacement of the properties in the event of a total loss, subject to applicable deductibles.  There are certain types of losses, such as losses resulting from wars, terrorism, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes or other acts of God that may be uninsurable or not economically insurable.  Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occur, we could lose capital invested in a property, as well as the anticipated future revenues from a property, while remaining obligated for any mortgage indebtedness or other financial obligations related to the property.  In addition, changes in building codes and ordinances, environmental considerations and other factors might make it impracticable for us to use insurance proceeds to replace a damaged or destroyed property.  If any of these or similar events occur, it may reduce our return from an affected property and the value of our investment.

Properties with environmental problems may create liabilities for us.  Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations, as an owner of real property, we may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances at, on, in or under our properties, as well as certain other potential costs relating to hazardous or toxic substances (including government fines and penalties and damages for injuries to persons and adjacent property).  A property can be adversely affected either through direct physical contamination or as the result of hazardous or toxic substances or other contaminants that have or may have emanated from other properties.  These laws may impose liability without regard to whether we knew of, or were responsible for, the presence or disposal of those substances.  This liability may be imposed on us in connection with the activities of an operator of, or tenant at, the property.  The cost of any required remediation, removal, fines or personal or property damages and our liability therefore could exceed the value of the property and/or our aggregate assets.  In addition, the presence of those substances, or the failure to properly dispose of or remove those substances, may adversely affect our ability to sell or rent that property or to borrow using that property as collateral, which, in turn, would reduce our revenues and ability to make distributions.
 
Prior to the acquisition of any property and from time to time thereafter, we obtain Phase I environmental reports, and, when deemed warranted, Phase II environmental reports concerning the Company's properties.  There can be no assurance, however, that (i) the discovery of environmental conditions that were previously unknown, (ii) changes in law, (iii) the conduct of tenants or neighboring property owner, or (iv) activities relating to properties in the vicinity of the Company's properties, will not expose the Company to material liability in the future.  Changes in laws increasing the potential liability for environmental conditions existing on properties or increasing the restrictions on discharges or other conditions may result in significant unanticipated expenditures or may otherwise adversely affect the operations of our tenants, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

5

Table Of Contents
We face risks relating to cybersecurity attacks that could cause loss of confidential information and other business disruptions.  We rely extensively on computer systems to process transactions and manage our business, and our business is at risk from and may be impacted by cybersecurity attacks. These could include attempts to gain unauthorized access to our data and computer systems. Attacks can be both individual and/or highly organized attempts organized by very sophisticated hacking organizations. We employ a number of measures to prevent, detect and mitigate these threats, which include password encryption, frequent password change events, firewall detection systems, anti-virus software in-place and frequent backups; however, there is no guarantee such efforts will be successful in preventing a cyber attack. A cybersecurity attack could compromise the confidential information of our employees, tenants and vendors. A successful attack could disrupt and otherwise adversely affect our business operations, including through lawsuits by third-parties.

The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 could require us to take remedial steps with respect to existing or newly acquired propertiesOur existing properties, as well as properties we may acquire, as commercial facilities, are required to comply with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Investigation of a property may reveal non-compliance with this Act. The requirements of this Act, or of other federal, state or local laws or regulations, also may change in the future and restrict further renovations of our properties with respect to access for disabled persons. Future compliance with this Act may require expensive changes to the properties.

Risks Related to our Organization and Structure

We will be taxed as a regular corporation if we fail to maintain our REIT status.  Since our founding in 1969, we have operated, and intend to continue to operate, in a manner that enables us to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.  However, the federal income tax laws governing REITs are complex.  The determination that we qualify as a REIT requires an analysis of various factual matters and circumstances that may not be completely within our control.  For example, to qualify as a REIT, at least 95% of our gross income must come from specific passive sources, such as rent, that are itemized in the REIT tax laws.  In addition, to qualify as a REIT, we cannot own specified amounts of debt and equity securities of some issuers.  We also are required to distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income (excluding capital gains) each year. Our continued qualification as a REIT depends on our satisfaction of the asset, income, organizational, distribution and stockholder ownership requirements of the Internal Revenue Code on a continuing basis. At any time, new laws, interpretations or court decisions may change the federal tax laws or the federal tax consequences of qualification as a REIT.  If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year and do not qualify for certain Internal Revenue Code relief provisions, we will be subject to federal income tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on our taxable income at regular corporate rates.  In addition, distributions to stockholders would not be deductible in computing our taxable income.  Corporate tax liability would reduce the amount of cash available for distribution to stockholders which, in turn, would reduce the market price of our stock.  Unless entitled to relief under certain Internal Revenue Code provisions, we also would be disqualified from taxation as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which we ceased to qualify as a REIT.

We will pay federal taxes if we do not distribute 100% of our taxable income.  To the extent that we distribute less than 100% of our taxable income, we will be subject to federal corporate income tax on our undistributed income.  In addition, we will incur a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which our distributions in any year are less than the sum of:

85% of our ordinary income for that year;
95% of our capital gain net income for that year; and
100% of our undistributed taxable income from prior years.

We have paid out, and intend to continue to pay out, our income to our stockholders in a manner intended to satisfy the distribution requirement and to avoid corporate income tax and the 4% nondeductible excise tax.  Differences in timing between the recognition of income and the related cash receipts or the effect of required debt amortization payments could require us to borrow money or sell assets to pay out enough of our taxable income to satisfy the distribution requirement and to avoid corporate income tax and the 4% excise tax in a particular year.

Gain on disposition of assets deemed held for sale in the ordinary course of business is subject to 100% tax.  If we sell any of our assets, the IRS may determine that the sale is a disposition of an asset held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business.  Gain from this kind of sale generally will be subject to a 100% tax.  Whether an asset is held "primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business" depends on the particular facts and circumstances of the sale.  Although we will attempt to comply with the terms of safe-harbor provisions in the Internal Revenue Code prescribing when asset sales will not be so characterized, we cannot assure you that we will be able to do so.

U.S. federal tax reform legislation could affect REITs generally, the geographic markets in which we operate, our stock and our results of operations, both positively and negatively in ways that are difficult to anticipate.  The U.S. Congress has passed sweeping tax reform legislation that would make significant changes to corporate and individual tax rates and the calculation of taxes, as well as international tax rules for U.S. domestic corporations.  As a REIT, we are generally not required to pay federal taxes otherwise applicable to regular corporations if we comply with the various tax regulations governing REITs.  Stockholders, however, are generally required to pay taxes on REIT dividends.  Tax reform legislation would affect the way in which dividends paid on our stock are taxed by the holder of that stock and  could impact our stock price or how stockholders and potential investors view an investment in REITs.   In addition, while certain elements of tax reform legislation would not impact us directly as a REIT, they could impact the geographic markets in which we operate, the tenants that populate our shopping centers and the customers who frequent our properties in ways, both positive and negative, that are difficult to anticipate.

Our ownership limitation may restrict business combination opportunities.
To qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, no more than 50% in value of our outstanding capital stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals during the last half of each taxable year.  To preserve our REIT qualification, our charter generally prohibits any person from owning shares of any class with a value of more than 7.5% of the value of all of our outstanding capital stock and provides that:

a transfer that violates the limitation is void;
shares transferred to a stockholder in excess of the ownership limitation are automatically converted, by the terms of our charter, into shares of "Excess Stock;"
a purported transferee receives no rights to the shares that violate the limitation except the right to designate a transferee of the Excess Stock held in trust; and
the Excess Stock will be held by us as trustee of a trust for the exclusive benefit of future transferees to whom the shares of capital stock ultimately will be transferred without violating the ownership limitation.

We may also redeem Excess Stock at a price which may be less than the price paid by a stockholder.  Pursuant to authority under our charter, our board of directors has determined that the ownership limitation does not apply to Mr. Charles J. Urstadt, our Chairman, who, as of October 31, 2017, beneficially owns 46.2% of our outstanding Common Stock and 0.5% of our outstanding Class A common stock or to Mr. Willing L. Biddle, our CEO, who beneficially owns 30.2% of our outstanding Common Stock and 0.1% of our outstanding Class A Common Stock.  Such holdings represent approximately 66.3% of our outstanding voting interests.  Together as a group Messrs. Urstadt, Biddle, and the other directors and executive officers hold approximately 66.7% of our outstanding voting interests through their beneficial ownership of our Common Stock and Class A common stock.  The ownership limitation may delay or discourage someone from taking control of us, even though a change of control might involve a premium price for our stockholders or might otherwise be in their best interest.

Certain provisions in our charter and bylaws and Maryland law may prevent or delay a change of control or limit our stockholders from receiving a premium for their shares.  Among the provisions contained in our charter and bylaws and Maryland law are the following:

Our board of directors is divided into three classes, with directors in each class elected for three-year staggered terms.
Our directors may be removed only for cause upon the vote of the holders of two-thirds of the voting power of our common equity securities.
Our stockholders may call a special meeting of stockholders only if the holders of a majority of the voting power of our common equity securities request such a meeting in writing.
Any consolidation, merger, share exchange or transfer of all or substantially all of our assets must be approved by (i) a majority of our directors who are currently in office or who are approved or recommended by a majority of our directors who are currently in office (the "Continuing Directors") and (ii) the holders of two-thirds of the voting power of our common equity securities.
Certain provisions of our charter may only be amended by (i) a vote of a majority of our Continuing Directors and (ii) the holders of a majority of the voting power of our common equity securities. These provisions relate to the election and classification of directors, the ownership limit and the stockholder vote required for certain business combination transactionsAn action by stockholders to remove a director would require a vote of at least two-thirds of the voting power of our outstanding common equity securities.
The number of directors may be increased or decreased by a vote of our board of directors.

In addition, we are subject to various provisions of Maryland law that impose restrictions and require affected persons to follow specified procedures with respect to certain takeover offers and business combinations, including combinations with persons who own 10% or more of our outstanding shares.  These provisions of Maryland law could delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control that our stockholders might deem to be in their best interests.  Furthermore, shares acquired in a control share acquisition have no voting rights, except to the extent approved by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of all votes entitled to be cast on the matter, excluding all interested shares.  Under Maryland law, "control shares" are those which, when aggregated with any other shares held by the acquiror, allow the acquiror to exercise voting power within specified ranges.  The control share provisions of Maryland law also could delay, defer or prevent a transaction or a change of control which our stockholders might deem to be in their best interests.  As permitted by Maryland law, our charter and bylaws provide that the "control shares" and "business combinations" provisions of Maryland law described above will not apply to acquisitions of those shares by Mr. Charles J. Urstadt or Mr. Willing L. Biddle or to transactions between the Company and Mr. Urstadt or Mr. Biddle or any of their respective affiliates.  Consequently, unless such exemptions are amended or repealed, we may in the future enter into business combinations or other transactions with Mr. Urstadt, Mr. Biddle or any of their respective affiliates without complying with the requirements of Maryland anti-takeover laws.  In view of the common equity securities controlled by Messrs. Urstadt and Biddle, either may control a sufficient percentage of the voting power of our common equity securities to effectively block approval of any proposal which requires a vote of our stockholders.

Our stockholder rights plan could deter a change of control.  We have adopted a stockholder rights plan.  This plan may deter a person or a group from acquiring more than 10% of the combined voting power of our outstanding shares of common stock and Class A common stock because, after (i) the person or group acquires more than 10% of the combined voting power of our outstanding Common stock and Class A Common stock, or (ii) the commencement of a tender offer or exchange offer by any person (other than us, any one of our wholly owned subsidiaries or any of our employee benefit plans, or certain exempt persons), if, upon consummation of the tender offer or exchange offer, the person or group would beneficially own 30% or more of the combined voting power of our outstanding shares of Common stock and Class A Common stock, and upon satisfaction of certain other conditions, all other stockholders will have the right to purchase securities from us at a price that is less than their fair market value.  This would substantially reduce the value of the stock owned by the acquiring person.  Our board of directors can prevent the plan from operating by approving the transaction and redeeming the rights.  This gives our board of directors significant power to approve or disapprove of the efforts of a person or group to acquire a large interest in us.  The rights plan exempts acquisitions of Common stock and Class A Common stock by Mr. Charles J. Urstadt, Willing L. Biddle, members of their families and certain of their affiliates.

The concentration of our stock ownership or voting power limits our stockholders' ability to influence corporate matters.  Each share of our Common Stock entitles the holder to one vote.  Each share of our Class A Common Stock entitles the holder to 1/20 of one vote per share.  Each share of Common Stock and Class A Common Stock have identical rights with respect to dividends except that each share of Class A Common Stock will receive not less than 110% of the regular quarterly dividends paid on each share of Common Stock.  As of October 31, 2017, Charles J. Urstadt, our Chairman, and Willing Biddle, our President and Chief Executive Officer, beneficially owned approximately 19.3% of our outstanding Common Stock and Class A Common Stock, which together represented approximately 66.3% of the voting power of our outstanding common stock.  Messrs. Urstadt and Biddle therefore have significant influence over management and affairs and over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and significant corporate transactions, such as a merger or other sale of our company or our assets, for the foreseeable future. This concentrated control limits or restricts our stockholders' ability to influence corporate matters.


6

Table Of Contents

Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

7

Table Of Contents
 
Item 2.
Properties.

Properties

The following table sets forth information concerning each property at October 31, 2017.  Except as otherwise noted, all properties are 100% owned by the Company.

Retail Properties:
 
Year Renovated
   
Year Completed
   
Year Acquired
   
Gross Leasable Sq Feet
   
Acres
   
Number of Tenants
   
% Leased
 
Principal Tenant
Stamford, CT
 
1997
   
1950
   
2002
     
374,000
       13.6      
34
     
97
%
Stop & Shop
Stratford, CT
 
1988
   
1978
   
2005
     
278,000
      29.0      
19
     
100
%
Stop & Shop, BJ's
Scarsdale, NY (1)
 
2004
   
1958
   
2010
     
250,000
      14.0      
27
     
98
%
ShopRite
New Milford, CT
 
2002
   
1972
   
2010
     
235,000
      20.0      
14
     
100
%
Walmart
Riverhead, NY (2)
   
-
     
2014
     
2014
     
198,000
      20.7      
3
     
98
%
Walmart
Danbury, CT
   
-
     
1989
     
1995
     
194,000
      19.3      
18
     
98
%
Christmas Tree Shops
Carmel, NY (3)
   
2006
     
1971
     
2010
     
189,000
      22.0      
38
     
98
%
Tops Markets
Ossining, NY
   
2000
     
1978
     
1998
     
137,000
      11.4      
26
     
96
%
Stop & Shop
Somers, NY
   
-
     
2002
     
2003
     
135,000
      26.0      
29
     
97
%
Home Goods
Midland Park, NJ
   
1999
     
1970
     
2015
     
130,000
     
7.9
     
26
     
97
%
Kings Supermarket
Carmel, NY
   
1999
     
1983
     
1995
     
129,000
      19.0      
17
     
96
%
ShopRite
Pompton Lakes, NJ
   
2000
     
1965
     
2015
     
125,000
      12.0      
16
     
44
%
Planet Fitness
Yorktown, NY
   
1997
     
1973
     
2005
     
121,000
     
16.4
     
12
     
73
%
Staples
New Providence, NJ
   
2010
     
1965
     
2013
     
109,000
    7.8      
24
     
98
%
Acme Markets
Newark, NJ (4)
   
-
     
1995
     
2008
     
108,000
     
8.4
     
13
     
95
%
Acme Markets
Wayne, NJ
   
1992
     
1959
     
1992
     
102,000
      9.0      
41
     
59
%
PNC Bank
Newington, NH
   
1994
     
1975
     
1979
     
102,000
      14.3      
7
     
97
%
JoAnns Fabrics
Darien, CT
   
1992
     
1955
     
1998
     
96,000
      9.5      
22
     
97
%
Stop & Shop
Emerson, NJ
   
2013
     
1981
     
2007
     
93,000
    7.0      
11
     
82
%
ShopRite
Stamford, CT (8)
   
2013
     
1963 & 1968
     2017      
87,000
   
6.7
     
25
     
95
%
Trader Joes
New Milford, CT
   
-
     
1966
     
2008
     
81,000
    7.6      
5
     
92
%
Big Y
Somers, NY
   
-
     
1991
     
1999
     
80,000
    10.8      
29
     
83
%
CVS
Montvale, NJ (2)
   
2010
     
1965
     
2013
     
79,000
    9.9      
15
     
95
%
The Fresh Market
Orange, CT
   
-
     
1990
     
2003
     
78,000
    10.0      
13
     
100
%
Trader Joes
Kinnelon, NJ
   
2015
     
1961
     
2015
     
77,000
    7.5      
12
     
98
%
Marshalls
Orangeburg, NY (5)
   
2014
     
1966
     
2012
     
74,000
    10.6      
23
     
90
%
CVS
Dumont, NJ (9)
   
-
     
1992
     
2017
     
74,000
    5.5      
34
     
100
%
Stop & Shop
Stamford, CT
   
2000
     
1970
     
2016
     
72,000
    9.7      
14
     
98
%
ShopRite (Grade A)
New Milford, CT
   
-
     
2003
     
2011
     
72,000
    8.8      
9
     
93
%
TJ Max
Eastchester, NY
   
2013
     
1978
     
1997
     
70,000
    4.0      
13
     
100
%
Acme Markets
Boonton, NJ
   
2016
     
1999
     
2014
     
63,000
    5.4      
10
     
100
%
Acme Markets
Ridgefield, CT
   
1999
     
1930
     
1998
     
62,000
    3.0      
41
     
91
%
Keller Williams
Fairfield, CT
   
-
     
1995
     
2011
     
62,000
    7.0      
3
     
100
%
Marshalls
Bloomfield, NJ
   
2016
     
1977
     
2014
     
59,000
     5.1      
9
     
96
%
Superfresh Supermarket
Yonkers, NY (7)
   
-
     
1982
     
2014
     
58,000
    5.0      
13
     
100
%
Acme Markets
Cos Cob, CT
   
2008
     
1986
     
2014
     
48,000
    1.1      
32
     
92
%
CVS
Briarcliff Manor, NY
   
2014
     
1975
     
2001
     
47,000
    1.0      
15
     
83
%
CVS
Wyckoff, NJ
   
2014
     
1971
     
2015
     
43,000
    5.2      
15
     
92
%
Walgreens
Westport, CT
   
-
     
1986
     
2003
     
40,000
    3.0      
9
     
64
%
Rio Bravo Restaurant
Old Greenwich, CT
   
-
     
1976
     
2014
     
39,000
    1.4      
13
     
92
%
Kings Supermarket
Rye, NY
   
-
   
Various
     
2004
     
39,000
    1.0      
22
     
96
%
A&S Deli
Derby, CT
   
-
     
2014
     
2017
     
39,000
    5.3      
6
     
91
%
Aldi Supermarket
Passaic, NJ
   
2016
     
1974
     
2017
     
37,000
    2.9      
3
     
100
%
Gala Fresh Market
Danbury, CT
   
2012
     
1988
     
2002
     
33,000
    2.7      
6
     
100
%
Buffalo Wild Wings
Bethel, CT
   
1967
     
1957
     
2014
     
31,000
    4.0      
7
     
100
%
Rite Aid
Ossining, NY
   
2001
     
1981
     
1999
     
29,000
    4.0      
3
     
88
%
Westchester Community College
Katonah, NY
   
1986
   
Various
     
2010
     
28,000
    1.7      
25
     
89
%
Squires
Stamford, CT
   
1995
     
1960
     
2016
     
27,000
    1.1      
7
     
100
%
Federal Express
Waldwick, NJ
   
-
     
1953
     
2017
     
27,000
     
1.8
     
11
     
100
%
United States Post Office
Harrison, NY
   
-
     
1970
     
2015
     
26,000
    1.6      
13
     
100
%
Key Foods
Pelham, NY
   
2014
     
1975
     
2006
     
25,000
    1.0      
9
     
100
%
Key Foods
Spring Valley, NY (2)
   
-
     
1950
     
2013
     
24,000
    1.6      
11 
     
94
%
Spring Valley Foods
Eastchester, NY
   
2014
     
1963
     
2012
     
24,000
    2.1      
5
     
100
%
CVS
Waldwick, NJ
   
-
     
1961
     
2008
     
20,000
    1.8      
     
100
%
Rite Aid
Somers, NY
   
-
     
1987
     
1992
     
19,000
    4.9      
12
     
100
%
Putnam County Savings Bank
Cos Cob, CT
   
1970
     
1947
     
2013
     
15,000
    0.9      
10
     
94
%
Jos. A Banks
Various (6)
   
-
   
Various
     
2013
     
15,000
    3.0      
     
57
%
Friendly Restaurants
Riverhead, NY (2)
   
-
     
2000
     
2014
     
13,000
      2.7      
3
     
100
%
Applebee's
Monroe, CT
   
-
     
2005
     
2007
     
10,000
      2.0      
6
     
100
%
Starbucks
Greenwich, CT
  -      
1961
     
2013
    10,000     0.8     5     100
%
Cava Mezza Grill
Old Greenwich, CT (8)
   
2001
     
1941
     
2017
     
8,000
      0.8      
1
     
100
%
CVS
Fort Lee, NJ
   
-
     
1967
     
2015
     
7,000
     0.4      
1
     
100
%
H-Mart
 
Office Properties & Banks Branches
                                                        
Greenwich, CT
   
-
   
Various
   
Various
     
58,000
      2.8      
15
     
94
%
UBP
Bronxville & Yonkers
   
-
     
1960
    
2008 & 2009
     
19,000
      0.7      
4
     
100
%
Peoples Bank , Chase Bank
Bernardsville, NJ
   
-
     
1970
    
2013
     
14,000
      1.1      
6
     
64
%
Lab Corp
Chester, NJ
   
-
     
1950
    
2013
     
9,000
      2.0      
1
     
100
%
REE Childcare
Stamford, CT (8)
   
2012
     
1960
    
2017
     
4,000
      0.5      
1
     
100
%
Chase Bank
                         
5,080,000
     
470.8
     
947
           
 

(1) 
Two wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company own an 11.642% economic ownership interest in the property.  The Company accounts for this joint venture under the equity method of accounting and does not consolidate the entity owning the property.
(2)
A wholly owned subsidiary of the Company has a 50% tenant in common interest in the property. The Company accounts for this joint venture under the equity method of accounting and does not consolidate its interest in the property.
(3)
A wholly owned subsidiary of the Company has a 66.67% tenant in common interest in the property. The Company accounts for this joint venture under the equity method of accounting and does not consolidate its interest in the property.
(4)
A wholly owned subsidiary of the Company is the sole general partner of a partnership that owns this property (84% ownership interest)
(5)
A wholly owned subsidiary of the Company is the sole managing member of a limited liability company that owns this property (40.6% ownership interest)
(6)
The Company owns five separate free standing properties, two of which are occupied 100% by a Friendly's Restaurant and two by other restaurant's.  The properties are located in New York, New Jersey and Connecticut.
(7)
A wholly owned subsidiary of the Company is the sole managing member of a limited liability company that owns this property (53.0% ownership interest)
(8)
A wholly owned subsidiary of the Company is the sole managing member of a limited liability company that owns this property (8.80% ownership interest)
(9)
A wholly owned subsidiary of the Company is the sole managing member of a limited liability company that owns this property (31.4% ownership interest)
 
8

Table Of Contents

Lease Expirations – Total Portfolio

The following table sets forth a summary schedule of the annual lease expirations for the consolidated properties for leases in place as of October 31, 2017, assuming that none of the tenants exercise renewal or cancellation options, if any, at or prior to the scheduled expirations.

Year of Expiration
 
Number of
Leases Expiring
   
Square Footage
of Expiring Leases
   
Minimum Base Rents
   
Percentage of Total
Annual Base Rent
that is Represented
by the Expiring Leases
 
      2018 (1)
   
197
     
438,800
   
$
10,972,200
     
11
%
2019
   
121
     
421,300
     
10,337,800
     
11
%
2020
   
89
     
412,900
     
9,401,500
     
10
%
2021
   
112
     
432,000
     
11,216,100
     
11
%
2022
   
105
     
637,100
     
18,081,800
     
19
%
2023
   
50
     
461,700
     
10,840,000
     
11
%
2024
   
34
     
168,700
     
4,577,300
     
5
%
2025
   
41
     
227,600
     
4,988,900
     
5
%
2026
   
33
     
126,700
     
3,635,100
     
4
%
2027
   
32
     
121,900
     
3,035,800
     
3
%
Thereafter
   
36
     
535,800
     
9,599,500
     
10
%
     
850
     
3,984,500
   
$
96,686,000
     
100
%

 
(1)
Represents lease expirations from November 1, 2017 to October 31, 2018 and month-to-month leases.

9

Table Of Contents

Item 3.
Legal Proceedings.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is involved in legal proceedings. There are no material legal proceedings presently pending against the Company.

Item 4.
 Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not Applicable
10

Table Of Contents

PART II

Item 5.
 Market for the Registrant's Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

 (a) Market Information

Shares of Common Stock and Class A Common Stock of the Company are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbols "UBP" and "UBA," respectively.  The following table sets forth the high and low closing sales prices for the Company's Common Stock and Class A Common Stock during the fiscal years ended October 31, 2017 and 2016 as reported on the New York Stock Exchange:

 
Fiscal Year Ended
 
Fiscal Year Ended
 
 
October 31, 2017
 
October 31, 2016
 
Common Shares:
Low
 
High
 
Low
 
High
 
First Quarter
 
$
16.85
   
$
19.64
   
$
16.63
   
$
19.01
 
Second Quarter
 
$
16.21
   
$
18.00
   
$
17.42
   
$
19.19
 
Third Quarter
 
$
15.92
   
$
18.87
   
$
18.25
   
$
22.37
 
Fourth Quarter
 
$
16.29
   
$
18.80
   
$
17.16
   
$
21.50
 

 
Fiscal Year Ended
 
Fiscal Year Ended
 
 
October 31, 2017
 
October 31, 2016
 
Class A Common Shares:
Low
 
High
 
Low
 
High
 
First Quarter
 
$
20.51
   
$
24.33
   
$
18.57
   
$
20.47
 
Second Quarter
 
$
19.66
   
$
22.62
   
$
19.51
   
$
21.46
 
Third Quarter
 
$
18.41
   
$
21.12
   
$
20.47
   
$
25.13
 
Fourth Quarter
 
$
20.07
   
$
22.65
   
$
21.11
   
$
24.50
 

(b) Approximate Number of Equity Security Holders

At December 31, 2017 (latest date practicable), there were 606 shareholders of record of the Company's Common Stock and 640 shareholders of record of the Class A Common Stock.

(c) Dividends Declared on Common Stock and Class A Common Stock and Tax Status

The following tables set forth the dividends declared per Common share and Class A Common share and tax status for Federal income tax purposes of the dividends paid during the fiscal years ended October 31, 2017 and 2016:

 
Common Shares
 
Class A Common Shares
 
Dividend Payment Date
Gross Dividend
Paid Per Share
 
Ordinary Income
 
Capital Gain
 
Non-Taxable Portion
 
Gross Dividend
Paid Per Share
 
Ordinary Income
 
Capital Gain
 
Non-Taxable Portion
 
                                 
January 20, 2017
 
$
0.235
   
$
0.14
   
$
0.02075
   
$
0.07425
   
$
0.265
   
$
0.158
   
$
0.02325
   
$
0.08375
 
April 17, 2017
 
$
0.235
   
$
0.14
   
$
0.02075
   
$
0.07425
   
$
0.265
   
$
0.158
   
$
0.02325
   
$
0.08375
 
July 17, 2017
 
$
0.235
   
$
0.14
   
$
0.02075
   
$
0.07425
   
$
0.265
   
$
0.158
   
$
0.02325
   
$
0.08375
 
October 20, 2017
 
$
0.235
   
$
0.14
   
$
0.02075
   
$
0.07425
   
$
0.265
   
$
0.158
   
$
0.02325
   
$
0.08375
 
   
$
0.94
   
$
0.56
   
$
0.083
   
$
0.297
   
$
1.06
   
$
0.632
   
$
0.093
   
$
0.335
 


 
Common Shares
 
Class A Common Shares
 
Dividend Payment Date
Gross Dividend
Paid Per Share
 
Ordinary Income
 
Capital Gain
 
Non-Taxable Portion
 
Gross Dividend
Paid Per Share
 
Ordinary Income
 
Capital Gain
 
Non-Taxable Portion
 
                                 
January 15, 2016
 
$
0.23
   
$
0.1205
   
$
0.078
   
$
0.0315
   
$
0.26
   
$
0.13625
   
$
0.08825
   
$
0.0355
 
April 15, 2016
 
$
0.23
   
$
0.1205
   
$
0.078
   
$
0.0315
   
$
0.26
   
$
0.13625
   
$
0.08825
   
$
0.0355
 
July 15, 2016
 
$
0.23
   
$
0.1205
   
$
0.078
   
$
0.0315
   
$
0.26
   
$
0.13625
   
$
0.08825
   
$
0.0355
 
October 21, 2016
 
$
0.23
   
$
0.1205
   
$
0.078
   
$
0.0315
   
$
0.26
   
$
0.13625
   
$
0.08825
   
$
0.0355
 
   
$
0.92
   
$
0.482
   
$
0.312
   
$
0.126
   
$
1.04
   
$
0.545
   
$
0.353
   
$
0.142
 

The Company has paid quarterly dividends since it commenced operations as a real estate investment trust in 1969.  During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017, the Company made distributions to stockholders aggregating $0.94 per Common share and $1.06 per Class A Common share. On December 14, 2017, the Company's Board of Directors approved the payment of a quarterly dividend payable January 19, 2018 to stockholders of record on January 5, 2018. The quarterly dividend rates were declared in the amounts of $0.24 per Common share and $0.27 per Class A Common share.

Although the Company intends to continue to declare quarterly dividends on its Common shares and Class A Common shares, no assurances can be made as to the amounts of any future dividends.  The declaration of any future dividends by the Company is within the discretion of the Board of Directors and will be dependent upon, among other things, the earnings, financial condition and capital requirements of the Company, as well as any other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors.  Two principal factors in determining the amounts of dividends are (i) the requirement of the Internal Revenue Code that a real estate investment trust distribute to shareholders at least 90% of its real estate investment trust taxable income, and (ii) the amount of the Company's available cash.

Each share of Common Stock entitles the holder to one vote.  Each share of Class A Common Stock entitles the holder to 1/20 of one vote per share.  Each share of Common Stock and Class A Common Stock have identical rights with respect to dividends except that each share of Class A Common Stock will receive not less than 110% of the regular quarterly dividends paid on each share of Common Stock.

The Company has a Dividend Reinvestment and Share Purchase Plan ("DRIP") that allows shareholders to acquire additional shares of Common Stock and Class A Common Stock by automatically reinvesting dividends.  Shares are acquired pursuant to the DRIP at a price equal to the higher of 95% of the market price of such shares on the dividend payment date or 100% of the average of the daily high and low sales prices for the five trading days ending on the day of purchase without payment of any brokerage commission or service charge.  As of October 31, 2017, 1,207,066 shares of Common Stock and 251,084 shares of Class A Common Stock have been issued under the DRIP.

(d) Issuer Repurchase

The Board of Directors of the Company has approved a share repurchase program ("Program") for the repurchase of up to 2,000,000 shares, in the aggregate, of Common stock, Class A Common stock and Series F Cumulative Preferred stock in open market transactions.  For the three month period ended October 31, 2017, the Company did not repurchase shares of any class of stock under the Program.

11

Table Of Contents

Item 6.                  Selected Financial Data.
(In thousands, except per share data)

   
Year Ended October 31,
 
   
2017
   
2016
   
2015
   
2014
   
2013
 
Balance Sheet Data:
                             
Total Assets
 
$
996,713
   
$
931,324
   
$
861,075
   
$
819,005
   
$
650,026
 
                                         
Revolving Credit Lines and Unsecured Term Loan
 
$
4,000
   
$
8,000
   
$
22,750
   
$
40,550
   
$
9,250
 
                                         
Mortgage Notes Payable and Other Loans
 
$
297,071
   
$
273,016
   
$
260,457
   
$
205,147
   
$
166,246
 
                                         
Preferred Stock Called For Redemption
 
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
-
   
$
61,250
   
$
-
 
                                         
Operating Data:
                                       
Total Revenues
 
$
123,560
   
$
116,792
   
$
115,312
   
$
102,328
   
$
95,203
 
                                         
Total Expenses and payments to noncontrolling interests
 
$
91,774
   
$
85,337
   
$
88,594
   
$
75,927
   
$
70,839
 
                                         
Income from Continuing Operations before Discontinued Operations
 
$
55,432
   
$
34,605
   
$
50,212
   
$
53,091
   
$
29,105
 
                                         
Per Share Data:
                                       
Net Income from Continuing Operations - Basic:
                                       
Class A Common Stock
 
$
0.92
   
$
0.57
   
$
1.04
   
$
1.22
   
$
0.31
 
Common Stock
 
$
0.82
   
$
0.50
   
$
0.92
   
$
1.09
   
$
0.28
 
                                         
Net Income from Continuing Operations - Diluted:
                                       
Class A Common Stock
 
$
0.90
   
$
0.56
   
$
1.02
   
$
1.19
   
$
0.30
 
Common Stock
 
$
0.80
   
$
0.49
   
$
0.90
   
$
1.06
   
$
0.27
 
                                         
Cash Dividends Paid on:
                                       
Class A Common Stock
 
$
1.06
   
$
1.04
   
$
1.02
   
$
1.01
   
$
1.00
 
Common Stock
 
$
0.94
   
$
0.92
   
$
0.90
   
$
0.90
   
$
0.90
 
                                         
Other Data:
                                       
                                         
Net Cash Flow Provided by (Used in):
                                       
Operating Activities
 
$
62,995
   
$
62,081
   
$
53,041
   
$
52,519
   
$
52,270
 
                                         
Investing Activities
 
$
16,262
   
$
(82,072
)
 
$
(106,975
)
 
$
(56,228
)
 
$
(50,949
)
                                         
Financing  Activities
 
$
(77,854
)
 
$
20,639
   
$
(12,472
)
 
$
73,793
   
$
(76,468
)
                                         
Funds from Operations (1)
 
$
43,203
   
$
43,603
   
$
38,056
   
$
33,032
   
$
29,506
 

(1)
The Company has adopted the definition of Funds from Operations (FFO) suggested by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT) and defines FFO as net income (computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles), excluding gains (or losses) from sales of properties plus real estate related depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for unconsolidated joint ventures.  For a reconciliation of net income and FFO, see Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations on page 13.  FFO does not represent cash flows from operating activities in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indicator of the Company's operating performance.  The Company considers FFO a meaningful, additional measure of operating performance because it primarily excludes the assumption that the value of its real estate assets diminishes predictably over time and industry analysts have accepted it as a performance measure.  FFO is presented to assist investors in analyzing the performance of the Company.  It is helpful as it excludes various items included in net income that are not indicative of the Company's operating performance.  However, comparison of the Company's presentation of FFO, using the NAREIT definition, to similarly titled measures for other REITs may not necessarily be meaningful due to possible differences in the application of the NAREIT definition used by such REITs.  For a further discussion of FFO, see Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations on page 13.

12

Table Of Contents

Item 7.                   Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company and the notes thereto included elsewhere in this report, the "Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" in Part I and "Item 1A. Risk Factors."

Executive Summary

Overview

We are a fully integrated, self-administered real estate company that has elected to be a REIT for federal income tax purposes, engaged in the acquisition, ownership and management of commercial real estate, primarily neighborhood and community shopping centers, with a concentration in the metropolitan New York tri-state area outside of the City of New York. Other real estate assets include office properties, single tenant retail or restaurant properties and office/retail mixed use properties.  Our major tenants include supermarket chains and other retailers who sell basic necessities.

At October 31, 2017, we owned or had equity interests in 81 properties, which include equity interests we own in seven consolidated joint ventures and seven unconsolidated joint ventures, containing a total of 5.1 million square feet of Gross Leasable Area ("GLA").  Of the properties owned by wholly owned subsidiaries or joint venture entities that we consolidate, approximately 92.7% was leased (93.3% at October 31, 2016).  Of the properties owned by unconsolidated joint ventures, approximately 97.7% was leased (98.4% at October 31, 2016).

We have paid quarterly dividends to our shareholders continuously since our founding in 1969 and have increased the level of dividend payments to our shareholders for 23 consecutive years.

We derive substantially all of our revenues from rents and operating expense reimbursements received pursuant to long-term leases and focus our investment activities on community and neighborhood shopping centers, anchored principally by regional supermarket or pharmacy chains.  We believe that because consumers need to purchase food and other types of staple goods and services generally available at supermarket or pharmacy-anchored shopping centers, the nature of our investments provides for relatively stable revenue flows even during difficult economic times.

We have a conservative capital structure and we have one $10.0 million mortgage maturing in April 2018.  Thereafter, we do not have any additional secured debt maturing until May 2019.

We focus on increasing cash flow, and consequently the value of our properties, and seek continued growth through strategic re-leasing, renovations and expansions of our existing properties and selective acquisitions of income-producing properties.  Key elements of our growth strategies and operating policies are to:

acquire quality neighborhood and community shopping centers in the northeastern part of the United States with a concentration on properties in the metropolitan New York tri-state area outside of the City of New York, and unlock further value in these properties with selective enhancements to both the property and tenant mix, as well as improvements to management and leasing fundamentals.  Our hope is to grow our assets through acquisitions by 5% to 15% per year on a dollar value basis subject to the availability of acquisitions that meet our investment parameters;

selectively dispose of underperforming properties and re-deploy the proceeds into potentially higher performing properties that meet our acquisition criteria;

invest in our properties for the long-term through regular maintenance, periodic renovations and capital improvements, enhancing their attractiveness to tenants and customers, as well as increasing their value;

leverage opportunities to increase GLA at existing properties, through development of pad sites and reconfiguring of existing square footage, to meet the needs of existing or new tenants;

proactively manage our leasing strategy by aggressively marketing available GLA, renewing existing leases with strong tenants, and replacing weak ones when necessary, with an eye towards securing leases that include regular or fixed contractual increases to minimum rents, replacing below-market-rent leases with increased market rents when possible and further improving the quality of our tenant mix at our shopping centers;

maintain strong working relationships with our tenants, particularly our anchor tenants;

maintain a conservative capital structure with low leverage levels; and

•       
control property operating and administrative costs.

Our hope is to grow our assets through acquisitions by 5% to 10% per year on a dollar value basis, subject to the availability of acquisitions that meet our investment parameters, although we cannot guarantee that investment properties meeting our investment specifications will be available to us.

13

Table Of Contents
 
Highlights of Fiscal 2017; Recent Developments

Set forth below are highlights of our recent property acquisitions, other investments, property dispositions and financings:

In September 2017, we completed the public offering of 4,600,000 shares of 6.25% Series H Senior Cumulative Preferred Stock (the "Series H Preferred Stock") at a price of $25 per share for net proceeds of $111.3 million after underwriting discounts but before offering expenses. These shares are nonvoting, have no stated maturity and are redeemable for cash at $25 per share at our option on or after September 18, 2022. Holders of these shares are entitled to cumulative dividends, payable quarterly in arrears. Dividends accrue from the date of issue at the annual rate of $1.5625 per share per annum. The holders of our Series H Preferred Stock have general preference rights with respect to liquidation and quarterly distributions. Except under certain conditions holders of the Series H Preferred Stock will not be entitled to vote on most matters. In the event of a cumulative arrearage equal to six quarterly dividends, holders of Series H Preferred Stock, together with all of our other Series of preferred stock (voting as a single class without regard to series) will have the right to elect two additional members to serve on our Board of Directors until the arrearage has been cured. Upon the occurrence of a Change of Control, as defined in our Articles of Incorporation, the holder of the Series H Preferred Stock will have the right to convert all or part of the shares of Series H Preferred Stock held by such holder on the applicable conversion date into a number of our shares of Class A common stock.

In August 2017, we acquired an approximate 31.4% equity interest in a newly formed entity, UB Dumont I, LLC ("UB Dumont"). UB Dumont owns a 74,000 square foot commercial property anchored by a Stop and Shop grocery store and also includes 19,000 square feet of apartments.  We are the managing member of UB Dumont and lease and manage the property.  The properties were contributed to UB Dumont by the former owners, along with $10.0 million in mortgage debt secured by the property.  The interest rate on the assumed mortgage is 3.87% per annum.  The contributors received ownership units of UB Dumont equal to the fair market value of the net assets contributed, which equity at formation was valued at $8.6 million.  At the closing of the acquisition, the property was 100% leased.  Our initial equity investment in UB Dumont at formation totaled $3.9 million.  The contributors of the property (non-managing members of UB Dumont) are entitled to receive an annual distribution on their invested capital, initially at the rate of 5.05% per annum.  We will retain all of the cash flow generated by the three properties after the payment of debt service and the aforementioned annual distribution to the non-managing members. The non-managing members have the right to require us to redeem their units of ownership in UB Dumont at prices defined in the governing agreement.  At inception of UB Dumont, that price was $21 per unit of ownership of UB Dumont.

In July 2017, we sold for $1.2 million a single tenant property located in Fairfield, CT that we acquired in March 2017 (see below), and realized a loss on the sale of $729,000.  Prior to the sale, we entered into a lease termination agreement with the tenant of the property.  The agreement provided for the tenant to pay us $3.2 million in exchange for being released from all future obligations under its lease.  We received payment in July 2017 and recorded the payment received as lease termination income, as the payment met all of the revenue recognition conditions under U.S. GAAP.  In addition, when the aforementioned property was acquired, we allocated $1.2 million of the consideration paid to this over-market lease.  As a result of this termination, we wrote-off the remaining $1.1 million asset as a reduction of lease termination income for the year ended October 31, 2017.

In July 2017, we repaid at maturity the existing $44 million first mortgage loan encumbering our Ridgeway property, located in Stamford, CT, with available cash and a $33 million borrowing on our Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility (the "Facility").  Subsequently in July, we placed a new $50 million non-recourse first mortgage loan encumbered by the subject property and used a portion of the proceeds to repay the $33 million borrowing on the Facility.  The new loan has a term of 10 years and requires payments of principal and interest at the rate of LIBOR plus 1.9% based on a 25-year amortization.  We entered into an interest rate swap agreement with the lender as the counterparty that converts the variable interest rate (based on LIBOR) to a fixed rate of 3.398% per annum.

In July 2017, we purchased for $8.2 million a 26,500 square foot shopping center located in Waldwick, NJ.  We funded the purchase with available cash and the assumption of an environmental remediation obligation in the amount of $3.3 million which is included in other liabilities on the October 31, 2017 consolidated balance sheet.

In March 2017, we acquired an approximate 8.8% equity interest in a newly formed entity, UB High Ridge, LLC, ("UB High Ridge"). UB High Ridge owns a shopping center, anchored by a Trader Joe's grocery store and two free standing commercial retail properties, one leased to JP Morgan Chase and the other to CVS.  Two of the properties are located in Stamford, CT and one of the properties is located in Greenwich, CT.  The three properties total approximately 99,400 square feet.  We are the managing member of UB High Ridge and will lease and manage the properties.  The properties were contributed by the former owners, along with $11.2 million in aggregate mortgage debt secured by two of the properties.  The weighted average interest rate per annum on the two assumed mortgages is 3.63% per annum.  The contributors received ownership units of UB High Ridge equal to the fair market value of the net assets contributed, which equity at formation was valued at $55.2 million.  At formation of UB High Ridge, the three properties combined were approximately 96.4% leased.  Our initial equity investment in UB High Ridge at formation totaled $5.5 million.  The contributors of the three properties (non-managing members of UB High Ridge) are entitled to receive an annual distribution on their invested capital, initially at the rate of 5.46% per annum.  We will retain all of the cash flow generated by the three properties after the payment of debt service and the aforementioned annual distribution to the non-managing members. The non-managing members have the right to require us to redeem their units of ownership in UB High Ridge at prices defined in the governing agreement.  At inception of UB High Ridge, that price was $23.50 per unit of ownership of UB High Ridge.

Also in March 2017, we purchased for $3.1 million a free-standing 12,900 square foot commercial property located in Fairfield, CT, which property is leased by Walgreen's.  This property was sold in July 2017 (see above).

In March 2017, we completed the sale of our White Plains property for a price of $56.6 million and realized a gain on sale of the property in the amount of $19.5 million.

In March 2017, we, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, purchased for $7.1 million a 36,500 square foot grocery-anchored shopping center located in Passaic, NJ.  In conjunction with the purchase, we assumed a mortgage note secured by the property in the amount of $3.5 million.

In January 2017, we purchased for $9.0 million a 38,800 square foot grocery-anchored shopping center located in Derby, CT.

Known Trends; Outlook

We believe that shopping center REITs face opportunities and challenges that are both common to and unique from other REITs and real estate companies.     As a shopping center REIT, we are focused on certain challenges that are unique to the retail industry.  In particular, we recognize the challenges presented by e-commerce to brick-and-mortar retail establishments, including our tenants. However, we believe that because consumers prefer to purchase food and other staple goods and services available at supermarkets in person, the nature of our properties makes them less vulnerable to the encroachment of e-commerce than other properties whose tenants may more directly compete with the internet.   Moreover, we believe the nature of our properties makes them less susceptible to economic downturns than other retail properties whose anchor tenants are not supermarkets or other staple goods providers.  We note, however, that many prospective in-line tenants are seeking smaller spaces than in the past, as a result, in part, of internet encroachment on their brick-and-mortar business.   When feasible, we actively work to place tenants that are less susceptible to internet encroachment, such as restaurants, fitness centers, healthcare and personal services.  We continue to be sensitive to these considerations when we establish the tenant mix at our shopping centers, and believe that our strategy of focusing on supermarket anchors is a strong one.

In the metropolitan tri-state area outside of New York City, demographics (income, density, etc.) remain strong and opportunities for new development, as well as acquisitions, are competitive, with high barriers to entry.  We believe that this will remain the case for the foreseeable future, and have focused our growth strategy accordingly.

As a REIT, we are susceptible to changes in interest rates, the lending environment, the availability of capital markets and the general economy.  For example, some experts are predicting an increased interest rate environment, which could negatively impact the attractiveness of REIT stock to investors and our borrowing activities.  It is also possible, however, that higher interest rates could signal a stronger economy, resulting in greater spending by consumers.  The impact of such changes are difficult to predict.

The U.S. Congress has passed sweeping tax reform legislation that would make significant changes to corporate and individual tax rates and the calculation of taxes, as well as international tax rules for U.S. domestic corporations.  As a REIT, we are generally not required to pay federal taxes otherwise applicable to regular corporations if we comply with the various tax regulations governing REITs.  Stockholders, however, are generally required to pay taxes on REIT dividends.  Tax reform legislation would affect the way in which dividends paid on our stock are taxed by the holder of that stock and could impact our stock price or how stockholders and potential investors view an investment in REITs.   In addition, while certain elements of tax reform legislation would not impact us directly as a REIT, they could impact the geographic markets in which we operate, the tenants that populate our shopping centers and the customers who frequent our properties in ways, both positive and negative, that are difficult to anticipate.

14

Table Of Contents
Leasing

Rollovers

For the fiscal year 2017, we signed leases for a total of 650,300 square feet of retail space in our consolidated portfolio.  New leases for vacant spaces were signed for 86,800 square feet at an average rental increase of 3.78% on a cash basis, excluding 3,333 square feet of new leases for which there was no prior rent history available.  Renewals for 560,200 square feet of space previously occupied were signed at an average rental increase of 4.36% on a cash basis.

Tenant improvements and leasing commissions averaged $24.38 per square foot for new leases and $3.40 per square foot for renewals for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017. The average term for new leases was 5.7 years and the average term for renewal leases was 4 years.

The rental increases/decreases associated with new and renewal leases generally include all leases signed in arms-length transactions reflecting market leverage between landlords and tenants during the period. The comparison between average rent for expiring leases and new leases is determined by including minimum rent paid on the expiring lease and minimum rent to be paid on the new lease in the first year. In some instances, management exercises judgment as to how to most effectively reflect the comparability of spaces reported in this calculation. The change in rental income on comparable space leases is impacted by numerous factors including current market rates, location, individual tenant creditworthiness, use of space, market conditions when the expiring lease was signed, the age of the expiring lease, capital investment made in the space and the specific lease structure. Tenant improvements include the total dollars committed for the improvement (fit-out) of a space as it relates to a specific lease but may also include base building costs (i.e. expansion, escalators or new entrances) that are required to make the space leasable.  Incentives (if applicable) include amounts paid to tenants as an inducement to sign a lease that do not represent building improvements.

The leases signed in 2017 generally become effective over the following one to two years. There is risk that some new tenants will not ultimately take possession of their space and that tenants for both new and renewal leases may not pay all of their contractual rent due to operating, financing or other matters.

In 2018, we believe our leasing volume will be in-line with our historical averages with overall positive increases in rental income for renewal leases and flat to slightly positive increases for new leases. However, changes in rental income associated with individual signed leases on comparable spaces may be positive or negative, and we can provide no assurance that the rents on new leases will continue to increase at the above described levels, if at all.

Significant Events with Impacts on Leasing

In July 2015, one of our largest tenants, A&P, filed a voluntary petition under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the "Bankruptcy Code").  Subsequently, A&P determined that it would be liquidating the company. Prior to A&P filing for bankruptcy, A&P leased and occupied nine spaces totaling 365,000 square feet in our portfolio.  The bankruptcy process relating to our nine spaces is complete with eight of the nine A&P leases having been assumed by new operators in the bankruptcy process or re-leased by the Company to new operators.  The remaining lease, located in our Pompton Lakes shopping center, totaling 63,000 square feet was rejected by A&P in bankruptcy and we are in the process of marketing that space for re-lease.  In July 2017, one other 36,000 square foot space formerly occupied by A&P that we had released to a local grocery operator became vacant as that operator failed to perform under their lease and was evicted.  We are currently marketing that space for lease and have several prospects.

Impact of Inflation on Leasing

Our long-term leases contain provisions to mitigate the adverse impact of inflation on our operating results. Such provisions include clauses entitling us to receive (a) scheduled base rent increases and (b) percentage rents based upon tenants' gross sales, which generally increase as prices rise. In addition, many of our non-anchor leases are for terms of less than ten years, which permits us to seek increases in rents upon renewal at then current market rates if rents provided in the expiring leases are below then existing market rates. Most of our leases require tenants to pay a share of operating expenses, including common area maintenance, real estate taxes, insurance and utilities, thereby reducing our exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation.
 
Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies are those that are both important to the presentation of the Company's financial condition and results of operations and require management's most difficult, complex or subjective judgments.  For a further discussion about the Company's critical accounting policies, please see Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements of the Company included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
15

Table Of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

At October 31, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents of $8.7 million, compared to $7.3 million at October 31, 2016.  Our sources of liquidity and capital resources include operating cash flow from real estate operations, proceeds from bank borrowings and long-term mortgage debt, capital financings and sales of real estate investments.  Substantially all of our revenues are derived from rents paid under existing leases, which means that our operating cash flow depends on the ability of our tenants to make rental payments.  In fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015, net cash flow provided by operations amounted to $63.0 million, $62.1 million and $53.0 million, respectively.

Our short-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of normal recurring operating expenses and capital expenditures, debt service, management and professional fees, cash distributions to certain limited partners and non-managing members of our consolidated joint ventures, dividends paid to our preferred stockholders and regular dividends paid to our Common and Class A Common stockholders, which we expect to continue.  Cash dividends paid on Common and Class A Common stock for the years ended October 31, 2017 and 2016 totaled $40.6 million and $37.1 million, respectively.  Historically, we have met short-term liquidity requirements, which is defined as a rolling twelve month period, primarily by generating net cash from the operation of our properties.   We believe that our net cash provided by operations will continue to be sufficient to fund our short-term liquidity requirements, including payment of dividends necessary to maintain our federal income tax REIT status.

Our long-term liquidity requirements consist primarily of obligations under our long-term debt, dividends paid to our preferred stockholders, capital expenditures and capital required for acquisitions.  In addition, the limited partners and non-managing members of our five consolidated joint venture entities, Ironbound, McLean, Orangeburg, UB High Ridge and UB Dumont, have the right to require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of their limited partner or non-managing member interests at prices and on terms as set forth in the governing agreements.  See Note 6 to the financial statements included in Item 8 of this Report on Form 10-K.  Historically, we have financed the foregoing requirements through operating cash flow, borrowings under our Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility (the "Facility"), debt refinancings, new debt, equity offerings and other capital market transactions, and/or the disposition of under-performing assets, with a focus on keeping our leverage low.  We expect to continue doing so in the future.  We cannot assure you, however, that these sources will always be available to us when needed, or on the terms we desire.

Capital Expenditures

We invest in our existing properties and regularly make capital expenditures in the ordinary course of business to maintain our properties. We believe that such expenditures enhance the competitiveness of our properties. In fiscal 2017, we paid approximately $9.7 million for property improvements, tenant improvements and leasing commission costs (approximately $8.5 million representing property improvements and approximately $1.2 million related to new tenant space improvements, leasing costs and capital improvements as a result of new tenant spaces).  The amount of these expenditures can vary significantly depending on tenant negotiations, market conditions and rental rates.  We expect to incur approximately $6.0 million predominantly for anticipated capital improvements and leasing costs related to new tenant leases and property improvements during fiscal 2018.  These expenditures are expected to be funded from operating cash flows, bank borrowings or other financing sources.

Financing Strategy, Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility and other Financing Transactions

Our strategy is to maintain a conservative capital structure with low leverage levels by commercial real estate standards.  Mortgage notes payable and other loans of $297.1 million consist entirely of fixed-rate mortgage loan indebtedness with a weighted average interest rate of 4.2% at October 31, 2017.  These mortgages are secured by 26 properties with a net book value of $568 million and have fixed rates of interest ranging from 3.5% to 6.6%.   We may refinance our mortgage loans, at or prior to scheduled maturity, through replacement mortgage loans.  The ability to do so, however, is dependent upon various factors, including the income level of the properties, interest rates and credit conditions within the commercial real estate market. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that such re-financings can be achieved.

At October 31, 2017, we had $4 million of variable-rate debt consisting of draws on our Facility (see below) that was not fixed through an interest rate swap or otherwise. See "Item 7.A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk" included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information on our interest rate risk.

We currently maintain a ratio of total debt to total assets below 30% and a fixed charge coverage ratio of over 3.86 to 1 (excluding preferred stock dividends), which we believe will allow us to obtain additional secured mortgage loans or other types of borrowings, if necessary.  We own 48 properties in our consolidated portfolio that are not encumbered by secured mortgage debt.  At October 31, 2017, we had borrowing capacity of $95 million on our Facility.  Our Facility includes financial covenants that limit, among other things, our ability to incur unsecured and secured indebtedness.  See Note 6 in our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information on these and other restrictions.

Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility and Other Property Financings

We have a $100 million unsecured revolving credit facility with a syndicate of three banks, BNY Mellon, BMO and Wells Fargo N.A. with the ability under certain conditions to additionally increase the capacity to $150 million, subject to lender approval.  The maturity date of the Facility is August 23, 2020 with a one-year extension at our option.  Borrowings under the Facility can be used for general corporate purposes and the issuance of up to $10 million of letters of credit.  Borrowings will bear interest at our option of Eurodollar rate plus 1.35% to 1.95% or The Bank of New York Mellon's prime lending rate plus 0.35% to 0.95%, based on consolidated indebtedness, as defined.  We pay a quarterly commitment fee on the unused commitment amount of 0.15% to 0.25% per annum, based on outstanding borrowings during the year.  As of October 31, 2017, $95 million was available to be drawn on the Facility.  Our ability to borrow under the Facility is subject to its compliance with the covenants and other restrictions on an ongoing basis.  The principal financial covenants limit our level of secured and unsecured indebtedness and additionally require us to maintain certain debt coverage ratios.  We were in compliance with such covenants at October 31, 2017.

During the year ended October 31, 2017, we borrowed $52 million on our Facility to fund a portion of the equity for property acquisitions, capital improvements to our properties and to repay the mortgage secured by our Ridgeway property at maturity until a new mortgage could be put in place later that month. For the year ended October 31, 2017 we repaid $56 million of borrowings on our Facility, with proceeds from the sale of our White Plains property and proceeds from the refinancing of our mortgage loan encumbering the Stamford property.

See Note 5 included in our consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a further description of mortgage financing transactions in fiscal 2017 and 2016.

Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Increase from fiscal 2016 to 2017:

The increase in operating cash flows was primarily due to our generating additional operating income for the year ended October 31, 2017 from properties acquired in fiscal 2016 and 2017 and the receipt of a lease termination payment in the amount of $3.2 million from a former tenant whose lease was terminated in July 2017 offset by an increase in tenant receivables in fiscal 2017 when compared with fiscal 2016.

Increase from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2016:

The increase was primarily due to an increase in operating income at various properties in fiscal 2016 when compared with fiscal 2015, resulting from new leasing completed in fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2016 and $4.8 million in extension fees collected from the entity under contract to purchase our White Plains property.   In addition, the increase was further aided by an increase in the collection of tenant receivables in fiscal 2016 when compared with fiscal 2015.

Net cash flows from Investing Activities

Increase from fiscal 2016 to 2017:

The increase in net cash flows provided by investing activities in fiscal 2017 when compared to fiscal 2016 was the result of the Company selling its White Plains, NY property and a single tenant property located in Fairfield, CT in fiscal 2017 and generating net proceeds of $45.3 million on those sales.  In addition, we expended $11.8 million less for improvements to our investment properties in fiscal 2017 when compared to fiscal 2016.  This increase was further accentuated by our acquiring four properties and investing in two joint ventures, which we consolidate, that acquired four properties in fiscal 2017 for a total equity investment of $30.6 million as compared with fiscal 2016 during which we acquired two investment properties requiring $58.7 million of equity capital.  The increase was further bolstered by the repayment of our one mortgage note receivable by the borrower in the amount of $13.5 million in fiscal 2017.  This note was funded in fiscal 2016.

Decrease in cash used from fiscal 2015 to fiscal 2016:
The decrease in cash flows used in investing activities in fiscal 2016 when compared to the prior fiscal year was the result of the purchase of two properties totaling $58.7 million is fiscal 2016 versus purchasing six properties totaling $138.5 million in fiscal 2015, offset by the Company receiving $42.9 million in fiscal 2015 in proceeds from the sale of the Meriden property.  In addition, we initiated a first mortgage loan in the amount of $13.5 million in fiscal 2016.

We regularly make capital investments in our properties for property improvements, tenant improvements costs and leasing commissions.

Net cash flows from Financing Activities

Cash generated:

Fiscal 2017: (Total $213.5 million)
· Proceeds from mortgage note payable in the amount of $50 million.
· Proceeds from revolving credit line borrowings in the amount of $52 million.
· Proceeds from the issuance of Series H Preferred Stock in the amount of $111.3 million.

Fiscal 2016: (Total $159.5 million)
· Proceeds from issuance of Class A Common Stock in the amount of $73.7 million.
· Proceeds from revolving credit line borrowings in the amount of $52.0 million.
· Proceeds from mortgage financings in the amount of $33.7 million.

Fiscal 2015: (Total $237.6 million)
· Proceeds from mortgage financings in the amount of $68.2 million.
· Proceeds from revolving credit line borrowings in the amount of $104.8 million.
· Proceeds from the issuance of Series G Preferred Stock in the amount of $4.6 million.
· Proceeds from the issuance of Class A Common stock in the amount of $59.8 million.

Cash used:

Fiscal 2017: (Total $291.4 million)
· Dividends to shareholders in the amount of $55.6 million.
· Repayment of mortgage notes payable in the amount of $43.7 million.
· Repayment of revolving credit line borrowings in the amount of $56 million.
· Redemption of preferred stock in the amount of $129.4 million.

Fiscal 2016: (Total $138.9 million)
· Dividends to shareholders in the amount of $51.4 million.
· Repayment of mortgage notes payable in the amount of $20.7 million.
· Repayment of revolving credit line borrowings in the amount of $66.8 million.

Fiscal 2015:  (Total $250.1 million)
· Dividends to shareholders in the amount of $50.0 million.
· Repayment of mortgage notes payable in the amount of $12.9 million.
· Repayment of revolving credit line borrowings in the amount of $97.6 million.
· Repayment of the unsecured term loan in the amount of $25 million.
· Redemption of preferred stock in the amount of $61.3 million.
· Repurchase of Class A Common stock in the amount of $3.4 million.


16

Table Of Contents
Results of Operations

Fiscal 2017 vs. Fiscal 2016

The following information summarizes our results of operations for the years ended October 31, 2017 and 2016 (amounts in thousands):

   
Year Ended October 31,
               
Change Attributable to:
 
Revenues
 
2017
   
2016
   
Increase
(Decrease)
   
%
Change
   
Property
Acquisitions/Sales
   
Properties Held in
Both Periods (Note 1)
 
Base rents
 
$
88,383
   
$
87,172
   
$
1,211
     
1.4
%
 
$
1,539
   
$
(328
)
Recoveries from tenants
   
28,676
     
25,788
     
2,888
     
11.2
%
   
1,950
     
938
 
Other income
   
4,069
     
3,213
     
856
     
26.6
%
   
155
     
701
 
                                                 
Operating Expenses
                                               
Property operating
   
20,074
     
18,717
     
1,357
     
7.3
%
   
720
     
637
 
Property taxes
   
19,621
     
18,548
     
1,073
     
5.8
%
   
641
     
432
 
Depreciation and amortization
   
26,512
     
23,025
     
3,487
     
15.1
%
   
2,302
     
1,185
 
General and administrative
   
9,183
     
9,284
     
(101
)
   
-1.1
%
   
n/a
     
n/a
 
                                                 
Non-Operating Income/Expense
                                               
Interest expense
   
12,981
     
12,983
     
(2
)
   
0.0
%
   
1,098
     
(1,100
)
Interest, dividends, and other investment income
   
356
     
242
     
114
     
47.1
%
   
n/a
     
n/a
 

Note 1 – Properties held in both periods includes only properties owned for the entire periods of 2017 and 2016.  All other properties are included in the property acquisition/sales column.  There are no properties excluded from the analysis.

Revenues

Base rents increased by 1.4% to $88.4 million in fiscal 2017, as compared with $87.2 million in the comparable period of 2016.  The increase in base rents and the changes in other income statement line items were attributable to:

Property Acquisitions and Properties Sold:

In fiscal 2017, the Company purchased four properties totaling 114,700 square feet of GLA, invested in two joint ventures that owns four properties totaling 173,600 square feet, whose operations we consolidate, and sold two properties totaling 203,800 square feet.  In fiscal 2016, the Company purchased two properties totaling 101,400 square feet.  These properties accounted for all of the revenue and expense changes attributable to property acquisitions and sales in year ended October 31, 2017 when compared with fiscal 2016.

Properties Held in Both Periods:

Revenues

Base Rent
The decrease in base rents for properties owned in both periods was caused predominantly by a slight reduction in the percent of the portfolio that is leased in fiscal 2017 when compared with fiscal 2016.

In fiscal 2017, the Company leased or renewed approximately 650,000 square feet (or approximately 15.0% of total consolidated property leasable area).  At October 31, 2017, the Company's consolidated properties were approximately 92.7% leased (93.3% leased at October 31, 2016).

Tenant Recoveries
For the year ended October 31, 2017, recoveries from tenants for properties owned in both periods (which represent reimbursements from tenants for operating expenses and property taxes) increased by $938,000. This increase was a result of an increase in both property operating expenses and property tax expense in the consolidated portfolio for properties owned for the entire periods of fiscal 2017 and 2016, along with an increase in leased rate at some properties which increased the rate at which the Company could bill operating expenses to tenants in fiscal 2017 versus fiscal 2016.

Expenses

Property operating expenses for properties owned in both fiscal year 2017 and 2016 increased by $637,000.  This increase was predominantly as a result of an increase in snow removal costs at our properties.

Real estate taxes for properties owned in both fiscal year 2017 and 2016 increased by $432,000 as a result of normal tax assessment increases at some of our properties.

Interest expense for properties owned in both fiscal year 2017 and 2016 decreased by $1.1 million as a result of the refinancing of our largest mortgage in July 2017.  In July 2017 we refinanced our mortgage loan secured by our Stamford, CT property and although the principal increased from $44 million to $50 million the interest rate was reduced from 5.52% to 3.398% per annum.  In addition, we repaid our mortgage at our Bloomfield, NJ property after the second quarter of fiscal 2016.  In addition, the reduction was accentuated by normal recurring amortization payments on our portfolio of mortgages, which reduces interest expense in fiscal 2017 when compared with fiscal 2016 for the same mortgages.

Depreciation and amortization expense for properties owned in both fiscal year 2017 and 2016 increased by $1.2 million as a result of an increase in capital improvements on properties held in both periods in fiscal 2016 and 2017.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expense for the year ended October 31, 2017, when compared with the year ended October 31, 2016 decreased by $101,000, as a result of a decrease in restricted stock amortization, which reduces compensation expense and a reduction in professional fees offset by increased compensation expense for additional staffing at the Company and increased bonus compensation for our employees in fiscal 2017 when compared with fiscal 2016.

17

Table Of Contents

Fiscal 2016 vs. Fiscal 2015

The following information summarizes our results of operations for the years ended October 31, 2016 and 2015 (amounts in thousands):

   
Year Ended October 31,
               
Change Attributable to:
 
Revenues
 
2016
   
2015
   
Increase
(Decrease)
   
%
Change
   
Property
Acquisitions/Sales
   
Properties Held in
Both Periods (Note 2)
 
Base rents
 
$
87,172
   
$
83,885
   
$
3,287
     
3.9
%
 
$
(1,556
)
 
$
4,843
 
Recoveries from tenants
   
25,788
     
28,703
     
(2,915
)
   
(10.2
)%
   
(516
)
   
(2,399
)
Other income
   
3,213
     
2,252
     
961
     
42.7
%
   
(114
)
   
1,075
 
                                                 
Operating Expenses
                                               
Property operating
   
18,717
     
21,267
     
(2,550
)
   
(12.0
)%
   
(690
)
   
(1,860
)
Property taxes
   
18,548
     
18,224
     
324
     
1.8
%
   
33
     
291
 
Depreciation and amortization
   
23,025
     
22,435
     
590
     
2.6
%
   
403
     
187
 
General and administrative
   
9,284
     
8,576
     
708
     
8.3
%
   
n/a
     
n/a
 
                                                 
Non-Operating Income/Expense
                                               
Interest expense
   
12,983
     
13,475
     
(492
)
   
(3.7
)%
   
497
     
(989
)
Interest, dividends, and other investment income
   
242
     
228
     
14
     
6.1
%
   
n/a
     
n/a
 


Note 2 – Properties held in both periods includes only properties owned for the entire periods of 2016 and 2015.  All other properties are included in the property acquisition/sales column.  There are no properties excluded from the analysis.

Revenues

Base rents increased by 3.9% to $87.2 million in fiscal 2016, as compared with $83.9 million in the comparable period of 2015.  The increase in base rents and the changes in other income statement line items were attributable to:

Property Acquisitions and Properties Sold:

In fiscal 2015, the Company purchased equity interests in six properties totaling approximately 409,000 square feet of GLA and sold two properties totaling approximately 320,000 square feet and in fiscal 2016, the Company purchased two properties totaling 101,000 square feet.  These properties accounted for all of the revenue and expense changes attributable to property acquisitions and sales in fiscal 2016 when compared with fiscal 2015.

Properties Held in Both Periods:

Revenues

Base Rent
Base rents increased by $4.8 million in fiscal 2016 as compared to fiscal 2015 primarily as a result of the Company receiving $4.8 million in extension fees from our White Plains property, which was sold in fiscal 2017.  In fiscal 2015, the Company entered into contract to sell our White Plains property and that closing was scheduled to occur in April 2016.  In February the purchaser approached the Company and asked for an extension of the closing to October 2016.  In exchange for granting the extension the Company received $2.8 million.  In October, the purchaser approached us again and asked for an additional extension, and in exchange for granting that extension the Company received an additional $2 million.  The Company recorded the entire $4.8 million in base rent on the accompanying consolidated income statements for the year ended October 31, 2016, as the fees collected for the extensions essentially amounted to the purchaser renting the shopping center until the closing of the sale, which took place in March of 2017.   In addition the increase was caused by an increase in base rents billed at several of our other shopping centers in excess of the prior year for new leasing done in the portfolio in fiscal 2015 and 2016 offset by a reduction in base rents at the three shopping centers which were leased to A&P and were not assumed in the A&P bankruptcy process (see leasing - significant events with impact on leasing section earlier in this Item 7).  Two of those three spaces have been re-leased and are now paying rent.

In fiscal 2016, the Company leased or renewed approximately 418,400 square feet (or approximately 10.4% of total consolidated property leasable area).  At October 31, 2016, the Company's consolidated properties were approximately 93.3%.  The above percentages exclude the Company's White Plains property which is being held vacant for sale.

Tenant Recoveries
For the year ended October 31, 2016, recoveries from tenants for properties owned in both periods (which represent reimbursements from tenants for operating expenses and property taxes) decreased by a net $2.4 million. This decrease was primarily the result of incurring $1.9 million less in operating expenses for properties owned in both periods, predominantly attributable to a significant reduction in snow removal costs during fiscal 2016 as compared with fiscal 2015.  In addition, this decrease was also the result of having two anchor stores formerly occupied by A&P vacant for most of the first and second quarters of fiscal 2016, which reduced the Company's recovery rate for operating costs at these properties.

Expenses

Property operating expenses for properties owned in both fiscal year 2016 and 2015 decreased by $1.9 million.  This decrease was primarily the result of having $1.9 million less in operating expenses in the portfolio, predominantly attributable to a significant reduction in snow removal costs during fiscal 2016 as compared with fiscal 2015.

Real estate taxes for properties owned in both fiscal year 2016 and 2015 increased by $291,000 as a result of normal tax assessment increases at some of our properties.

Interest expense for properties owned in both fiscal year 2016 and 2015 decreased by $989,000 as a result of the Company having less outstanding on its Facility in fiscal 2016 as compared with fiscal 2015 and the Company repaying two mortgages totaling $14.8 million in fiscal 2015 and 2016 and the Company repaying its $25 million term loan in August 2015.

Depreciation and amortization expense from properties owned in the year ended October 31, 2016 as compared to the corresponding prior period, increased by $187,000 as a result of an increase in capital improvements on properties held in both periods.

General and Administrative Expenses:

General and administrative expense for the year ended October 31, 2016, when compared with the year ended October 31, 2015 increased by $708,000, as a result of increased compensation expense for additional staffing at the Company, increased bonus compensation for our employees and an increase in restricted stock amortization as a result of newer tranches of restricted stock grants being valued at a higher stock price than that of expiring tranches of restricted stock.
18

Table Of Contents

Funds from Operations

We consider Funds from Operations ("FFO") to be an additional measure of our operating performance.  We report FFO in addition to net income applicable to common stockholders and net cash provided by operating activities.  Management has adopted the definition suggested by The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts ("NAREIT") and defines FFO to mean net income (computed in accordance with GAAP) excluding gains or losses from sales of property, plus real estate-related depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for unconsolidated joint ventures.

Management considers FFO a meaningful, additional measure of operating performance because it primarily excludes the assumption that the value of the Company's real estate assets diminishes predictably over time and industry analysts have accepted it as a performance measure.  FFO is presented to assist investors in analyzing the performance of the Company.  It is helpful as it excludes various items included in net income that are not indicative of our operating performance, such as gains (or losses) from sales of property and depreciation and amortization.  However, FFO:

does not represent cash flows from operating activities in accordance with GAAP (which, unlike FFO, generally reflects all cash effects of transactions and other events in the determination of net income); and

should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance.

FFO as defined by us may not be comparable to similarly titled items reported by other real estate investment trusts due to possible differences in the application of the NAREIT definition used by such REITs.  The table below provides a reconciliation of net income applicable to Common and Class A Common Stockholders in accordance with GAAP to FFO for each of the three years in the period ended October 31, 2017 (amounts in thousands):

   
Year Ended October 31,
 
   
2017
   
2016
   
2015
 
                   
Net Income Applicable to Common and Class A Common Stockholders
 
$
33,898
   
$
19,436
   
$
34,659
 
                         
Real property depreciation
   
20,505
     
18,866
     
18,750
 
Amortization of tenant improvements and allowances
   
4,448
     
3,517
     
3,161
 
Amortization of deferred leasing costs
   
1,468
     
557
     
449
 
Depreciation and amortization on unconsolidated joint ventures
   
1,618
     
1,589
     
1,414
 
(Gain)/loss on sale of properties
   
(18,734
)
   
(362
)
   
(20,377
)
                         
Funds from Operations Applicable to Common and Class A Common Stockholders
 
$
43,203
   
$
43,603
   
$
38,056
 
                         

FFO amounted to $43.2 million in fiscal 2017, compared to $43.6 million in fiscal 2016 and $38.1 million in fiscal 2015.

The net increase in FFO in fiscal 2017 when compared with fiscal 2016 was predominantly attributable, among other things, to: (a) the additional net income generated from properties acquired in the second half of fiscal 2016 and properties acquired in fiscal 2017; (b) a reduction in the charge for bad debt expense in the amount of $578,000 in fiscal 2017 versus fiscal 2016; (c) interest income generated from a $13.5 million mortgage originated in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, which was not repaid until October of fiscal 2017; d) a $1.8 million increase in lease termination income in fiscal 2017 versus fiscal 2016 related to the lease termination of the only lease in our Fairfield, CT property in the third quarter of fiscal 2017; (e) a $412,000 reduction in acquisition costs in fiscal 2017 versus fiscal 2016 as a result of an accounting change that became effective for us on the first day of fiscal 2017 which changes how costs related to investment property acquisitions are accounted for; offset by (f) $4.1 million in preferred stock redemption charges in fiscal 2017 related to the Company redeeming its Series F preferred stock in October 2017, there were no preferred stock redemption charges in fiscal 2016 or fiscal 2015.

The net increase in FFO in fiscal 2016 when compared with fiscal 2015 was predominantly attributable, among other things, to: (a) a decrease in acquisition costs of $1.7 million in fiscal 2016 when compared to fiscal 2015; (b) a decrease in preferred stock dividends as a result of issuing a new series of preferred stock in fiscal 2015 with a lower interest rate than the series it replaced; (c) extension fees received from the entity in contract to purchase our Westchester Pavilion property that gave them the right to delay the closing of the property to 2017 in the amount of $4.8 million (included in base rent); (d) an increase in operating income at several of our properties from new leasing completed in fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2016; offset by (e) a decrease in rental income relating to tenant vacancies at several properties, most notably three spaces formerly occupied by A&P See "Leasing—Significant Events with Impacts on Leasing" in this Item 7.
19

Table Of Contents
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have seven off-balance sheet investments in real property through unconsolidated joint ventures:

a 66.67% equity interest in the Putnam Plaza Shopping Center,

an 11.642% equity interest in the Midway Shopping Center L.P.,

a 50% equity interest in the Chestnut Ridge Shopping Center and Plaza 59 Shopping Centers,

a 50% equity interest in the Gateway Plaza shopping center and the Riverhead Applebee's Plaza, and

a 20% economic interest in a partnership that owns a suburban office building with ground level retail.

These unconsolidated joint ventures are accounted for under the equity method of accounting, as we have the ability to exercise significant influence over, but not control of, the operating and financial decisions of these investments.  Our off-balance sheet arrangements are more fully discussed in Note 7, "Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Joint Ventures" in our financial statements in Item 8.  Although we have not guaranteed the debt of these joint ventures, we have agreed to customary environmental indemnifications and nonrecourse carve-outs (e.g. guarantees against fraud, misrepresentation and bankruptcy) on certain loans of the joint ventures.  The below table details information about the outstanding non-recourse mortgage financings on our unconsolidated joint ventures (amounts in thousands):

 
    
 
Principal Balance
           
Joint Venture Description
Location
 
Original Balance
   
At October 31, 2017
   
Fixed Interest Rate Per Annum
 
Maturity Date
Midway Shopping Center
Scarsdale, NY
 
$
32,000
   
$
28,397
     
4.80
%
Dec-2027
Putnam Plaza Shopping Center
Carmel, NY
 
$
21,000
   
$
19,046
     
4.17
%
Oct-2024
Gateway Plaza
Riverhead, NY
 
$
14,000
   
$
12,749
     
4.18
%
Feb-2024
Applebee's Plaza
Riverhead, NY
 
$
1,300
   
$
1,044
     
5.98
%
Aug-2026
Applebee's Plaza
Riverhead, NY
 
$
1,000
   
$
906
     
3.38
%
Aug-2026
 
 
20

Table Of Contents
Contractual Obligations

Our contractual payment obligations as of October 31, 2017 were as follows (amounts in thousands):

   
Payments Due by Period
 
   
Total
   
2018
   
2019
   
2020
   
2021
   
2022
   
Thereafter
 
Mortgage notes payable and other loans
 
$
297,071
   
$
16,295
   
$
33,076
   
$
5,848
   
$
6,200
   
$
54,989
   
$
180,663
 
Interest on mortgage notes payable
   
71,551
     
12,655
     
11,435
     
10,232
     
9,881
     
8,560
     
18,788
 
Revolving Credit Lines
   
4,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
4,000
     
-
     
-
 
Tenant obligations*
   
6,000
     
6,000
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
     
-
 
Total Contractual Obligations
 
$
378,622
   
$
34,950
   
$
44,511
   
$
16,080
   
$
20,081
   
$
63,549
   
$
199,451
 

*Committed tenant-related obligations based on executed leases as of October 31, 2017.

We have various standing or renewable service contracts with vendors related to property management. In addition, we also have certain other utility contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business which may extend beyond one year, which vary based on usage.  These contracts include terms that provide for cancellation with insignificant or no cancellation penalties.  Contract terms are generally one year or less.
21

Table Of Contents

Item 7A.               Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to interest rate risk primarily through our borrowing activities, which include fixed-rate mortgage debt and, in limited circumstances, variable rate debt.  As of October 31, 2017, we had total mortgage debt and other notes payable of $297 million, of which 100% was fixed-rate, inclusive of variable rate mortgages that have been swapped to fixed interest rates using interest rate swap derivatives contracts.

For our fixed-rate debt, there is inherent rollover risk for borrowings as they mature and are renewed at current market rates.  The extent of this risk is not quantifiable or predictable because of the variability of future interest rates and the Company's future financing requirements.

To reduce our exposure to interest rate risk on variable-rate debt, we use interest rate swap agreements, for example, to convert some of our variable-rate debt to fixed-rate debt.  As of October 31, 2017, we had eight open derivative financial instruments.  These interest rate swaps are cross collateralized with mortgages on properties in Rye, NY, Ossining, NY, Yonkers, NY, Orangeburg, NY, Stamford, CT and Greenwich, CT.  The Rye swaps expire in October 2019, the Ossining and Yonkers swaps expire in October 2024, the Orangeburg, NY swap expires in October 2024, the Stamford swap expires in July 2027, and the Greenwich swaps expire in September 2026, all concurrent with the maturity of the respective mortgages.  All of the aforementioned derivatives contracts are adjusted to fair market value at each reporting period.  The Company has concluded that all of the aforementioned derivatives contracts are effective cash flow hedges as defined in ASC Topic 815.  We are required to evaluate the effectiveness at inception and at each reporting date.  As a result of the aforementioned derivatives contracts being effective cash flow hedges all changes in fair market value are recorded directly to stockholders equity in accumulated comprehensive income and have no effect on the earnings of the Company.  In August 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2017-12, which better aligns an entity's risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedge results. To meet that objective, the amendment expands and refines hedge accounting for both nonfinancial and financial risk components and aligns the recognition and presentation of the effects of the hedging instrument and the hedged item in the financial statements.  This amendment is effective for us in our fiscal year 2020 and since we have always entered into cash flow hedges for interest rate protection we believe the accounting of our derivatives contracts will not change.

The following table sets forth the Company's long-term debt obligations by principal cash payments and maturity dates, weighted average fixed interest rates and estimated fair value at October 31, 2017 (amounts in thousands, except weighted average interest rate):

   
For the Fiscal Year Ended October 31,
    2018     2019     2020     2021     2022     Thereafter    
Total
   
Estimated Fair Value
Mortgage notes payable and otherloans                                                                         
 
$
16,295