Toggle SGML Header (+)


Section 1: 10-K (FORM 10-K)

Form 10-K
Table of Contents

FORM 10-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

[ X ] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2010

OR

[    ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number: 0-13322

United Bankshares, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

    West Virginia   55-0641179    

(State or other jurisdiction of

  incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer    

Identification No.) 

300 United Center

500 Virginia Street, East

Charleston, West Virginia

  25301    

(Address of principal executive offices)

  (Zip Code)    

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (304) 424-8704

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock, $2.50 Par Value

(Title of Class)

Securities registered pursuant to 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ X ] No [    ]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [    ] No [ X ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ] No [    ]

 

1


Table of Contents

UNITED BANKSHARES, INC.

FORM 10-K

(Continued)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [ X ] No [    ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [    ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:

 

Large accelerated filer [ X ]    Accelerated filer [    ]
Non-accelerated filer   [     ]    Smaller reporting company [    ]
  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)   

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes [    ] No [ X ]

The aggregate market value of United Bankshares, Inc. common stock, representing all of its voting stock that was held by non-affiliates on June 30, 2010, was approximately $919,357,848.

As of January 31, 2011, United Bankshares, Inc. had 43,624,135 shares of common stock outstanding with a par value of $2.50.

Documents Incorporated By Reference

Definitive Proxy Statement dated April 8, 2011 for the 2011 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting to be held on May 16, 2011, portions of which are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K.

 

2


Table of Contents

UNITED BANKSHARES, INC.

FORM 10-K

(Continued)

 

As of the date of filing this Annual report, neither the annual shareholders’ report for the year ended December 31, 2010, nor the proxy statement for the annual United shareholders’ meeting has been mailed to shareholders.

CROSS-REFERENCE INDEX

 

          Page  
Part I      

Item 1.

  

BUSINESS

     4   

Item 1A.

  

RISK FACTORS

     12   

Item 1B.

  

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

     16   

Item 2.

  

PROPERTIES

     17   

Item 3.

  

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

     17   

Item 4.

  

(REMOVED AND RESERVED)

     17   
Part II      

Item 5.

  

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON STOCK, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

     18   

Item 6.

  

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

     22   

Item 7.

  

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     22   

Item 7A.

  

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

     49   

Item 8.

  

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

     54   

Item 9.

  

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES

     109   

Item 9A.

  

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

     109   

Item 9B.

  

OTHER INFORMATION

     109   
Part III      

Item 10.

  

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

     110   

Item 11.

  

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

     110   

Item 12.

  

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

     110   

Item 13.

  

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

     110   

Item 14.

  

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

     111   
Part VI      

Item 15.

  

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

     112   

 

3


Table of Contents

UNITED BANKSHARES, INC.

FORM 10-K, PART I

 

Item 1. BUSINESS

Organizational History and Subsidiaries

United Bankshares, Inc. (United) is a West Virginia corporation registered as a bank holding company pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. United was incorporated on March 26, 1982, organized on September 9, 1982, and began conducting business on May 1, 1984 with the acquisition of three wholly-owned subsidiaries. Since its formation in 1982, United has acquired twenty-seven banking institutions. As of December 31, 2010, United has two banking subsidiaries (the Banking Subsidiaries) doing business under the name of United Bank, one operating under the laws of West Virginia referred to as United Bank (WV) and the other operating under the laws of Virginia referred to as United Bank (VA). United’s Banking Subsidiaries offer a full range of commercial and retail banking services and products. United also owns nonbank subsidiaries which engage in other community banking services such as asset management, real property title insurance, investment banking, financial planning, and brokerage services.

Employees

As of December 31, 2010, United and its subsidiaries had approximately 1,451 full-time equivalent employees and officers. None of these employees are represented by a collective bargaining unit and management considers employee relations to be excellent.

Web Site Address

United’s web site address is “www.ubsi-inc.com”. United makes available free of charge on its web site the annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments thereto, as soon as reasonably practicable after United files such reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The reference to United’s web site does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained in the web site and should not be considered part of this document. These reports are also available at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the public reference room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

Business of United

As a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, United’s present business is community banking. As of December 31, 2010, United’s consolidated assets approximated $7.2 billion and total shareholders’ equity approximated $793 million.

United is permitted to acquire other banks and bank holding companies, as well as thrift institutions. United is also permitted to engage in certain non-banking activities which are closely related to banking under the provisions of the Bank Holding Company Act and the Federal Reserve Board’s Regulation Y. Management continues to consider such opportunities as they arise, and in this regard, management from time to time makes inquiries, proposals, or expressions of interest as to potential opportunities, although no agreements or understandings to acquire other banks or bank holding companies or nonbanking subsidiaries or to engage in other nonbanking activities, other than those identified herein, presently exist. See Note B - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of United’s Agreement and Plan of Reorganization with Centra Financial Holdings, Inc.

Business of Banking Subsidiaries

United, through its subsidiaries, engages primarily in community banking and offers most banking

 

4


Table of Contents

products and services permitted by law and regulation. Included among the banking services offered are the acceptance of deposits in checking, savings, time and money market accounts; the making and servicing of personal, commercial, floor plan and student loans; and the making of construction and real estate loans. Also offered are individual retirement accounts, safe deposit boxes, wire transfers and other standard banking products and services. As part of their lending function, the Banking Subsidiaries offer credit card services.

The Banking Subsidiaries each maintain a trust department which acts as trustee under wills, trusts and pension and profit sharing plans, as executor and administrator of estates, and as guardian for estates of minors and incompetents, and in addition performs a variety of investment and security services. Trust services are available to customers of affiliate banks. United Bank (WV) provides services to its correspondent banks such as check clearing, safekeeping and the buying and selling of federal funds.

United Brokerage Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of United Bank (WV), is a fully-disclosed broker/dealer and a registered Investment Advisor with the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., the Securities and Exchange Commission, and a member of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation. United Brokerage Services, Inc. offers a wide range of investment products as well as comprehensive financial planning and asset management services to the general public.

United Bank (WV) is a member of a network of automated teller machines known as the STAR ATM network while United Bank (VA) participates in the MOST network. Through STAR and MOST, the Banking Subsidiaries are participants in a network known as Cirrus, which provides banking on a nationwide basis.

United through its Banking Subsidiaries offers an Internet banking service, Smart Touch Online Banking, which allows customers to perform various transactions using a computer from any location as long as they have access to the Internet and a secure browser. Specifically, customers can check personal account balances, receive information about transactions within their accounts, make transfers between accounts, stop payment on a check, and reorder checks. Customers may also pay bills online and can make payments to virtually any business or individual. Customers can set up recurring fixed payments, one-time future payments or a one-time immediate payment. Customers can also set up their own merchants, view and modify that merchant list, view pending transactions and view their bill payment history with approximately three (3) months of history.

United also offers an automated telephone banking system, Telebanc, which allows customers to access their personal account(s) or business account(s) information from a touch-tone telephone.

Lending Activities

United’s loan portfolio, net of unearned income, decreased $476.5 million to $5.3 billion in 2010. The loan portfolio is comprised of commercial, real estate and consumer loans including credit card and home equity loans. All classifications of loans declined for 2010. Commercial real estate loans and commercial loans (not secured by real estate) decreased $95.6 million or 5.0% and $70.0 million or 6.3%, respectively. Residential real estate loans decreased $159.1 million or 8.6% and construction loans declined $88.7 million or 15.8%. Consumer loans decreased $64.1 million or 20.1%.

Commercial Loans

The commercial loan portfolio consists of loans to corporate borrowers primarily in small to mid-size industrial and commercial companies, as well as automobile dealers, service, retail and wholesale merchants. Collateral securing these loans includes equipment, machinery, inventory, receivables, vehicles and commercial real estate. Commercial loans are considered to contain a higher level of risk than other loan types although care is taken to minimize these risks. Numerous risk factors impact this portfolio including industry specific risks such as economy, new technology, labor rates and cyclicality, as well as customer specific factors, such as cash flow, financial structure, operating controls and asset quality. United diversifies risk within this portfolio by closely monitoring industry concentrations and portfolios to ensure that it does not exceed established lending guidelines. Diversification is intended to limit the risk of loss from any single unexpected economic event or trend. Underwriting standards require a comprehensive credit analysis and independent evaluation of virtually all larger

 

5


Table of Contents

balance commercial loans by the loan committee prior to approval.

Real Estate Loans

Commercial real estate loans consist of commercial mortgages, which generally are secured by nonresidential and multi-family residential properties. Also included in this portfolio are loans that are secured by owner-occupied real estate, but made for purposes other than the construction or purchase of real estate. Commercial real estate loans are to many of the same customers and carry similar industry risks as the commercial loan portfolio. Real estate mortgage loans to consumers are secured primarily by a first lien deed of trust. These loans are traditional one-to-four family residential mortgages. The loans generally do not exceed an 80% loan to value ratio at the loan origination date and most are at a variable rate of interest. These loans are considered to be of normal risk. Also included in the category of real estate mortgage loans are home equity loans.

As of December 31, 2010, approximately $319.1 million or 6.1% of United’s loan portfolio were real estate loans that met the regulatory definition of a high loan-to-value loan. A high loan-to-value real estate loan is defined as any loan, line of credit, or combination of credits secured by liens on or interests in real estate that equals or exceeds a certain percentage established by United’s primary regulator of the real estate’s appraised value, unless the loan has other appropriate credit support. The certain percentage varies depending on the loan type and collateral. Appropriate credit support may include mortgage insurance, readily marketable collateral, or other acceptable collateral that reduces the loan-to-value ratio below the certain percentage. Of the $319.1 million, $125.0 million is secured by first deeds of trust on residential real estate with $113.7 million of that total falling in a loan-to-value (LTV) range of 90% to 100% and $11.3 million above a LTV of 100%; $67.9 million is secured by subordinate deeds of trust on residential real estate with $55.4 million between a LTV of 90% to 100% and $12.5 million above a LTV of 100%; and $126.2 million is secured by commercial real estate generally ranging from the regulatory limit for the type of commercial real estate up to a LTV of 100%. Of the $126.2 million high loan to value commercial loans, $37.3 million are classified as Other Construction Loans and Land Loans, $47.6 million are Non-residential Secured, $14.3 million are Commercial Owner occupied properties, $15.7 million are 1-4 family Residential Secured first lien properties, and $4.4 million are Residential Construction Loans. The remaining $6.9 million are spread out in three different categories, none of which are material.

Consumer Loans

Consumer loans are secured by automobiles, boats, recreational vehicles, and other personal property. Personal loans, student loans and unsecured credit card receivables are also included as consumer loans. United monitors the risk associated with these types of loans by monitoring such factors as portfolio growth, lending policies and economic conditions. Underwriting standards are continually evaluated and modified based upon these factors.

Underwriting Standards

United’s loan underwriting guidelines and standards are updated periodically and are presented for approval by the respective Boards of Directors of each of its subsidiary banks. The purpose of the standards and guidelines is to grant loans on a sound and collectible basis; to invest available funds in a safe, profitable manner; to serve the legitimate credit needs of the communities of United’s primary market area; and to ensure that all loan applicants receive fair and equal treatment in the lending process. It is the intent of the underwriting guidelines and standards to: minimize loan losses by carefully investigating the credit history of each applicant, verify the source of repayment and the ability of the applicant to repay, collateralize those loans in which collateral is deemed to be required, exercise care in the documentation of the application, review, approval, and origination process, and administer a comprehensive loan collection program.

United’s underwriting standards and practices are designed to originate both fixed and variable rate loan products in a manner which is consistent with the prudent banking practices applicable to these exposures. Typically, both fixed and variable rate loan underwriting practices incorporate conservative methodology, including the use of stress testing for commercial loans, and other product appropriate measures designed to provide an adequate margin of safety for the full collection of both principal and interest within contractual terms. Consumer

 

6


Table of Contents

real estate secured loans are underwritten to the initial rate, and to a higher assumed rate commensurate with normal market conditions. Therefore, it is the intent of United’s underwriting standards to insure that adequate primary repayment capacity exists to address both future increases in interest rates, and fluctuations in the underlying cash flows available for repayment. Historically, and at December 31, 2010, United has not offered “teaser rate” loans, and had no loan portfolio products which were specifically designed for “sub-prime” borrowers. Management defines “sub-prime” borrowers as consumer borrowers with a credit score of less than 660.

The above guidelines are adhered to and subject to the experience, background and personal judgment of the loan officer assigned to the loan application. A loan officer may grant, with justification, a loan with variances from the underwriting guidelines and standards. However, the loan officer may not exceed his or her respective lending authority without obtaining the prior, proper approval as outlined in United’s loan policy from a superior, a regional supervisor or market president (dual approval per policy) or the Loan Committee, whichever is deemed appropriate for the nature of the variance.

Loan Concentrations

United has commercial loans, including real estate and owner-occupied, income-producing real estate and land development loans, of approximately $3.2 billion as of December 31, 2010. These loans are primarily secured by real estate located in West Virginia, southeastern Ohio, Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia. United categorizes these commercial loans by industry according to the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) to monitor the portfolio for possible concentrations in one or more industries. As of the most recent fiscal year-end, United has one such industry classification that exceeded 10% of total loans. As of December 31, 2010, approximately $1.3 billion or 24.0% of United’s total loan portfolio were for the purpose of renting or leasing real estate. The loans were originated by United’s subsidiary banks using underwriting standards as set forth by management. United’s loan administration policies are focused on the risk characteristics of the loan portfolio, including commercial real estate loans, in terms of loan approval and credit quality. It is the opinion of management that these loans do not pose any unusual risks and that adequate consideration has been given to the above loans in establishing the allowance for loan losses.

Secondary Markets

United generally originates loans within the primary market area of its banking subsidiaries. United may from time to time make loans to borrowers and/or on properties outside of its primary market area as an accommodation to its customers. Processing of all loans is centralized in the Charleston, West Virginia office. As of December 31, 2010, the balance of mortgage loans being serviced by United for others was insignificant.

United Bank (WV) engages in the origination and acquisition of residential real estate loans for resale. These loans are for single-family, owner-occupied residences with either adjustable or fixed rate terms, with a variety of maturities tailored to effectively serve its markets. United Bank (WV)’s originations are predominately in its West Virginia markets. Mortgage loan originations are generally intended to be sold in the secondary market on a best efforts basis.

During 2010, United originated $49.2 million of real estate loans for sale in the secondary market and sold $47.6 million of loans designated as held for sale in the secondary market. Net gains on the sales of these loans during 2010 were $662 thousand.

The principal sources of revenue from United’s mortgage banking business are: (i) loan origination fees; (ii) gains or losses from the sale of loans; and (iii) interest earned on mortgage loans during the period that they are held by United pending sale, if any.

Investment Activities

United’s investment policy stresses the management of the investment securities portfolio, which includes both securities held to maturity and securities available for sale, to maximize return over the long-term in a manner

 

7


Table of Contents

that is consistent with good banking practices and relative safety of principal. United currently does not engage in trading account activity. The Asset/Liability Management Committee of United is responsible for the coordination and evaluation of the investment portfolio.

Sources of funds for investment activities include “core deposits”. Core deposits include certain demand deposits, statement and special savings and NOW accounts. These deposits are relatively stable and they are the lowest cost source of funds available to United. Short-term borrowings have also been a significant source of funds. These include federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and FHLB borrowings. Repurchase agreements represent funds that are generally obtained as the result of a competitive bidding process.

United’s investment portfolio is comprised of a significant amount of mortgage-backed securities. United has a small amount of U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Agencies and Corporations. Obligations of States and Political Subdivisions are comprised of primarily “AAA” rated municipal securities. Interest and dividends on securities for the years of 2010, 2009, and 2008 were $39.3 million, $55.5 million, and $71.0 million, respectively. For the years of 2010, 2009 and 2008, United recognized net losses on security transactions of $7.8 million, $14.7 million and $9.4 million, respectively. In the year 2010, United recognized other-than-temporary impairment charges of $9.8 million on certain investment securities consisting primarily of $7.3 million on pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations (TRUP CDOs), $1.2 million on collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) and $1.3 million on a certain investment security carried at cost. In the year 2009, United recognized other-than-temporary impairment charges of $15.0 million on certain investment securities consisting primarily of $8.0 million on a single-issue trust preferred security and $5.4 million on pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations (TRUP CDOs).

Competition

United faces a high degree of competition in all of the markets it serves. United considers all of West Virginia to be included in its market area. This area includes the five largest West Virginia Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA): the Parkersburg MSA, the Charleston MSA, the Huntington MSA, the Wheeling MSA and the Weirton MSA. United serves the Ohio counties of Lawrence, Belmont, Jefferson and Washington primarily because of their close proximity to the Ohio border and United banking offices nearby in West Virginia. United’s Virginia markets include the Maryland, northern Virginia and Washington, D.C. MSA, the Winchester MSA, the Harrisonburg MSA, and the Charlottesville MSA. United considers all of the above locations to be the primary market area for the business of its banking subsidiaries.

With prior regulatory approval, West Virginia and Virginia banks are permitted unlimited branch banking throughout each state. In addition, interstate acquisitions of and by West Virginia and Virginia banks and bank holding companies are permissible on a reciprocal basis, as well as reciprocal interstate acquisitions by thrift institutions. These conditions serve to intensify competition within United’s market.

As of December 31, 2010, there were 68 bank holding companies operating in the State of West Virginia registered with the Federal Reserve System and the West Virginia Board of Banking and Financial Institutions and 100 bank holding companies operating in the Commonwealth of Virginia registered with the Federal Reserve System and the Virginia Corporation Commission. These holding companies are headquartered in various states and control banks throughout West Virginia and Virginia, which compete for business as well as for the acquisition of additional banks.

Economic Characteristics of Primary Market Area

As of December 2010, West Virginia’s unemployment rate was 9.5% according to information from West Virginia’s Bureau of Employment Programs. The number of unemployed state residents rose 5,900 to 73,500 for the month of December as compared to the month of November. Total unemployment was up 6,400 over the year of 2010. The state unemployment rate of 9.5% for December 2010 was an increase from a rate of 8.8% for the month of November 2010 and 8.6% for December 2009. Population outflows that have constrained faster

 

8


Table of Contents

economic growth in West Virginia may be moderating. The new U.S. Census Bureau figures show that West Virginia’s population is slowly increasing again. The 2010 Census data show the number of residents in West Virginia rose by 2.5% over the last decade, from 1,808,344 to 1,852,994. That’s an annual growth rate of about one-quarter of one percent. The economic recovery is under way in West Virginia, according to the latest forecast from the West Virginia University College of Business and Economics. The state economy is likely to continue to expand during 2011, although growth is likely to be slow. Most job growth in West Virginia is expected to come in service-providing sectors, like health care; professional and business services; and trade, transportation and utilities. Manufacturing and construction also are expected to add jobs, reflecting the global economic rebound and the gradual recovery from the housing bust. Mining jobs are expected to decline modestly, reflecting the mild recovery in coal production.

United’s Virginia subsidiary banking offices are located in markets that historically have reflected low unemployment rate levels. According to information available from the Virginia Employment Commission, Virginia’s unemployment rate as of December 2010 was 6.4% which was below the U.S. December 2010 unemployment level of 9.1% and two-tenths of a percentage point decrease from 6.6% in November. The unemployment rate was 6.7% for December 2009. The Virginia economy is expected to add 25,400 new jobs in fiscal year (FY) 2011. While this total is well below what a typical economic expansion would add to payrolls, it does follow on the heels of an unprecedented two year run of job losses. Economists are predicting that personal income will grow 2.8% in FY 2011 and 3.6 percent in FY 2012. Wages and salaries are expected to grow 2.6% in FY 2011 and 4.7% in FY 2012. Employment is expected to modestly increase by 0.7% and 2.0% in FYs 2011 and 2012, respectively. Employment in the professional and business services sector is forecast to increase by 1.6% in FY 2011. Construction employment is expected to fall by 3.0% in FY 2011. FY 2012 would mark the first year of growth in this sector since FY 2006. Employment in trade, transportation and utilities is expected to increase by 1.4% in FY 2011.

Regulation and Supervision

United, as a bank holding company, is subject to the restrictions of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and is registered pursuant to its provisions. As such, United is subject to the reporting requirements of and examination by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Board of Governors).

The Bank Holding Company Act prohibits the acquisition by a bank holding company of direct or indirect ownership of more than five percent of the voting shares of any bank within the United States without prior approval of the Board of Governors. With certain exceptions, a bank holding company also is prohibited from acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than five percent of the voting shares of any company which is not a bank, and from engaging directly or indirectly in business unrelated to the business of banking, or managing or controlling banks.

The Board of Governors, in its Regulation Y, permits bank holding companies to engage in preapproved non-banking activities closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks. Approval of the Board of Governors is necessary to engage in certain other non-banking activities which are not preapproved or to make acquisitions of corporations engaging in these activities. In addition, on a case-by-case basis, the Board of Governors may approve other non-banking activities.

On July 30, 2002, the President of the United States signed into law the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, a broad accounting, auditing, disclosure and corporate governance reform law. The legislation was passed in an effort to increase corporate responsibility by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures pursuant to the securities laws and to allow stockholders to more easily and efficiently monitor the performance of companies and directors.

On October 3, 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the EESA) was signed into law. EESA temporarily raised the limit on federal deposit insurance coverage from $100,000 to $250,000 per depositor. Separate from EESA, in October 2008, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) also announced the Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (TLGP) to guarantee eligible newly issued senior unsecured debt by

 

9


Table of Contents

FDIC-insured institutions through October 31, 2009. Under one component of this program, the Transaction Account Guaranty Program (TAGP), the FDIC temporarily provided a full guarantee on all noninterest-bearing transaction accounts held by any depositor, regardless of dollar amount, through December 31, 2009. The $250,000 deposit insurance coverage limit was scheduled to return to $100,000 on January 1, 2010, but was extended by congressional action until December 31, 2013. The TLGP expired on December 31, 2010 while the TAGP expired on June 30, 2010. As discussed on the following page, separate temporary unlimited coverage for noninterest-bearing transaction accounts became effective on December 31, 2010 and will last until December 31, 2012.

On July 21, 2010, President Obama signed the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act), into law. The Dodd-Frank Act significantly changes regulation of financial institutions and the financial services industry. The Dodd-Frank Act includes, among other things, provisions creating a Financial Services Oversight Council to identify emerging systemic risks and improve interagency cooperation; centralizing the responsibility for consumer financial protection by creating a new agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which will be responsible for implementing, examining and enforcing compliance with federal consumer financial laws; permanently raising the current standard maximum deposit insurance amount to $250,000; establishing strengthened capital standards for banks, and disallowing trust preferred securities as qualifying for Tier 1 capital (subject to certain grandfather provisions for existing trust preferred securities); establishing new minimum mortgage underwriting standards; granting the Federal Reserve Board the power to regulate debit card interchange fees; and implementing corporate governance changes. Many aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act are subject to rulemaking that will take effect over several years, thus making it difficult to assess all the effects the Dodd-Frank Act will have on the financial industry, including United, at this time.

As a bank holding company doing business in West Virginia, United is also subject to regulation and examination by the West Virginia Board of Banking and Financial Institutions (the West Virginia Banking Board) and must submit annual reports to the West Virginia Banking Board. Further, any acquisition application that United must submit to the Board of Governors must also be submitted to the West Virginia Banking Board for approval.

United is also under the jurisdiction of the SEC and certain state securities commissions in regard to the offering and sale of its securities. Generally, United must file under the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, as amended, to issue additional shares of its common stock. United is also registered under and is subject to the regulatory and disclosure requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as administered by the SEC. United is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the quotation symbol “UBSI,” and is subject to the rules of the NASDAQ for listed companies.

The Banking Subsidiaries, as state member banks, are subject to supervision, examination and regulation by the Federal Reserve System, and as such, are subject to applicable provisions of the Federal Reserve Act and regulations issued thereunder. Each Banking Subsidiary is subject to regulation by its state banking authority.

Deposit Insurance

The deposits of United’s Banking Subsidiaries are insured by the FDIC to the extent provided by law. Accordingly, these Banking Subsidiaries are also subject to regulation by the FDIC. The Banking Subsidiaries are subject to deposit insurance assessments to maintain the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) of the FDIC. The FDIC utilizes a risk-based assessment system that imposes insurance premiums based upon a risk matrix that takes into account a bank’s capital level and supervisory rating (CAMELS rating). The risk matrix utilizes four risk categories which are distinguished by capital levels and supervisory ratings.

In December 2008, the FDIC issued a final rule that raised assessment rates for the first quarter of 2009 by a uniform 7 basis points, resulting in a range between 12 and 50 basis points, depending upon the risk category. In March 2009, the FDIC issued final rules to further change the assessment system beginning in the second quarter of 2009. The changes commenced April 1, 2009 to ensure that riskier institutions bear a greater share of the increase in assessments, and are subsidized to a lesser degree by less risky institutions.

 

10


Table of Contents

In May 2009, the FDIC issued a final rule which levied a special assessment applicable to all insured depository institutions totaling 5 basis points of each institution’s total assets less Tier 1 capital as of June 30, 2009, not to exceed 10 basis points of domestic deposits. The special assessment was part of the FDIC’s efforts to rebuild the DIF. United’s deposit insurance expense during 2009 included $3.6 million recognized in the second quarter related to the special assessment.

In November 2009, the FDIC issued a rule that required all insured depository institutions, with limited exceptions, to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009 and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. The FDIC also adopted a uniform three-basis point increase in assessment rates effective on January 1, 2011; however, as further discussed below, the FDIC has elected to forego this increase under a new DIF restoration plan adopted in October 2010.

In December 2009, United paid $36.4 million in prepaid risk-based assessments, of which $28.0 million is remaining and included in other assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2010.

In October 2010, the FDIC adopted a new DIF restoration plan to ensure that the fund reserve ratio reaches 1.35% by September 30, 2020, as required by the Dodd-Frank Act. Under the new restoration plan, the FDIC will forego the uniform three-basis point increase in initial assessment rates scheduled to take place on January 1, 2011 and maintain the current schedule of assessment rates for all depository institutions. At least semi-annually, the FDIC will update its loss and income projections for the fund and, if needed, will increase or decrease assessment rates, following notice-and-comment rulemaking if required.

In November 2010, the FDIC issued a final rule to implement provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act that provide for temporary unlimited coverage for non-interest-bearing transaction accounts. The separate coverage for non-interest-bearing transaction accounts became effective on December 31, 2010 and terminates on December 31, 2012.

United’s FDIC insurance expense totaled $9.7 million, $9.2 million and $1.1 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Capital Requirements

As a bank holding company, United is subject to consolidated regulatory capital requirements administered by the Federal Reserve Board. United’s Banking Subsidiaries are also subject to the capital requirements administered by the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board’s risk-based capital guidelines are based upon the 1988 capital accord (Basel I) of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the Basel Committee). The requirements are intended to ensure that banking organizations have adequate capital given the risk levels of assets and off-balance sheet financial instruments. Under the requirements, banking organizations are required to maintain minimum ratios for Tier 1 capital and total capital to risk-weighted assets (including certain off-balance sheet items, such as letters of credit). For purposes of calculating the ratios, a banking organization’s assets and some of its specified off-balance sheet commitments and obligations are assigned to various risk categories.

United and its Banking Subsidiaries are currently required to maintain Tier 1 capital and “total capital” (the sum of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital) equal to at least 4.0% and 8.0%, respectively, of its total risk-weighted assets (including various off-balance-sheet items, such as letters of credit). In addition, for a depository institution to be considered “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, its Tier 1 and total capital ratios must be at least 6.0% and 10.0% on a risk-adjusted basis, respectively. Bank holding companies and banks are also required to comply with minimum leverage ratio requirements. The leverage ratio is the ratio of a banking organization’s Tier 1 capital to its total adjusted quarterly average assets (as defined for regulatory purposes). The requirements necessitate a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0% for United and its banking subsidiaries. In addition, for a depository institution to be considered “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, its leverage ratio must be at least 5.0%.

 

11


Table of Contents

In 2004, the Basel Committee published a new capital accord (Basel II) to replace Basel I. A definitive final rule for implementing the advanced approaches of Basel II in the United States, which applies only to certain large or internationally active banking organizations, or “core banks” – defined as those with consolidated total assets of $250 billion or more or consolidated on-balance sheet foreign exposures of $10 billion or more, became effective as of April 1, 2008. United and its banking subsidiaries were not required to comply with the advanced approaches of Basel II.

In December 2010, the Basel Committee released its final framework for strengthening international capital and liquidity regulation, now officially identified by the Basel Committee as “Basel III”. Basel III, when implemented by the U.S. banking agencies and fully phased-in, will require bank holding companies and their bank subsidiaries to maintain substantially more capital, with a greater emphasis on common equity.

The U.S. banking agencies have indicated informally that they expect to propose regulations implementing Basel III in mid-2011 with final adoption of implementing regulations in mid-2012. Notwithstanding its release of the Basel III framework as a final framework, the Basel Committee is considering further amendments to Basel III, including the imposition of additional capital surcharges on globally systemically important financial institutions. In addition to Basel III, the Dodd-Frank Act requires or permits the Federal banking agencies to adopt regulations affecting banking institutions’ capital requirements in a number of respects, including potentially more stringent capital requirements for systemically important financial institutions. Accordingly, the regulations ultimately applicable to United and its banking subsidiaries may be substantially different from the Basel III final framework as published in December 2010. Requirements to maintain higher levels of capital or to maintain higher levels of liquid assets could adversely impact United’s net income and return on equity.

 

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

United is subject to risks inherent to the Company’s business. The material risks and uncertainties that management believes affect the Company are described below. Before making an investment decision, you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below together with all of the other information included or incorporated by reference in this report. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties that management is not aware of or focused on or that management currently deems immaterial may also impair United’s business operations. This report is qualified in its entirety by these risk factors.

United’s business may be adversely affected by conditions in financial markets and economic conditions generally

United’s business is concentrated in the West Virginia, Northern Virginia and Shenandoah Valley Virginia market areas. As a result, its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows are subject to changes if there are changes in the economic conditions in these areas. A prolonged period of economic recession or other adverse economic conditions in these areas could have a negative impact on United. A significant decline in general economic conditions nationally, caused by inflation, recession, acts of terrorism, outbreak of hostilities or other international or domestic occurrences, unemployment, changes in securities markets, declines in the housing market, a tightening credit environment or other factors could impact these local economic conditions and, in turn, have a material adverse effect on United’s financial condition and results of operations which occurred during this past year.

Economic conditions began deteriorating during the latter half of 2007 and continued throughout 2010. Business activity across a wide range of industries and regions has been greatly reduced and many businesses are experiencing serious difficulties due to a lack of consumer spending and the lack of liquidity in credit markets. Unemployment has also increased significantly. As a result of this economic crisis, many lending institutions, including United, have experienced declines in the performance of their loans, including construction, land development and land loans, commercial loans and consumer loans. Moreover, competition among depository institutions for deposits and quality loans has increased significantly. In addition, the values of real estate collateral supporting many commercial loans and home mortgages have declined and may continue to decline. Overall, the

 

12


Table of Contents

general business environment has had an adverse effect on United’s business, and there can be no assurance that the environment will improve in the near term. Accordingly, until conditions improve, United’s business, financial condition and results of operations could continue to be adversely affected.

The value of certain investment securities is volatile and future declines or other-than-temporary impairments could have a materially adverse affect on future earnings and regulatory capital

Continued volatility in the fair value for certain investment securities, whether caused by changes in market conditions, interest rates, credit risk of the issuer, the expected yield of the security, or actual defaults in the portfolio could result in significant fluctuations in the value of the securities. This could have a material adverse impact on United’s accumulated other comprehensive income and shareholders’ equity depending on the direction of the fluctuations. Furthermore, future downgrades or defaults in these securities could result in future classifications as other-than-temporarily impaired. This could have a material impact on United’s future earnings, although the impact on shareholders’ equity will be offset by any amount already included in other comprehensive income for securities that were temporarily impairment.

There are no assurances as to adequacy of the allowance for credit losses

United believes that its allowance for credit losses is maintained at a level appropriate to absorb any probable losses in its loan portfolio given the current information known to management.

Management establishes the allowance based upon many factors, including, but not limited to:

 

   

historical loan loss experience;

 

   

industry diversification of the commercial loan portfolio;

 

   

the effect of changes in the local real estate market on collateral values;

 

   

the amount of nonperforming loans and related collateral security;

 

   

current economic conditions that may affect the borrower’s ability to pay and value of collateral;

 

   

volume, growth and composition of the loan portfolio; and

 

   

other factors management believes are relevant.

These determinations are based upon estimates that are inherently subjective, and their accuracy depends on the outcome of future events, so ultimate losses may differ from current estimates. Changes in economic, operating and other conditions, including changes in interest rates, that are generally beyond United’s control, can affect the Company’s credit losses. With unfavorable economic conditions since the end of 2007, United’s credit losses have been on the rise. If the economic conditions do not improve or continue to decline, United’s credit losses could continue to increase, perhaps significantly. As a result, such losses could exceed United’s current allowance estimates. United can provide no assurance that its allowance is sufficient to cover actual credit losses should such losses differ substantially from our current estimates.

In addition, federal and state regulators, as an integral part of their respective supervisory functions, periodically review United’s allowance for credit losses.

Changes in interest rates may adversely affect United’s business

United’s earnings, like most financial institutions, are significantly dependent on its net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between the interest income United earns on loans and other assets which earn interest and the interest expense incurred to fund those assets, such as on savings deposits and borrowed money. Therefore, changes in general market interest rates, such as a change in the monetary policy of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or otherwise beyond those which are contemplated by United’s interest rate risk model and policy, could have an effect on net interest income. For more information concerning United’s

 

13


Table of Contents

interest rate risk model and policy, see the discussion under the caption “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” under Item 7A.

United is subject to credit risk

There are risks inherent in making any loan, including risks with respect to the period of time over which the loan may be repaid, risks resulting from changes in economic and industry conditions, risks inherent in dealing with individual borrowers and risks resulting from uncertainties as to the future value of collateral. United seeks to mitigate the risk inherent in its loan portfolio by adhering to prudent loan approval practices. Although United believes that its loan approval criteria are appropriate for the various kinds of loans the Company makes, United may incur losses on loans that meet our loan approval criteria. Due to recent economic conditions affecting the real estate market, many lending institutions, including United, have experienced substantial declines in the performance of their loans, including construction, land development and land loans. The value of real estate collateral supporting many construction and land development loans, land loans, commercial and multi-family loans have declined and may continue to decline. United cannot assure that the economic conditions affecting customers and the quality of the loan portfolio will improve and thus, United’s financial condition and results of operations could continue to be adversely affected.

Loss of United’s Chief Executive Officer or other executive officers could adversely affect its business

United’s success is dependent upon the continued service and skills of its executive officers and senior management. If United loses the services of these key personnel, it could have a negative impact on United’s business because of their skills, years of industry experience and the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel. The services of Richard M. Adams, United’s Chief Executive Officer, would be particularly difficult to replace. United and Mr. Adams are parties to an Employment Agreement providing for his continued employment by United through March 31, 2015.

United operates in a highly competitive market

United faces a high degree of competition in all of the markets it serves. United considers all of West Virginia to be included in its market area. This area includes the five largest West Virginia Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA): the Parkersburg MSA, the Charleston MSA, the Huntington MSA, the Wheeling MSA and the Weirton MSA. United serves the Ohio counties of Lawrence, Belmont, Jefferson and Washington primarily because of their close proximity to the Ohio border and United banking offices nearby in West Virginia. United’s Virginia markets include the Maryland, northern Virginia and Washington, D.C. MSA, the Winchester MSA, the Harrisonburg MSA, and the Charlottesville MSA. United considers all of the above locations to be the primary market area for the business of its banking subsidiaries

There is a risk that aggressive competition could result in United controlling a smaller share of these markets. A decline in market share could lead to a decline in net income which would have a negative impact on stockholder value.

Dividend payments by United’s subsidiaries to United and by United to its shareholders can be restricted

The declaration and payment of future cash dividends will depend on, among other things, United’s earnings, the general economic and regulatory climate, United’s liquidity and capital requirements, and other factors deemed relevant by United’s board of directors. Federal Reserve Board policy limits the payment of cash dividends by bank holding companies, without regulatory approval, and requires that a holding company serve as a source of strength to its banking subsidiaries.

United’s principal source of funds to pay dividends on its common stock is cash dividends from its subsidiaries. The payment of these dividends by its subsidiaries is also restricted by federal and state banking laws and regulations. As of December 31, 2010, an aggregate of approximately $32.1 million and $43.4 million was available for dividend payments from United Bank (WV) and United Bank (VA), respectively, to United without regulatory approval.

 

14


Table of Contents

United may be adversely affected by the soundness of other financial institutions

Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, or other relationships. United has exposure to many different industries and counterparties, and routinely executes transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, mutual and hedge funds, or other institutional clients. Recent defaults by financial services institutions, and even rumors or questions about a financial institution or the financial services industry in general, have led to marketwide liquidity problems and could lead to losses or defaults by United or other institutions. Any such losses could adversely affect United’s financial condition or results of operations.

United is subject to extensive government regulation and supervision

United is subject to extensive federal and state regulation, supervision and examination. Banking regulations are primarily intended to protect depositors’ funds, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole, not shareholders. These regulations affect United’s lending practices, capital structure, investment practices, dividend policy, operations and growth, among other things. These regulations also impose obligations to maintain appropriate policies, procedures and controls, among other things, to detect, prevent and report money laundering and terrorist financing and to verify the identities of United’s customers. Congress and federal regulatory agencies continually review banking laws, regulations and policies for possible changes. Changes to statutes, regulations or regulatory policies, including changes in interpretation or implementation of statutes, regulations or policies, could affect United in substantial and unpredictable ways. Such changes could subject the Company to additional costs, limit the types of financial services and products United may offer and/or increase the ability of nonbanks to offer competing financial services and products, among other things. United expends substantial effort and incurs costs to improve its systems, audit capabilities, staffing and training in order to satisfy regulatory requirements, but the regulatory authorities may determine that such efforts are insufficient. Failure to comply with relevant laws, regulations or policies could result in sanctions by regulatory agencies, civil money penalties and/or reputation damage, which could have a material adverse effect on United’s business, financial condition and results of operations. While the Company has policies and procedures designed to prevent any such violations, there can be no assurance that such violations will not occur. As an example, the FDIC imposed higher assessments on deposits in 2009 based on the adequacy of the deposit insurance fund, conditions of the banking industry and as a result of changes in specific programs. Recently, the Dodd-Frank Act changed the FDIC’s assessment base for federal deposit insurance from the amount of insured deposits to consolidated average assets less tangible capital. It is possible that United’s deposit insurance premiums could increase even more in the future under this new requirement.

In the normal course of business, United and its subsidiaries are routinely subject to examinations and challenges from federal and state tax authorities regarding the amount of taxes due in connection with investments that the Company has made and the businesses in which United has engaged. Recently, federal and state taxing authorities have become increasingly aggressive in challenging tax positions taken by financial institutions. These tax positions may relate to tax compliance, sales and use, franchise, gross receipts, payroll, property and income tax issues, including tax base, apportionment and tax credit planning. The challenges made by tax authorities may result in adjustments to the timing or amount of taxable income or deductions or the allocation of income among tax jurisdictions. If any such challenges are made and are not resolved in the Company’s favor, they could have a material adverse effect on United’s financial condition and results of operations.

United may elect or be compelled to seek additional capital in the future, but capital may not be available when it is needed

United is required by federal and state regulatory authorities to maintain adequate levels of capital to support the Company’s operations. In addition, United may elect to raise additional capital to support the Company’s business or to finance acquisitions, if any, or United may otherwise elect to raise additional capital. In that regard, a number of financial institutions have recently raised considerable amounts of capital as a result of

 

15


Table of Contents

deterioration in their results of operations and financial condition arising from the turmoil in the mortgage loan market, deteriorating economic conditions, declines in real estate values and other factors, which may diminish United’s ability to raise additional capital.

United’s ability to raise additional capital, if needed, will depend on conditions in the capital markets, economic conditions and a number of other factors, many of which are outside the Company’s control, and on United’s financial performance. Accordingly, United cannot be assured of its ability to raise additional capital if needed or on terms acceptable to the Company. If United cannot raise additional capital when needed, it may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

United’s information systems may experience an interruption or breach in security

United relies heavily on communications and information systems to conduct its business. In addition, as part of its business, United collects, processes and retains sensitive and confidential client and customer information. United’s facilities and systems, and those of our third party service providers, may be vulnerable to security breaches, acts of vandalism, computer viruses, misplaced or lost data, programming and/or human errors, or other similar events. Any failure, interruption or breach in security of these systems could result in failures or disruptions in the Company’s customer relationship management, general ledger, deposit, loan and other systems. While United has policies and procedures designed to prevent or limit the effect of the failure, interruption or security breach of its information systems, there can be no assurance that any such failures, interruptions or security breaches will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be adequately addressed. The occurrence of any failures, interruptions or security breaches of the Company’s information systems could damage United’s reputation, result in a loss of customer business, subject United to additional regulatory scrutiny, or expose the Company to civil litigation and possible financial liability, any of which could have a material adverse effect on United’s financial condition and results of operations.

The recently enacted Dodd-Frank Act may adversely affect United’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Dodd-Frank Act significantly changes regulation of financial institutions and the financial services industry. The Dodd-Frank Act includes, among other things, provisions creating a Financial Services Oversight Council to identify emerging systemic risks and improve interagency cooperation; centralizing the responsibility for consumer financial protection by creating a new agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which will be responsible for implementing, examining and enforcing compliance with federal consumer financial laws; permanently raising the current standard maximum deposit insurance amount to $250,000; establishing strengthened capital standards for banks, and disallowing trust preferred securities as qualifying for Tier 1 capital (subject to certain grandfather provisions for existing trust preferred securities); establishing new minimum mortgage underwriting standards; granting the Federal Reserve Board the power to regulate debit card interchange fees; and implementing corporate governance changes. Many aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act are subject to rulemaking that will take effect over several years, thus making it difficult to assess all the effects the Dodd-Frank Act will have on the financial industry, including United, at this time. However, it is possible that United’s interest expense could increase and deposit insurance premiums could change, and steps may need to be taken to increase qualifying capital. United expects that operating and compliance costs will increase and could adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.

In addition, these changes may also require United to invest significant management attention and resources to evaluate and make any changes necessary to comply with new statutory and regulatory requirements which may negatively impact United’s financial condition and results of operation. United is currently reviewing the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act and assessing their probable impact on United and its operations.

 

Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None

 

 

16


Table of Contents
Item 2. PROPERTIES

Offices

United is headquartered in the United Center at 500 Virginia Street, East, Charleston, West Virginia. United’s executive offices are located in Parkersburg, West Virginia at Fifth and Avery Streets. United operates one hundred and twelve (112) full service offices—fifty-three (53) offices located throughout West Virginia, fifty-six (56) offices in the Shenandoah Valley region of Virginia and the Northern Virginia, Maryland and Washington, D.C. metropolitan area and three (3) in southeastern Ohio. United owns all of its West Virginia facilities except for two in the Wheeling area, two in the Charleston area, two in the Beckley area, two in the Charles Town area and one each in Parkersburg, Morgantown, and Clarksburg, all of which are leased under operating leases. United owns most of its facilities in the Shenandoah Valley region of Virginia except for ten offices, three in Winchester, one each in Charlottesville, Front Royal, Harrisonburg, Staunton, Waynesboro, Weyers Cave and Woodstock, all of which are leased under operating leases. United leases all of its facilities under operating lease agreements in the Northern Virginia, Maryland and Washington, D.C. areas except for four offices, one each in Fairfax, Alexandria, and Vienna, Virginia and one in Bethesda, Maryland, which are owned facilities. In Ohio, United leases two of its three facilities, one each in Bellaire and St. Clairsville. United leases an operations center facility in the Charleston, West Virginia area.

 

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the normal course of business, United and its subsidiaries are currently involved in various legal proceedings. Management is vigorously pursuing all its legal and factual defenses and, after consultation with legal counsel, believes that all such litigation will be resolved with no material effect on United’s financial position.

 

Item 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)

 

17


Table of Contents

UNITED BANKSHARES, INC.

FORM 10-K, PART II

 

Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Stock

As of January 31, 2011, 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $2.50 per share, were authorized for United, of which 44,319,157 were issued, including 695,022 shares held as treasury shares. The outstanding shares are held by approximately 6,382 shareholders of record, as well as 15,186 shareholders in street name as of January 31, 2011. The unissued portion of United’s authorized common stock (subject to registration approval by the SEC) and the treasury shares are available for issuance as the Board of Directors determines advisable. United offers its shareholders the opportunity to invest dividends in shares of United stock through its dividend reinvestment plan. United has also established stock option plans and a stock bonus plan as incentive for certain eligible officers. In addition to the above incentive plans, United is occasionally involved in certain mergers in which additional shares could be issued and recognizes that additional shares could be issued for other appropriate purposes.

In May of 2006, United’s Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase plan, whereby United could buy up to 1,700,000 shares of its common stock in the open market. During 2010 and 2009, no shares were repurchased under the plan.

The Board of Directors believes that the availability of authorized but unissued common stock of United is of considerable value if opportunities should arise for the acquisition of other businesses through the issuance of United’s stock. Shareholders do not have preemptive rights, which allows United to issue additional authorized shares without first offering them to current shareholders.

Currently, United has only one voting class of stock issued and outstanding and all voting rights are vested in the holders of United’s common stock. On all matters subject to a vote of shareholders, the shareholders of United will be entitled to one vote for each share of common stock owned. Shareholders of United have cumulative voting rights with regard to election of directors.

On December 23, 2008, the shareholders of United authorized the issuance of preferred stock up to 50,000,000 shares with a par value of $1.00 per share. The authorized preferred stock may be issued by the Company’s Board of Directors in one or more series, from time to time, with each such series to consist of such number of shares and to have such voting powers, full or limited, or no voting powers, and such designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights, and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, as shall be stated in the resolution or resolutions providing for the issuance of such series adopted by the Board of Directors. Currently, no shares of preferred stock have been issued.

The authorization of preferred stock will not have an immediate effect on the holders of the Company’s common stock. The actual effect of the issuance of any shares of preferred stock upon the rights of the holders of common stock cannot be stated until the Board of Directors determines the specific rights of any shares of preferred stock. However, the effects might include, among other things, restricting dividends on common stock, diluting the voting power of common stock, reducing the market price of common stock or impairing the liquidation rights of the common stock without further action by the shareholders. Holders of the common stock will not have preemptive rights with respect to the preferred stock.

There are no preemptive or conversion rights or, redemption or sinking fund provisions with respect to United’s stock. All of the issued and outstanding shares of United’s stock are fully paid and non-assessable.

 

18


Table of Contents

Dividends

The shareholders of United are entitled to receive dividends when and as declared by its Board of Directors. Dividends have been paid quarterly. Dividends were $1.20 per share in 2010, $1.17 per share in 2009 and $1.16 per share in 2008. See “Market and Stock Prices of United” for quarterly dividend information.

The payment of dividends is subject to the restrictions set forth in the West Virginia Corporation Act and the limitations imposed by the Federal Reserve Board. Payment of dividends by United is dependent upon receipt of dividends from its Banking Subsidiaries. Payment of dividends by United’s state member Banking Subsidiaries is regulated by the Federal Reserve System and generally, the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board (FRB) is required if the total dividends declared by a state member bank in any calendar year exceeds its net profits, as defined, for that year combined with its retained net profits for the preceding two years. Additionally, prior approval of the FRB is required when a state member bank has deficit retained earnings but has sufficient current year’s net income, as defined, plus the retained net profits of the two preceding years. The FRB may prohibit dividends if it deems the payment to be an unsafe or unsound banking practice. The FRB has issued guidelines for dividend payments by state member banks emphasizing that proper dividend size depends on the bank’s earnings and capital. See Note S, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Market and Stock Prices of United

United Bankshares, Inc. stock is traded over the counter on the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations System, Global Select Market (NASDAQ) under the trading symbol UBSI. The closing sale price reported for United’s common stock on February 16, 2011, the last practicable date, was $28.35.

The high and low prices listed below are based upon information available to United’s management from NASDAQ listings. No attempt has been made by United’s management to ascertain the prices for every sale of its stock during the periods indicated. However, based on the information available, United’s management believes that the prices fairly represent the amounts at which United’s stock was traded during the periods reflected.

The following table presents the dividends and high and low prices of United’s common stock during the periods set forth below:

 

2011    Dividends   

High

    

Low

 

First Quarter through February 16, 2011

   ---        $  30.84         $  27.80   
2010         

Fourth Quarter

   $  0.30      $  30.25         $  24.15   

Third Quarter

   $  0.30      $  27.25         $  22.09   

Second Quarter

   $  0.30      $  31.99         $  23.82   

First Quarter

   $  0.30      $  28.00         $  20.15   
2009         

Fourth Quarter

   $  0.30      $  20.81         $  16.39   

Third Quarter

   $  0.29      $  23.56         $  16.68   

Second Quarter

   $  0.29      $  27.75         $  16.81   

First Quarter

   $  0.29      $  33.64         $  13.15   

 

19


Table of Contents

Stock Performance Graph

The following Stock Performance Graph and related information shall not be deemed “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each as amended, except to the extent that United specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing.

The following graph compares United’s cumulative total shareholder return (assuming reinvestment of dividends) on its common stock for the five-year period ending December 31, 2010, with the cumulative total return (assuming reinvestment of dividends) of the Standard and Poor’s Midcap 400 Index and with the NASDAQ Bank Index. The cumulative total shareholder return assumes a $100 investment on December 31, 2005 in the common stock of United and each index and the cumulative return is measured as of each subsequent fiscal year-end. There is no assurance that United’s common stock performance will continue in the future with the same or similar trends as depicted in the graph.

LOGO

 

     Period Ending  
     12/31/05      12/31/06      12/31/07      12/31/08      12/31/09      12/31/10  

United Bankshares, Inc.

     100.00         112.88         84.85         104.74         66.92         102.47   

NASDAQ Bank Index

     100.00         113.78         91.17         71.61         59.93         68.40   

S&P Mid-Cap Index

     100.00         110.30         119.09         75.96         104.29         132.04   

 

20


Table of Contents

Issuer Repurchases

The table below includes certain information regarding United’s purchase of its common shares during the three months ended December 31, 2010:

 

Period   

Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased

(1) (2)

     Average Price
Paid per Share
     Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced
Plans (3)
     Maximum
Number of
Shares that May
Yet be Purchased
Under the Plans
(3)
 

10/01 – 10/31/2010

     ---         ---         ---         322,200   

11/01 – 11/30/2010

     2,592       $   26.49         ---         322,200   

12/01 – 12/31/2010

     1,365       $   29.80         ---         322,200   
              

Total

     3,957       $   27.63         
              

 

  (1)

Includes shares exchanged in connection with the exercise of stock options under United’s stock option plans. Shares are purchased pursuant to the terms of the applicable stock option plan and not pursuant to a publicly announced stock repurchase plan. For the quarter ended December 31, 2010, the following shares were exchanged by participants in United’s stock option plans: November 2010 – 2,422 shares at an average price of $26.58 and December 2010 – 1,365 shares at an average price of $29.80.

 

  (2)

Includes shares purchased in open market transactions by United for a rabbi trust to provide payment of benefits under a deferred compensation plan for certain key officers of United and its subsidiaries. For the quarter ended December 31, 2010, the following shares were purchased for the deferred compensation plan: November 2010 –170 shares at an average price of $25.12.

 

  (3)

In May of 2006, United’s Board of Directors approved a repurchase plan to repurchase up to 1,700,000 shares of United’s common stock on the open market (the 2006 Plan). The timing, price and quantity of purchases under the plans are at the discretion of management and the plan may be discontinued, suspended or restarted at any time depending on the facts and circumstances.

 

21


Table of Contents
Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following consolidated selected financial data is derived from United’s audited financial statements as of and for the five years ended December 31, 2010. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes contained elsewhere in this report.

 

     Five Year Summary  
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)    2010      2009      2008      2007      2006  

Summary of Operations:

              

Total interest income

         $     323,382             $     365,845             $     429,911             $     438,729             $     400,683   

Total interest expense

     85,196         120,374         177,119         213,310         181,090   

Net interest income

     238,186         245,471         252,792         225,419         219,593   

Provision for loan losses

     13,773         46,065         25,155         5,330         1,437   

Other income

     62,203         53,970         67,303         57,749         49,033   

Other expense

     182,212         175,127         171,073         147,929         137,173   

Income taxes

     32,457         10,951         36,913         39,235         40,767   

Net income

     71,947         67,298         86,954         90,674         89,249   

Cash dividends

     52,300         50,837         50,231         47,446         45,219   

Per common share:

              

Net income:

              

Basic

     1.65         1.55         2.01         2.16         2.15   

Diluted

     1.65         1.55         2.00         2.15         2.13   

Cash dividends

     1.20         1.17         1.16         1.13         1.09   

Book value per share

     18.18         17.53         16.97         17.61         15.44   

Selected Ratios:

              

Return on average shareholders’ equity

     9.19%         8.81%         11.12%         12.99%         13.90%   

Return on average assets

     0.95%         0.85%         1.09%         1.28%         1.34%   

Dividend payout ratio

     72.69%         75.54%         57.77%         52.33%         50.67%   

Selected Balance Sheet Data:

              

Average assets

         $  7,533,974             $  7,925,506             $  8,007,068             $  7,100,885             $  6,641,224   

Investment securities

     794,715         966,920         1,291,822         1,394,764         1,275,470   

Loans held for sale

     6,869         5,284         868         1,270         2,041   

Total loans

     5,260,326         5,736,809         6,014,155         5,793,484         4,806,747   

Total assets

     7,155,719         7,805,101         8,102,091         7,994,739         6,717,598   

Total deposits

     5,713,534         5,971,100         5,647,954         5,349,750         4,828,192   

Long-term borrowings

     386,458         771,935         852,685         774,162         499,200   

Total liabilities

     6,362,707         7,043,551         7,365,379         7,233,540         6,083,506   

Shareholders’ equity

     793,012         761,550         736,712         761,199         634,092   

 

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Congress passed the Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995 to encourage corporations to provide investors with information about the company’s anticipated future financial performance, goals, and strategies. The act provides a safe haven for such disclosure; in other words, protection from unwarranted litigation if actual results are not the same as management expectations.

United desires to provide its shareholders with sound information about past performance and future trends. Consequently, any forward-looking statements contained in this report, in a report incorporated by reference to this report, or made by management of United in this report, in any other reports and filings, in press releases and in oral statements, involve numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those contained in or implied by

 

22


Table of Contents

United’s statements for a variety of factors including, but not limited to: changes in economic conditions; business conditions in the banking industry; movements in interest rates; competitive pressures on product pricing and services; success and timing of business strategies; the nature and extent of governmental actions and reforms; and rapidly changing technology and evolving banking industry standards.

INTRODUCTION

The following discussion and analysis presents the significant changes in financial condition and the results of operations of United and its subsidiaries for the periods indicated below. This discussion and the consolidated financial statements and the notes to consolidated financial statements include the accounts of United Bankshares, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated. Management has evaluated all significant events and transactions that occurred after December 31, 2010, but prior to the date these financial statements were issued, for potential recognition or disclosure required in these financial statements.

This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes thereto, which are included elsewhere in this document.

PENDING ACQUISITION

After the close of business on December 15, 2010, United entered into an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the Agreement) with Centra Financial Holdings, Inc. (Centra), a West Virginia corporation headquartered in Morgantown, West Virginia. The acquisition of Centra will afford United the opportunity to enhance its existing footprint in Maryland and West Virginia, as well as provide an entry into Pennsylvania. Centra has $1.4 billion in assets and 15 offices and one loan origination office. Centra’s locations are in and surrounding the four strategic markets of Hagerstown, Maryland; Martinsburg, West Virginia; Morgantown, West Virginia; and Uniontown, Pennsylvania. In accordance with the Agreement, Centra will merge with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of United (the Merger). At which time, Centra will cease and the wholly-owned subsidiary of United will survive and continue to exist as a West Virginia corporation.

The estimated aggregate consideration of the transaction is approximately $197.7 million based on Centra’s 8.5 million common shares outstanding, Centra’s 1.2 million options outstanding and United’s stock price of $29.20 per share as of December 31, 2010. The announced price represents 18.1 times Centra’s 2011 earnings estimate and 1.4 times book value. Please refer to Note B of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on this acquisition.

APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The accounting and reporting policies of United conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is required to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions and judgments, which are reviewed with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates. These policies, along with the disclosures presented in the financial statement notes and in this financial review, provide information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the financial statements and how those values are determined. Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to the methods, assumptions, and estimates underlying those amounts, management has identified the determination of the allowance for credit losses, the valuation of investment securities and the related other-than-temporary impairment analysis, and the calculation of the income tax provision to be the accounting areas that require the most subjective or complex judgments, and as such could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available. The most significant accounting policies followed by United are presented in Note A, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The allowance for credit losses represents management’s estimate of the probable credit losses inherent in the lending portfolio. Determining the allowance for credit losses requires management to make forecasts of losses that are highly uncertain and require a high degree of judgment. At December 31, 2010, the allowance for loan losses was $73.0 million and is subject to periodic adjustment based on management’s assessment of current probable losses in the loan portfolio. Such

 

23


Table of Contents

adjustment from period to period can have a significant impact on United’s consolidated financial statements. To illustrate the potential effect on the financial statements of our estimates of the allowance for loan losses, a 10% increase in the allowance for loan losses would have required $7.3 million in additional allowance (funded by additional provision for credit losses), which would have negatively impacted the year of 2010 net income by approximately $4.7 million, or $0.11 diluted per common share. Management’s evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses and the appropriate provision for credit losses is based upon a quarterly evaluation of the loan portfolio and lending related commitments. This evaluation is inherently subjective and requires significant estimates, including estimates related to the amounts and timing of future cash flows, value of collateral, losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and consideration of current economic trends, all of which are susceptible to constant and significant change. The allowance allocated to specific credits and loan pools grouped by similar risk characteristics is reviewed on a quarterly basis and adjusted as necessary based upon subsequent changes in circumstances. In determining the components of the allowance for credit losses, management considers the risk arising in part from, but not limited to, charge-off and delinquency trends, current economic and business conditions, lending policies and procedures, the size and risk characteristics of the loan portfolio, concentrations of credit, and other various factors. The methodology used to determine the allowance for credit losses is described in Note A, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. A discussion of the factors leading to changes in the amount of the allowance for credit losses is included in the Provision for Credit Losses section of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A). For a discussion of concentrations of credit risk, see Item 1, under the caption of Loan Concentrations in this Form 10-K.

Accounting estimates are used in the presentation of the investment portfolio and these estimates impact the presentation of United’s financial condition and results of operations. United classifies its investments in debt and equity securities as either held to maturity or available for sale. Securities held to maturity are accounted for using historical costs, adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Securities available for sale are accounted for at fair value, with the net unrealized gains and losses, net of income tax effects, presented as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. When available, fair values of securities are based on quoted prices or prices obtained from third party vendors. Third party vendors compile prices from various sources and may determine the fair value of identical or similar securities by using pricing models that consider observable market data. Prices obtained from third party vendors that do not reflect forced liquidation or distressed sales are not adjusted by management. Where prices reflect forced liquidation or distressed sales, as is the case with United’s portfolio of pooled trust preferred securities, management estimates fair value based on a discounted cash flow methodology using appropriately adjusted discount rates reflecting nonperformance and liquidity risks. Due to the subjective nature of this valuation process, it is possible that the actual fair values of these securities could differ from the estimated amounts, thereby affecting United’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The potential impact to United’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows for changes in the valuation process cannot be reasonably estimated.

If the estimated value of investments is less than the cost or amortized cost, the investment is considered impaired and management evaluates whether an event or change in circumstances has occurred that may have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investment. If such an event or change has occurred, management must exercise judgment to determine the nature of the potential impairment (i.e., temporary or other-than-temporary) in order to apply the appropriate accounting treatment. If United intends to sell, or is more likely than not will be required to sell an impaired debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current period credit loss, other-than-temporary impairment is recognized in earnings. The amount recognized in earnings is equal to the entire difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. If United does not intend to sell, and is not more likely than not they will be required to sell the impaired debt security prior to recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss, the other-than-temporary impairment is separated into the following: 1) the amount representing the credit loss, which is recognized in earnings, and 2) the amount related to all other factors, which is recognized in other comprehensive income. Given the recent disruptions in the financial markets, the decision to recognize other-than-temporary impairment on investment securities has become more difficult as complete information is not always available and market conditions and other relevant factors are subject to rapid changes. Therefore, the other-than-temporary impairment assessment has become a critical accounting policy for United. For additional information on management’s consideration of investment valuation and other-than-temporary impairment, see Note C and Note T, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

United’s calculation of income tax provision is inherently complex due to the various different tax laws and jurisdictions in which we operate and requires management’s use of estimates and judgments in its determination. The current income tax

 

24


Table of Contents

liability also includes income tax expense related to our uncertain tax positions as required in ASC topic 740, “Income Taxes.” Changes to the estimated accrued taxes can occur due to changes in tax rates, implementation of new business strategies, resolution of issues with taxing authorities and recently enacted statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance. These changes can be material to the Company’s operating results for any particular reporting period. The analysis of the income tax provision requires the assessments of the relative risks and merits of the appropriate tax treatment of transactions, filing positions, filing methods and taxable income calculations after considering statutes, regulations, judicial precedent and other information. United strives to keep abreast of changes in the tax laws and the issuance of regulations which may impact tax reporting and provisions for income tax expense. United is also subject to audit by federal and state authorities. Because the application of tax laws is subject to varying interpretations, results of these audits may produce indicated liabilities which differ from United’s estimates and provisions. United continually evaluates its exposure to possible tax assessments arising from audits and records its estimate of probable exposure based on current facts and circumstances. The potential impact to United’s operating results for any of the changes cannot be reasonably estimated. See Note L, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding United’s ASC topic 740 disclosures.

Any material effect on the financial statements related to these critical accounting areas is further discussed in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

USE OF FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

United determines the fair value of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy established in ASC topic 820, whereby the fair value of certain assets and liabilities is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. ASC topic 820 establishes a three-level hierarchy for disclosure of assets and liabilities recorded at fair value. The classification of assets and liabilities within the hierarchy is based on whether the inputs in the methodology for determining fair value are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market-based information obtained from independent sources (Level 1 or Level 2), while unobservable inputs reflect management’s estimate of market data (Level 3). For assets and liabilities that are actively traded and have quoted prices or observable market data, a minimal amount of subjectivity concerning fair value is needed. Prices and values obtained from third party vendors that do not reflect forced liquidation or distressed sales are not adjusted by management. When quoted prices or observable market data are not available, management’s judgment is necessary to estimate fair value.

At December 31, 2010, approximately 10.18% of total assets, or $728.13 million, consisted of financial instruments recorded at fair value. Of this total, approximately 90.67% or $660.18 million of these financial instruments used valuation methodologies involving observable market data, collectively Level 1 and Level 2 measurements, to determine fair value. Approximately 9.33% or $67.95 million of these financial instruments were valued using unobservable market information or Level 3 measurements. Most of these financial instruments valued using unobservable market information were pooled trust preferred investment securities classified as available-for-sale. At December 31, 2010, only $5.94 million or less than 1% of total liabilities were recorded at fair value. This entire amount was valued using methodologies involving observable market data. United does not believe that any changes in the unobservable inputs used to value the financial instruments mentioned above would have a material impact on United’s results of operations, liquidity, or capital resources. See Note T for additional information regarding ASC topic 820 and its impact on United’s financial statements.

2010 COMPARED TO 2009

FINANCIAL CONDITION SUMMARY

United’s total assets as of December 31, 2010 were $7.16 billion which was a decline of $649.38 million or 8.32% from December 31, 2009. The decrease was primarily the result of decreases in investment securities and portfolio loans of $172.21 million or 17.81% and $476.48 million or 8.31%, respectively. Partially offsetting these decreases to total assets was an $11.62 million increase in cash and cash equivalents. The decrease in total assets is reflected in a corresponding decrease in total liabilities of $680.84 million or 9.67% from year-end 2009. The decrease in total liabilities was due mainly to reductions of $257.57 million or 4.31% in deposits and $415.21 million or 41.73% in borrowings while accrued expenses and other liabilities decreased $7.92 million or 10.50%. Shareholders’ equity increased $31.46 million or 4.13% from year-end 2009.

 

25


Table of Contents

The following discussion explains in more detail the changes in financial condition by major category.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2010 increased $11.62 million or 2.58% from year-end 2009 as United placed its excess cash in an interest-bearing account with the Federal Reserve. Of this total increase, interest-bearing deposits with other banks increased $30.87 million due mainly to the cash placed at the Federal Reserve while cash and due from banks decreased $19.25 million or 14.30% and federal funds sold were flat. During the year of 2010, net cash of $100.83 million and $631.92 million was provided by operating activities and investing activities, respectively. Net cash of $721.13 million was used in financing activities. Further details related to changes in cash and cash equivalents are presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Securities

Total investment securities decreased $172.21 million or 17.81% from year-end 2009. Securities available for sale declined $158.50 million or 19.53%. This change in securities available for sale reflects $1.39 billion in sales, maturities and calls of securities, $1.24 billion in purchases, and an increase of $32.92 million in fair value. Securities held to maturity decreased $10.39 million or 13.41% from year-end 2009 due to calls and maturities of securities. Other investment securities declined $3.32 million or 4.27% from year-end 2009 due to the redemption of $3.48 million of FHLB stock and an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $1.29 million on an investment security during the fourth quarter of 2010.

The following is a summary of available for sale securities at December 31:

 

     2010      2009      2008  
     (In thousands)  

U.S. Treasury and other U.S. Government agencies and corporations

         $  103,851             $      4,960             $       10,704   

States and political subdivisions

     81,801         96,900         112,720   

Mortgage-backed securities

     386,125         624,396         883,361   

Marketable equity securities

     5,794         5,277         5,070   

Corporate securities

     140,226         148,009         153,261   
                          

TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR SALE SECURITIES, at amortized cost

     $  717,797         $  879,542         $  1,165,116   
                          

TOTAL AVAILABLE FOR SALE SECURITIES, at fair value

     $  653,276         $  811,777         $  1,097,043   
                          

The following is a summary of held to maturity securities at December 31:

 

     2010      2009      2008  
     (In thousands)  

U.S. Treasury and other U.S. Government agencies and corporations

         $  11,200             $  11,331             $    11,455   

States and political subdivisions

     20,288         25,904         34,495   

Mortgage-backed securities

     94         110         135   

Corporate securities

     35,454         40,076         70,322   
                          

TOTAL HELD TO MATURITY SECURITIES, at amortized cost

     $  67,036         $  77,421         $  116,407   
                          

TOTAL HELD TO MATURITY SECURITIES, at fair value

     $  62,315         $  70,535         $  103,505   
                          

Gross unrealized losses on investment securities were $91.04 million at December 31, 2010. Securities in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or more at December 31, 2010 consisted primarily of mortgage-backed and corporate securities. The unrealized loss on mortgage-backed securities portfolio relates primarily to AAA securities of various private label issuers. The unrealized loss on corporate securities was mainly related to single issue trust preferred securities and trust preferred collateralized debt obligations.

As of December 31, 2010, United’s mortgage-backed securities had an amortized cost of $386.22 million, with an estimated fair value of $397.60 million. The portfolio consisted primarily of $308.69 million in agency residential mortgage-backed securities with a fair value of $323.84 million and $77.53 million in non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities with

 

26


Table of Contents

an estimated fair value of $73.76 million.

As of December 31, 2010, United’s corporate securities had an amortized cost of $175.68 million, with an estimated fair value of $90.00 million. The portfolio consisted primarily of $124.63 million in pooled trust preferred securities with a fair value of $49.91 million and $47.72 million in single issue trust preferred securities with an estimated fair value of $36.76 million. In addition to the trust preferred securities, the Company held positions in various other corporate securities with an amortized cost and fair value of $3.33 million, none of which were individually significant.

The pooled trust preferred securities consisted of positions in 24 different securities. The underlying issuers in the pools were primarily financial institutions and to a lesser extent, insurance companies. The Company has no exposure to Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) in its investment portfolio. The Company owns both senior and mezzanine tranches in pooled trust preferred securities; however, the Company does not own any income notes. The senior and mezzanine tranches of trust preferred collateralized debt obligations generally have some protection from defaults in the form of over-collateralization and excess spread revenues, along with waterfall structures that redirect cash flows in the event certain coverage test requirements are failed. Generally, senior tranches have the greatest protection, with mezzanine tranches subordinated to the senior tranches, and income notes subordinated to the mezzanine tranches. Senior tranches represent $23.62 million of the Company’s pooled securities, while mezzanine tranches represent $101.47 million. Of the $101.47 million in mezzanine tranches, $18.13 million are now in the Senior position as the Senior notes have been paid to a zero balance. As of December 31, 2010, $10.00 million of the pooled trust preferred securities were investment grade, $5.00 million were split-rated, and the remaining $110.09 million were below investment grade. In terms of capital adequacy, the Company allocates additional risk-based capital to the below investment grade securities.

Of the $47.72 million in single issue trust preferred securities at December 31, 2010, $23.64 million or 49.54% were investment grade; $13.04 million or 27.32% were unrated; $4.45 million or 9.33% were split rated; and $6.59 million or 13.81% were below investment grade. The three largest exposures accounted for 52.45% of the $47.72 million. These included Wells Fargo at $10.28 million, SunTrust Bank at $7.50 million and Peoples Bancorp, Inc. at $7.25 million. All single-issue trust preferred securities are currently receiving full scheduled principal and interest payments.

Management recognized net other-than-temporary impairment charges totaling $7.32 million on pooled trust preferred securities during 2010. Other than these securities, management does not believe that any other individual security with an unrealized loss as of December 31, 2010 is other-than-temporarily impaired. United believes the decline in value resulted from changes in market interest rates, credit spreads and liquidity, not an adverse change in the expected contractual cash flows. Based on a review of each of the securities in the investment portfolio, management concluded that it was not probable that it would be unable to realize the cost basis investment and appropriate interest payments on such securities. United has the intent and the ability to hold these securities until such time as the value recovers or the securities mature. However, United acknowledges that any impaired securities may be sold in future periods in response to significant, unanticipated changes in asset/liability management decisions, unanticipated future market movements or business plan changes.

More information relating to investment securities is presented in Note C, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Loans

Loans held for sale increased $1.59 million as loan originations exceeded loan sales in the secondary market during the year of 2010. Portfolio loans, net of unearned income, decreased $476.48 million or 8.31% from year-end 2009 due to a decline in each major loan category as loan demand was soft during 2010 due to poor economic conditions. Commercial, financial and agricultural loans declined $165.61 million or 5.51%. Within the commercial, financial and agricultural loans category, commercial real estate loans and commercial loans (not secured by real estate) decreased $95.64 million or 5.05% and $69.96 million or 6.31%, respectively. Residential real estate loans and construction loans declined $159.06 million or 8.55% and $88.67 million or 15.84%, respectively. Consumer loans decreased $64.09 million or 20.13%.

 

27


Table of Contents

A summary of loans outstanding is as follows:

 

     December 31  
     2010      2009      2008      2007      2006  

Commercial, financial & agricultural

         $  2,837,692             $  3,003,298             $  3,167,458             $  2,957,497             $  2,220,004   

Residential real estate

     1,700,380         1,859,439         1,915,355         1,882,498         1,720,794   

Construction & land development

     470,934         559,602         601,995         601,323         523,042   

Consumer

     254,345         318,439         335,750         359,243         349,868   

Less: Unearned interest

     (3,025)         (3,969)         (6,403)         (7,077)         (6,961)   
                                            

Total loans

     5,260,326         5,736,809         6,014,155         5,793,484         4,806,747   

Allowance for loan losses

     (73,033)         (67,853)         (61,494)         (50,456)         (43,629)   
                                            

TOTAL LOANS, NET

     $  5,187,293         $  5,668,956         $  5,952,661         $  5,743,028         $  4,763,118   
                                            

Loans held for sale

     $         6,869         $         5,284         $            868         $         1,270         $         2,041   
                                            

The following table shows the maturity of commercial, financial, and agricultural loans and real estate construction and land development loans as of December 31, 2010:

 

(In thousands)    Less Than
One Year
     One To
Five Years
     Over
Five Years
     Total  

Commercial, financial & agricultural

         $  746,014             $  1,106,552             $     985,126             $  2,837,692   

Construction & land development

     245,769         147,168         77,997         470,934   
                                   

Total

     $  991,783         $  1,253,720         $  1,063,123         $  3,308,626   
                                   

At December 31, 2010, commercial, financial and agricultural loans and real estate construction and land development loans by maturity are as follows:

 

(In thousands)    Less Than
One Year
     One to
Five Years
     Over
Five Years
     Total  

Outstanding with fixed interest rates

         $  646,185             $     951,503             $     635,765             $  2,233,453   

Outstanding with adjustable rates

     345,598         302,217         427,358         1,075,173   
                                   
     $  991,783         $  1,253,720         $  1,063,123         $  3,308,626   
                                   

More information relating to loans is presented in Note D, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other Assets

Other assets were relatively flat from year-end 2009, decreasing $2.67 million or less than 1% due mainly to decreases of $9.90 million in deferred tax assets, $8.43 million in prepaid FDIC assessments due to the reduction of the three-year prepayment of premiums made at the end of 2009, $1.88 million in core deposit intangibles due to amortization, and $1.70 million in income taxes receivable. The decrease in income taxes receivable for the year of 2010 was due to a tax benefit in 2009 associated with net operating loss carryforwards and a positive adjustment to income taxes as a result of a concluded state tax examination. Virtually offsetting these decreases from year-end 2009 were increases of $8.58 million in the pension asset due to a $9.10 million contribution in the third quarter of 2010, $5.84 million in the cash surrender values of bank-owned life insurance policies, $4.71 million in OREO due to increased foreclosures as a result of the current economic conditions, and derivatives assets of $587 thousand due to a change in fair value.

Deposits

Deposits represent United’s primary source of funding. Total deposits at December 31, 2010 decreased $257.57 million or 4.31% from year-end 2009. In terms of composition, noninterest-bearing deposits increased $95.10 million or 8.58% while interest-bearing deposits decreased $352.66 million or 7.25% from December 31, 2009.

 

28


Table of Contents

The increase in noninterest-bearing deposits was due mainly to increases in commercial noninterest-bearing deposits of $100.93 million or 12.86% and personal noninterest-bearing deposits of $12.55 million or 4.61%. Official checks and noninterest-bearing public funds declined $11.47 million or 26.77% and $10.52 million or 44.42%, respectively.

The decrease in interest-bearing deposits was due mainly to a decrease in time deposits over $100,000 of $335.93 million or 25.33%. Within time deposits over $100,000, Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (CDARS) balances declined $178.61 million, fixed rate certificate of deposits (CDs) declined $76.42 million, brokered deposits decreased $60.84 million and variable rate CDs decreased $19.17 million. Time deposits under $100,000 decreased $255.80 million or 18.15%. Within time deposits under $100,000, fixed rate certificate of deposits (CDs) declined $114.92 million, CDARS balances declined $85.47 million and variable rate CDs decreased $57.70 million. Interest-bearing money market accounts (MMDAs) increased $167.22 million or 10.99%. In addition, regular savings balances increased $39.35 million or 11.28% and interest-bearing checking deposits increased $32.50 million or 12.61%.

The table below summarizes the changes by deposit category since year-end 2009:

 

     December 31
2010
     December 31
2009
     $ Change        % Change    

(Dollars in thousands)

           

Demand deposits

         $     657,395             $     575,501             $       81,894         14.23%   

Interest-bearing checking

     290,153         257,654         32,499         12.61%   

Regular savings

     388,332         348,982         39,350         11.28%   

Money market accounts

     2,234,252         2,053,829         180,423         8.78%   

Time deposits under $100,000

     1,153,337         1,409,137         (255,800)         (18.15%)   

Time deposits over $100,000

     990,065         1,325,997         (335,932)         (25.33%)   
                                   

Total deposits

     $  5,713,534         $  5,971,100         $  (257,566)         (4.31%)   
                                   

At December 31, 2010, the scheduled maturities of time deposits are as follows:

 

Year

   Amount  
(In thousands)   

2011

         $  1,415,148   

2012

     355,489   

2013

     152,273   

2014

     107,317   

2015 and thereafter

     113,175   
        

TOTAL

     $  2,143,402   
        

Maturities of time certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more outstanding at December 31, 2010 are summarized as follows:

 

(In thousands)    Amount  

3 months or less

         $  430,936   

Over 3 through 6 months

     98,208   

Over 6 through 12 months

     188,501   

Over 12 months

     272,420   
        

TOTAL

     $  990,065   
        

 

29


Table of Contents

The average daily amount of deposits and rates paid on such deposits is summarized for the years ended December 31:

 

     2010      2009      2008  
     Amount      Interest
Expense
     Rate      Amount      Interest
Expense
     Rate      Amount      Interest
Expense
     Rate  
                          
     (Dollars in thousands)  

Demand deposits

       $     320,915         ---           ---           $     275,331         ---           ---           $     210,244         ---           ---     
NOW and money market deposits      2,675,969         $  11,365         0.42%         2,346,354         $    8,980         0.38%         2,203,701         $    17,571         0.80%   

Savings deposits

     380,081         332         0.09%         346,887         300         0.09%         334,564         638         0.19%   

Time deposits

     2,349,119         43,966         1.87%         2,829,599         74,183         2.62%         2,688,521         105,826         3.94%   
                                   

TOTAL

     $  5,726,084         $  55,663         0.97%         $  5,798,171         $  83,463         1.44%         $  5,437,030         $  124,035         2.28%   
                                                              

More information relating to deposits is presented in Note I, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Borrowings

Total borrowings decreased $415.21 million or 41.73% during the year of 2010. Since year-end 2009, short-term borrowings decreased $29.73 million or 13.34% due mainly to a $28.56 million decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase. Long-term borrowings decreased $385.48 million or 49.94% since year-end 2009 due to the repayment of FHLB advances from excess cash.

The table below summarizes the changes by borrowing category since year-end 2009:

 

     December 31      Amount
Change
     Percentage
Change
 
     2010      2009        

(Dollars in thousands)

           

Federal funds purchased

         $      8,542             $      7,835             $           707         9.02%   

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

     183,097         211,659         (28,562)         (13.49%)   

TT&L note option

     1,575         3,450         (1,875)         (54.35%)   

Long-term FHLB advances

     202,181         587,213         (385,032)         (65.57%)   

Issuances of trust preferred capital securities

     184,277         184,722         (445)         (0.24%)   
                                   

Total borrowings

     $  579,672         $  994,879         $  (415,207)         (41.73%)   
                                   

For a further discussion of borrowings see Notes J and K, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other liabilities at December 31, 2010 decreased $7.92 million or 10.50% from year-end 2009 mainly as a result of decreases of $6.91 million in derivative liabilities due to a change in fair value and $4.16 million in interest payable due to a decline in borrowings and certificate of deposits. Partially offsetting these decreases were increases in income taxes payable of $2.53 million and accrued employee expenses of $2.32 million.

Shareholders’ Equity

Shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2010 increased $31.46 million or 4.13% from December 31, 2009 as United continued to balance capital adequacy and the return to shareholders. The increase in shareholders’ equity was due mainly to increases in retained earnings and accumulated other comprehensive income.

Retained earnings increased due to earnings net of dividends declared which equaled $19.65 million for the year of 2010.

 

30


Table of Contents

Accumulated other comprehensive income increased $7.73 million due mainly to an increase of $21.40 million, net of deferred taxes in United’s available for sale investment portfolio. In addition, the change in fair value and the termination of United’s cash flow hedge resulted in increases of $3.67 million and $1.33 million, net of deferred taxes, respectively. The after-tax noncredit portion of OTTI losses for the year of 2010 were $19.29 million. The accretion of pension costs for the year of 2010 were $1.31 million, net of deferred taxes while the after-tax adjustment to United’s pension asset resulted in a decline of $783 thousand.

EARNINGS SUMMARY

Net income for the year 2010 was $71.95 million or $1.65 per diluted share compared to $67.30 million or $1.55 per diluted share for the year of 2009.

United’s return on average assets for the year of 2010 was 0.95% and return on average shareholders’ equity was 9.19% as compared to 0.85% and 8.81% for the year of 2009. United’s most recently reported Federal Reserve peer group banking companies’ (bank holding companies with total assets between $3 and $10 billion) average return on assets was 0.39% and average return on equity was 2.48% for the first nine months of 2010.

During the fourth quarter of 2010, United recovered funds from its insurance carrier in the amount of $15.00 million related to claims it made under its insurance policies for losses United incurred as a result of fraudulent loans previously charged-off in 2009. The $15.00 million of insurance proceeds were recorded as a recovery within United’s allowance for loan losses which resulted in provision for credit losses expense of $13.77 million for the year of 2010. Also, the results for the year of 2010 included noncash, before-tax, other-than-temporary impairment charges of $9.82 million on certain investment securities. The results for the year of 2010 included before-tax, net gains of $2.01 million on the sale of investment securities.

Results for the year of 2009 included noncash before-tax other-than-temporary impairment charges of $15.02 million on certain investment securities, a credit loss provision of $17.55 million for three loans with fraudulent collateral made to three affiliated companies of a commercial customer and an additional expense of $3.63 million for a special FDIC assessment. Results for the year of 2009 also included an income tax benefit of $11.51 million associated with net operating loss carryforwards.

Net interest income for the year of 2010 was $238.19 million, a decrease of $7.29 million or 2.97% from the prior year. The provision for credit losses was $13.77 million for the year 2010 as compared to $46.07 million for the year of 2009.

Noninterest income was $62.20 million for the year of 2010, up $8.23 million or 15.25% when compared to the year of 2009. Included in noninterest income for the year of 2010 and 2009 were the previously mentioned noncash before-tax other-than-temporary impairment charges of $9.82 million and $15.02 million, respectively. Noninterest expense was $182.21 million, an increase of $7.09 million or 4.05% for the year of 2010 when compared to 2009.

Income tax expense for the year of 2010 was $32.46 million as compared to $10.95 million for the year of 2009. During the third quarter of 2010, United reduced its income tax reserve by $430 thousand due to the expiration of the statue of limitations for examinations of certain years. During the third quarter of 2009, United reduced its income tax reserve by $568 thousand due to the expiration of the statue of limitations for examinations of certain years. During the first quarter of 2009, United recorded a benefit associated with net operating loss carryforwards and a positive adjustment to income tax expense as a result of a concluded tax examination. The total income tax benefit recorded in the first quarter of 2009 related to these two events was $11.51 million. As a result of these tax adjustments, United’s effective tax rate was approximately 31.1% and 14.0% for years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, as compared to 29.8% for 2008.

The following discussion explains in more detail the results of operations by major category.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income represents the primary component of United’s earnings. It is the difference between interest income from earning assets and interest expense incurred to fund these assets. Net interest income is impacted by changes in the volume

 

31


Table of Contents

and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as well as changes in market interest rates. Such changes, and their impact on net interest income in 2010 and 2009, are presented below.

Net interest income for the year of 2010 was $238.19 million, a decrease of $7.29 million or 2.97% from the year of 2009. The $7.29 million decrease in net interest income occurred because total interest income declined $42.46 million while total interest expense only declined $35.18 million from the year of 2009. For the purpose of this remaining discussion, net interest income is presented on a tax-equivalent basis to provide a comparison among all types of interest earning assets. The tax-equivalent basis adjusts for the tax-favored status of income from certain loans and investments. Although this is a non-GAAP measure, United’s management believes this measure is more widely used within the financial services industry and provides better comparability of net interest income arising from taxable and tax-exempt sources. United uses this measure to monitor net interest income performance and to manage its balance sheet composition.

Tax-equivalent net interest income for the year of 2010 was $244.09 million, a decrease of $12.58 million or 4.90% from the year of 2009. The net interest margin for the year of 2010 was 3.64%, up 5 basis points from a net interest margin of 3.59% during the same period last year.

Tax-equivalent interest income for the year of 2010 was $329.29 million, a $47.76 million or 12.67% decrease from the year of 2009. This decrease was primarily attributable to a decline in average earning assets of $448.75 million or 6.27% for the year of 2010. Average net loans declined $423.12 million or 7.26% for the year of 2010 while average investments decreased $259.22 million or 22.39% due mainly to maturities and calls of securities which were not fully reinvested from the year of 2009. Average short-term investments increased $233.59 million as a result of United placing its excess cash in an interest-bearing account with the Federal Reserve. The average yield on earning assets declined 36 basis points for the year of 2010 as compared to the year of 2009.

Interest expense for the year of 2010 was $85.20 million, a decrease of $35.18 million or 29.22% from the year of 2009. The decrease in interest expense for the year of 2010 was mainly due to a decrease of 45 basis points in the cost of funds from the year of 2009 as a result of lower market interest rates during 2010. The average cost of interest-bearing deposits was 1.21% for the year of 2010, down 54 basis points from 1.75% for the year of 2009 while the average cost of short-term borrowings was 0.06% for the year of 2010, a decrease of 8 basis points from 0.14% for the year of 2009. The average cost of long-term borrowings was 4.30% for the year of 2010, an increase of 6 basis points from 4.24% for the year of 2009. Average interest-bearing deposits decreased $178.79 million or 3.74% while average short-term borrowings decreased $158.26 million or 35.41%. Average long-term borrowings decreased $171.93 million or 20.12% as United repaid $385.03 million of FHLB advances from excess cash during 2010.

The following table reconciles the difference between net interest income and tax-equivalent net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008.

 

     Year Ended  
(Dollars in thousands)    December 31
2010
     December 31
2009
     December 31
2008
 

Net interest income, GAAP basis

     $ 238,186         $ 245,471         $ 252,792   

Tax-equivalent adjustment (1)

     5,906         11,199         14,229   
                          

Tax-equivalent net interest income

     $ 244,092         $ 256,670         $ 267,021   
                          

 

  (1) The tax-equivalent adjustment combines amounts of interest income on federally nontaxable loans and investment securities using the statutory federal income tax rate of 35% and interest income on state nontaxable loans and investment securities using the statutory state income tax rate of 8.75% for 2009 and 2008. For the year of 2010, all interest income on loans and investment securities was subject to state income taxes.

 

32


Table of Contents

The following table shows the consolidated daily average balance of major categories of assets and liabilities for each of the three years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 with the consolidated interest and rate earned or paid on such amount. The interest income and yields on federally nontaxable loans and investment securities are presented on a tax-equivalent basis using the statutory federal income tax rate of 35%. For the year of 2010, interest income on all loans and investment securities was subject to state income taxes. For the year of 2009 and 2008, the interest income and yield on state nontaxable loans and investment securities are presented on a tax-equivalent basis using the statutory state income tax rate of 8.75%.

 

     Year Ended
December 31, 2010
     Year Ended
December 31, 2009
     Year Ended
December 31, 2008
 
(Dollars in thousands)    Average
Balance
    Interest
(1)
     Avg.
Rate
(1)
     Average
Balance
    Interest
(1) (2)
     Avg.
Rate
(1) (2)
     Average
Balance
    Interest
(1) (2)
     Avg.
Rate

(1)  (2)
 

ASSETS

                       

Earning Assets:

                       

Federal funds sold, securities repurchased under agreements to resell & other short-term investments

   $ 407,908      $ 1,267         0.31%       $ 174,319      $ 309         0.18%       $ 36,752      $ 714         1.94%   

Investment Securities:

                       

Taxable

     791,600        34,564         4.37%         989,176        46,834         4.73%         1,168,192        59,652         5.11%   

Tax-exempt

     106,981        7,257         6.78%         168,623        12,020         7.13%         209,386        15,503         7.40%   
                          

Total Securities

     898,581        41,821         4.65%         1,157,799        58,854         5.08%         1,377,578        75,155         5.46%   

Loans, net of unearned Income (3)

     5,471,297        286,200         5.23%         5,888,900        317,881         5.40%         5,865,609        368,271         6.28%   

Allowance for loan losses

     (69,643           (64,128           (55,476     
                                         

Net loans

     5,401,654           5.30%         5,824,772           5.46%         5,810,133           6.34%   
                          

Total earning assets

     6,708,143      $ 329,288         4.91%         7,156,890      $ 377,044         5.27%         7,224,463      $ 444,140         6.15%   
                                         

Other assets

     825,831              768,616              782,605        
                                         

TOTAL ASSETS

   $ 7,533,974            $ 7,925,506            $ 8,007,068        
                                         

LIABILITIES

                       

Interest-Bearing Funds:

                       

Interest-bearing deposits

   $ 4,597,335      $ 55,663         1.21%       $ 4,776,120      $ 83,463         1.75%       $ 4,569,583      $ 124,035         2.71%   

Short-term borrowings

     288,704        167         0.06%         446,963        645         0.14%         875,545        14,828         1.69%   

Long-term borrowings

     682,507        29,366         4.30%         854,438        36,266         4.24%         852,457        38,256         4.49%   
                          

Total Interest-Bearing Funds

     5,568,546        85,196         1.53%         6,077,521        120,374         1.98%         6,297,585        177,119         2.81%   
                                         

Noninterest-bearing deposits

     1,128,749              1,022,051              867,447        

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

     54,029              61,948              60,173        
                                         

TOTAL LIABILITIES

     6,751,324              7,161,520              7,225,205        

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

     782,650              763,986              781,863        
                                         

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

   $ 7,533,974            $ 7,925,506            $ 8,007,068        
                                         

NET INTEREST INCOME

     $ 244,092            $ 256,670            $ 267,021      
                                         

INTEREST SPREAD

          3.38%              3.29%              3.34%   

NET INTEREST MARGIN

          3.64%              3.59%              3.70%   

 

  (1)

The interest income and the yields on federally nontaxable loans and investment securities are presented on a tax-equivalent basis using the statutory federal income tax rate of 35%.

  (2)

The interest income and the yields on state nontaxable loans and investment securities are presented on a tax-equivalent basis using the statutory state income tax rate of 8.75%.

  (3)

Nonaccruing loans are included in the daily average loan amounts outstanding.

 

33


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth a summary for the periods indicated of the changes in consolidated interest earned and interest paid detailing the amounts attributable to (i) changes in volume (change in the average volume times the prior year’s average rate), (ii) changes in rate (change in the average rate times the prior year’s average volume), and (iii) changes in rate/volume (change in the average volume times the change in average rate).

 

     2010 Compared to 2009      2009 Compared to 2008  
     Increase (Decrease) Due to      Increase (Decrease) Due to  
(In thousands)    Volume      Rate      Rate/
Volume
     Total      Volume      Rate      Rate/
Volume
     Total  

Interest income:

                       

Federal funds sold, securities purchased under agreements to resell and other short-term investments

   $ 420       $ 227       $ 311       $ 958       $ 2,669       $ (647)       $  (2,427)       $ (405)   

Investment securities:

                       

Taxable

     (9,345)         (3,561)         636         (12,270)         (9,148)         (4,439)         769         (12,818)   

Tax-exempt (1), (2)

     (4,395)         (590)         222         (4,763)         (3,016)         (565)         98         (3,483)   

Loans (1),(2),(3)

     (23,102)         (9,320)         741         (31,681)         928         (51,129)         (189)         (50,390)   
                                                                       

TOTAL INTEREST INCOME

     (36,422)         (13,244)         1,910         (47,756)         (8,567)         (56,780)         (1,749)         (67,096)   
                                                                       

Interest expense:

                       

Interest-bearing deposits

   $ (3,129)       $  (25,791)       $ 1,120       $  (27,800)       $ 5,597       $ 43,868)       $  (2,301)       $ (40,572)   

Short-term borrowings

     (222)         (358)         102         (478)         (7,243)         (13,571)         6,631         (14,183)   

Long-term borrowings

     (7,290)         513         (123)         (6,900)         89         (2,131)         52         (1,990)   
                                                                       

TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE

     (10,641)         (25,636)         1,099         (35,178)         (1,557)         (59,570)         4,382         (56,745)   
                                                                       

NET INTEREST INCOME

   $  (25,781)       $ 12,392       $ 811       $ (12,578)       $  (7,010)       $ 2,790       $ (6,131)       $  (10,351)   
                                                                       

 

  (1) Yields and interest income on federally tax-exempt loans and investment securities are computed on a fully tax-equivalent basis using the statutory federal income tax rate of 35%.
  (2) Yields and interest income on state tax-exempt loans and investment securities are computed on a fully tax-equivalent basis using the statutory state income tax rate of 8.75% in 2009 and 2008.
  (3) Nonaccruing loans are included in the daily average loan amounts outstanding.

Provision for Credit Losses

At December 31, 2010, nonperforming loans were $67.23 million or 1.28% of loans, net of unearned income compared to nonperforming loans of $72.26 million or 1.26% of loans, net of unearned income at December 31, 2009. The components of nonperforming loans include: 1) nonaccrual loans, 2) loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal, but have not been put on a nonaccrual basis and 3) loans whose terms have been restructured for economic or legal reasons due to financial difficulties of the borrowers.

Loans past due 90 days or more were $6.80 million at December 31, 2010, a decrease of $13.52 million or 66.54% from $20.31 million at year-end 2009. The decrease in loans past due 90 days or more since year-end 2009 was primarily the result of loans being charged-off, placed on nonaccrual or transferred to OREO. At year-end 2010, nonaccrual loans were $60.00 million, an increase of $9.14 million or 17.97% from $50.86 million at year-end 2009. The increase in nonaccrual loans was primarily due to two failed residential developments in the Shenandoah Valley region of Virginia of $6.1 million and $5.8 million. Restructured loans were $437 thousand at year-end 2010 as compared to $1.09 million restructured loans at year-end 2009. The loss potential on these loans has been properly evaluated and allocated within the company’s allowance for loan losses.

 

34


Table of Contents

Nonperforming assets include nonperforming loans and real estate acquired in foreclosure or other settlement of loans (OREO). Total nonperforming assets of $112.00 million, including OREO of $44.77 million at December 31, 2010, represented 1.57% of total assets which compares favorably to United’s most recently reported Federal Reserve peer group banking companies’ (bank holding companies with total assets between $3 and $10 billion) percentage of 3.58% at September 30, 2010.

Management is not aware of any other significant loans or securities, groups of loans or securities, or segments of the loan or investment portfolio not included below or disclosed elsewhere herein where there are serious doubts as to the ability of the borrowers or issuers to comply with the present repayment terms of the debt. The following table summarizes nonperforming assets for the indicated periods.

 

     December 31  
     2010      2009      2008      2007      2006  
     (In thousands)  

Nonaccrual loans

     $   59,996         $   50,856         $ 42,317         $ 14,115         $  5,755   

Loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal, and are still accruing interest

     6,798         20,314         11,881         14,210         8,432   

Restructured loans (1)

     437         1,087         ---         ---         ---   
                                            

Total nonperforming loans

     67,231         72,257         54,198         28,325         14,187   

Other real estate owned

     44,770         40,058         19,817         6,365         4,231   
                                            

TOTAL NONPERFORMING ASSETS

     $ 112,001         $ 112,315         $ 74,015         $ 34,690         $ 18,418   
                                            

 

(1) The restructured loan with a balance of $437 thousand at December 31, 2010 is past due 90 days or more, but is not included in the “Loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal, and are still accruing interest” category.

Loans are designated as impaired when, in the opinion of management, the collection of principal and interest in accordance with the loan contract is doubtful. At December 31, 2010, impaired loans were $70.36 million, which was an increase of $7.14 million or 11.29% from the $63.22 million in impaired loans at December 31, 2009. This increase in impaired loans was due mainly to increased impairments associated with loans in the Company’s commercial and real estate construction and development portfolios primarily as a result of the current economic conditions. Based on current information and events, United believes it is probable that the borrowers will not be able to repay all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreements. The loss potential on these loans has been properly evaluated and allocated within the company’s allowance for loan losses. For further details on impaired loans, see Note E, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

United maintains an allowance for loan losses and an allowance for lending-related commitments. The combined allowances for loan losses and lending-related commitments are referred to as the allowance for credit losses. At December 31, 2010, the allowance for credit losses was $75.04 million as compared to $70.01 million at December 31, 2009.

At December 31, 2010, the allowance for loan losses was $73.03 million as compared to $67.85 million at December 31, 2009. As a percentage of loans, net of unearned income, the allowance for loan losses was 1.39% at December 31, 2010 and 1.18% of loans, net of unearned income at December 31, 2009. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans or coverage ratio was 108.63% and 93.91% at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The coverage ratio for United’s Federal Reserve peer group was 70.98% at September 30, 2010. For United, this ratio at December 31, 2010 improved from the ratio at December 31, 2009 because nonperforming loans decreased $5.03 million or 6.96% while the allowance for loan losses increased $5.18 million or 7.63% for the year of 2010. Adjustments to risk grades and qualitative risk factors within the allowance for loan loss analysis were based on delinquency and loss trends of such loans and resulted in increased allowance allocations of $5.2 million or 7.6%. This increase did not coincide with the decrease of 6.96% in nonperforming loans in comparison with the previous year. The Company’s detailed methodology and analysis indicated an increase in the allowance for loan losses primarily because of higher historical loss rates, increased loss allocations on impaired loans and higher levels of nonaccrual loans within the nonperforming loan category.

 

35


Table of Contents

For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the provision for credit losses was $13.77 million and $46.07 million, respectively. Net charge-offs were $8.75 million for the year of 2010 as compared to net charge-offs of $39.66 million for the year of 2009. As previously mentioned, United recovered funds from its insurance carrier in the amount of $15.00 million during the fourth quarter of 2010 related to claims it made under its insurance policies for losses United incurred as a result of fraudulent loans in the amount of $17.55 million previously charged-off in 2009. The $15.00 million of insurance proceeds were recorded as a recovery within United’s allowance for loan losses which resulted in a provision for credit losses expense of $13.77 million for the year of 2010. Net charge-offs and the provision for credit losses for the year of 2009 included the above mentioned $17.55 million for loans with fraudulent collateral made to three affiliated companies of a commercial customer.

The following table summarizes United’s credit loss experience for each of the five years ended December 31:

 

     2010     2009     2008     2007     2006  
     (Dollars in thousands)  

Balance of allowance for credit losses at beginning of year

   $ 70,010      $ 63,603      $ 58,744      $ 52,371      $ 52,871   

Allowance of purchased company at date of acquisition

     ---        ---        ---        7,648        ---   

Loans charged off:

          

Commercial, financial & agricultural (2)

     5,495        22,626        5,710        1,007        1,310   

Residential real estate (2)

     9,334        9,695        6,505        818        529   

Construction & land development (2)

     9,298        6,288        6,375        4,460        ---   

Consumer (2)

     1,635        2,468        2,608        1,453        1,389   
                                        

TOTAL CHARGE-OFFS

     25,762        41,077        21,198        7,738        3,228   

Recoveries:

          

Commercial, financial & agricultural (2)

     16,158        669        318        435        705   

Residential real estate (2)

     493        272        215        248        175   

Construction & land development (2)

     21        89        23        10        ---   

Consumer (2)

     346        389        346        440        411   
                                        

TOTAL RECOVERIES

     17,018        1,419        902        1,133        1,291   
                                        

NET LOANS CHARGED OFF

     8,744        39,658        20,296        6,605        1,937   

Provision for credit losses

     13,773        46,065        25,155        5,330        1,437   
                                        

BALANCE OF ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES AT END OF YEAR

   $ 75,039      $ 70,010      $ 63,603      $ 58,744      $ 52,371   
                                        

Loans outstanding at the end of period (gross), continuing operations (1)

   $ 5,263,351      $ 5,740,778      $ 6,020,558      $ 5,800,561      $ 4,813,708   

Average loans outstanding during period (net of unearned income) (1)

   $ 5,467,927      $ 5,883,995      $ 5,863,858      $ 5,149,430      $ 4,726,758   

Net charge-offs as a percentage of average loans outstanding

     0.16     0.67     0.35     0.13     0.04

Allowance for credit losses, continuing operations as a percentage of nonperforming loans

     111.6     96.89     117.35     207.39     369.15

 

  (1) Excludes loans held for sale.
  (2) Certain loan amounts were reclassified in prior years to conform with the new disclosure rules about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) topic 310.

United evaluates the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses and its loan administration policies are focused upon the risk characteristics of the loan portfolio. United’s process for evaluating the allowance is a formal company-wide process that

 

36


Table of Contents

focuses on early identification of potential problem credits and procedural discipline in managing and accounting for those credits. This process determines the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses, allocation among loan types and lending-related commitments, and the resulting provision for credit losses.

Allocations are made for specific commercial loans based upon management’s estimate of the borrowers’ ability to repay and other factors impacting collectibility. Other commercial loans not specifically reviewed on an individual basis are evaluated based on historical loss percentages applied to loan pools that have been segregated by risk. Allocations for loans other than commercial loans are made based upon historical loss experience adjusted for current environmental conditions. The allowance for credit losses includes estimated probable inherent but undetected losses within the portfolio due to uncertainties in economic conditions, delays in obtaining information, including unfavorable information about a borrower’s financial condition, the difficulty in identifying triggering events that correlate perfectly to subsequent loss rates, and risk factors that have not yet fully manifested themselves in loss allocation factors. In addition, a portion of the allowance accounts for the inherent imprecision in the allowance for credit losses analysis.

The following table presents the allocation of United’s allowance for credit losses for each of the five years ended December 31:

 

     2010      2009      2008      2007      2006  
     (In thousands)  

Commercial, financial & agricultural (1)

   $  37,490       $  43,467       $  39,550       $  32,957       $  27,512   

Residential real estate (1)

     11,653         6,971         4,144         3,058         3,266   

Construction & land development (1)

     18,738         12,184         10,169         9,169         7,178   

Consumer (1)

     2,161         3,545         4,920         4,166         4,014   

Allowance for estimated imprecision

     2,991         1,686         2,711         1,107         1,659   
                                            

Allowance for loan losses

     73,033       $ 67,853       $ 61,494         50,457       $ 43,629   

Allowance for lending-related commitments

     2,006         2,157         2,109         8,287         8,742   
                                            

Allowance for credit losses

   $ 75,039       $ 70,010       $ 63,603       $ 58,744       $ 52,371   
                                            

(1) Certain loan amounts were reclassified in 2010 to conform with the new disclosure rules about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) topic 310.

The following is a summary of loans outstanding as a percent of total loans at December 31:

 

     2010      2009      2008      2007      2006  

Commercial, financial & agricultural (1)

     53.95%         52.35%         52.66%         51.05%         46.19%   

Residential real estate (1)

     32.32%         32.41%         31.85%         32.49%         35.80%   

Construction & land development (1)

     8.95%         9.76%         10.01%         10.38%         10.88%   

Consumer (1)

     4.78%         5.48%         5.48%         6.08%         7.13%   
                                            

Total

     100.00%         100.00%         100.00%         100.00%         100.00%   
                                            

(1) Certain loan amounts were reclassified in prior years to conform with the new disclosure rules about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses in Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) topic 310.

United’s formal company-wide review of the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2010 produced increased allocations in two of the four loan categories. The allowance allocated to commercial loans decreased by $6.0 million partly due to the reclassification of $300 million of commercial loans secured by 1-4 family units into the residential loan pool as the associated allowance of approximately $4 million was reallocated from commercial loans to residential real estate. The remaining decrease in the allowance allocated to commercial loans was due to other factors, which included the impact of lower outstanding loan balances, lower historical loss rates as a result of improved charge-off history and a 2.6% decrease in qualitative adjustments being applied to the larger loan pool subsets within the portfolio. Real estate loan pool allocations increased $4.7 million also as a result of the reclassification as well as increases in historical loss rates and an increase in specific loss allocations of impaired loans of $2.1 million, which were partially offset by a decline in the outstanding loan

 

37


Table of Contents

balances. The real estate construction loan pool allocations increased $6.6 million in comparison with the December 31, 2009 year-end primarily due to increased historical loss rates offset somewhat by lower outstanding loan balances. The components of the allowance allocated to consumer loans decreased by $1.4 million due to the refinement of the methodology related to the allocation for overdraft losses and decreases in historical loss rates as a result of improved charge-off history. In summary, the overall increase of $5.2 million in the allowance for loan losses from the previous year was driven by increased allocations in the real estate and real estate construction and development pools that recognizes the continuing economic problems and elevated risk factors of that sector of the economy. The allowance for lending-related commitments at December 31, 2010 was relatively flat from December 31, 2009, decreasing by only $151 thousand.

An allowance is established for probable credit losses on impaired loans via specific allocations. Nonperforming commercial loans and leases are regularly reviewed to identify impairment. A loan or lease is impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will not be able to collect all amounts contractually due. Measuring impairment of a loan requires judgment and estimates, and the eventual outcomes may differ from those estimates. Impairment is measured based upon the present value of expected future cash flows from the loan discounted at the loan’s effective rate, the loan’s observable market price or the fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. When the selected measure is less than the recorded investment in the loan, an impairment has occurred. The allowance for impaired loans was $8.6 million at December 31, 2010 and $6.9 million at December 31, 2009. Compared to the prior year-end, this element of the allowance increased by $1.7 million primarily due to increased residential real estate and commercial loan pool specific allocations.

An allowance is also recognized for imprecision inherent in loan loss migration models and other estimates of loss. There are many factors affecting the allowance for loan losses and allowance for lending-related commitments; some are quantitative while others require qualitative judgment. Although management believes its methodology for determining the allowance adequately considers all of the potential factors to identify and quantify probable losses in the portfolio, the process includes subjective elements and is therefore susceptible to change. This estimate for imprecision has been established to recognize the variance, within a reasonable margin, of the loss estimation process. The estimate for imprecision increased at December 31, 2010 by $1.3 million to $3.0 million. This represents 4.0% of the Company’s total allowance for credit losses and in as much as this variance approximates a pre-determined narrow parameter, the methodology has confirmed that the Company’s allowance for credit losses is at an appropriate level.

Management believes that the allowance for credit losses of $75.04 million at December 31, 2010 is adequate to provide for probable losses on existing loans and lending-related commitments based on information currently available.

United’s loan administration policies are focused on the risk characteristics of the loan portfolio in terms of loan approval and credit quality. The commercial loan portfolio is monitored for possible concentrations of credit in one or more industries. Management has lending limits as a percentage of capital per type of credit concentration in an effort to ensure adequate diversification within the portfolio. Most of United’s commercial loans are secured by real estate located in West Virginia, southeastern Ohio, Virginia and Maryland and the District of Columbia. It is the opinion of management that these commercial loans do not pose any unusual risks and that adequate consideration has been given to these loans in establishing the allowance for credit losses.

Management is not aware of any potential problem loans, trends or uncertainties, which it reasonably expects, will materially impact future operating results, liquidity, or capital resources which have not been disclosed. Additionally, management has disclosed all known material credits, which cause management to have serious doubts as to the ability of such borrowers to comply with the loan repayment schedules.

Other Income

Other income consists of all revenues, which are not included in interest and fee income related to earning assets. Noninterest income has been and will continue to be an important factor for improving United’s profitability. Recognizing the importance, management continues to evaluate areas where noninterest income can be enhanced.

Noninterest income was $62.20 million for the year of 2010, up $8.23 million or 15.25% from the year of 2009. Included in noninterest income for the year of 2010 was a before-tax, net gain of $2.01 million on the sale of investment securities and

 

38


Table of Contents

noncash, before-tax, other-than-temporary impairment charges of $9.82 million on certain investment securities consisting primarily of $7.32 million on pooled trust preferred collateralized debt obligations (TRUP CDOs), $1.20 million on collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs) and $1.29 million on a certain investment security carried at cost. Included in noninterest income for the year of 2009 were noncash, before-tax, other-than-temporary impairment charges of $15.02 million on investment securities including $8.00 million on a single-issue trust preferred security, $5.37 million on a certain TRUP CDO and $782 thousand on a certain investment security carried at cost. Excluding the results of the investment security transactions, noninterest income for the year of 2010 would have increased $1.34 million or 1.95% from the year of 2009.

Revenue from trust income and brokerage commissions increased $572 thousand or 4.38% due mainly to an increase in brokerage volume. United continues its efforts to broaden the scope and activity of its trust and brokerage service areas, especially in the northern Virginia market, to provide additional sources of fee income that complement United’s traditional banking products and services. The northern Virginia market provides a relatively large number of potential customers with high per capita incomes.

Fees from deposit services were $39.22 million for the year of 2010, a decrease of $1.07 million or 2.65% as compared to the year of 2009 due mainly to the impact of Regulation E which was effective during the third quarter of 2010. Regulation E requires banks to notify customers when an automated teller machine (ATM) or debit-card transaction will result in an overdraft or insufficient funds (NSF) fees. Due mainly to this new regulation, NSF fees decreased $2.14 million during the year of 2010. Partially offsetting this decrease were increases of $923 thousand and $277 thousand in check card income and ATM fees, respectively, due to increased consumer spending.

For the year 2010, income from bank owned life insurance policies increased $1.26 million or 36.80% due mainly to an increase in cash surrender values while fees from bankcard transactions increased $631 thousand or 15.19% compared to the year of 2009 due to the sale of United’s merchant business. Mortgage banking income increased $54 thousand or 8.88% due to increased spreads on mortgage loan sales in the secondary market during the year of 2010 as compared to 2009. Mortgage loan sales were $47.60 million in 2010 as compared to $69.67 million in 2009. Other income decreased $120 thousand or 2.29% for the year of 2010 as compared to last year’s income.

Other Expense

Just as management continues to evaluate areas where noninterest income can be enhanced, it strives to improve the efficiency of its operations to reduce costs. Other expense includes all items of expense other than interest expense, the provision for credit losses and income tax expense. Noninterest expense for the year of 2010 was $182.21 million, an increase of $7.09 million or 4.05% from the year of 2009.

Employee compensation for the year of 2010 increased $1.66 million or 2.82% from the year of 2009 due largely to higher commissions and incentives expense. Also included in employee compensation was expense for stock options of $1.05 million for the year of 2010 as compared to $484 thousand for the year of 2009.

Employee benefits expense decreased $2.44 million or 12.73%. Specifically within employee benefits expense was an decrease in pension expense of $3.11 million primarily as a result of a $9.10 million and an $11.00 million contribution made in the third quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively. United uses certain valuation methodologies to measure the fair value of the assets within United’s pension plan which are presented in Note M, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The funded status of United’s pension plan is based upon the fair value of the plan assets compared to the projected benefit obligation. The determination of the projected benefit obligation and the associated periodic benefit expense involves significant judgment and estimation of future employee compensation levels, the discount rate and the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. If United assumes a 1% increase or decrease in the estimation of future employee compensation levels while keeping all other assumptions constant, the benefit cost associated with the pension plan would increase by approximately $2.00 million and $1.00 million, respectively. If United assumes a 1% increase or decrease in the discount rate while keeping all other assumptions constant, the benefit cost associated with the pension plan would increase by approximately $279 thousand and $2.92 million, respectively. If United assumes a 1% increase or decrease in the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets while keeping all other assumptions constant, the benefit cost associated with the pension plan would increase by approximately $575 thousand and $2.36 million, respectively.

 

39


Table of Contents

Net occupancy expense increased $228 thousand or 1.34% for the year of 2010 as compared to the year of 2009. The higher net occupancy expense for 2010 was due mainly to additional building maintenance expense and a decline in rent income.

Other real estate owned (OREO) expense increased $5.64 million or 102.86% for the year of 2010 as compared to the year of 2009. The increase from 2009 was due mainly to an increase in losses from sales and deterioration in property values associated with OREO. Equipment expense decreased $190 thousand or 3.06% for the year of 2010 as compared to the year of 2009 due to a decline in depreciation.

Data processing expense was flat, decreasing $60 thousand or less than 1% for the year of 2010 as compared to the year of 2009. Bankcard processing fees increased $86 thousand or 2.69% due to increased transactions as a result of more consumer spending for the year of 2010 as compared to last year. FDIC insurance expense increased $507 thousand or 5.52% for the year of 2010 as compared to the year of 2009 due mainly to higher premiums to increase the insurance fund for banks.

Other expenses increased $1.65 million or 3.66% for the year of 2010 as compared to the year of 2009. This increase was due mainly to increases in advertising expense of $887 thousand and loan collection expense of $794 thousand.

United’s efficiency ratio was 53.87% for the year of 2010 which was comparable to 51.35% for the year of 2009.

Income Taxes

For the year ended December 31, 2010, income taxes were $32.46 million, compared to $10.95 million for 2009. During the third quarter of 2010, United reduced its income tax reserve by $430 thousand due to the expiration of the statue of limitations for examinations of certain years as compared to a reduction of $568 thousand in the income tax reserve during the third quarter of 2009. During the first quarter of 2009, United recorded a benefit associated with net operating loss carryforwards and a positive adjustment to income tax expense as a result of a concluded tax examination. The total income tax benefit recorded in the first quarter of 2009 related to these two events was $11.51 million. As a result of these tax adjustments, United’s effective tax rate was approximately 31.1% and 14.0% for years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, as compared to 29.8% for 2008. For further details related to income taxes, see Note L, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Quarterly Results

Net income for the first quarter of 2010 was $17.42 million or $0.40 per diluted share compared to $29.63 million or $0.68 per diluted share in 2009. The results for the first quarter of 2010 included a before-tax, net gain of $1.24 million on the sale of a corporate bond and noncash, before-tax, other-than-temporary impairment charges of $1.49 million on certain investment securities. The results for the first quarter of 2009 included a benefit of $11.51 million associated with net operating loss carryforwards and a positive adjustment to income tax expense as a result of a concluded tax examination. The results for the first quarter of 2009 included a benefit of $11.51 million associated with net operating loss carryforwards and a positive adjustment to income tax expense as a result of a concluded tax examination.

For the second quarter of 2010, net income was $17.92 million or $0.41 per diluted share compared to $8.16 million or $0.19 per diluted share in 2009. The results for the first half and second quarter of 2010 included before-tax, net gains of $1.90 million and $796 thousand, respectively, on the sale of investment securities and noncash, before-tax, other-than-temporary impairment charges of $2.58 million and $1.10 million, respectively, on certain investment securities. Results for the second quarter of 2009 included a credit loss provision of $17.55 million for three loans with fraudulent collateral made to three affiliated companies of a commercial customer, an additional expense accrual of $3.63 million for a special FDIC assessment, and noncash, before-tax, other-than-temporary impairment charges of $1.10 million on certain investment securities.

In the third quarter of 2010, net income was $17.32 million or $0.40 per diluted share as compared to $12.07 million or $0.28 per diluted share in the third quarter of 2009. The results for the third quarter of 2010 included noncash, before-tax, other-than-temporary impairment charges of $1.86 million on certain investment securities and a positive tax adjustment of $430 thousand due to the expiration of the statute of limitations for examinations of certain years. The results for the third quarter of 2009 included noncash, before-tax, other-than-temporary impairment charges of $10.96 million on investment securities and a positive tax adjustment of $568 thousand due to the expiration of the statute of limitations for examinations of certain years.

 

40


Table of Contents

Fourth quarter of 2010 net income was $19.29 million or $0.44 per diluted share, an increase from net income of $17.44 million or $0.40 per diluted share in the fourth quarter of 2009. During the fourth quarter of 2010, United recovered funds from its insurance carrier in the amount of $15.00 million related to claims it made under its insurance policies for losses United incurred as a result of fraudulent loans previously charged-off in 2009. The $15.00 million of insurance proceeds were recorded as a recovery within United’s allowance for loan losses. Based on United’s normal analysis of the allowance for loan losses at quarter-end, a negative provision for credit losses of $5.62 million was recorded for the fourth quarter of 2010. Also, the results for the fourth quarter of 2010 included noncash, before-tax, other-than-temporary impairment charges of $5.37million on certain investment securities. Results for the fourth quarter of 2009 included noncash, before-tax, other-than-temporary impairment charges of $2.83 million on certain investment securities.

Tax-equivalent net interest income for the fourth quarter of 2010 was $59.98 million, a decrease of $3.68 million or 5.78% from the fourth quarter of 2009. This decrease in tax-equivalent net interest income was primarily attributable to a decline in average earning assets of $538.34 million or 7.54% from the fourth quarter of 2009. Average net loans declined $465.23 million or 8.15% for the fourth quarter of 2010 while average investments decreased $213.67 million or 20.11% due mainly to maturities and calls of securities which were not fully reinvested from the fourth quarter of 2009. However, average short-term investments increased $140.56 million to mitigate some of the decline in average earning assets as a result of United placing its excess cash in an interest-bearing account with the Federal Reserve. The average yield on earning assets declined 28 basis points for the fourth quarter of 2010 as compared to the same quarter in 2009. Partially offsetting the decreases to tax-equivalent net interest income was a decrease of 42 basis points in the fourth quarter of 2010 average cost of funds. The net interest margin for the fourth quarter of 2010 was 3.62%, which was an increase of 7 basis points from a net interest margin of 3.55% for the fourth quarter of 2009.

As previously mentioned, United recovered funds from its insurance carrier in the amount of $15.00 million during the fourth quarter of 2010 which were recorded as a recovery within United’s allowance for loan losses. Based on United’s normal analysis of the allowance for loan losses at quarter-end, a negative provision for credit losses of $5.62 million was recorded for the fourth quarter of 2010. For the fourth quarter of 2009, the provision for credit losses was $6.72 million. The $15.00 million recovery on these loans in the fourth quarter of 2010 resulted in net recoveries of $7.85 million for the quarter as compared to net charge-offs of $6.45 million for the fourth quarter of 2009.

Noninterest income for the fourth quarter of 2010 was $13.36 million, which was a decrease of $851 thousand from the fourth quarter of 2009. Included in noninterest income for the fourth quarter of 2010 were noncash, before-tax, other-than-temporary impairment charges of $5.37 million on certain investment securities as compared to noncash, before-tax other-than-temporary impairment charges of $2.83 million on certain investment securities for the fourth quarter of 2009. Excluding the results of the noncash, other-than-temporary impairment charges as well as net gains and losses from sales and calls of investment securities, noninterest income for the fourth quarter of 2010 would have increased $1.95 million or 11.58% from the fourth quarter of 2009. This increase for the fourth quarter of 2010 was due primarily to increases of $866 thousand in fees from trust and brokerage services due to higher volume, $524 thousand in income from derivatives not in hedge relationships due to a change in the fair value, and $503 thousand in bankcard fees due to the sale of United’s merchant business. A similar amount of expense related to the change in the fair value of derivatives not in hedge relationships is included in other expense in the income statement. Partially offsetting these increases was a decrease in fees from deposit services of $384 thousand due mainly to the impact of Regulation E.

Noninterest expense for the fourth quarter of 2010 was $49.38 million, which was an increase of $5.43 million or 12.37% from the fourth quarter of 2009. This increase was due mainly to increases of $3.06 million in other real estate owned (OREO) costs due mainly to declines in the fair values of OREO properties, $1.73 million in employee compensation due to higher commissions and incentives, $524 thousand in expense from derivatives not in hedge relationships due to a change in the fair value, $470 thousand for an anticipated litigation loss and $395 thousand in merger-related expenses for the recently announced agreement to acquire Centra Financial Holdings, Inc. (Centra). Partially offsetting these increases was a decrease in employee benefits expense of $956 thousand due mainly to a decline in the expense associated with United’s employee pension plan primarily as a result of a $9.10 million and an $11.00 million contribution made in the third quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

41


Table of Contents

Additional quarterly financial data for 2010 and 2009 may be found in Note V, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

The Effect of Inflation

United’s income statements generally reflect the effects of inflation. Since interest rates, loan demand and deposit levels are impacted by inflation, the resulting changes in the interest-sensitive assets and liabilities are included in net interest income. Similarly, operating expenses such as salaries, rents and maintenance include changing prices resulting from inflation. One item that would not reflect inflationary changes is depreciation expense. Subsequent to the acquisition of depreciable assets, inflation causes price levels to rise; therefore, historically presented dollar values do not reflect this inflationary condition. With inflation levels at relatively low levels and monetary and fiscal policies being implemented to keep the inflation rate increases within an acceptable range, management expects the impact of inflation would continue to be minimal in the near future.

The Effect of Regulatory Policies and Economic Conditions

United’s business and earnings are affected by the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States government, its agencies and various other governmental regulatory authorities. The Federal Reserve Board regulates the supply of money in order to influence general economic conditions. Among the instruments of monetary policy available to the Federal Reserve Board are (i) conducting open market operations in United States government obligations, (ii) changing the discount rate on financial institution borrowings, (iii) imposing or changing reserve requirements against financial institution deposits, and (iv) restricting certain borrowings and imposing or changing reserve requirements against certain borrowings by financial institutions and their affiliates. These methods are used in varying degrees and combinations to affect directly the availability of bank loans and deposits, as well as the interest rates charged on loans and paid on deposits.

United’s business and earnings are also affected by general and local economic conditions. For most of 2010 and 2009, certain credit markets experienced difficult conditions and volatility. Downturns in the credit market can cause a decline in the value of certain loans and securities, a reduction in liquidity and a tightening of credit. A downturn in the credit market often signals a weakening economy that can cause job losses and thus distress on borrowers and their ability to repay loans. Uncertainties in credit markets and the economy present significant challenges for the financial services industry.

Regulatory policies and economic conditions have had a significant effect on the operating results of financial institutions in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future; however, United cannot accurately predict the nature, timing or extent of any effect such policies or economic conditions may have on its future business and earnings.

Contractual Obligations, Commitments, Contingent Liabilities and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

United has various financial obligations, including contractual obligations and commitments, that may require future cash payments. The table below presents, by payment date, significant known contractual obligations to third parties as of December 31, 2010:

 

            Total Payments Due by Period  
(In thousands)    Total      One Year
or Less
     One to
Three Years
     Three to
Five Years
     Over Five
Years
 

Deposits without a stated maturity (1)

     $ 3,570,132         $ 3,570,132         ---         ---         ---   

Time deposits (2) (3)

     2,200,770         1,441,030         $ 532,151         $ 221,777         $ 5,812   

Short-term borrowings (2)

     193,214         193,214         ---         ---         ---   

Long-term borrowings (2) (3)

     647,527         75,131         110,899         54,746         406,751   

Operating leases

     31,203         7,387         11,346         6,685         5,785   

 

  (1)

Excludes interest.

  (2)

Includes interest on both fixed and variable rate obligations. The interest associated with variable rate obligations is based upon interest rates in effect at December 31, 2010. The interest to be paid on variable rate obligations is affected by changes in market interest rates, which materially affect the contractual obligation amounts to be paid.

 

42


Table of Contents
  (3)

Excludes carrying value adjustments such as unamortized premiums or discounts.

As of December 31, 2010, United recorded a liability for uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties, of $971 thousand. This liability represents an estimate of tax positions that United has taken in its tax returns which may ultimately not be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. Since the ultimate amount and timing of any future cash settlements cannot be predicted with reasonable certainty, this estimated liability is excluded from the contractual obligations table.

United also enters into derivative contracts, mainly to protect against adverse interest rate movements on the value of certain assets or liabilities, under which it is required to either pay cash to or receive cash from counterparties depending on changes in interest rates. Derivative contracts are carried at fair value and not notional value on the consolidated balance sheet. Because the derivative contracts recorded on the balance sheet at December 31, 2010 do not represent the amounts that may ultimately be paid under these contracts, they are excluded from the preceding table. Further discussion of derivative instruments is included in Note P, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

United is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include loan commitments and standby letters of credit. United’s maximum exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty to the financial instrument for the loan commitments and standby letters of credit is the contractual or notional amount of those instruments. United uses the same policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.

The following table details the amounts of significant commitments and letters of credit as of December 31, 2010:

 

(In thousands)    Amount  

Commitments to extend credit:

  

Revolving open-end secured by 1-4 residential

     $ 469,301   

Credit card and personal revolving lines

     106,708   

Commercial

     986,362   
        

Total unused commitments

     $  1,562,371   
        

Financial standby letters of credit

     $ 82,227   

Performance standby letters of credit

     35,478   

Commercial letters of credit

     1,469   
        

Total letters of credit

     $ 119,174   
        

Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses, generally within one year, and may require the payment of a fee. Further discussion of commitments is included in Note O, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Liquidity

In the opinion of management, United maintains liquidity that is sufficient to satisfy its depositors’ requirements and the credit needs of its customers. Like all banks, United depends upon its ability to renew maturing deposits and other liabilities on a daily basis and to acquire new funds in a variety of markets. A significant source of funds available to United is “core deposits.” Core deposits include certain demand deposits, statement and special savings and NOW accounts. These deposits are relatively stable and they are the lowest cost source of funds available to United. Short-term borrowings have also been a significant source of funds. These include federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase as well as advances from the FHLB. Repurchase agreements represent funds that are obtained as the result of a competitive bidding process.

Liquid assets are cash and those items readily convertible to cash. All banks must maintain sufficient balances of cash and near-cash items to meet the day-to-day demands of customers and United’s cash needs. Other than cash and due from banks,

 

43


Table of Contents

the available for sale securities portfolio and maturing loans are the primary sources of liquidity.

The goal of liquidity management is to ensure the ability to access funding that enables United to efficiently satisfy the cash flow requirements of depositors and borrowers and meet United’s cash needs. Liquidity is managed by monitoring funds availability from a number of primary sources. Substantial funding is available from cash and cash equivalents, unused short-term borrowings, and a geographically dispersed network of branches providing access to a diversified and substantial retail deposit market.

Short-term needs can be met through a wide array of outside sources such as correspondent and downstream correspondent federal funds and utilization of Federal Home Loan Bank advances.

Other sources of liquidity available to United to provide long-term as well as short-term funding alternatives, in addition to FHLB advances, are long-term certificates of deposit, lines of credit, borrowings that are secured by bank premises or stock of United’s subsidiaries and issuances of trust preferred securities. In the normal course of business, United through its Asset Liability Committee evaluates these as well as other alternative funding strategies that may be utilized to meet short-term and long-term funding needs. See Notes J and K, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Cash flows provided by operations in 2010 were $100.83 million as compared to $53.66 million of cash provided by operations during 2009 due in large part to an increase in other assets of $39 thousand in 2010 as compared an increase in other assets of $63.04 million in 2009. This increase in other assets in 2009 was due primarily to the $36.4 million in prepaid FDIC assessments recorded. In addition, net income increased $4.65 million from 2009 to 2010. Partially offsetting these increases were decreases in the provision expense for credit losses of $32.29 million and losses on investment securities of $6.90 million from 2009 to 2010. In 2010, net cash of $631.92 million was provided by investing activities which was primarily due to net cash received of $162.44 million for excess net proceeds from sales, calls and maturities of investment securities over purchases and the net repayment of $468.11 million in portfolio loans. In 2009, net cash of $545.16 million was provided in investing activities primarily due to net cash received of $310.98 million for excess net proceeds from sales, calls and maturities of investment securities over purchases and the net repayment of $239.31 million in portfolio loans. During the year of 2010, net cash of $721.13 million was used in financing activities due primarily to a decline of $257.57 million in deposits and the repayment of FHLB borrowings in the amount of $385.03 million during the year of 2010. Other uses of cash for financing activities included the payment of $52.26 million for cash dividends. For the year of 2009, net cash of $362.59 million was used in financing activities due primarily to the repayment of securities sold under agreements to repurchase and overnight FHLB borrowings in the amount of $222.77 million and $212 million, respectively. Other uses of cash for financing activities included the repayment of federal funds purchased of $120.35 million and the payment of $50.38 million for cash dividends. The net effect of the cash flow activities was an increase in cash and cash equivalents of $11.62 million for the year of 2010 as compared to an increase in cash and cash equivalents of $236.23 million for the year of 2009. See the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

United anticipates it can meet its obligations over the next 12 months and has no material commitments for capital expenditures. There are no known trends, demands, commitments, or events that will result in or that are reasonably likely to result in United’s liquidity increasing or decreasing in any material way. United also has lines of credit available. See Notes J and K, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail regarding the amounts available to United under its lines of credit.

The Asset Liability Committee monitors liquidity to ascertain that a liquidity position within certain prescribed parameters is maintained. No changes are anticipated in the policies of United’s Asset and Liability Committee.

Capital Resources

United’s capital position is financially sound. United seeks to maintain a proper relationship between capital and total assets to support growth and sustain earnings. United has historically generated attractive returns on shareholders’ equity. Based on regulatory requirements, United and its banking subsidiaries are categorized as “well capitalized” institutions. United’s risk-based capital ratios of 13.65% at December 31, 2010 and 12.23% at December 31, 2009, were both significantly higher than the minimum regulatory requirements. United’s Tier I capital and leverage ratios of 12.25% and 9.92%, respectively, at December 31, 2010, are also well above minimum regulatory requirements. Being classified as a “well-capitalized” institution

 

44


Table of Contents

allows United to have special regulatory consideration in various areas. See Note S, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Total year-end 2010 shareholders’ equity increased $31.46 million or 4.13% to $793.01 million from $761.55 million at December 31, 2009. United’s equity to assets ratio was 11.08% at December 31, 2010 as compared to 9.76% at December 31, 2009. The primary capital ratio, capital and reserves to total assets and reserves, was 12.00% at December 31, 2010, as compared to 10.56% at December 31, 2009. United’s average equity to average asset ratio was 10.39% and 9.64% for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. All these financial measurements reflect a financially sound position.

During the fourth quarter of 2010, United’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend of $0.30 per share. Dividends per share of $1.20 for the year of 2010 represented an increase of 2.56% over the $1.17 per share paid for 2009. Total cash dividends declared to common shareholders were approximately $52.30 million for the year of 2010 as compared to $50.84 million for the year of 2009. The year 2010 was the thirty-seventh consecutive year of dividend increases to United shareholders.

The following table shows selected consolidated operating and capital ratios for each of the last three years ended December 31:

 

     2010      2009      2008  

Return on average assets

     0.95%         0.85%         1.09%   

Return on average equity

     9.19%         8.81%         11.12%   

Dividend payout ratio

     72.69%         75.54%         57.77%   

Average equity to average assets ratio

     10.39%         9.64%         9.76%   

2009 COMPARED TO 2008

FINANCIAL CONDITION SUMMARY

United’s total assets as of December 31, 2009 were $7.81 billion which was a decline of $296.99 million or 3.67% from December 31, 2008. The decrease was primarily the result of decreases in investment securities and portfolio loans of $324.90 million or 25.15% and $277.35 million or 4.61%, respectively. The decrease in investment securities was due mainly to a decline of $285.77 million or 26.00% in securities available for sale. This change in securities available for sale reflected $512.56 million in sales, maturities and calls of securities, $233.16 million in purchases, and a slight increase of $308 thousand in market value. Securities held to maturity decreased $38.99 million or 33.49% from year-end 2008 due to calls and maturities of securities. The decline in the loan portfolio was due mainly to a decrease in commercial loans (not secured by real estate) of $166.67 million or 13.07%. Single-family residential real estate loans and construction loans declined $55.92 million or 2.92% and $42.39 million or 7.04%, respectively. Commercial real estate loans decreased $27.68 million or 1.68% while other real estate loans increased $30.19 million or 12.31%, respectively. Consumer loans decreased $17.31 million or 5.16%. Partially offsetting these decreases to total assets was a $236.23 million increase in cash and cash equivalents as United placed its excess cash in an interest-bearing account with the Federal Reserve. Of this total increase, interest-bearing deposits with other banks increased $300.26 million due mainly to the cash placed at the Federal Reserve while cash and due from banks decreased $56.29 million or 29.49% and federal funds sold decreased $7.74 million or 91.52%. During the year of 2009, net cash of $53.66 million and $545.16 million was provided by operating activities and investing activities, respectively. Net cash of $362.59 million was used in financing activities.

The decrease in total assets is reflected in a corresponding decrease in total liabilities of $321.83 million or 4.37% from year-end 2008. The decrease in total liabilities was due mainly to a reduction of $636.13 million or 39.00% in borrowings while accrued expenses and other liabilities decreased $8.90 million or 10.55%. Since year-end 2008, short-term borrowings decreased $555.38 million or 71.36% due to a $212 million reduction in overnight FHLB borrowings, a $222.77 million decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase and a $120.35 million decline in federal funds purchased. Long-term borrowings decreased $80.75 million or 9.47% since year-end 2008. Accrued expenses and other liabilities at December 31, 2009 decreased $8.90 million or 10.55% from year-end 2008 mainly as a result of decreases of $6.15 million in derivative liabilities due to a change in fair value and $5.41 million in interest payable due to a decline in borrowings and interest rates on certificate of deposits. Deposits increased $323.15 million or 5.72% from year-end 2008. In terms of composition,

 

45


Table of Contents

noninterest-bearing deposits increased $202.06 million or 22.30% while interest-bearing deposits increased $121.09 million or 2.55% from December 31, 2008.

Shareholders’ equity increased $24.84 million or 3.37% from year-end 2008. Retained earnings increased due to earnings net of dividends declared which equaled $16.46 million for the year of 2009. Accumulated other comprehensive income increased $7.77 million due mainly to an increase of $2.92 million in United’s pension benefit obligation, net of deferred income taxes and the amortization of pension costs of $2.10 million, net of deferred income taxes. The fair value of United’s cash flow hedge increased $1.97 million, net of deferred income taxes while the fair value of United’s available for sale investment portfolio increased $200 thousand, net of deferred income taxes.

EARNINGS SUMMARY

Net income for the year 2009 was $67.30 million or $1.55 per diluted share compared to $86.95 million or $2.00 per diluted share for the year of 2008. These results for the year of 2009 included noncash before-tax other-than-temporary impairment charges of $15.02 million on certain investment securities, a credit loss provision of $17.55 million for three loans with fraudulent collateral made to three affiliated companies of a commercial customer and an additional expense of $3.63 million for a special FDIC assessment. Results for the year of 2009 also included an income tax benefit of $11.51 million associated with net operating loss carryforwards and a positive adjustment to income tax expense as a result of a concluded tax examination as well as an additional positive tax adjustment of $568 thousand due to the expiration of the statute of limitations for examinations of certain years.

Results for the year of 2008 included noncash before-tax other-than-temporary impairment charges of $10.49 million on certain investment securities. Also included in the results for the year of 2008 was a positive tax adjustment of $1.42 million due to the expiration of the statute of limitations for examinations of certain years and a $917 thousand before-tax gain related to Visa’s initial public offering and the partial redemption of Visa shares held by United.

United’s return on average assets for the year of 2009 was 0.85% and return on average shareholders’ equity was 8.81% as compared to 1.09% and 11.12% for the year of 2008.

Net interest income for the year of 2009 was $245.47 million, a decrease of $7.32 million or 2.90% from the prior year. The provision for credit losses was $46.07 million for the year 2009 as compared to $25.16 million for the year of 2008.

Noninterest income was $53.97 million for the year of 2009, down $13.33 million or 19.81% when compared to the year of 2008. Included in noninterest income for the year of 2009 and 2008 were the previously mentioned noncash before-tax other-than-temporary impairment charges of $15.02 million and $10.49 million, respectively. Noninterest expense was $175.13 million, an increase of $4.05 million or 2.37% for the year of 2009 when compared to 2008.

Income tax expense for the year of 2009 was $10.95 million as compared to $36.91 million for the year of 2008. During the third quarter of 2009, United reduced its income tax reserve by $568 thousand due to the expiration of the statue of limitations for examinations of certain years as compared to $1.42 million in the third quarter of 2008. During the first quarter of 2009, United recorded a benefit associated with net operating loss carryforwards and a positive adjustment to income tax expense as a result of a concluded tax examination. The total income tax benefit recorded in the first quarter of 2009 related to these two events was $11.51 million. As a result of these tax adjustments, United’s effective tax rate was approximately 14.0% and 29.8% for years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, as compared to 30.2% for 2007.

The following discussion explains in more detail the results of operations by major category.

 

46


Table of Contents

Net Interest Income

Net interest income for the year of 2009 was $245.47 million, a decrease of $7.32 million or 2.90% from the year of 2008. The $7.32 million decrease in net interest income occurred because total interest income declined $64.07 million while total interest expense only declined $56.75 million from the year of 2008.

Tax-equivalent net interest income for the year of 2009 was $256.67 million, a decrease of $10.35 million or 3.88% from the year of 2008. The net interest margin for the year of 2008 was 3.59%, down 11 basis points from a net interest margin of 3.70% during the same period last year.

Tax-equivalent interest income for the year of 2009 was $377.04 million, a $67.10 million or 15.11% decrease from the year of 2008. This decrease in tax-equivalent interest income was primarily attributable to a decrease of 88 basis points in the yield on average earning assets due to a decrease in market interest rates. The average yield on net loans was 5.46% for the year of 2009, down 88 basis points from 6.34% for the year of 2008 while the average yield on investment securities was 5.08% for the year of 2009, a decrease of 38 basis points from 5.46% for the year of 2008. In addition, average earning assets were relatively flat from the year of 2008, declining $67.57 million or less than 1% as average investment securities decreased $219.78 million or 15.95%. Average net loans were virtually flat from the year of 2008, increasing $14.64 million or less than 1%.

Interest expense for the year of 2009 was $120.37 million, a decrease of $56.75 million or 32.04% from the year of 2008. The decrease in interest expense for the year of 2009 was mainly due to a decrease of 83 basis points in the cost of funds from the year of 2008 as a result of lower market interest rates during 2009. The average cost of interest-bearing deposits was 1.75% for the year of 2009, down 96 basis points from 2.71% for the year of 2008 while the average cost of short-term borrowings was 0.14% for the year of 2009, a decrease of 155 basis points from 1.69% for the year of 2008. The average cost of long-term borrowings was 4.24% for the year of 2009, a decrease of 25 basis points from 4.49% for the year of 2008 as a result of a decrease in market interest rates and the prepayment of higher-rate FHLB advances in 2008. Average interest-bearing deposits increased $206.54 million or 4.52% while average short-term borrowings decreased $428.58 million or 48.95%. Average long-term borrowings were relatively flat from the year of 2008, increasing $1.98 million or less than 1%.

Provision for Credit Losses

For the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, the provision for credit losses was $46.07 million and $25.16 million, respectively. Net charge-offs were $39.66 million for the year of 2009 as compared to net charge-offs of $20.30 million for the year of 2008. The increase in the provision for credit losses for the year of 2009 was due mainly to the previously mentioned provision of $17.55 million for loans with fraudulent collateral made to three affiliated companies of a commercial customer as well as a continued decline in credit quality in 2009.

At December 31, 2009, the allowance for loan losses was $67.85 million as compared to $61.49 million at December 31, 2008. As a percentage of loans, net of unearned income, the allowance for loan losses was 1.18% at December 31, 2009 and 1.02% of loans, net of unearned income at December 31, 2008. The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans or coverage ratio was 93.91% and 113.46% at December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.

Other Income

Noninterest income was $53.97 million for the year of 2009, down $13.33 million or 19.81% from the year of 2008. Included in noninterest income for the year of 2009 were noncash, before-tax, other-than-temporary impairment charges of $15.02 million on investment securities including an $8.00 million on a single-issue trust preferred security, $5.37 million on a certain TRUP CDO and $782 thousand on one security carried at cost. Noninterest income for the year of 2008 was $67.30 million which included noncash, before-tax other-than-temporary impairment charges on investment securities totaling $10.49 million and a $917 thousand gain related to Visa’s initial public offering and the partial redemption of Visa shares held by United. The noncash, before-tax, other-than-temporary impairment charges of $10.49 million consisted mainly of charges of $9.00 million on a corporate debt holding and $889 thousand on certain marketable equity securities that had been in an unrealized loss position for more than six months. Excluding the results of the investment security transactions, noninterest

 

47


Table of Contents

income for the year of 2009 would have decreased $8.05 million or 10.49% from the year of 2008.

Revenue from trust income and brokerage commissions decreased $3.52 million or 21.21% due to a decrease in the value of the trust assets under management.

Fees from deposit services were $40.29 million for the year of 2009, an increase of $1.10 million or 2.81% as compared to the year of 2008 due mainly to the High Performance Checking Program. In particular, check card fees increased $544 thousand, insufficient funds (NSF) fees increased $417 thousand and account analysis fees increased $154 thousand during the year of 2009.

For the year 2009, income from bank owned life insurance policies decreased $677 thousand or 16.54% due mainly to a decrease in cash surrender values while fees from bankcard transactions decreased $1.66 million or 28.55% compared to the year of 2008 due to a lower volume of spending by consumers as a result of the current economic conditions. Mortgage banking income increased $223 thousand or 57.92% due to increased mortgage loan sales in the secondary market during the year of 2009 as compared to 2008. Mortgage loan sales were $69.67 million in 2009 as compared to $31.15 million in 2008.

Other income decreased $3.49 million or 39.99% for the year of 2009 as compared to last year’s income. This decrease in other income is due mainly to a decrease of $3.54 million in the fair value of certain derivative financial instruments not in a hedging relationship with a similar amount of expense related to a decline in the fair value of derivative financial instruments included in other expense.

Other Expense

Noninterest expense for the year of 2009 was $175.13 million, an increase of $4.05 million or 2.37% from the year of 2008.

Employee compensation for the year of 2009 decreased $2.45 million or 3.99% from the year of 2008 due largely to less commissions and incentives expense. Also included in employee compensation was expense for stock options of $484 thousand for the year of 2009 as compared to $547 thousand for the year of 2008.

Employee benefits expense increased $5.51 million or 40.29%. Specifically within employee benefits expense was an increase in pension expense of $6.22 million due to a decline in the fair value of the plan assets.

Net occupancy expense increased $336 thousand or 2.01% for the year of 2009 as compared to the year of 2008. The higher net occupancy expense for 2009 was due mainly to additional building rental expense and real property taxes. Equipment expense, including other real estate owned (OREO) costs, increased $2.77 million or 31.07% for the year of 2009 as compared to the year of 2008. The increase from 2008 was due mainly to an increase in losses from sales and deterioration in property values associated with OREO.

Data processing expense increased $864 thousand or 8.63% for the year of 2009 as compared to the year of 2008. Bankcard processing fees decreased $1.62 million or 33.68% due to decreased transactions as a result of less consumer spending for the year of 2009 as compared to last year.

FDIC insurance expense increased $8.03 million or 700.09% for the year of 2009 as compared to the year of 2008. The increase was due mainly to the additional expense of $3.63 million in the second quarter of 2009 for a special assessment by the FDIC as well as higher premiums to increase the insurance fund for banks.

Other expenses decreased $9.39 million or 17.24% for the year of 2009 as compared to the year of 2008 due mainly to a decrease of $3.54 million in the fair value of certain derivative financial instruments not in a hedging relationship with a similar amount of income related to a decline in the fair value of derivative financial instruments included in other income. In addition, several general operating expenses declined for the year of 2009 as compared to the previous year. In particular, advertising expense decreased $1.94 million, telephone expense decreased $1.17 million and core deposit intangibles amortization decreased $933 thousand.

 

48


Table of Contents

United’s efficiency ratio was 51.35% for the year of 2009 which was comparable to 48.03% for the year of 2008.

Income Taxes

For the year ended December 31, 2009, income taxes were $10.95 million, compared to $36.91 million for 2008. During the third quarter of 2009, United reduced its income tax reserve for uncertainties by $568 thousand as compared to a 2008 reduction of $1.42 million due to the expiration of the statute of limitations for examination of certain years. During the first quarter of 2009, United recorded a benefit associated with the reversal of an allowance for net operating loss carryforwards and a positive adjustment to income tax expense as a result of a concluded tax examination. The total income tax benefit recorded in the first quarter of 2009 related to these two events was $11.51 million. As a result of these tax adjustments, United’s effective tax rate was 14.0% and 29.8% for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

 

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The objective of United’s Asset/Liability Management function is to maintain consistent growth in net interest income within United’s policy guidelines. This objective is accomplished through the management of balance sheet liquidity and interest rate risk exposures due to changes in economic conditions, interest rate levels and customer preferences.

Interest Rate Risk

Management considers interest rate risk to be United’s most significant market risk. Interest rate risk is the exposure to adverse changes in United’s net interest income as a result of changes in interest rates. United’s earnings are largely dependent on the effective management of interest rate risk.

Management of interest rate risk focuses on maintaining consistent growth in net interest income within Board-approved policy limits. United’s Asset/Liability Management Committee (ALCO), which includes senior management representatives and reports to the Board of Directors, monitors and manages interest rate risk to maintain an acceptable level of change to net interest income as a result of changes in interest rates. Policy established for interest rate risk is stated in terms of the change in net interest income over a one-year and two-year horizon given an immediate and sustained increase or decrease in interest rates. The current limits approved by the Board of Directors are structured on a staged basis with each stage requiring specific actions.

United employs a variety of measurement techniques to identify and manage its exposure to changing interest rates. One such technique utilizes an earnings simulation model to analyze the sensitivity of net interest income to movements in interest rates. The model is based on actual cash flows and repricing characteristics for on and off-balance sheet instruments and incorporates market-based assumptions regarding the impact of changing interest rates on the prepayment rate of certain assets and liabilities. The model also includes executive management projections for activity levels in product lines offered by United. Assumptions based on the historical behavior of deposit rates and balances in relation to changes in interest rates are also incorporated into the model. Rate scenarios could involve parallel or nonparallel shifts in the yield curve, depending on historical, current, and expected conditions, as well as the need to capture any material effects of explicit or embedded options. These assumptions are inherently uncertain and, as a result, the model cannot precisely measure net interest income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and management’s strategies.

Interest sensitive assets and liabilities are defined as those assets or liabilities that mature or are repriced within a designated time frame. The principal function of managing interest rate risk is to maintain an appropriate relationship between those assets and liabilities that are sensitive to changing market interest rates. The difference between rate sensitive assets and rate sensitive liabilities for specified periods of time is known as the “GAP.” Earnings-simulation analysis captures not only the potential of these interest sensitive assets and liabilities to mature or reprice, but also the probability that they will do so. Moreover, earnings-simulation analysis considers the relative sensitivities of these balance sheet items and projects their behavior over an extended period of time. United closely monitors the sensitivity of its assets and liabilities on an on-going basis and projects the effect of various interest rate changes on its net interest margin.

 

49


Table of Contents

The following table shows United’s estimated consolidated earnings sensitivity profile as of December 31, 2010 and 2009:

 

Change in

Interest Rates

   Percentage Change in Net Interest Income

(basis points)

       

December 31, 2010

 

December 31, 2009

   
+200       6.87%   5.14%  
+100       2.71%   1.41%  
-100       1.80%   3.77%  
-200       ---   ---  

Given an immediate, sustained 100 basis point upward shock to the yield curve used in the simulation model, it is estimated that net interest income for United would increase by 2.71% over one year as of December 31, 2010, as compared to an increase of 1.41% as of December 31, 2009. A 200 basis point immediate, sustained upward shock in the yield curve would increase net interest income by an estimated 6.87% over one year as of December 31, 2010, as compared to an increase of 5.14% as of December 31, 2009. A 100 basis point immediate, sustained downward shock in the yield curve would increase net interest income by an estimated 1.80% over one year as of December 31, 2010 as compared to an increase of 3.77% over one year as of December 31, 2009. With the federal funds rate at 0.25% at December 31, 2010 and 2009, management believed a 200 basis point immediate, sustained decline in rates was highly unlikely.

This analysis does not include the potential increased refinancing activities, which should lessen the negative impact on net income from falling rates. While it is unlikely market rates would immediately move 100 or 200 basis points upward or downward on a sustained basis, this is another tool used by management and the Board of Directors to gauge interest rate risk. All of these estimated changes in net interest income are and were within the policy guidelines established by the Board of Directors.

To further aid in interest rate management, United’s subsidiary banks are members of the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB). The use of FHLB advances provides United with a low risk means of matching maturities of earning assets and interest-bearing funds to achieve a desired interest rate spread over the life of the earning assets. In addition, United uses credit with large regional banks and trust preferred securities to provide funding.

As part of its interest rate risk management strategy, United may use derivative instruments to protect against adverse price or interest rate movements on the value of certain assets or liabilities and on future cash flows. These derivatives commonly consist of interest rate swaps, caps, floors, collars, futures, forward contracts, written and purchased options. Interest rate swaps obligate two parties to exchange one or more payments generally calculated with reference to a fixed or variable rate of interest applied to the notional amount. United accounts for its derivative activities in accordance with the provisions of ASC topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.”

Extension Risk

At December 31, 2010, United’s mortgage related securities portfolio had an amortized cost of $386 million, of which approximately $271 million or 70% were fixed rate collateralized mortgage obligations (CMOs). These fixed rate CMOs consisted primarily of planned amortization class (PACs), sequential-pay and accretion directed (VADMs) bonds having an average life of approximately 2 years and a weighted average yield of 4.95%, under current projected prepayment assumptions. These securities are expected to have very little extension risk in a rising rate environment. Current models show that an immediate, sustained upward shock of 300 basis points in rates, the average life of these securities would only extend to 2.7 years. The projected price decline of the fixed rate CMO portfolio in rates up 300 basis points would be 5.2%, less than the price decline of a 2 year treasury note. By comparison, the price decline of a 30-year current coupon mortgage backed security (MBS) in rates higher by 300 basis points would be approximately 17%.

United had approximately $68 million in 15-year mortgage backed securities with a projected yield of 4.67% and a projected average life of 2.4 years as of December 31, 2010. This portfolio consisted of seasoned 15-year mortgage paper with a weighted average loan age (WALA) of 5.8 years and a weighted average maturity (WAM) of 8.7 years.

United had approximately $17 million in 20-year mortgage backed securities with a projected yield of 4.83% and a projected

 

50


Table of Contents

average life of 3.8 years on December 31, 2010. This portfolio consisted of seasoned 20-year mortgage paper with a weighted average loan age (WALA) of 7 years and a weighted average maturity (WAM) of 12.5 years.

United had approximately $9 million in 30-year mortgage backed securities with a projected yield of 6.61% and a projected average life of 4.3 years on December 31, 2010. This portfolio consisted of seasoned 30-year mortgage paper with a weighted average loan age (WALA) of 11.4 years and a weighted average maturity (WAM) of 16.9 years.

The remaining 5% of the mortgage related securities portfolio at December 31, 2010, included adjustable rate securities (ARMs), balloon securities, and 10-year mortgage backed pass-through securities.

 

51


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management of United Bankshares, Inc. (the Company) is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2010, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm who audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements has also issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010. Ernst & Young’s report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting appears on page 53 hereof.

 

 

/s/ Richard M. Adams

   

/s/ Steven E. Wilson

Richard M. Adams, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer

    Steven E. Wilson, Executive Vice President, Treasurer, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

February 25, 2011

 

52


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and the

Shareholders of United Bankshares, Inc.

We have audited United Bankshares, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). United Bankshares, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on United Bankshares, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, United Bankshares, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of United Bankshares, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010 and our report dated February 25, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Charleston, West Virginia

February 25, 2011

 

53


Table of Contents
Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors and the

Shareholders of United Bankshares, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of United Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of United Bankshares, Inc.’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of United Bankshares, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), United Bankshares, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 25, 2011 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Charleston, West Virginia

February 25, 2011

 

54


Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Dollars in thousands, except par value)

 

      December 31
2010
     December 31
2009
 

Assets

     

Cash and due from banks

       $ 115,352               $ 134,605       

Interest-bearing deposits with other banks

     345,319             314,445       

Federal funds sold

     718             717       
                 

Total cash and cash equivalents

     461,389             449,767       

Securities available for sale at estimated fair value (amortized cost-$717,797 at December 31, 2010 and $879,542 at December 31, 2009)

     653,276             811,777       

Securities held to maturity (estimated fair value-$62,315 at December 31, 2010 and $70,535 at December 31, 2009)

     67,036             77,421       

Other investment securities

     74,403             77,722       

Loans held for sale

     6,869             5,284       

Loans

     5,263,351             5,740,778       

Less: Unearned income

     (3,025)             (3,969)       
                 

Loans net of unearned income

     5,260,326             5,736,809       

Less: Allowance for loan losses

     (73,033)             (67,853)       
                 

Net loans

     5,187,293             5,668,956       

Bank premises and equipment

     55,378             57,527       

Goodwill

     311,765             312,069       

Accrued interest receivable

     23,564             27,158       

Other assets

     314,746             317,420       
                 

TOTAL ASSETS

       $ 7,155,719               $ 7,805,101       
                 

Liabilities

     

Deposits:

     

Noninterest-bearing

       $ 1,203,255               $ 1,108,157       

Interest-bearing

     4,510,279             4,862,943       
                 

Total deposits

     5,713,534             5,971,100       

Borrowings:

     

Federal funds purchased

     8,542             7,835       

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

     183,097             211,659       

Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings

     202,181             587,213       

Other short-term borrowings

     1,575             3,450       

Other long-term borrowings

     184,277             184,722       

Allowance for lending-related commitments

     2,006             2,157       

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

     67,495             75,415       
                 

TOTAL LIABILITIES

     6,362,707             7,043,551       

Shareholders’ Equity

     

Preferred stock, $1.00 par value; Authorized-50,000,000 shares; none issued

     ---             ---       

Common stock, $2.50 par value; Authorized-100,000,000 shares; issued-44,319,157 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, including 697,522 and 881,419 shares in treasury at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively

     110,798             110,798       

Surplus

     93,431             95,284       

Retained earnings

     673,260             653,613       

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

     (60,656)             (68,383)       

Treasury stock, at cost

     (23,821)             (29,762)       
                 

TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

     793,012             761,550       
                 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

       $  7,155,719               $  7,805,101       
                 

See notes to consolidated financial statements

 

55


Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

      Year Ended December 31  
     2010      2009      2008  

Interest income

        

Interest and fees on loans

       $  282,834               $  310,077               $  358,240       

Interest on federal funds sold and other short-term investments

     1,267             309             714       

Interest and dividends on securities:

        

Taxable

     34,564             46,834             59,652       

Tax-exempt

     4,717             8,625             11,305       
                          

Total interest income

     323,382             365,845             429,911       

Interest expense

        

Interest on deposits

     55,663             83,463             124,035       

Interest on short-term borrowings

     167             645             14,828       

Interest on long-term borrowings

     29,366             36,266             38,256       
                          

Total interest expense

     85,196             120,374             177,119       
                          

Net interest income

     238,186             245,471             252,792       

Provision for credit losses

     13,773             46,065             25,155       
                          

Net interest income after provision for credit losses

     224,413             199,406             227,637       

Other income

        

Fees from trust and brokerage services

     13,637             13,065             16,582       

Fees from deposit services

     39,220             40,289             39,189       

Bankcard fees and merchant discounts

     4,786             4,155             5,815       

Other service charges, commissions, and fees

     1,918             1,906             1,932       

Income from bank-owned life insurance

     4,673             3,416             4,093       

Income from mortgage banking

     662             608             385       

Other income

     5,116             5,236             8,725       

Total other-than-temporary impairment losses

     (40,756)             (34,206)             (10,489)       

Portion of loss recognized in other comprehensive income

     30,941             19,186             ---       
                          

Net other-than-temporary impairment losses

     (9,815)             (15,020)             (10,489)       

Net gains on sales/calls of investment securities

     2,006             315             1,071       
                          

Net investment securities losses

     (7,809)             (14,705)             (9,418)       
                          

Total other income

     62,203             53,970             67,303       

Other expense

        

Employee compensation

     60,564             58,901             61,347       

Employee benefits

     16,749             19,192             13,680       

Net occupancy expense

     17,246             17,018             16,682       

Other real estate owned (OREO) expense

     11,131             5,487             2,484       

Equipment expense

     6,014             6,204             6,436       

Data processing expense

     10,820             10,880             10,016       

Bankcard processing expense

     3,284             3,198             4,822       

FDIC insurance expense

     9,684             9,177             1,147       

Other expense

     46,720             45,070             54,459       
                          

Total other expense

     182,212             175,127             171,073       
                          

Income before income taxes

     104,404             78,249             123,867       

Income taxes

     32,457             10,951             36,913       
                          

Net income

       $ 71,947               $ 67,298               $ 86,954       
                          

 

56


Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

      Year Ended December 31  
     2010      2009      2008  

Earnings per common share:

        

Basic

       $ 1.65               $ 1.55               $ 2.01       
                          

Diluted

       $ 1.65               $ 1.55               $ 2.00       
                          

Dividends per common share

       $ 1.20               $ 1.17               $ 1.16       
                          

Average outstanding shares:

        

Basic

     43,547,965             43,410,431             43,286,894       

Diluted

     43,625,183             43,456,889             43,434,083       

See notes to consolidated financial statements

 

57


Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

                                  Accumulated                
     Common Stock                    Other             Total  
            Par             Retained      Comprehensive      Treasury      Shareholders’  
     Shares      Value      Surplus      Earnings      Income (Loss)      Stock      Equity  
        

Balance at January 1, 2008

     44,320,832       $ 110,802       $ 98,405       $ 602,185       $ (12,480)         $ (37,713)       $ 761,199   

Cumulative effect adjustment for accounting for deferred compensation and postretirement benefit aspects of endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangements

              (1,486)               (1,486)   

Effects of changing pension plan measurement date pursuant to accounting for defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans, net of tax

              (270)               (270)   

Net income

              86,954               86,954   

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

                 (63,671)            (63,671)   
                          

Total comprehensive income, net of tax

                       23,283   

Stock based compensation expense

           547                  547   

Purchase of treasury stock (22,062 shares)

                    (646)         (646)   

Distribution of treasury stock for deferred compensation plan (5,938 shares)

                    183         183   

Common dividends declared ($1.16 per share)

              (50,231)               (50,231)   

Common stock options exercised (185,289 shares)

           (2,298)               6,431         4,133   
        

Balance at December 31, 2008

     44,320,832         110,802         96,654         637,152         (76,151)         (31,745)         736,712   

Net income

              67,298               67,298   

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

                 7,768            7,768   
                          

Total comprehensive income, net of tax

                       75,066   

Stock based compensation expense

           484                  484   

Purchase of treasury stock (74,703 shares)

                    (1,304)         (1,304)   

Distribution of treasury stock for deferred compensation plan (30,902 shares)

                    536         536   

Common dividends declared ($1.17 per share)

              (50,837)               (50,837)   

Common stock options exercised (79,323 shares)

           (1,858)               2,751         893   

Fractional shares adjustment

     (1,675)         (4)         4               
        

Balance at December 31, 2009

     44,319,157         110,798         95,284         653,613         (68,383)         (29,762)         761,550   

Net income

              71,947               71,947   

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

                 7,727            7,727   
                          

Total comprehensive income, net of tax

                       79,674   

Stock based compensation expense

           1,050                  1,050   

Purchase of treasury stock (8,910 shares)

                    (249)         (249)   

Distribution of treasury stock for deferred compensation plan (28,466 shares)

                    520         520   

Cash dividends ($1.20 per share)

              (52,300)               (52,300)   

Common stock options exercised (164,341 shares)

           (2,903)               5,670         2,767   
        

Balance at December 31, 2010

     44,319,157       $ 110,798       $ 93,431       $ 673,260       $ (60,656)       $ (23,821)       $ 793,012   
        

See notes to consolidated financial statements

 

58


Table of Contents

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

UNITED BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

        
(In thousands)    Year Ended December 31  
     2010      2009      2008  

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

        

Net income

   $ 71,947       $ 67,298       $ 86,954   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

        

Provision for credit losses

     13,773         46,065         25,155   

Depreciation, amortization and accretion

     6,788         6,823         6,658   

Loss on sales of bank premises, OREO and equipment

     1,835         1,594         239   

Loss on securities transactions

     7,809         14,705         9,418   

Loans originated for sale

     (49,181)         (74,089)         (30,743)   

Proceeds from sales of loans

     48,258         70,281         31,530   

Gain on sales of loans

     (662)         (608)         (385)   

Stock-based compensation

     1,050         484         547   

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

     6,582         (6,625)         (179)   

Contribution to pension plan

     (9,100)         (11,000)         ---   

Amortization of net periodic pension costs

     1,467         4,470         (1,787)   

Changes in:

        

Interest receivable

     3,594         4,658         6,422   

Other assets

     (39)         (63,037)         (20,487)   

Accrued expenses and other liabilities

     (3,297)         (7,362)         598   
                          

NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

     100,824         53,657         113,940   
                          

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

        

Proceeds from maturities and calls of held to maturity securities

     6,480         31,353         32,013   

Proceeds from sales of securities held to maturity

     2,979         ---         ---   

Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale

     57,294         5,500         2,010   

Proceeds from maturities and calls of securities available for sale

     1,331,904         507,287         621,029   

Purchases of securities available for sale

     (1,236,221)         (233,160)         (626,202)   

Net purchases of bank premises and equipment

     (3,262)         (4,947)         (2,428)   

Net change in other investment securities

     4,643         (183)         3,439   

Net change in loans

     468,106         239,311         (233,403)   
                          

NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES

     631,923         545,161         (203,542)   
                          

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

        

Cash dividends paid

     (52,257)         (50,383)         (50,179)   

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements

     459         273         654   

Acquisition of treasury stock

     (11)         (1,180)         (206)   

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

     2,492         724         2,223   

Distribution of treasury stock for deferred compensation plan

     520         536         183   

Redemption of debt related to trust preferred securities

     ---         ---         (10,310)   

Repayment of long-term Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings

     (385,032)         (80,325)         (60,734)   

Proceeds from long-term Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings

     ---         ---         150,000   

Changes in:

        

Time deposits

     (591,732)         (162,714)         386,586   

Other deposits

     334,166         485,860         (87,989)   

Federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other short-term borrowings

     (29,730)